Bluesky is An Ontological Space for Sadomasochism, Trolling, & Schadenfreude
So, during the initial exodus from Twitter after it became X following Elon Muskās purchase, many people left but kept their accounts, purposefully to bully, surveil, antagonize, and troll others. Peopleāincluding meāmoved to Bluesky, Mastodon, or both, and used their Twitter accounts purely for harassment and similar behavior. Essentially, X became the place you went to act like a dumpster fire. Because most people within occult niches are highly toxic, I tend to not only block them but also block anyone they follow for reasons Iām about to explain.
I really only use that account to criticize occulture, post nudes, or share YouTube videos. Since Iām aware of fed posting, I avoid commenting on political topics or anarchist discourse on the Clearnet. Keep that in mind. If you scroll through my profile, youāll see me poking fun at chaotes, posting nudes, gushing about or complaining about my husband, sharing dating horror story YouTube videos, or pet grooming videos. If you look at my likes, youāll only see gay porn, mathematics papers, engineering papers, etc. Thereās no mention of anything political, especially genocides.
There was a person Iād never interacted with who was part of a starter pack for occultists. I blocked them. Then I woke up this morning to find I was added to this list:
Chomsky Honks
Genocide apologist posting cringe from a Starbucks as it burns down around them
So, with all that in mind, these occultists Iāve never interacted with added me to a list. I am neither invested in Bluesky nor strongly connected to their network, primarily because I block almost everyone on it and donāt ever look at any feeds whatsoever, including the Home, followers, or Discover feeds. Therefore, the posts I do interact with are from pockets of people way outside my network. Itās kind of like driving to the bathhouse in Atlanta from a small town in Bubbafuck, Georgia, because everyone in your small town is garbage. Same idea, ontologically.
Honestly, I donāt care, because Iāve mostly moved back to Mastodon and blog more.
What theyāve done is implicitly a form of defamation, because they feel slighted and justified in defaming someone they donāt know, simply because a stranger theyāve never spoken to blocked them. I tend to do a basic block on anyone who blocks me, because if youāve decided you donāt want to see me, thereās probably no good-faith reason for us to engage in the future. Itās likely thereās some malicious intent later on. As you can see with this, I was correct.
So, in order for them to know I blocked them, they had to continuously check who had blocked them, and they believe people who block them should be punished through bullying. Since the description of the list doesnāt fit me, they retaliated out of malice. The idea behind these cliques is pretty simple: they feel threatened by anyone who rejects their normative statements because it means they are being rejected, and they view any form of dissent as an existential threat. As a result, they believe people who reject them, set boundaries, or dissent from the consensus of their culture need to be punished, and the AT protocol provides convenient tools for brigading. Ironically, these people are anti-fascist yet have a very Christian-like evangelical way of viewing the world. The lack of insight is pretty funny.
Iām the child of cult leaders and members with Cluster B personalities, so Iām not clutching my pearls, especially since Iām already set up elsewhere outside of Bluesky. They do not have the means to impose significant consequences on me, so I find it amusing. I genuinely find it funny how they eat each other. Iām not calling anyone to actionāIām just enjoying the fire.
This person wasnāt aware of who I was. We never interacted, and being added to a list that defames me happened directly after I blocked them without any prior interaction. I saw their account from the firehose and wasnāt algorithmically presented with it, meaning weāre not even in the same clique. Now, if they had said something like āspams hashtags, trolls, makes alts,ā that would make sense.
When you look at it for what it is, they wanted to defame, disparage, and brigadeāpunitive actions because they interpreted a boundary as hostile. This is projection, as they are weaponizing a mechanism to enforce boundaries. Do I care? No. Iām just pointing out how it turned its predecessor, X, into what it is now. It became a place for people to harass others, not a space for genuine, good-faith discussions, connections, or even debates. That is not my interpretation.
Well, to anyone who knows, you might ask: Did they block you because you have a particular reputation? No. I am a Web 1.0 mage, so the networks Iām known in have roots and associations in the old forums. The occulture people who have fixated on me for years go all the way back to Wizard Forums, the psionics forums, the unsolved mystery forums, etc., from the early 2000s. If youāre a circa 2016 social media influencer mage, you probably wouldnāt know meāprimarily because the moment I see you, Iāll block you. Thereās also a moderation block list just for me and my alts.
This behavior is typical of the culture on Bluesky, so much so that itās a common complaint people now haveāmany no longer view block lists as legitimate moderation tools. People are being advised to be skeptical of lists with a large number of people.
Oh, Iām not playing the victim here. I donāt care, because I could easily get back at them. Iām infamously vindictive and petty. More importantly, it supports my point and vindicates me. Iām not signaling victimhood; rather, Iām pointing out a culture, albeit one I participate in. Tying this back to my initial point: part of what signaled the death of Twitter as a serious forum and its transformation into X was the bullying. A while ago, I did a phylogenetic memetic analysis that basically showed how the culture on Bluesky is highly derivative of image boards. But donāt you bully and troll people? Yes, yes, I do ā on Bluesky, and the lack of moderation and culture enable it. Thatās my point.
Bluesky is an accelerationist and reactionary platform that gives you the tools to surveil and harass people. The developers of Bluesky and the AT Protocol have explicitly said they are technological accelerationists and libertarians. Iām not virtue signaling here; rather, I am saying Bluesky is a reactionary platform, so its culture should be understood as performative, hostile, and adversarialānot cooperative or collaborative. Just like Twitter. You canāt do what I do on Bluesky on the fediverse, because the culture wonāt allow it.
You saw this type of behavior on Tumblr, where the population carrying the memetics of that culture migrated to Twitter and now Bluesky. Essentially, Bluesky became a place where malice, bullying, and hostile behavior became so normalized that Iām not even upset about lists being weaponized like this. For example, Iām not posting this on Bluesky, and I, myself, have bullied people on Bluesky. But I behave myself on Mastodon. I am using myself as an example. The trolling is happening on Bluesky. The thoughtful posts are happening on Mastodon. The blog this will be posted on is federated, so this is being posted to the fediverse.
Thatās what happened to Twitter. It started normalizing hostile, toxic behavior, so that people left the platform and only returned to Twitter for schadenfreude. I have my own WordPress fediverse instance. I am just on Bluesky for the schadenfreude.