Okay, after the fifth conversation in the past month with a freelance journalist who had all the same questions and concerns, it's time for some facts which recommend against earnest and enterprising reporters going the traditional freelance route.
#1 (most important): If you are good at something, do not give it away for free. To put it differently, if you do give things away for free, give it all away for free. Don't try to straddle both.
#2 produce unique, valuable content that can't be found elsewhere that also adds to our understanding of the world.
If you freelance, chances are they will pay you a couple hundred bucks with the expectation that you will be overjoyed to have your story published in their pages. Congrats.
Nevermind that they haven't changed the rates they pay freelancers since 1992. But after you've done that a few times, please stop giving away your work so easily.
The main issue I have with journalists who reach out is that they have no sense of agency over the work they produce. They literally give their work away for nothing and then wonder why it's treated that way. It's as if their blood, sweat and tears only has value if it is reproduced in some reputable media organization. The truth is, most major media outlets positively subsist on this assumption.
Far too many people who have something worthwhile to say are content to outsource their research to places like Substack or Medium, without contemplating what they may be giving away in the process. There is no substitute for having your own place on the Internet that is uniquely yours.
There is zero substitute for staking out a domain that describes who you are and what you're about, and then dedicating much of that time you would have otherwise dedicated to pimping your Substack link or whatever.
This is likely the first of many posts on this thread. Thanks for reading.