@ryan @realcaseyrollins Who call retarded to other/s is the true retarded.

@realcaseyrollins Oh, btw, Jesus was communist really, then, if you defend ‘right’=elitism, you are against Jesus ‘Christ’ of Nazaret.

@realcaseyrollins Because what you call “extreme leftism” does not exists at all.

@realcaseyrollins But if you want to continue talking about that, you need to compare what you define “left” with what is really “left”, and even if that terminology is really valid or not in politics.

@realcaseyrollins What I am saying is not only an statement, is an argument.

@realcaseyrollins Left is equitative, then left is never “far-left” because is never extremist.

@realcaseyrollins You are not responding nothing…and you are no giving only a clue that you have any argument that substantiate what you are writing here.

@realcaseyrollins Laughing = lack of arguments. Ok.

@midway @GrumpyRabbit @realcaseyrollins Yes, where far-left were not defined by them, then, far-left remains nonexistent

@realcaseyrollins You are who have a very low literacy rate, and even lower thinking rate. That you read something in a book doesn’t mean that that statement was valid or true.

@realcaseyrollins @GrumpyRabbit You remain saying nonsense non-arguments. No, Bluesky is not far left, because far left doesn’t exists. Left wing never is extremist because all extremism is in right-wing and far-right-wing that are all forms of elitism like nazism and fascism.

You have any arguments because you can’t say anything with minimum coherence if you believe in the existence of ‘far-left-wing’.

And your last question demonstrates your total fault of arguments of coherence.

@realcaseyrollins @GrumpyRabbit You have not argument against I said, and because of that you have not other resource that try to insult me (without success, i should say).

@realcaseyrollins @GrumpyRabbit Far left doesn’t exist. The only extremist group is far-right.

@realcaseyrollins @GrumpyRabbit You remain having no argument about what you are saying…

@GrumpyRabbit What you call “leftists” , generally are right when they talk. You not. And not: bluesky is not “leftist” even.

@GrumpyRabbit Sorry, but the only seditious here is the own Trump that is not respect the law. A lot of executives orders (almost all) go against constitutional precepts. In respect of electoral processes, that attempt of change electoral precepts ( even if that precepts were already enforced by constitution ) is really an attempt to end with constitution in an effort to get that president have powers over constitution that constitutes a clear conflict of interest.

And not: president has not that powers, and otherwise, not only your finantial block (US is not a country) is not a democracy (it never was it), but a dictatorship.

The person that needs to be condemned by all this violations of the law is POTS: Donald Trump.

@GrumpyRabbit In Anarchism are not specific rulers, because rules or common agreements about behaviour are done among all community, and even among communities, in a true articulation of all humanity.

@GrumpyRabbit Right wing doesn’t exists, really. There are only “elitism” (that is the real name of “right wing” and the description of fascism and nazism (there is no socialism in nazism), and “pro-equity” (here equity in the sense of equality of possibilities for all people).

Fascism and nazism are in the elitist wing of all, then is correct to say that nazism is totally antisocialist.

@GrumpyRabbit Said by yourself, that power is not of the president, it owns on entire congress , and not only on the president.

@GrumpyRabbit That is not seditious. Federal Judge is saying Trump has no electoral powers (like he has not) and that he is trying to simulate he is doing anything that he cannot do because constitution is doing by itself. Then, that executive order is totally invalid. The federal judge block is totally correct.