@hweimer Thanks for sharing your opinion. Reviewer 2 or not, citing this paper while ignoring others still contributes to the bias, which in turn creates a skewed view of the literature.
I’m surprised by how many people mention that paper to me, without realizing that I know it better than they think! And, more importantly, without knowing that most of its conclusions have since been invalidated... It’s unfortunate, especially in a period where quality science is supposed to be a priority.