Dani Dayan, Westbank settler, was lid van de YESHA (= Judea, Samaria + Gaza) Council sinds 1999 en voorzitter vanaf 2007 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dani_Dayan#Political_career).
De #YESHAcouncil zegt recht te hebben op al het land "from the river to the sea" (meer over deze ultraZionisten in mijn volgende toot, en daarna een AI-rant).
Vandaag zag ik dat Dani Dayan in 2014 (na zijn ontslagname bij YESHA in 2013) een alternatief plan voor de door de VS voorgestelde #TweeStatenOplossing publiceerde in https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/343726 (nauwelijks te lezen zonder NoScript of AdBlocker).
In het kort: de hele Westbank zou Israëlisch grondgebied worden. Palestijnen zouden er mogen blijven wonen (en vooral werken), mits zij zich op geen enkele wijze zouden verzetten – te handhaven door meer IDF-soldaten in de regio.
In 2015 weigerde Brazilië hem als ambassadeur (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dani_Dayan#Diplomatic_career).
Momenteel is Dani Dayan voorzitter van de IHRA en van Yad Vashem, alsmede vice-voorzitter van Auschwitz. Daarmee is hij een belangrijke en invloedrijke bron van #Hasbara (lees bijv. zijn verklaring onderaan https://www.auschwitz.org/en/museum/auschwitz-council/).
Meer over meneer Dayan in https://todon.nl/@ErikvanStraten/115366940876615051 (Engelstalig).
#DaniDayanToICC #Apartheid #Zionisten #FrancescaAlbaneseIsRight #Gaza #Westbank #Racisme #Fascisme
![Uit https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/343726
A Courageous Plan: Peaceful Non-Reconciliation
There is now a vacuum which should be filled by a courageous Israeli initiative regarding the lives of Palestinian Arabs in Judea and Samaria.
Dani Dayan
Jun 9, 2014, 11:18 AM (GMT+3)
The collapse of the Kerry Plan presents Israel with a formidable challenge. It goes without saying that I myself never believed in nor subscribed to this type of policy, but one can’t deny the fact that it provided a horizon, albeit an illusionary one, for many Israelis and Palestinians, as well as for many in the international community.
However, the dismal failure of the American initiative brought home even to them the understanding that that this conflict has no political solution at this time. This “despair” has led to the realization that for the first time in decades, and certainly since the signing of the Oslo accords, there is no serious plan capable of producing results within a reasonable amount of time on the table. A vacuum of sorts has formed and this vacuum, contrary to the conventional 'right-wing' approach, is now problematic.
The vacuum should be filled by a courageous Israeli […]](https://files.mastodon.social/cache/media_attachments/files/115/464/270/829/409/856/original/103303305ad92fe9.jpg)
![Een fragment uit https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/343726
Of course, the plan must be implemented gradually and with caution, in reversible increments, with a constant eye on the ultimate goal – maximum normalization of life in Judea and Samaria. As I see it, the country's leaders, led by the Prime Minister and Defense Minister, must behave as if hanging before them is a permanent virtual banner asking, "What have we done today to enable the Palestinian Arabs to live in a more dignified manner?"
A basic condition for implementation of the plan is the introduction of a
[begin rood onderstrepen door mij]
"zero tolerance for violence” defense policy. Palestinian freedom of movement will not result in a reduction of Israeli military activity in Areas A and B. In fact, just the opposite might occur.
[einde onderstrepen]
It goes without saying that zero tolerance for violence means zero tolerance on both sides – the various “Price Tag” activities must be eradicated once and for all, and the sooner the better.
I realize that this plan will spark fierce criticism from certain quarters, and it is not difficult to guess what they will say. I feel no need to apologize. Neither side has a monopoly over human sensitivity or respect for human rights. My well-known position that posits that there should be no sovereignty between the Jordan and the Mediterranean other than Israeli sovereignty is not relevant to this plan. In fact, no political “end game” position is relevant.](https://files.mastodon.social/cache/media_attachments/files/115/464/270/866/559/437/original/3de015d769fc8579.jpeg)
