@soatok @sarahjamielewis I disagree on @signalapp 's "#Privacy" claims simply because demanding a #PhoneNumber when it's not a "technical necessity" is just indefensibly bad and at best "#KYC with extra steps", thus anti-privacy.
- If #Signal did put privacy first, they'd refuse to collect any data in the first place and actively make it impossible for them to identify, single-out ot otherwise snitch on users!
To me Signal has the same stench as #ANØM aka. #OperationIronside aka. #OperationTrøjanShield and unless one can 100% #SelfHost and #decentralize it, it's claims are at best #marketing #lies amidst legislation like #CloudAct, that'll give them no choice but to snitch & d0x users to the #US government!
- Only truly #anonymous|ly useable, decentralized and self-custody #mesaging with real #E2EE is going to be secure. And Signal falls flat on it's face compared to #XMPP+#OMEMO (i.e. @gajim & @monocles / #monoclesChat) and #PGP/MIME (i.e. @delta / #deltaChat & @thunderbird )…


