Since the 2015 decision to legalize gay marriage in the U.S., the Supreme Court has shifted to the right, and conservative judges now hold a 6-3 majority, heightening concern for the future of marriage equality. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/06/23/world/trump-10-years-gay-marriage/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=mastodon #worldnews #lbgtq #samesexmarriage #us #donaldtrump #republicans
#SamesexMarriage
Hey Fediverse!
I am still looking for resources (preferably gay/queer or feminist) criticizing marriage in general or same-sex marriage.
Can you help me find this?
Preferably in French, otherwise in English.
I have already read Manifesto against gay normalization, Alain Naze (Manifeste contre la normalisation gay).
thank you !
#Gay #Queer #SameSexMarriage #Marriage #Couple #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA #LibreTranslate
"Meanwhile, at the SBC annual meeting--amid this loss, the denomination's own refusal to address rampant sexual abuse in its own ranks, and the attacks on our democracy by the man Southern Baptists were instrumental in bringing to power--the leaders at the meeting determined that the most pressing issues God was calling them to address were overturning the legality of marriage equality and banning women from being pastors."
#SouthernBaptists #SexualAbuse #women #LGBTQ #SameSexMarriage
/2
No one has that right.
And God is not behind such ugly actions.
We can frame this discussion as a religious-freedom discussion ONLY if we ignore and care nothing about the hurt being inflicted on others by people claiming God and their — THEIR — belief system as their warrant for hurting others.
With the demand of Southern Baptists that their understanding of marriage be imposed on all the rest of us:
This is not, as many would want to think, a "We all have a right to believe as we choose" discussion.
It's a discussion about who has the right to attack, denigrate, hurt, harm others and claim that God is behind these ugly actions.
Southern Baptists then chose to attack women’s rights and down the road, LGBTQ rights.
When issues arise pointing to a moral arc within history, you can count on Southern Baptists to take the side that points in the opposite direction.
I grew up Southern Baptist and have two first cousins who are Southern Baptist ministers.
I know Southern Baptists.
Southern Baptists split the Baptist church in the US to defend the immoral practice of slavery.
The denomination is called “Southern Baptist” for this reason. It was born out of the commitment to keep slavery alive.
Southern Baptists defended draconian immoral Jim Crow laws and bitterly resisted civil rights laws giving people of color basic rights.
Southern Baptists then chose to attack women’s rights and down the road, LGBTQ rights.
“The denomination has long opposed gay marriage, but Tuesday was the first time its members have voted to work to legally end it. Expanding on conservatives’ success in overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, the vote signals growing evangelical ambitions to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court ruling that was handed down 10 years ago this month.”
“The Southern Baptist Convention voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to call for the overturning of the Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage, with strategists citing the successful effort that overturned the right to legal abortions as a possible blueprint for the new fight.”
~ Ruth Graham
#SouthernBaptists #SameSexMarriage #GayMarriage #LGBTQ
/1
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/10/us/southern-baptist-obergefell-same-sex-marriage.html
Evangelical resolution on the 21st Century #EconTwitter #religion #repugnance #samesexmarriage
http://marketdesigner.blogspot.com/2025/06/evangelical-resolution-on-21st-century.html
Africa: Umc West Africa Conference Reaffirms Ban On Same-Sex Marriage Despite Global Church Ruling: [FrontPageAfrica] Monrovia -- The President of the West Africa Central Conference of The United Methodist Church (UMC), Bishop Samuel J. Quire Jr., has clarified that a recent U.S.-based church ruling will have no bearing on West African UMC policies, reaffirming the Conference's commitment to biblical standards… http://newsfeed.facilit8.network/TL7zWQ #Africa #SameSexMarriage #UMC #WestAfrica #MethodistChurch
Skrmetti’s Outcome and Obergefell’s Legacy Loom Over Pride Month - Assigned Media
#trans #Transgender #Skrmetti #SCOTUS #SameSexMarriage #USPol
At least we won't forget the date thanks to this wonderful cross-stitch from our friend Hayley - featuring Nyota and Nebula ❤️
#CrossStitch #Cross-Stitch #art #cat #wedding #GayMarriage #SameSexMarriage #LGBTQ #gay
Can't believe it's been a whole month since our wedding!
Still feels unreal calling him my husband after 13 years together 😅
#LGBTQ #Gay #GayMarriage #SameSexMarriage #Wedding #Husbands
#TheMetalDogArticleList
#MetalInjection
CHTHONIC's FREDDY LIM Appointed As Taiwan's Ambassador To Finland
https://metalinjection.net/news/chthonics-freddy-lim-appointed-as-taiwans-ambassador-to-finland
#FreddyLim #Taiwan #Finland #Chthonic #Ambassador #Metal #Legislature #HumanRights #SameSexMarriage #Ukraine
Ancora sul matrimonio egualitario
Vi segnalo questo podcast in cui se n'è parlato:
Lo trovate un po' su tutte le piattaforme, compreso su Antenna Pod.
In particolare, si spiega perché il testo legato alla raccolta firme che sta girando non è accurato.
open.spotify.com/episode/2QAdk…
#MatrimonioEgualitario #matrimonio #diritti #EQUITA #referendum #gaymarriage #samesexmarriage #Matrimoniogay #lgbtquia #lgbt #italia #repubblicadellebanane
Qualquadra non cosa.
Qualcuno esperto in #legge , magari un #avvocato, mi aiuti a capire, per favore.
Tutto felice e contento ho firmato il referendum di cui si parla, condiviso da alcuni amici, ma sembrerebbe che sia addirittura controproducente una raccolta firme. Che fare, in questo caso? Sarà corretto quello che dice la rete Lenford? (fonte in chiusura del post).
Sono davvero amareggiato e confuso.
"NON ESISTE UN REFERENDUM SUL MATRIMONIO TRA PERSONE DELLO STESSO SESSO
In questi giorni sta circolando online la richiesta di firme per un referendum, che viene descritto dal partito promotore con queste parole: ‘si firma per il referendum sul matrimonio delle coppie same sex’.
Non è così.
Anche se si raccogliessero almeno 500.000 firme entro il 3 agosto 2025 e anche se il referendum venisse giudicato ammissibile (e, quindi, effettivamente proponibile) dalla Corte costituzionale, un esito favorevole nelle urne NON introdurrebbe in Italia il matrimonio per coppie formate da persone dello stesso sesso.
Quel referendum, infatti, vuole mantenere le unioni civili introdotte nel 2016, eliminando le parti che le differenziano dal matrimonio anche rispetto alla filiazione.
La conseguenza di una vittoria dei ‘SÌ’ sarebbe, perciò, questa: le coppie same sex potrebbero continuare soltanto a unirsi civilmente, parificando gli effetti della loro unione a quelli matrimoniali, ma non potrebbero sposarsi.
Questo è un punto che deve essere molto chiaro e che Rete Lenford, nata nel 2007 proprio con la campagna ‘Affermazione civile’ volta a introdurre in Italia il matrimonio per persone dello stesso sesso, ha il dovere di chiarire pubblicamente, a seguito di decine di richieste che ci stanno giungendo nelle ultime ore.
Nei prossimi giorni, e con ampio margine di anticipo rispetto alla scelta che potrà essere fatta sulla firma della proposta referendaria, Rete Lenford lavorerà a una nota illustrativa con uno sguardo ‘bifocale’:
1) tecnico, per un approfondimento sui singoli quesiti e sulla loro dubbia ammissibilità, anche (e soprattutto) per le contraddittorie conseguenze in punto di filiazione, specialmente con riguardo alle coppie conviventi e alla legge sulla procreazione medicalmente assistita (la quale, anche dopo il referendum, continuerebbe a mantenere il requisito esplicito della ‘diversità di sesso’ della coppia richiedente);
2) politico, per le significative implicazioni che questo referendum potrebbe generare sia sul percorso di introduzione del ‘matrimonio same sex’, sia su quello di riconoscimento delle famiglie omogenitoriali.
Naturalmente, e anche al fine di elaborare una posizione condivisa in vista del termine del 3 agosto prossimo, non mancheremo di attivare un confronto con le altre realtà associative, tenute sorprendentemente escluse da questa iniziativa partitica.
Nel frattempo, ci è risultato doveroso prenderci del tempo, ma allo stesso tempo chiarire sin da subito quale sarebbe l’esito del referendum, così da favorire soltanto firme consapevoli da parte di chi, già in questi giorni, decidesse di non aspettare una elaborazione delle realtà LGBT+ e volesse esprimere online la propria posizione."
The Finnish Church rejects same-sex unions and parallel definitions of marriage.
A proposal had sought to add parallel definitions of marriage to the Church’s constitution.
However, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland will not adopt the proposed model that would have recognised both heterosexual and same-sex unions as parallel definitions of marriage.
#Finland #Church #SameSexMarriage #Marriage #LGBTQ #Religion
Client Info
Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst