Cancer Treatments Guidance: Medicating Cancer-Cell Genome

Biosynthesis Computing Center
http://www.enhknow.com/adoptrbrokerage/managedventures/biosynthcomp/Treatments/cancercureguidances/medicationguidance.html

@ultracricket @RebeccaSolnit
Sometimes it is worthwhile to join an entrepreneurial team working on Green technology, and do the best contribution you can. That way at least you get to make an impact on your own through the positive effect of the venture, and if the venture should become successful, then the impact becomes even greater. At least this is my approach to energy, fertilizers, etc.

@petergleick
You are still conflating the statement. Are all Jews of the Ashkenazi sect? So how does it get broadened to all Jews?

At the start of the pandemic this assertion of racial "targeted nature" of the virus was advanced by a Czech microbiologist after detailed analysis of the sequencing of the biologic units. So what is so particular with the statement of RFK, Jr?

@petergleick
Are Jews an ethnic or race? Are Muslims an ethnic or a race? So where is the racism? May be all the other people who are not Jews and Muslims should also accuse you of racism.
Is this a joke? This thinly veiled smearing of people should stop.

@petergleick
The video of the news report does not show any part in which that statement was made.

BTW, what is wrong with observing that a vaccine impacts any subgroup of humanity more adversely than others? So one can no longer speak as a "matter of factly" about an observation? Any sensible and well-meaning person has the obligation to prove him wrong on the facts and not smear him.

You, Peter, should provide the data about the virus and show that his avowed statement is wrong or else leave the man alone and stop smearing his character. For someone who is allegedly a science-oriented thinker this uninformed mob mentality is quite surprising.

Otherwise do not even write it, except to disprove unfounded allegations.

Cancer Treatments Guidance: Medications Bioactivity-Mechanisms and Curativeness

Biosynthesis Computing Center
http://www.enhknow.com/adoptrbrokerage/managedventures/biosynthcomp/Biosynthres/resrchactivity/canceresrchplan.html

@TatianaIlyina
There is biofuel jet fuel, but the production process may not yet be continuous as to close the recycling loop.

@TatianaIlyina
I just saw your reply about two days ago. Sorry about that I have been extremely preoccupied these past eight months.

Anyway about the Climate Science issue, it is not the veracity of the scientists as you that is the hurdle, rather it is the economics. As a professor once said to me: When you are hungry, you will be so busy seeking out food for now that you will not have any time whatsoever to philosophize about anything else.

So the fossil fuel based products companies managers and owners who are "hungry" do not care to philosophize, unless they can be shown to achieve the same level of feeding even during and after the transitioning.

Climate Scientists therefore must learn economics of companies and industries and approach the problem from that perspective.

Subsistence Green Farming

The war in Ukraine has shown the fragility of the supply chain of #chemicalfertilizers that is so crucial to the feed of humanity. This fragility has been allowed to sustain, even though there is the option of developing and applying #Biofertilizers for #farming, a sort of #GreenFarming. The hurdle has been the lack of structured inexpensive development of Biofertilizers. The consequential economic crash as anticipated by many and the derivative famine also anticipated has made the need for the pervasive production of small scale production of Biofertilizers as critical to the survival of many lives in the years to come.

Accordingly, the development and training on the empirical oriented technology for biofertilizers productions and farm-use of biofertilizers are decidedly being advanced through publications of rather empirical oriented articles on #SubsistenceGreenFarming for the general masses. The object is have everyone interested in not suffering famine to be able to produce biofertilizers in the one's backyard or garden, which can be used to support #domesticfarming for self feed self or #urbanfarming for #community feed.

Moreover, scientists not trained in #ChemicalEngineering or #BiochemicalEngineering will also benefit from the articles as the publications will also invariably teach DIY #algaecultivation methodology. Such should inform newbies on fundamentals of algae cultivation without going broke

One article per month is guaranteed to be published, with target date of 10th of each month or nearest weekday; however, on occasions and optionally, a second article may be published with target date of 24th of the month also otherwise nearest weekday.

The publications link is enhknow.substack.com, however, to cover the services of research assistants, access is by subscription only at $5 per month. Thank you, and see you there.

@TatianaIlyina
There are no meat equivalents: Not all the amino acids are quite equivalent. So consumption some meat is required to keep up our health.

@shawnwegner

There is a certain power associated with being the "controller" of the World energy, and giving up that power willy nilly just is not appealing. Until and unless these energy barons reestablish under conditions of their ownerships of the substitutes and continue to remain in power, not much will happen.

@wall0159 @saravicca

No no no, you have got it all wrong. Solar Collector-based Solar Energy Electric Power does not use PV. There is no known design of Solar Collector that uses PV.

Many years ago at the time I posted the "Carbon Stripper..." I also posted Solar Collector designs which several people including profs at Malaysia even tested out and validated for me. Except for the collector, the rest of the design was not disclosed. So the design works.

Well possibly our approach may be considered as using Trade Secrets to protect the technologies, but there are also configurations that we keep private so even violation of trade secrets will not enable a breaching of the replication secrets of the technology.

Thank you for your well wish.

@wall0159 @saravicca

That's odd: Why would we need Solar Powered mini g machines when we have electric powered mining machines? The same goes for the furnaces, etc. After all, it is Solar Energy Electric Power meaning power stations that generate the electricity with Solar Energy harnessing transducer technology.

The Air Separation Process, will be commercial and non-subsidized because my company will be deploying it within each of three process technologies we have been working on and show profitability from the product output. We have no plans to sell it as a standalone product, so you are not likely to see it being offered for sale. Moreover, we fund ourselves and so do not have to disclose the science. Besides we have broken up the production process into about four different stages in at least three different countries to ensure that the technology does not get stolen easily. It is our critical competitive advantage in several technologies using atmospheric air as raw material, so we guard it very closely.

There you have it.

@wall0159 @saravicca

On building Solar Collector-based Solar Energy Electric Power systems, we do not lack the machines, and the requisite Supply Chain is not that complex to build - at least for a technology in our brokerage technology bank. There are plans on a company to start building them in Spain beginning sometime this year, 2023, and then export the manufacturing process technology to other countries for nations-based adoption.

The expression, "we are forcing negative emission" is not an assertion, rather a thought: The suggestion is that, that thought in some Novel CDRs developers could become so overwhelming as resulting in being frozen with fear of helplessness. However, developing any CDR would, in fact, have as its goal, Forcing Negative Emission.

Air Separation Process operating at room temperature is a composite design of two proprietary designs: One of which has been fully developed and the other still under development. Yet computational validation has confirmed the process. There is also plan for the technology currently under design to be manufactured through a company also in Spain. The choice of Spain here, of course, is dictated by the demands of building up the Supply Chain, as you had rightly reasoned previously but about the solar energy technology.

Personally, I had posted on the Internet --several years back; a design that would strip off the carbon of the carbon dioxide of ambient air. Inferentially, the efficiency of that technology shoots up extensively when retrofitted with the Solar Collector-based Solar Energy Electric Power system and the Room-Temperature Air Separation Process, because as you might have already rightly guessed, the integrated use of the two technologies (and speaking by your concept) reverses the "low entropy to high entropy" outcomes of burning fossil. Keep in mind though that my conceptualization of entropy is as the "Resistance in the conversion of heat into the internal energy of matter" and the reverse, and that the excess randomness is due to the increase in the internal energy and not to the Resistance in the atomic transducer of heat to energy.

Obviously this technology, say we call, Carbon Stripper Negative Emission Process, provides an alternative and better sequestration of carbon than storing the carbon dioxide in underground caverns. Of course, the design for stripping off the carbon from the carbon dioxide has since been taken down, although you may be lucky to still find it in some websites that had discussed it during those years past. Mark you, this technology is quite scalable.

Even so the capital investments required to adopt each of these technologies in the necessary process design is very large, may be in excess of $5 Billions which most investors would not want to take on.

@wall0159 @saravicca

All good points and the challenge is great given the scope of accomplishments that is required, with some of the issues being political and of personality.

Yet addressing just the energy requirement and the need for fossil fuel as resource, point-wise structured growth is possible while global growth may succumb to the issues you raised. So let say one point builds a Solar Collector based Solar Energy Electric Power source -- the first one using, of course, fossil fuel; but then builds a second one using the first, then two more using the earlier two, and now four more using the previous and so on, -- see where it leads; and the issue of the use of fossil fuel vanishes. Even so admittedly, Solar Collector based energy resource as above is very expensive.

The second issue is perspective: We are forcing negative emission because we are trying to save the Earth from destruction. That perspective could with some people become overwhelming, as the development would not seem to be moving fast enough. However, a perspective of "Wow, such vast 'endless' reservoir of carbon raw materials" as this ( any for that matter) projects would be more energizing one would think, and that is the preferred view here. The primary reason being that, then the focus is on designs that are profitable in the long run: Biotechnology Companies have the longest time-to-maturity:15 years, so defining "in the long run" as excess of 15 years would better position the entrepreneur to becoming less hassled over the years in the march to maturity.

Surprisingly though, this time-to-maturity gets cut drastically to being manageable with the use of Air Separation Processes that operate at room temperature. A food for thought.

All considered, while the seriousness of the matter makes the outcome of Global concern, the willingness to spend the huge amount of financial capital to achieve the goal is actually personal and so is the burden only well-meaning few, ...and with whom I should like match along.

@wall0159 @saravicca

Curious why the doubt that scaling up CDRs is Thermodynamically feasible, after all Novel CDRs are not driven by natural Thermodynamic potentials. So I do not foresee a Thermodynamic limitation, of course, unless the extraction of the carbon dioxide is driven by such.

@saravicca

Developing #CDRs is expensive. I have worked on developing three CDR designs and each one would require several 100 millions. In each design the carbon was to be stripped of the carbon dioxide and be stored creatively.

Now for this perspective to become a deployable stance, the primary CDR method must occur at room temperature, and that is very difficult. To do. Then, of course, additional work is necessary to contain the carbon and creativity required to do so, lifts the required initial capital investment into the billions: $2.6 Bn and higher. Raising that staggering amount, whether from VCs, family offices or what-have-you is virtually impossible.

@TatianaIlyina

Thank you for the reference link. I have read the debate between the other scientists.

Would it have been better to hold the protest at the entrance to the hall instead of on the stage which could also be interpreted as being "disruptive". Perhaps she, Dr Abramoff, was dismissed for being disruptive which ORNL deems not reflective of standards expected of its scientists? Just thinking out loud.

@TatianaIlyina

Would be nice to know what the protester-scientists thought the other scientists could do other than studying and presenting on the issues as they were already doing. Curious out here!

#ClimateChange: A Bottle Neck

The challenge in #NegativeEmission is this need to extract the #CO2 from the #atmosphere at a #process volume, not be #energyintensive, and at #roomtemperature. Once the #extraction or #separation of the CO2 from the atmosphere gets performed as such, then there can be designed various profitable #Negative #Emission Process Technologies for #Climate #Change. #Profitability, of course, is the #driving-force that must be reckoned with in the fight against #Globalwarming

#globalwarming, #carboncapture, #emissionmitigation, #risingtemperature