@dbrgn Echter Alt-Text:

Publiziert auf: Tages-Anzeiger

Guten Tag

Vielen Dank für Ihren Kommentar. Leider müssen wir Ihnen jedoch mitteilen, dass Ihr Kommentar nicht veröffentlich werden kann. Um einen angenehmen, sachlichen und fairen Umgang miteinander zu gewährleisten, publizieren wir keine Beiträge, die sich im Ton vergreifen. Dazu gehört die Verwendung von polemischen und beleidigenden Ausdrücken. Ebenso persönliche Angriffe auf andere Diskussionsteilnehmer sowie Dritte oder auch ein grundsätzlicher Ton «unter der Gürtellinie». Als beleidigend gelten auch Verunstaltungen von Namen, entweder von anderen Diskussionsteilnehmern, aber auch von dritten Personen oder Einrichtungen.

Kommentartext:
“Ich habe mal für das Werbefrei-Zusatzabo beim Tagi bezahlt. Habe dann festgestellt, dass zwar die Werbeanzeige wegbleibt, nicht jedoch das Tracking. Unakzeptabel, dass meine Daten trotz Zusatzabo weiter verkauft werden. Jetzt bezahle ich das halt nicht mehr, und blockiere Werbung und Tracking auf Netzwerklevel.”

@sfwrtr If you want to use these in vim, you need to convert them as follows:

• | becomes \|
• (?: becomes \%(
• ) becomes \)
• \b at the beginning of a word becomes \<
• \b at the end of a word becomes \>

That is:

1. can\>\|can't\|can not\|could\>\|couldn't\|cannot\|shall\>\|shan't\|shall not\|should\>\|shouldn't\|should not\|would not\|\<would\>\|\<wouldn't\|with\>\|without\|\<were\>\|\<weren't\>\|neither\|\<either

2. write\>\|\<right\|lead\>\|\<led\>\|lede\|choose\|chose\|\<to\>\|\<too\>\|\<two\>\|\<it\>\|\<it's\>\|\<lay\>\|\<lie\|\<lain\|dye\|\<die\|\<dying\|\<loss\|loose\|losing\|loosing\|access\|assess\|accept\|except

3. ly\>\|\<about\>\|almost\|already\|barely\|\<bit\>\|begin\|\<began\>\|\can\|certain\|generally\|\<guess\|\<just\>\|kind\|\<like\|maybe\|mostly\|near\|course\|pretty\|perhaps\|possibly\|potentially\|really\|probably\|\<seem\|\<some\>\|sort\|start\|\<still\>\|surprisingly\|suppose\|\<think\>\|usually\|could\|\<saw\>\|\<heard\>\|\<felt\>\|\<knew\>\|\<read\>\|noticed\|recognized\|\<and\>\|\<but\>\|\%(I\|he\|she\) could \%(see\|hear\|taste\|touch\)\|\%(I\|he\|she\) \%(saw\|hear\|knew\|read\|felt\|noticed\|recognized\) that

Also, make sure hlsearch is on so all matches are highlighted visually.

#vim

@astra_underscore <insert Fjölnir meme>

@michaelvcooper1

I feel like you're twisting words to suit your argument, so I'd like to clarify a few things.

As far as I'm concerned, there is a difference between explaining something and expressing an opinion on something. (But in either case you should be at least passingly familiar with the topic at hand if you want to be taken seriously. There's your "qualifications".) You're seamlessly switching between calling it a man just trying to explain something, an online debate, and someone expressing an opinion. Those are not the same thing.

Explaining things at people (particularly things you know nothing about and your audience does) is patronizing in and of itself.

No one was anonymous.

Whittaker is not the CEO of Signal. (That would be Brian Acton, I believe.)

Why is it that you expect Whittaker to announce her qualifications just to reject something that has been asserted without any justification? Why isn't the onus on Mitchell to provide any evidence for his claims? (Or at least to check her profile to see who he's lecturing. In your words: Not hard.) Those were rhetorical questions; I don't expect an answer. Bye.

@michaelvcooper1 @tomwarren.co.uk

Did you know the name of the CEO of Signal, before this exchange went viral?

Not actively, but the name looked familiar, so I would've taken a second to look at their profile before replying.

Do you look up the credentials of every person you answer on social media?

Why was an answer necessary in this case?

Particularly this answer, which implied familiarity with or insider knowledge of Signal's business strategy ("... likely be timing up with Anthropic's Claude or Perplexity ...") and technical foundations ("... engineers have already began laying out the ground work ..."). Keep in mind, all this was stated as definite fact, not an opinion, speculation or rumor ("They will ... its coming").

And then that same dude doesn't even recognize the name of the person who has been the president of Signal and sitting on its board of directors since 2022.

So what exactly qualifies him to "explain" anything about Signal?

@sevepy Pro: powerful. Contra: syntactically bizarre, not compatible with any other tool/language.

@u0421793 @MyWoolyMastadon @sudorandom

hang on – what cereal, nobody’s mentioned a cereal yet, what on earth are you talking about.

Kevin has mentioned it, indirectly, in the Wikipedia link he gave you. It literally says: "John Draper discovered through his friendship with Engressia that the free whistles given out in Cap'n Crunch cereal boxes also produced a 2600 Hz tone when blown (providing his nickname, "Captain Crunch")."

As for when and where this happened, the very first sentence of the linked section states: "Phreaking began in the 1960s when it was discovered that certain whistles could replicate the 2600 Hz pitch used in phone signalling systems in the United States."

@SheDrivesMobility Link geht bei mir nicht (404). Der schon: https://www.emf-verlag.de/buecher/kinderbuecher/sachbuecher/komm-mit-in-die-welt-von-morgen/978-3-7459-2646-0

@u0421793 @sudorandom As for the "highly local scenario in some foreign country": Yes, the country in question being the USA.

@u0421793 @sudorandom Cool. Tell that to Bell and the FBI: https://www.counterpunch.org/2008/06/30/blind-whistling-phreaks-and-the-fbi-s-historical-reliance-on-phone-tap-criminality/

@michaelvcooper1 @tomwarren.co.uk What do you mean, "an anonymous person"? The name is right there: Meredith Whittaker.

No more embargoed security issues for libxml2: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/913

@beyondmachines1

@nordpirat Auch im Deutschen verständlich als "Fußgängergebiet"; hier ist allerdings die Bezeichnung "Fußgängerzone" üblicher.

@simontatham Another thing that's annoying to parse using traditional tools: here-documents.

Also related: "Ruby slippers" parsing, where the lexer synthesizes tokens based on what is currently acceptable to the parser. https://jeffreykegler.github.io/Ocean-of-Awareness-blog/individual/2011/11/marpa-and-the-ruby-slippers.html

“During World War II, New York was occupied by Nazi German forces from October 1941 until September 1943.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York,_Ukraine

@bjoern 🤷

@redmp For records? Pretty sure it's "always", yes. https://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/derived.html#:~:text=fields%20must%20be%20given

https://github.com/ubuntu/authd/security/advisories/GHSA-g8qw-mgjx-rwjr

When a user who hasn't logged in to the system before (i.e. doesn't exist in the authd user database) logs in via SSH, the user is considered a member of the root group in the context of the SSH session. That leads to a local privilege escalation if the user should not have root privileges.

Again I stand by what I said.

"I can't believe I even have to talk about these people. That's how ridiculous it s."

We have the equivalent of the scientologists running the field of AI with untold amounts of money and power and we're the ones who have to do point by point rebuttals of their eugenicists dreams.

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-commentary/billionaires-psychology-tech-politics-1235358129/