Hatt zufällig jemand Zugriff auf dieses Paper? https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12212
Ja, ich weiß, dass es Indizien gibt, dass das ein #PredatoryJournal ist, aber ich muss da trotzdem mal reinschauen.
Irgendwie scheint #scihub nichts mehr zu haben.
EN: Does anyone has this paper: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12212
:boost_ok: #boostok #followerpower
#MissingPaper #CanIHazPaper #Academia #AcademicChatter #Science
I think these predatory journals are really onto something with this idea that they should tell us how much of their «Original Article(s)» are allowed to be plagiarized.
#PredatoryJournal is a complex issue. I consider that we should focus on two things: 1. Support researchers before they submit a Paper, 2. Reform #ResearchAssessment
I'm against generalizations in this subject.
Kommen wir zu #Reviewer2 .
Jetzt merke ich, warum der Editor gewarnt hat.
Reviewer2 bewertet mit "minor Revisions" also durchaus okaye Arbeit.
Satz 1 seines Reviews:
"Es ist erforderlich, dass die Autor*innen folgende zwei relevante Arbeiten zitieren:
doi.org/10.3390/xxxx
doi.org/10.3390/yyyy ."
Habe nachgeschaut. Ich kenne jetzt Reviewer2.
Und es sind (mMn) auch keine richtige Veröffentlichungen, sondern es gehört zu einem #Raubjournal (#predatoryJournal).
Ansonsten hält sich der Reviewer zurück und weist nur auf zwei drei kleinere Punkte hin.
Was tun, wenn ihr euer Manuskript versehentlich bei einem Predatory Journal eingereicht habt?
Welche Strategien ihr anwenden könnt und wie ihr am besten damit umgeht, erklären wir euch im neuen QuIX.
Yet another shoddy #Elsevier journal sending me chemistry or chemical engineering papers to review.
(Narrator: he was not a chemical engineer, chemist, or anything chemist adjacent. In fact, his only chemistry related skill was once putting out a fire in high school chemistry )
To add insult to injury, it includes some attempt at an NDA, and sign over of
rights
"You must not share your review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, irrespective of the publication outcome. If the manuscript is rejected by this journal and the
author agrees that the submission be transferred to another Elsevier journal
via the Article Transfer Service, we may securely transfer your reviewer
comments and name/contact details to the receiving journal editor for their
peer review purposes."
OK Rongjun Chen and the Chemical Engineering Journal, I'm sharing your shoddy referee selection process. Come at me bro.
This is weird, two papers with the same name. The new one appears to be a plagiarized version of the old one, but the text is different. (Perhaps edited with a LLM?)
What do you think is the point here - is the idea to siphon off citations intended for the other paper? Are the authors real, or is the whole thing just made up as fake data for a predatory journal?
Why change the text, but not the title?
Hey,
A proff. from an Colombian institution published a paper in a #PredatoryJournal. When he realized of that, he tried to retire the article from the journal and now the publisher is charging him to retire the document.
What can the proff. do in this case?
I've known of similar situations before, but I've never heard of a solution
My Junk E-Mail folder today (I had to look into it because of an unrelated issue). All requests to write or review articles, or to serve as editorial member for poop journals 💩.
And those are only the ones that got caught in the spam filter 🚮. There are plenty more of those that make it into my inbox on an almost hourly basis.
How to spot dodgy emails from dodgy academic journals just after your money, Rule number 173:
When it is from Kevin Spacey.
The Journal of Intelligent Communication is now on my autodelete list.
#PredatoryJournal #AcademicSpam
Sometime #PredatoryJournal are funny with 1998 websites
Getting way too many spam invitations to submit a manuscript (17+ today) or to speak at a conference. Trying to train my spam filter to recognize them, but it only caught 11 of them today. Wish there was an effective way to filter out all of them.
#PredatoryJournal #Spam
Wow! Very Potential! So mRNA!
If we make everything about money and profits, I guess we can't be surprised it gets infested with scams.
#PredatoryJournal #PredatoryJournals #Publishing #ScientificPublishing
If you are considering publishing in a scientific journal that you don't know and want to avoid feeding predatory journals, a helpful website is
https://thinkchecksubmit.org/
Also useful:
https://doaj.org/
(directory of quality checked open access journals)
Hey potentially predatory journals: Telling me that you have recently invited me to peer-review (when you haven't actually done so), and that you are now following-up on my lack of response... It's not having the effect you hoped it would have.
#PeerReview #AcademicJournal
#PredatoryJournal
#PredatoryPublishing
#AcademicChatter
Another day, another “final opportunity” email from a #PredatoryJournal. Surprisingly not #MDPI today! #AcademicChatter
#OSFAIR2023 panel on Emerging #PublishingModels
Emmanuel Kulczycki proposes a new term: "mislocated centers of scholarly communication" instead of #PredatoryPublisher or #PredatoryJournal
A snippet from one of my spam emails this morning to make you smile...
"Your belief in my efforts will create the good reputation for my Journal. I believe in you that your eminent manuscript will turn my life, help to achieve higher position and better rank.
I hope to rejoice this week with your article."
Unfortunately, they won't be rejoicing.
#Spam #PredatoryJournal #Manuscript #Article #Academia @academicchatter
In the past week I've received academic spam requests from Johnny Depp and George Orwell
#academia #academicSpam #predatoryJournal #research #academics
