Lmst

Latest News: Supreme Court: You have to tell why you are being arrested: Supreme Court
https://vaartha.com/national/you-have-to-tell-me-why-you-are-being-arrested-supreme-court/577767/
#SupremeCourt #సుప్రీంకోర్టు
#RightToKnow #తెలియనివ్వండి_హక్కు
#GroundsOfArrest #అరెస్ట్‌మూలాలు
#ConstitutionalRights #సంవిధానహక్కులు
#Article22 #ఆర్టికల్22
#PersonalLiberty #వ్యక్తిగతస్వేచ్ఛ
#LegalRights #చట్టపరహక్కులు
#DueProcess #న్యాయప్రక్రియ
#JusticeForAll #మకాలీన్యాయం
#LawUpdate #చట్టనవీకరణ
#ArrestRights #అరెస్ట్‌హక్కులు
#SCJudgement #సుప్రీంకోర్టు తీర్పు

#CJEU @Curia ruling on #Article22 #GDPR multi-stage profiling
- Credit agency scoring = 'decision' & within A22 if downstream actors rely on it, else gap in the law.
- A22 a prohibition. not a triggered right
Judgment (FR) https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?mode=req&pageIndex=0&docid=280426&part=1&doclang=FR&text=&dir=&occ=first&cid=5036707
@RDBinns & me on this https://academic.oup.com/idpl/article/11/4/319/6403925 #SCHUFA

The hearing for the first ever CJEU @Curia #Article22 #GDPR case, SCHUFA Holdings, on whether the upstream creation of profile for #CreditScoring that will be influential downstream will be a significant, automated decision, is scheduled for the 26 January 2023.

@RDBinns and I wrote about the underlying conceptual quandaries the Article 22 definition creates in IDPL here. Not clear how the court will deal with them. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipab020 #eudp #privacy #algorithms

Questions referred

Is Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 ' to be interpreted as meaning that the automated establishment of a probability value concerning the ability of a data subject to service a loan in the future already constitutes a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning the data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her, where that value, determined by means of personal data of the data subject, is transmitted by the controller to a third-party controller and the latter draws strongly on that value for its decision on the establishment, implementation or termination of a contractual relationship with the data subject?

If Question 1 is answered in the negative, are Articles 6(1) and 22 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 to be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the use of a probability value - in casu, in relation to a natural person's ability and willingness to pay, in the case where information about claims against that person is taken into account - regarding specific future behaviour of a natural person for the purpose of deciding on the establishment, implementation or termination of a contractual relationship with that person (scoring) is permissible only if certain further conditions, which are set out in more detail in the grounds of the request for a preliminary ruling, are met?

Thibault Izoret (@TIM_7375): ""Honte, honte, honte !" : les manifestants s'opposent au survol d'un #drone au dessus de la place du #Trocadero. La #LoiSecuriteGlobale c'est aussi l'#article22 qui donne un cadre légal et étend l'utilisation de drones pour le maintien de l'ordre #PPLSecuriteGlobale #paris" | nitter – https://nitter.net/TIM_7375/status/1330164181023252485#m

#Article22

Client Info