Who would have thought that he would overstate the sums involved so spectacularly? Certainly not #judgearthurengoron in #newyork !
#judgearthurengoron
#trump #bond #knightspecialtyinsurance #donhankey #judgearthurengoron #letitiajames #newyorkcivilfraud
Don the con ;
“The insurance company that helped former President Donald Trump pay a $175 million bond is coming under more scrutiny as financial experts get a better look at the contract it wrote.
The Daily Beast reports that the Knight Specialty Insurance Company's bond contract "doesn’t actually promise it will pay the money if the former president loses his $464 million bank fraud case on appeal" but instead "says Trump will pay, negating the whole point of an insurance company guarantee."
Experts who spoke with the publication about the contract did not hold back on how shady this arrangement seems.
This is not common," said N. Alex Hanley, the CEO of Jurisco Surety Bonds. "The only reason this would be done is to limit the liability to the surety."
THE LEGAL BREAKDOWN
Brian Tyler Cohen With Glenn Kirschner
Trump's financial problems SURGE with SERIOUS court update
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMNF_OseTDM
Excellent discussion of Donald Trump's mounting financial dilemmas.
Donald Trump: Criminal in Chief
:
#arthurengoron #briantylercohen #darthtraitor #democrats #donaldtrump #ejeancarroll #firstcriminal #glennkirschner #jeancarroll #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #legalbreakdown #thelegalbreakdown #trump #trumpisbroke
:::
CNN
Trump asks judge to delay enforcing the $355 million civil fraud decision for one month
By Kara Scannell, CNN
Published 5:56 PM EST, Wed February 21, 2024
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/21/politics/trump-engoron-fraud-ruling-delay/index.html
:
#arthurengoron #darthtraitor #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #trump #trumpfraud #trumpfraudverdict #trumpisbroke
:::
WOULD YOU PUT UP A $355 MILLION BOND FOR DONALD TRUMP?
Who Would?
BREAKING: Trump LOSES MASSIVELY in bombshell court ruling
Brian Tyler Cohen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtbgltmFwlg
Another gem from Brian Tyler Cohen.
Please note the TrumpIsBroke hashtag. A Mastodonian started it quite recently I think. If anything, it is much truer today.
:
#arthurengoron #darthtraitor #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #trump #trumpfraud #trumpfraudcase #trumpfraudtrial #trumpisbroke
:::
This is among the main things we need to get across to people clustered around the political center. Trump's legal jeopardy is not some misty future possibility. He has had court judgments against him already, including a jury of his peers finding him to have sexually abused E. Jean Carroll and then willfully and repeatedly defamed her. Judge Arthur Engoron has already found that Donald Trump and his company committed business fraud on a massive scale. There is nothing abstract or off in the future about these and other matters. Donald Trump has done wrong many times and the justice system has caught him and very likely will catch him again. And again and again. Voters need to know that this reckoning is already well underway and they need to be reminded of it over and over again. Trump has moved public opinion by telling the same lies repeatedly. We have to move public opinion the other way by telling the truth again and again and again.
:
#arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #ejeancarroll #jeancarroll #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #trump #trumpbusinessfraud #trumpfraud #trumpsexualpredator
:::
Good Day!!
Hugo Scheiber, Man Reading Newspaper, 1918
Yesterday was a huge news day. The top story was the decision by the DC Circuit Court ruling stating that Trump does not have immunity from prosecution for crimes committed as president. Now Trump must decide by Monday whether to take the case to the Supreme Court.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding the Colorado case arguing that the 14th Amendment makes Trump ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot.
Trump is also awaiting a decision from Judge Engoron in the New York fraud case that could potentially bankrupt him.
In addition, Republicans in the House and Speaker Mike Johnson failed miserably as he lost two votes he put on the floor: aid to Israel and impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. On top of that, the head of the RNC announced her resignation.
In the Senate, Mitch McConnell knifed Senator James Lankford in the back after assigning him to negotiated a border bill that included aid to Ukraine and Israel. Democrats gave Republicans everything they wanted, but they backed down on Trump’s orders.
I’ll get to as many of these stories as I can.
Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein at Politico: Trump is not immune from prosecution for bid to subvert the 2020 election, appeals court rules.
Former President Donald Trump — and indeed any other former president — may be prosecuted for alleged crimes they committed while in office, a federal appeals court panel ruled Tuesday.
The unanimous 57-page decision from a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is a major win for special counsel Jack Smith, who is seeking to put Trump on trial this year on federal felony charges stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Trump quickly vowed an appeal, which could be at the Supreme Court by Monday.
“For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant,” the D.C. Circuit judges wrote. “But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution.”
The ruling affirms U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s historic conclusion that former presidents may be prosecuted for crimes they committed in office, even if those alleged crimes arguably related to their official duties. Trump had argued that former presidents could not be prosecuted for such actions without first being impeached and convicted by Congress.
The judges put their decision on hold only until Monday to allow Trump to ask the Supreme Court to take up the immunity fight on an emergency basis. If he does so, the decision won’t take effect until the high court acts on his request, the appeals panel decreed.
Trump could also ask the D.C. Circuit to rehear the case. But the panel said doing that won’t delay the return of the case to Chutkan, the trial judge, unless the full bench of the D.C. Circuit agrees to a rehearing, which requires a majority of the 11 active appellate judges.
The force of Tuesday’s unanimous ruling Tuesday, backed by two liberal judges and one staunch conservative, may have been worth the wait for Smith. Rather than a splintered decision that could be picked apart more easily, the ruling lays out a groundbreaking legal and political framework for bringing a former president to trial.
The Newspaper, by Aldo Luongo
At The Atlantic, George Conway writes: An Airtight Ruling Against Trump. In a masterful opinion, the D.C. Circuit rejected the former president’s bid for immunity.
On July 24, 1974, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, ordering President Richard Nixon to produce the Watergate tapes, the president turned to his chief of staff, Alexander Haig, to understand what had just happened. He later recounted the exchange in his memoirs:
“Unanimous?” I guessed.
“Unanimous. There’s no air in it at all,” he said.
“None at all?” I asked.
“It’s tight as a drum.”
These words echoed through my mind today, nearly 50 years later, as I read the historic opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in United States v. Trump, holding that former President Donald Trump does not enjoy immunity from prosecution for any crimes he committed in attempting to end constitutional democracy in the United States.
The result was no surprise. As I said last month, no one who attended the oral argument could have believed Trump had any chance of prevailing. The question was timing: How long would an appeal delay Trump’s trial, originally scheduled for March 4? Many of us thought that the decision might come sooner, perhaps within days of the argument, given how quickly the court had scheduled briefing and argument. And by the end of last week, some commentators had, by their own reckoning, reached the “freakout stage” as to why the decision was taking so long.
They—and we—needn’t have worried. Issued exactly four weeks after the argument, the court’s decision came plenty fast. It’s not that often that you get a unanimous 57-page decision on novel questions of law in 28 days. And you almost never get an opinion of this quality in such a short period of time. I’ve read thousands of judicial opinions in my four decades as a law student and lawyer. Few have been as good as this one.
Unanimous. No air. Tight as a drum. The court’s per curiam opinion—per curiam meaning “for the court,” in that no individual judge authored it—is all that and more. It’s a masterful example of judicial craftsmanship on many levels. The opinion weaves together the factual context, the constitutional text, the judicial precedent, history, the parties’ concessions, and razor-sharp reasoning, with no modicum of judicial and rhetorical restraint, to produce an overwhelmingly cohesive, and inexorably convincing, whole. The opinion deserves a place in every constitutional-law casebook, and, most important—are you listening, members of the Supreme Court?—requires no further review.
The opinion far exceeds any commentator’s poor power to add or detract, so I’ll mostly let it speak for itself. The bottom line:
For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution.
I shared this as a gift link (see above), so you should be able to read the whole piece without a subscription.
You can also check out this article at Just Security: How Long Will Trump’s Immunity Appeal Take? Analyzing the Alternative Timelines.
On the Colorado case, Anne E. Marimow writes at The Washington Post: In Trump’s Colorado case, Supreme Court will make and face history.
The Supreme Court on Thursday will confront the critical question of Donald Trump’s eligibility to return to the White House, hearing arguments in an unprecedented case that gives the justices a central role in charting the course of a presidential election for the first time in nearly a quarter-century.
Reading the Newspapers, by Aristarkh Lentulov
The justices will decide whetherColorado’s top court was correctto apply a post-Civil War provisionof the Constitution to order Trump off the ballot after concluding his actions around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol amounted to insurrection.Primary voting is already underway in some states. Colorado’s ballots for the March 5 primary were printed last week and include Trump’s name. But his status as a candidate will depend on what the Supreme Court decides.
Unlike Bush v. Gore in 2000, when the court’s decision handed the election to George W. Bush, the case challenging Trump’s qualifications for a second term comes at a time when a large swath of the country views the Supreme Court through a partisan lens and a significant percentagestill believes false claims that the last presidential election was rigged.
The justices — especially their cautious, consensus-building chief, John G. Roberts Jr. — may be reluctant to wade into such a politically fraught dispute, experts say. The court could rule more narrowly, finding, for example, that Colorado was wrong to bar Trump from the ballot because of a technicality.
But election law experts have implored the justices to definitively decide the key question of whether Trump is disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, settling the issue nationwide so that other states with similar challenges to Trump’s candidacy follow along.
They warn of political instability not seen since the Civil War if the court was to overturn Colorado’s ruling but leave open the possibility that Congress could try to disqualify Trump later in the process, including after the general election.
“You can see this one coming. There are flashing red lights warning 10 months before the election that chaos this time is not only possible but more than likely given that 2020 broke the norm and dented the guardrails,” said veteran Republican election lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg, who played a central role for Bush in the Florida recount.
Note the other SCOTUS cases coming up:
Trump’s eligibility is not the only question before the court that could affect the former president’s political future. Later this term, the justices are set to review the validity of a law that was used to charge hundreds of people in connection with the Jan. 6 riot and is also a key element of Trump’s four-count federal election obstruction case in Washington. Trump’s claim that he is protected by presidential immunity from being prosecuted for trying to block Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory also appears headed to the high court after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled against Trump this week.
In the Colorado case, the justices will have to weigh untested legal issues against the backdrop of broad concerns about democracy. Put simply, should the ramifications of disqualifying the leading Republican candidate in the midst of the primary election outweigh the consequences of allowing a candidate to run again after he tried to subvert the outcome of the last election?
In the civil fraud case in New York, we are awaiting a decision by Judge Arthur Engoron, but there is a problem. The Trump Organization’s former CFO Allan Weisselberg is trying to negotiate a settlement with the Manhattan DA in the election interference case, because he may have committed perjury in that case. Judge Engoron wants to know whether that affects his case.
The New York Times: Judge in Trump’s Civil Fraud Case Asks Whether a Key Witness Lied.
The judge overseeing Donald J. Trump’s civil fraud case has questioned whether a key witness committed perjury during the former president’s trial, a new court filing shows.
The judge, Arthur F. Engoron, asked Mr. Trump’s lawyers to address the truthfulness of the witness, Allen H. Weisselberg, Mr. Trump’s longtime chief financial officer. Mr. Weisselberg and Mr. Trump are both defendants in the case, which was brought by the New York attorney general, Letitia James.
Man Reading Newspaper, by Cliff Wilson
Justice Engoron, who is expected to issue a decision in the nonjury case this month, cited a recent New York Times article about Mr. Weisselberg’s testimony. The article reported that Mr. Weisselberg, 76, is negotiating a potential agreement with the Manhattan district attorney’s office that would require him to plead guilty to perjury for his testimony.
“I of course want to know whether Mr. Weisselberg is now changing his tune, and whether he is admitting he lied under oath in my courtroom at this trial,” Justice Engoron wrote to the lawyers on both sides of the case in a recent email made public on Tuesday.
The complex situation stems from overlapping criminal and civil cases brought by the two New York law enforcement agencies.
The district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, has jurisdiction over perjury and other crimes committed in Manhattan. In addition to scrutinizing Mr. Weisselberg’s testimony in the civil fraud case, Mr. Bragg is preparing to put Mr. Trump on trial next month for criminal charges stemming from a hush-money payment to a porn star.
In the civil fraud case, the attorney general, Ms. James, accused Mr. Trump, Mr. Weisselberg and others of fraudulently inflating the former president’s net worth and is asking the judge to impose a roughly $370 million penalty. The monthslong trial took place in the fall.
Mr. Weisselberg was one of more than 40 witnesses. While it is unclear which of his statements might have caught the district attorney’s attention, the attorney general’s office stopped questioning him shortly after Forbes magazine published an article in which it accused Mr. Weisselberg of having lied under oath about his involvement in valuing Mr. Trump’s penthouse apartment.
As to how Trump will manage to pay the huge settlement that is very likely coming from Judge Engoron, Jose Pagliery writes at The Daily Beast: Inside Donald Trump’s Incredible Cash Crunch.
Donald Trump is just days away from getting slammed with a court judgment that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars as a punishment for his decades of bank fraud with the Trump Organization. And two little-known New York laws could leave Trump scrambling for cash: a requirement that he immediately front the money to appeal the decision, and a sky-high state interest rate.
During a deposition with the New York Attorney General in April 2023, Trump boasted that he had $400 million in cash, bragging about how it’s “a lot for a developer.” But even if that were true, it likely won’t be enough to simultaneously cover last month’s $83 million verdict at his rape defamation trial—which he needs to immediately set aside to appeal that case—and the $370 million demanded by the AG for his incessant lying to banks.
Woman Reading Newspaper, by Arne Kavli
While the judge deciding the bank fraud case hasn’t come up with a final figure that Trump owes, every indication is that it will be into the hundreds of millions. A message from the judge on Tuesday actually suggested it could be even more than what the New York AG is seeking.
Trump’s sudden cash demands are exacerbated by a quirk in New York law. Not only would the judgment get automatically inflated by an unusually high interest rate of 9 percent, but Trump would need to give the court the enlarged total—plus an extra 10 to 20 percent—in order to appeal and have another day in court. And it would all be due by mid-March.
The self-proclaimed billionaire real estate tycoon is about to be caught in a trap of his own making, forced to front a massive amount of cash and possibly liquidate assets—while potentially unable to access the money, because the court order could limit his ability to tap his Monopoly board of properties.
Meanwhile, Trump also faces mounting difficulty in finding surety companies and banks to guide him through the appeal, because his credibility is the very focal point of the case in question. (Trump also has a long history of stiffing banks and creditors.)
One more interesting read (h/t JJ) by Ankush Khardori at New York Magazine: What Happens, Exactly, If Trump Is Sentenced to Prison? New York Mag. usually allows only one free article, so clear your cashe before you head over there.
On the embarrassing day for House Republicans:
David Kurtz at Talking Points Memo: Republicans Are Flailing Like Never Before And It’s Amazing To Behold.
The House GOP under Speaker Mike Johnson is flopping around like a fish in the bottom of the boat.In a nearly unprecedented failure, Johnson brought articles of impeachment to the House floor and lost. He lost! He didn’t have the votes! He couldn’t do the math!
It was a spectacular and unexpected failure. The impeachment was bogus to begin with. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas had not committed any high crimes or misdemeanors and hadn’t even been accused of doing so. This was purely a political impeachment, designed to front the border issue for the House GOP and Donald Trump in an election year. So even on its own terms as a political hatchet job, Johnson was unable to get the job done.
House Republicans insist they can bring the impeachment back to the floor later and win because Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) would have been the deciding vote last night but was absent for treatment for cancer. We shall see.
As a fitting coda to the day, Johnson brought up an Israel funding bill right after the impeachment vote, and it failed, too.
Stephen Collinson: How a botched impeachment laid bare a GOP House that cannot function.
Once Mike Johnson’s speakership was merely implausible. Now it looks incompetent.
The rookie Republican leader – already struggling to wield a tiny, extreme and malfunctioning majority – suffered a spectacular embarrassment on Tuesday night in a failed vote to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
The drama undermined what was already a questionable case for impeachment – more over policy disagreements than the constitutional standard of treason, bribery or high crimes and misdemeanors.
And it told a story of a House in utter disarray.
Joe Reading Newspaper, by David Tanner
Setting up a high-stakes, televised tour de force for the impeachment of a Cabinet official for only the second time in history was a daring act. But failing to actually pull it off by a couple of votes broke the cardinal rule of not putting a bill on the floor until the numbers are rock solid.
The result was a debacle that made the House leadership a laughing stock.
The failure played into the hands of a White House that delights in portraying Johnson’s majority as an engine for Donald Trump’s political stunts more than a serious governing force. And it raised serious doubts over the GOP’s capacity to pull off another politized maneuver designed to please the former president – an impeachment of President Joe Biden.
The malpractice of Johnson’s impeachment team was encapsulated by Democrats outmaneuvering them to bring a shoeless Rep. Al Green, who was recovering from surgery, to the chamber in a wheelchair to cast a dramatic vote.
Moments after the Mayorkas impeachment failed, Johnson was also unable to pass a standalone bill containing billions of dollars in aid for Israel. It was another busted gambit to jam the Biden administration. The president had threatened to veto the bill in protest of Johnson’s refusal to hold votes on a broader package that also included aid to Ukraine and Taiwan. The speaker said Biden and Democrats should be “ashamed” of failing to support an ally embroiled in a war. But the double failure on the House floor did more to highlight his own deficiencies than discomfort Biden.
On the Senate mess:
Kayla Guo at The Washington Post: As G.O.P. Demolishes Border Deal, One of Its Own Stands in the Wreckage.
It was late on a Thursday afternoon in the marbled halls of the Senate, and a small group of negotiators — one Republican, one Democrat and one independent — had just about finished a painstakingly put together border security compromise it took them months to forge.
But what should have been a triumphant moment felt more like an ordeal for the lone Republican in the trio.
“I feel like the guy standing in the middle of the field in a thunderstorm, holding up the metal stick,” Senator James Lankford, the Oklahoma Republican who was his party’s lead broker of the deal, told reporters last week.
The plight of Mr. Lankford, a slim, understated Baptist minister with a neatly combed shock of red hair and a baritone voice that regularly delivers deadpan quips, reflects the extraordinary rise and fall of the border and Ukraine deal that is expected to collapse in a test vote in the Senate on Wednesday — and the political forces within the Republican Party that brought it down.
For months, Mr. Lankford, a staunch conservative, labored over the package alongside Senators Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, and Kyrsten Sinema, an Arizona independent, demanding strict immigration policies his party insisted must be a part of any bill to send a fresh infusion of aid to Ukraine. But when Mr. Lankford managed to extract them, he found his fellow Republicans unwilling to embrace the plan, in a vivid illustration of how the political ground for any compromise on immigration has vanished for a party that has decided the issue is too valuable as a political weapon to resolve….
Just as Mr. Lankford and his fellow negotiators neared a deal, former President Donald J. Trump stepped in, trashing the bill both before and after it was released on Sunday and opening the floodgates of Republican resistance. That left Mr. Lankford fighting to keep the deal alive while being attacked by members of his own party, including in his home state, where the Republican Party tried to censure him late last month for “playing fast and loose with Democrats on our border policy.” (The resolution was later rescinded.)
Mr. Lankford said he was only the latest in a long line of lawmakers who had been burned by failed efforts to push through a bipartisan immigration deal.
Read all the details at the WaPo.
That’s it for me today. What’s do you think about all this? What else is on your mind?
https://skydancingblog.com/2024/02/07/wednesday-reads-48/
#14thAmendment #AllenWeisselberg #Colorado #DCCircuitCourt #JamesLankford #JudgeArthurEngoron #MikeJohnson #MitchMcConnell #SupremeCourt #TrumpSImmunityClaims
The Independent
Key points from AP analysis of Trump's New York civil fraud case
Within days, Donald Trump could potentially have his sprawling real estate business empire ordered “dissolved” for repeated misrepresentations on financial statements to lenders, adding him to a short list of scam marketers, con artists and others who have been hit with the ultimate punishment for violating New York’s anti-fraud law
Bernard Condon
5 hours ago
It may be worth reconsidering by Judge Arthur Engoron as to whether he wants to go beyond what the Attorney General is requesting. Dissolution would be the main issue. One article elsewhere argued that dissolving Trump's New York state businesses is beyond the judge's authority. The "How Dissolution Would Work" section, as well as elsewhere in this article, presents the issue much more clearly. It seems to me a narrow focus is far more likely to survive the inevitable appeal. If you are interested in the crime and punishment of Fraudster Trump, this article is very much worthwhile.
:
#arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #trump #trumpfraud #trumpfraudtrial
:::
Newsweek
Trump Witness Undermined Credibility With Payment Remarks: Ex-Prosecutor
Dec 10, 2023 at 5:20 AM EST
By Ewan Palmer
News Reporter
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-witness-eli-bartov-paid-fraud-new-york-trial-1851048
This is a very interesting look at Trump's fraud trial.
If you get, as I did, an advertisement blocking your view of several paragraphs, try this MSN posting of the same Newsweek article.
To my way of thinking, questioning or even attacking Prof. Bartov's integrity is a mistake. Instead, it seems to me, Trump's team shopped around for a fringe thinker whose views suit their client's case. If I am wrong about this, accountants will know. Meanwhile, legal analysis seems to edge out accounting analysis.
I think I need to go back to watch the Monty Python sketch on accountancy.
:
#alexwitt #arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #donaldtrumpfraud #elibartov #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #kevinwallace #kristygreenberg #michielmccarty #trump #trumpfraud
:::
Associated Press
Appeals court reinstates gag order that barred Trump from maligning court staff in NY fraud trial
By JENNIFER PELTZ and MICHAEL R. SISAK
Updated 11:56 AM EST, November 30, 2023
https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-lawsuit-trial-gag-order-15304270ea3f61284a414f938155ae62
Justice 1
Scoundrel 0
Notice that, in the illustration, Tricky Don is wearing brown-face to cover up his pallid, ill-looking complexion.
:
#allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #trump
:::
MSNBC
‘Twisted logic’: Katyal shreds Trump as fraud receipts haunt him in trial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6ULss5tX2o
This is an excellent discussion and it is well worth the time it takes to watch it.
:
#allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #judgechutkan #judgetanyachutkan #katiephang #melissamurray #neilkatyal #tanyachutkan #trump
:::
ABC News
Nov 27, 1:53 PM EST
Threats against clerk are 'just part of the game,' said Trump lawyer
["Many a tear has to fall
But it's all in the game."
Billboard No. 1 Hit for Tommy Edwards]
Nov 27, 12:54 PM EST
Trump's lawyers disavow threats against judge, clerk
:
#alinahabba #allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #chriskise #christopherkise #cliffordrobert #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #trump
:::
Hallmark Presents:
A DONALD TRUMP THANKSGIVING
The Hill
Trump knocks prosecutor, ‘Radical Left Lunatics’ in Thanksgiving message
by Lauren Irwin - 11/23/23 9:14 AM ET
“Happy Thanksgiving to ALL, including the Racist & Incompetent Attorney General of New York State, Letitia ‘Peekaboo’ James, who has let Murder & Violence Crime FLOURISH, & Businesses FLEE; the Radical Left Trump Hating Judge, a ‘Psycho,’ Arthur Engoron, who Criminally Defrauded the State of New York, & ME, by purposely Valuing my Assets at a ‘tiny’ Fraction of what they are really worth in order to convict me of Fraud before even a Trial, or seeing any PROOF, & used his Politically Biased & Corrupt Campaign Finance Violator, Chief Clerk Alison Greenfield, to sit by his side on the ‘Bench’ & tell him what to do,” Trump said on his social media site.
Trump also targeted Biden, accusing him of weaponizing the “Department of Injustice” against his predecessor in the Oval Office, as well as “all of the other Radical Left Lunatics, Communists, Fascists, Marxists, Democrats, & RINOS, who are seriously looking to DESTROY OUR COUNTRY.”
“Have no fear, however, we will WIN the Presidential Election of 2024, & MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!” Trump concluded.
:
#allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #trump
:::
Newsweek
Letitia James Has Found 'Smoking Gun' Against Donald Trump—Attorney
Nov 23, 2023 at 12:24 PM EST
By Kate Plummer
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-civil-fraud-trial-documents-letitia-james-mary-1846388
:
#arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #donaldtrumpfraud #jeffreymcconney #joegallina #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #marytrump #trump #trumpfraud
:::
MAGA TERRORISM
CNN
Judge and clerk in Trump civil fraud trial have received hundreds of ‘serious and credible’ threats
By Kara Scannell, CNN
Published 4:36 PM EST, Wed November 22, 2023
https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/22/politics/trump-gag-order-threats-judge-clerk/index.html
All the while, appeals courts screw around.
Why isn't this called MAGA terrorism? It should be. MAGA is a domestic terrorist cult and it should be treated as such.
:
#allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #charleshollon #democrats #donaldtrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #trump
:::
Newsweek Via MSN
Donald Trump's Comments Could Land Him in Jail: Ex-White House Lawyer
Story by Ewan Palmer • 3h
This article includes a contrary opinion. The final three paragraphs contain a good statement of one of the main things that are wrong in these cases. Intended or not, it includes a possible remedy.
Personally, I think this citizen's arrest fantasy is plenty of reason for Trump being jailed for at least a day, with the threat of being jailed for the duration if he keeps it up. That is my proposal. Jail him for a day and then we'll see. I'm okay with there being an intermediate step, accompanied by a stern and very clear warning. It is time to put a stop to blasts from Trump's mouth and phone thumbing.
:
#allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #barbaramcquade #davearonberg #democrats #donaldtrump #letitiajames #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #trump #tycobb
:::
SUBPOENA-INDUCED MEMORY LOSS IN TRUMPS OF ALL AGES
YouTube Video
Ivanka Trump blows MAJOR opportunity in courtroom
Brian Tyler Cohen
2.39M subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8dHae7WeUI
:
#arthurengoron #briantylercohen #democrats #donaldtrump #glennkirschner #ivankatrump #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #trump
:::
Newsweek Via MSN
Trump Lawyer Objecting to Her Own Document Draws Mockery: 'Incompetent'
Story by Kate Plummer • 2h
:
#arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #ivankatrump #letitiajames #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #trump #trumpfraud
:::
A DUMBO TRUMP TWOFER
Huffpost
Lawrence O’Donnell Reveals The 1 Word From Trump That ‘Destroyed’ His Defense
The MSNBC host called it “the stupidest possible thing he could say” under oath.
By Ed Mazza
Nov 7, 2023, 02:10 AM EST
|Updated a day ago
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/lawrence-odonell-trump-defense_n_6549d6afe4b0e63c9dc0a842
The Wrap
MSNBC Guesses Trump Wasn’t Cross-Examined Because His Lawyers Wanted Him Off the Stand ASAP (Video)
“He’s not helping himself” with his civil fraud trial testimony, former U.S. attorney Chuck Rosenberg says
Sharon Knolle
November 6, 2023 @ 4:58 PM
https://www.thewrap.com/donald-trump-civil-fraud-trial-msnbc-chuck-rosenberg/
:
#arthurengoron #democrats #donaldtrump #donaldtrumpfraud #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #letitiajames #trump #trumpfraud #trumptrial
:::
Salon
“Crazy thing to say to a judge”: Experts stunned after judge explodes at Trump lawyer’s “misogyny”
Judge Engoron pounded the table and threatened to gag Trump's lawyers for taking a shot at his law clerk
By Igor Derysh
Senior News Editor
:
#alinahabba #allisongreenfield #arthurengoron #chriskise #christopherkise #colleenfaherty #democrats #donaldtrump #elizabethdelavega #georgeconway #joycevance #judgearthurengoron #judgeengoron #michaelcohen #trump
:::
Client Info
Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst