#equivalencetests

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2025-04-22

#327 Effect Sizes for Equivalence Testing: Incorporating the Equivalence Interval

Thoughts: Not sure what value this approach has yet, but sharing for feedback.

osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/5buz

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-12-04

#238 Bridging null hypothesis testing and estimation

Thoughts: An overview of the ways you can claim "no effect" under a bayesian framework.

osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c7b45

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-11-27

#233 Conditional equivalence testing (CET rule)

Thoughts: Many might not know that there are several decision rules for equivalence test. This one is slightly different from TOST classic.

journals.plos.org/plosone/arti

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-11-26

#232 Bayesian Interval-Null Testing

Thoughts: @JASPStats has a module for Equivalence Tests that include Bayesian Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Hypothesis Testing.


jasp-stats.org/2020/06/02/freq

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-11-12

#222 ROPE sensitivity to scales

Thoughts: Insightful github thread on setting ROPE ranges for equivalence tests, & scaled / standardized predictors. PSA: make sure your model makes sense.

github.com/easystats/bayestest

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-11-01

#215 Four one-sided test of significance (FOST)

Thoughts: If you liked the "two one-sided t-tests" you'll love four! 2x the fun and inference. Superiority+equivalence+inferiority

pedermisager.org/blog/four-one

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-10-18

#205 Equivalence Tests Using {marginaleffects}

Thoughts: Easily testing for "no effect" is important. Here's a tutorial by @carlislerainey using @VincentAB r pkg.

carlislerainey.com/blog/2023-0

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-10-11

#199 Mixed model equivalence test using R and PANGEA

Thoughts: While there are easier ways to compute tests for such models now, it is nice to see how you'd do so manually.

pedermisager.org/blog/mixed_mo

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-10-03

#194 Design and analysis of noninferiority studies

Thoughts: Sometimes all you want to know is "is this new thing not worse than the previous one?". Enter noninferiority tests.

support.sas.com/kb/48/616.html

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-01-29
Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2023-04-17

🚨My new paper is out. I explore the effect of uncertainty framing (epistemic or aleatory) on veracity judgements. The "negative" results indicate that phrasing the judgement as "how SURE are you... " vs "how LIKELY is it... " does *not* impact veracity judgments.

Zloteanu, M. (2023). Uncertain Veracity Judgements: Does the Framing of the Question Influence Deception Detection? Experimental Results, 1-16
doi.org/10.1017/exp.2023.9

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2023-01-14

Part II of my series on what to do with non-significant results is up now.

In this post, I focus on how to determine if your data is compatible with the claim of "no effect" (and why relying on p-values is wrong). It covers TOST equivalence tests and how to interpret and write up your results for publication. Link below πŸ”—

mzstats.blogspot.com/2023/01/w

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst