#academicpublishing

Nele Põldvere (PhD)nelepoldvere@fediscience.org
2025-12-05

Book recommendation! 📖

Earlier this year, Vassiliki Geka published an excellent book on Imperative-Based Dialogic Constructions and Discourse Units: jbe-platform.com/content/books

Later this year, Journal of Pragmatics published my review of the book, which you can access freely for 50 days (now 49 days!) via this link: authors.elsevier.com/a/1mDE41L

I'm very passionate about #ConstructionGrammar taking #dialogicity seriously and this book does exactly that! 👍

#AcademicPublishing #Linguistics #Pragmatics #Philosophy

Miguel Afonso Caetanoremixtures@tldr.nettime.org
2025-12-04

"To conduct their study, the researchers prompted GPT-4o, a recent model from OpenAI, to generate six different literature reviews. These reviews centered on three mental health conditions chosen for their varying levels of public recognition and research coverage: major depressive disorder (a widely known and heavily researched condition), binge eating disorder (moderately known), and body dysmorphic disorder (a less-known condition with a smaller body of research). This selection allowed for a direct comparison of the AI’s performance on topics with different amounts of available information in its training data.
(...)
After generating the reviews, the researchers methodically extracted all 176 citations provided by the AI. Each reference was painstakingly verified using multiple academic databases, including Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed. Citations were sorted into one of three categories: fabricated (the source did not exist), real with errors (the source existed but had incorrect details like the wrong year, volume number, or author list), or fully accurate. The team then analyzed the rates of fabrication and accuracy across the different disorders and review types.

The analysis showed that across all six reviews, nearly one-fifth of the citations, 35 out of 176, were entirely fabricated. Of the 141 citations that corresponded to real publications, almost half contained at least one error
(...)
The rate of citation fabrication was strongly linked to the topic. For major depressive disorder, the most well-researched condition, only 6 percent of citations were fabricated. In contrast, the fabrication rate rose sharply to 28 percent for binge eating disorder and 29 percent for body dysmorphic disorder. This suggests the AI is less reliable when generating references for subjects that are less prominent in its training data."

psypost.org/study-finds-nearly

#AI #GenerativeAI #Hallucinations #LLMs #Chatbots #Science #AcademicPublishing

J Psychological Experiencejpsyexp
2025-12-04

Researchers often have to navigate cumbersome submission systems when sending their work.

offers a user-friendly single portal for all submissions, minimising friction and repetition.

Submit today: jpsyexp.org/submit



2025-12-04

Scientific publishing may be the biggest scam you've never heard of. A billion-dollar industry built on free labor and public money—then sold back to us at a markup. It's not just broken. It's sabotaging progress.
#Science #OpenAccess #AcademicPublishing

zmescience.com/science/news-sc

Thomas Guignardtimtom@code4lib.social
2025-12-03

This #AdventCalendar is a fun way to learn how to spot predatory practices in #AcademicPublishing !
papermills.tilda.ws/advent2025

Dr PenDrPen
2025-12-03

Call for Assistant Editor
**Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education**
Internationally peer-reviewed, the *Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education* (JARHE), focuses on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education.

Email patrickblessinger - at - gmail.com to submit an application.

emeraldgrouppublishing.com/jou

Gregor Kalinkatgkalinkat@det.social
2025-12-02
2025-12-01

Are there examples of successful academic boycotts?

I can think of several unsuccessful examples, like the PLoS petition and the Cost of Knowledge boycott.

Getting academics to make and stick to collective agreements is like herding cats.

researchwhisperer.org/2025/11/

#Boycotts #AcademicPublishing #AcademicJournals #AcademicLibraries #Librarians #CatHerding #ScholComm #ScholarlyPublishing

2025-12-01

New preprint on arXiv: “Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing”. I discuss CC Signals, recent court cases, and argue that training GenAI on scholarly outputs should not be treated as a fair use exception.

doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.21

#GenerativeAI #Copyright #AcademicPublishing #OpenScience #ScholComm #AIpolicy #LLM #FairUse #CreativeCommons #CCSignals

Paul R. Pival (he/him)ppival@glammr.us
2025-11-28

New blog post: Mita’s observations on gatekeeping – The Distant Librarian distlib.pival.me/mitas-observa

#distlib #scholarship #AcademicPublishing

Vesna GB · VA for Academicsvesnagb
2025-11-28

In academia, BF usually means Before Friday — the weekly rush of drafts, slides, reports.

Today I’m launching my work as a VA for Academics, supporting editing, submission prep, coordination & visuals. ✨





Dr PenDrPen
2025-11-27

See my earlier post today about the journal mill grifters all coming to the AI yard.

Screen capture of a Ben Williamson tweet referring to the huge amount of research papers all about AI.
2025-11-27

My new book Culture Wars in Britain comes out in May 2026. Should work for a general readership as well as academic audience. I'll post more in the new year. Currently available for preorder on Amazon at £16.99.

#book #books #sociology #culturewars #academicpublishing #AcademicChatter

Cover of Culture Wars in Britain by Nick Hubble. In the Society Now series from Emerald Press. Red background, white circle with black lettering.
Dr PenDrPen
2025-11-27

I am making a concerted effort to not write about AI. All the journal paper grifters have come to the AI yard. I, as a traditional contrarian, will run in the opposite direction. This makes total sense to me.

2025-11-27

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) now accepts HTML-based submissions for interactive research articles: tmlr-beyond-pdf.org/about

The format uses Markdown with supplementary HTML files and a .bib citation file. The final articles are similar to distill.pub publications with embedded widgets, videos, and GIFs.

It’s great to have more interactivity in articles, but I think it would make sense to consider bundling JavaScript dependencies locally. The example article currently relies on CDNs, which could cause reliability issues.
Interestingly, metadata currently includes only title, abstract, authors with affiliations, and table of contents. Keywords are not included.

#bibliometrics #academicpublishing

Natural Gas Industry B updatesngibjournal
2025-11-26

Last five days! is calling for Young EBM! If you are interested in some editorial work as a young researcher, DO NOT hesitate to apply!
Deadline: 30 Nov 2025
Send your CV to: jrx@trqgy.cn

2025-11-20

In just over an hour I'll discuss AI Editorial Policies with Brittany Paloma Fiedler & Imogen Clarke as part of a panel organized by the Library Publishing Coalition.

(We're representing
@libraryleadpipe & Ubiquity Press, respectively.)

It's at 9am Pacific / 10am Mountain / 12pm Eastern / 5pm UK today, 2025-11-20.

Hope you'll join us!

librarypublishing.org/upcoming

#AcademicPublishing #libraries #libraryWorkers

2025-11-20

Welcome to my profile on HCommons Social.

I am a historian and director of the Hispanic Historical Studies Network (UK), dedicated to the research and dissemination of Hispanic history from a transnational perspective. Here I share editorial updates, archival discoveries, and reflections on genealogy, heraldry, and institutional culture.

Verified profile: hcommons.social/@mariosantoslo

This space complements my academic and editorial work.

Welcome to those who value historical rigour and institutional continuity.

#HispanicHistory #ArchivalResearch #AcademicPublishing

Dr PenDrPen
2025-11-19

Something that baffles me about academic publishing is that if you write a conceptual paper making an argument for something, PR often demands to know exactly how you chose the literature to make your argument. These (often) same people promote rampant use of Gen AI for all kinds of academic work, with no such standard applied (its impossible to have it).

What gives?

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst