@typographica Add “New York” also to the list. There's no public information on who designed the new “New York”, other than ‘Apple team’.
Software Engineer, Typophile, among multitudes. Areas of interest & expertise include Typefaces, TeX, Metafont, OpenType shaping, Unicode, Indic scripts etc. Maintains many open-source Malayalam fonts at https://rachana.org.in.
@typographica Add “New York” also to the list. There's no public information on who designed the new “New York”, other than ‘Apple team’.
@khaled Ok, thanks.
Hi @khaled !
Is it correct that LuaTeX (with `Renderer=HarfBuzz`) doesn't yet work with COLRv1 fonts?
I've tested with LuaHBTeX 1.18.0 (TeXLive 2024) and it does show colours on COLRv0 fonts, but not on COLRv1.
@letterror @volkskrant that typeface looks very Gerrard Unger-ish... is it one?
@typographiesfr Thank you, I was deceived by the screenshots.
Now that I actually downloaded and checked the fonts; it indeed _has_ comprehensive set of symbols. Also very glad to see the fontspec and LaTeX style files; that makes using the fonts a breeze!
@typographiesfr Very nice typeface, and thank you for licensing it in OFL!
An observation: generally, Greek alphabets in math are italic; but in this font those are upright. Was it a specific design decision?
@simoncozens Thanks Simon.
So, in the reference example, ‘Format 10’ means ‘Paint Glyph’ and ‘Format 2’ means ‘Paint Solid color’, I reckon.
Anyone knows whether `fonttools`/`ufo2ft` support generating COLRv1? Any documentation available how the `lib.plist` should look like?
Is this the only available example? https://github.com/googlefonts/ufo2ft/blob/main/tests/data/COLRv1Test.ufo/lib.plist
The 46th International TeX Users Group conference (#TUG2025) will be held in Kerala, India during July 18–20; enjoying varied talks and a bit of Monsoon 🙂
Registrations are still open, conference talks can still be submitted, and the hotel booking closes May 31st. Register now!
@ri Very detailed, excellent documentation.
I shall point out a minor mistake: Fig. 7 uses 0D30 RA; but the explanation above it uses 0D31 RRA. It would be correct to use 0D30 in both cases.
Grammatically; both RA and RRA conjoins with the base character to form its reph form (ref. Kēraḷapāṇinīyam), but Unicode & OpenType consider only 0D30 RA for the conjoining form.
Self introduction
I'm Rajeesh, a software architect/computer programmer from Kerala, India.
Type aficionado, _very_ interested & experienced in OpenType layout, Unicode, TeX, Metafont and free/libre software. I maintain a lot of open source fonts for traditional Malayalam orthography at https://rachana.org.in.
I'm a KDE developer, Fedora packager, was part of HarfBuzz Indic testing team, improved FontForge a little, and contributes to many open source projects in free time; among others.