vy

Tan lejos de Dios y tan cerca de Tejas.

vy boosted:
Jones Murphyjonesmurphy
2026-02-15

NAFTA did far less damage to the working class than the working class did itself. Look at what the working class mostly did prior to NAFTA. They switched into the GOP in anger and disgust at Civil Rights. Thus they voted for anti-worker labor law for decades before NAFTA. They voted against minimum wage. They left unions. The slashed taxes on billionaires & corps, concentrating wealth away from the working class. Then many are blaming NAFTA. That is bullshit.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@Geri @charlesdelavalleepoussin And does that mean I should let your fake history be unchallenged?

vyvy
2026-02-15

@Geri @charlesdelavalleepoussin 500 BCE is not well before Roman times and the appearance of the word in a work by a Greek of that time doesn't mean it was in wide use or certainly that it should be used for Cananite cities from a thousand years earlier.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@Geri @charlesdelavalleepoussin What "Contemporary summaries"?

Do you think people spoke english in the 5th century CE?

vyvy
2026-02-15

@Geri @charlesdelavalleepoussin Not everything that starts with "P" in transcription to latin alphabet is the same as "Palestine". In particular "Peleset" which, as far as I remember, means "Sea People" describes a wide group of related invaders of Egypt whose origins are not known.

As Wikipedia points out, there is a scholarly consensus.

In the early 2nd century CE, the Roman province called Judaea was renamed Syria Palaestina[a] following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–136 CE), the last of the major Jewish–Roman wars.[18][19] According to the prevailing scholarly view,[20] the name change was a punitive measure aimed at severing the symbolic and historical connection between the Jewish people and the land.[21][22][b][23]
vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri I am for historical accuracy in museum exhibitions. If that is weakness, so be it.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri The use of "Palestine" to describe parts of the Levant was in pre-Roman times is a European anachronism and is not accurate.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri What they said on their website is "UKLFI requested that the Museum review its collections and revise terminology so regions are referred to by historically accurate names such as Canaan, the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, or Judea, depending on the period being described." so they asked for that "scholarly" process. Is there something wrong with that? Is it accurate to use the European term "Palestine" for ancient Cannonite cities?

vyvy
2026-02-15

@HarriettMB @Geri This has nothing to do with religion but only with historical accuracy. "Palestine" was a Roman word for Judea. It had nothing to with with modern Palestinians and, in fact, European gentiles used to call Jews in Europe "Palestinians" until they murdered most of them.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri You have no idea why they made the decision, you're just making up a story that makes feel angry.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri You appear to represent a common trend for Europeans to believe that making up conspiracy stories about Jews relieves Europeans of blame for Colonialism and Holocaust.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri But the historical facts are that "Palestine" was a Roman name for the province that they conquered in the Jewish Wars and was imposed on Judea after the Roman genocide. Also, European gentiles called European Jews "Palestinians" after the middle ages. Trying to rewrite history is Orwellian.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@capnthommo @Geri The imposition of imperial names for conquered territories and the suppression of indigenous names - e.g. substituting "Palestine" for "Phillistine" is a common process, but that doesn't make it accurate.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@charlesdelavalleepoussin @Geri For Europeans, conspiracy stories about Jews are like putting on an old comfortable pair of shoes.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@HarriettMB @Geri
The word "Palestine" appears once in the King James translation of the Bible, but is not found in other translations. So you don't have to worry. It was a European (Roman) term.

vyvy
2026-02-15

@Geri Who made those complaints? People who object to fake history. The word "Palestine" was used by Roman (European) imperialists for what was left over after their genocide in Israel/Judea. There is no evidence of prior use.

vyvy
2026-02-15

The C11 specification from is so dreadful, so full of dumb ideas badly explained, as to shock the conscience

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst