@adamhsparks @benmarwick yes, we tried to add an extra step in the process for some of the submissions. We were not sure when in the process the data editors should act, before or concomitant to peer review. I think we tried different ways. The lack of understanding of what data we were expecting and the general lack of interest was a pattern. It was frustrating. I think the way is mandating data sharing but there is a general fear by publishers that submission rate will fall dramatically.