@athyHans@c.im @jhavok@mastodon.social @antonioserrata@masto.ai @_9CL7T9k8cjnD_@mastodon.social @lednabwm@mstdn.party @Willow@stranger.social I agree with you that not all (fill in the blank) are (unpleasant condition or tendency). I used the example I did because it was my assertion that the person I was exchanging ideas with was painting with too broad a brush. Not all Christians are whatever diabolical thing was being asserted. Had my interlocutor not been an atheist I would have used some different example. I suspect that you already know that, but I don't have a fancy word to describe that condition. I would agree that two wrongs don't make a right, that was never my contention. It is counterproductive to label people based on the broadest possible interpretation of what some person somewhere did at some time. That was my point. The Soviet regime in general was opposed to organized religion, that is no great stretch. I do not suspect atheists of being communist, or socialist, simply because they are atheist, and frankly I wouldn't be upset if they were.
People want to say that I am awful because I am a whatever, don't get overly exercised if I pick up some of your rocks and throw them back. Or just quit with the labels and be people.