Rajeesh KV

Software Engineer, Typophile, among multitudes. Areas of interest & expertise include Typefaces, TeX, Metafont, OpenType shaping, Unicode, Indic scripts etc. Maintains many open-source Malayalam fonts at rachana.org.in.

2025-06-18

@typographica Add “New York” also to the list. There's no public information on who designed the new “New York”, other than ‘Apple team’.

2025-06-05

@khaled Ok, thanks.

2025-06-04

Hi @khaled !

Is it correct that LuaTeX (with `Renderer=HarfBuzz`) doesn't yet work with COLRv1 fonts?

I've tested with LuaHBTeX 1.18.0 (TeXLive 2024) and it does show colours on COLRv0 fonts, but not on COLRv1.

2025-05-27

@letterror @volkskrant that typeface looks very Gerrard Unger-ish... is it one?

2025-05-24

@typographiesfr Thank you, I was deceived by the screenshots.

Now that I actually downloaded and checked the fonts; it indeed _has_ comprehensive set of symbols. Also very glad to see the fontspec and LaTeX style files; that makes using the fonts a breeze!

2025-05-24

@typographiesfr Very nice typeface, and thank you for licensing it in OFL!

An observation: generally, Greek alphabets in math are italic; but in this font those are upright. Was it a specific design decision?

2025-05-17

@bbbourq @hdonker And their tiny card scanning machines run on Linux. I saw the Tux once when the machine was just booting 🐧

2025-05-15

@simoncozens Thanks Simon.

So, in the reference example, ‘Format 10’ means ‘Paint Glyph’ and ‘Format 2’ means ‘Paint Solid color’, I reckon.

2025-05-14

Anyone knows whether `fonttools`/`ufo2ft` support generating COLRv1? Any documentation available how the `lib.plist` should look like?

Is this the only available example? github.com/googlefonts/ufo2ft/

2025-05-07

The 46th International TeX Users Group conference (#TUG2025) will be held in Kerala, India during July 18–20; enjoying varied talks and a bit of Monsoon 🙂

Registrations are still open, conference talks can still be submitted, and the hotel booking closes May 31st. Register now!

tug.org/tug2025/

2025-04-17

@ri Very detailed, excellent documentation.

I shall point out a minor mistake: Fig. 7 uses 0D30 RA; but the explanation above it uses 0D31 RRA. It would be correct to use 0D30 in both cases.

Grammatically; both RA and RRA conjoins with the base character to form its reph form (ref. Kēraḷapāṇinīyam), but Unicode & OpenType consider only 0D30 RA for the conjoining form.

2025-04-16

Self introduction

I'm Rajeesh, a software architect/computer programmer from Kerala, India.

Type aficionado, _very_ interested & experienced in OpenType layout, Unicode, TeX, Metafont and free/libre software. I maintain a lot of open source fonts for traditional Malayalam orthography at rachana.org.in.

I'm a KDE developer, Fedora packager, was part of HarfBuzz Indic testing team, improved FontForge a little, and contributes to many open source projects in free time; among others.

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst