Under mind controlling systems, there is never a legitimate reason you can have for disagreeing. It will be attributed to a personal grudge, selfishness, resentment, hurt feelings, trying to gain notoriety, lying to hurt the organization, or often some version of 'you failed' or 'you couldn't take the heat' and now you're bitter.
People who are stuck in these systems self-censor any thoughts they have that resemble disagreement because they fear becoming a bad person. They have multiple examples of bad people who disagreed for 'immoral reasons', and they don't want to fall prey to those same reasons. Subconsciously what they really fear is isolation and becoming targets for abuse, but the system gives them a comfortable cover story consciously, which feels like being ethical and following necessary rules.
When cornered with an actual mistake, or proof of having done real harm, mind controlling systems will fallback to 'it was for the greater good so it's not a big deal'. The transition will be seamless, where members previously said no mistakes were made and detractors were wicked, to saying yes a mistake was made but it didn't matter because of the greater mission. Soon after, the group will return to a posture of infallibility as if nothing happened.
You will often see this play out under a guise of transparency. For example Jehovah's Witnesses often say that anyone is welcome to attend their meetings, that their full history of literature is available to read. It's all an open book, and anyone reading it without bias would find that their record is spot free. The trick is that when someone does see a blemish or asks a question about a particular policy that was changed in the past, that is evidence that they were reading with some bias and shouldn't be engaged with.
#exCult #exJW #highControlGroup #cultMindControl