アドブロックは権利だし技術的保護手段の回避の違法化は憲法違反です！！！！！！
#TINLA
「権利制限規定」とか「権利制限の適用対象から除外」とかの用語めちゃくちゃややこしいけど、
* 「権利」とは著作権つまり著作権者が使用者による使用の方法を制限する権利のこと
* 「権利制限の適用対象」とは著作権者が使用を制限できる範囲から除外するような、使用者による使用の方法。たとえば引用とか。
* 「権利制限規定」とは著作権の行使を制限する規定、つまり使用者に特別に特定の使用方法を認めること (たとえば引用を著作者の許可なく行えるとか)
……というのを踏まえて、「権利制限の適用対象から除外」されている行為とはつまり、「使用者に特別に許していた使用方法に該当しないので、著作権者によるお許しがないと駄目な行為」です (ややこしい！)
https://x.com/astrophys_tan/status/1135909834639831042 #tw
長さを測る器具ではなく直線を引くための「定規」だからおｋ！ という理屈が可能らしい、ウケる #TINLA
画像引用の疑問点：有料配信動画のスクリーンショットを引用できるか？-アニメとスピーカーと‥‥。
https://kato19.blogspot.com/2016/03/screen-shot-gazou-inyou.html
ふーむ #TINLA
Additional information not mentioned.
1. Annulment must be filed before the 10th year marriage anniversary, otherwise, it's no longer available.
2. Not all muslims can divorce under Islamic Sharia Law. If a muslim couple (actually, even if only one is a Muslim) …
(NOTE: #IANAL & #TINLA)
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:uivc5p7uhbo3sicndtcaog5b/post/3lfu4x2v52m2h
New Episode: hpr4168 :: Beyond Economic Recovery
Hosted by Trixter on 2024-07-24 is flagged as Clean and is released under a CC-BY-SA license.
Tags: #archiving, #archivist, #legal, #TINLA, #IANAL
@trashheap Using a built-in software feature, like “reshare”/“boost”, is not a #Copyright infringement. I can't remember which case it was, but a high court in the USA explained the different between re-uploading/redistribution vs. using a platform's built-in “reshare” feature.
What can be considered as infringement are:
* Re-uploading / redistributing an image/photo/art/fiction/ebook/story. Since these are automatically Copyrighted to the author/creator/writer.
* Creating a derivative, or a reproduction, work without permission or a license.
On screenshots, it is case-by-case:
* Was it a screenshot of a scene from an animation or live-action production? It is infringement, however, in countries where there is Fair Use, or similar, they can get away with it depending on usage. (Example, in an article or review, it falls under Fair Use. [But if you overdo it, you still might get in trouble.])
* Was it a screenshot of a post where a Copyrighted work was included? If the subject is clearly about the post and not the Copyrighted material, it is fine. Otherwise, it's a grey area. If the owner of the Copyrighted material that was included in that screenshot, can prove their Rights were infringed, they can potentially win in court. (But using a platform's “reshare” feature is, again, fine as you simply re-shared it, not re-uploaded.)
How about text-only posts?
* Generally, text-only posts in microblogging platforms, are not Copyrighted as those do not fall under any conditions of the Copyright Law. If the post owner can prove their post was a creative work, then they can try it in court.
Of course, the Copyright landscape is constantly changing in our fast evolving cyberspace. For example, in many platforms today, they allow threading of a post. In some, even though the platform doesn't have any threading feature, mobile apps can add such features (example, Trunks can display a Mastodon thread properly even though Mastodon's web and mobile interface don't support threading).
So, if a user can prove that it is a “thread”, then there is a chance it can be Copyrightable. But, again, largely, “no”.
---
Anyway, it's the simplest way I can explain it. Also, #IANAL and #TINLA.
By the way, don't be confused between #Copyright and #Trademark. These two are totally different.
Let's use Mickey and Minnie Mouse.
While the earliest versions of Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse are now in the #PublicDomain it does not mean you can freely create and sell your own merchandise with them on it. That falls under Trademark.
Copyright covers works of art like the character, the stories, literary works, music. In the Mickey and Minnie Mouse case, the images and stories, and the character art itself, are now in the Public Domain.
However, using these characters as in a merchandise like mugs and t-shirts is not under Copyright, it is under Trademark. Disney still holds the Trademark rights for these characters.
You can draw Mickey and Minnie. You can create new stories for them. Not only that, but you can write a new literary work, say a novel or a children's book or a film, based on the earliest versions of these characters. Just not anything that falls under Trademark.
If you are going to do something that you think might fall under Trademark law, the best course of action is to ask #Disney. If they say it doesn't fall under Trademark law, then keep that reply, as it is your proof they gave you permission. Otherwise, try to negotiate if you really need it.
So, again, Copyright (and in this case Public Domain) is totally different from Trademark. Many countries choose to call these two as #IntellectualPropertyRights. While it is correct (and confusing), they are different and there is no overlap between them. They have completely separate uses/coverage.
#IANAL and #TINLA, however, it doesn't mean you can't study Copyright and Trademark laws.
When is a lawyer not your legal counsel?
WHEN THEY ARE YOUR CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATOR
https://mastodon.cardina1.red/@mizunashi_mana@mstdn.mizunashi.work/110695452006218149
これは (当然ながら) #IANAL #TINLA なんだけど、雑に言えば「誰が書いてもそうなる」という創作性がない記述については著作権が認められないみたいな感じのことがあったはずで (少なくとも日本はたぶんそう)、設定ファイルについても構文が決まっていて書くべき値もほとんど必然的に決まる事例が多いので、創作性はおそらく認められない事例が多かろうと思う。海外は知らんけど。
@tw Oh, that. #IANAL & #TINLA but I would personally advise against it.
I have decades of experience with software and other intellectual property and my knowledge and experience suggests to me that I wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if someone complained about copying an emoji. At best, such a complaint would result in cleanup work that I don’t have time for.
https://jhrlegal.com/i-want-to-incorporate-an-emoji-into-my-product-logo-or-marketing-pieces-is-that-copyright-infringement-attorney-advertising/#:~:text=Emojis%20are%20Protected%20by%20Copyright&text=This%20means%20that%20emojis%20are,platforms%2C%20which%20includes%20their%20emojis.
CC-BYな動画のダウンロードが公式によって提供されていないのは問題だけど、以下の引用にある例外条項(a)の解釈によってはNewPipeなどでダウンロードしても問題はなさそうな気がする #IANAL #TINLA
本サービスの利用には制限があり、以下の行為が禁止されています。 本サービスまたはコンテンツのいずれかの部分に対しても、アクセス、複製、ダウンロード、配信、送信、放送、展示、販売、ライセンス供与、改変、修正、またはその他の方法での使用を行うこと。ただし、（a）本サービスによって明示的に承認されている場合、または（b）YouTube および（適用される場合）各権利所持者が事前に書面で許可している場合を除きます。 https://www.youtube.com/t/terms
RT: https://mastodon.cardina1.red/@lo48576/104416579784781799
Client Info
Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst