@lerxst @TheBreadmonkey no no. The problem was that as we delved deeper, we chose theories that were counter intuitive, because we fell for the popular narrative that universe is a bizar place. It is not. The only things bizar in our universe are the humans and their theories.

@lerxst @TheBreadmonkey ludwig, the problem nowadays seems to be that if you have two theories, the one you can understand and the other is bursting from its internal enigmatic contradictions, people choose the latter. Even if the former predicts and expleins better.

The litmus test for a physical theory seems to be that it must cause huge cognitive dissonance in order to be taken serious. I find that counter productive.

@TheBreadmonkey would it not be better to teach theories that one CAN understand?

I thought that perhaps ik could introduce myself with the first video i made on my book "Monkeys do not die as lizards".

https://www.schuttevaar.nl/natuurkunde/blog/2132109_bpo-theory-an-introduction

Message: physics can be made much simpler by introducing only a few basic new concepts.

I would be happy to hear your opinions.
#physics #quantum #standardmodel

@avlcharlie you could also jump up and down and you will see variations in the acceleration of the spaceship, due to the reaction forces caused by your accelerating and deaccelerating body.

@rk actually, for the sheet it would be sufficient to be infinitely thin. No need to be large.

Vandaag mijn account hier aangemaakt. Zijn er mensen die met mij van gedachten willen wisselen over de twee onderwerpen die mij het meest bezig houden:
- hoe de economische ongelijkheid terug te dringen.
- hoe we de natuurkunde een nieuwe theoretische basis kunnen geven.
???