#AAS244

2024-06-14

Goodbye #AAS244 and #MadisonWI.
I had fun and learned a lot. I also ate a lot of cheese.
See you all at #AAS245!

Statue of the University of Wisconsin–Madison badger mascot, in front of lake Mendota at sunset. There is a line of patchy clouds in the sky.
2024-06-13

The final plenary of the conference: Scanning the X-ray Sky for Dark Matter by Kerstin Perez, Columbia University.

What is dark matter? Is it a new kind of particle?

Looking for an anomalous signal, astroparticle physicists go out looking for dark matter, find something, and then astronomers tell them it's something else — it’s usually pulsars.

Using the annoying stray light in NuStar, you can search for signals of sterile neutrinos, a dark matter candidate. Only upper limits so far. #AAS244

The (challenge is crossed out) FUN of astroparticle searches!
Common challenge = minimize/constrain astrophysical background, maximize predicted dark matter signal.
No matter what, measuring something new about the universe!
A schematic graph shows flux vs energy. A blue line slopes downward. It is labeled "Background (choice of target, particle signature)". A red line is flat and then peaks to the left, above the blue line. It is labeled "Dark Matter annihilation". The distance above the blue line is labeled "σν, dark matter profile/density, boost factors, galactic/solar propagation...". This shows a signal from dark matter above the background.The sky as a laboratory
Three scenarios are depected.

1) Two dark matter particles collide in a box labeled "New (BSM) physics". It produces stable particles. Charged particles follow a circuitous path to us.
Choose particle signature with low or well-constrained predicted background, need precise modelling of cosmic-ray propagation, interaction cross sections, etc.

2) A dark matter particle enters a box labeled "New (BSM) physics". It produces a photon which goes in a straight line to us.
Choose observational target with high DM density (Galactic center, dwarf galaxies), low or well-constrained predicted astrophysical background.

3) Dark matter streams out of a star. It interacts with interstellar material/fields.
Uncertainties due to stellar model, inter- stellar material/fieldsAdapting NuSTAR as a large-aperture DM telescope.
• "0-bounce" photons that bypass the optics are typically a major background.
• Novel analysis exploits >10x increase in efficiency for slowly-varying, diffuse signa.l
Image of the full NuStar field of view with an orange shaded area that looks like a pacman. It has a 3.5 deg radius.
Image of the NuStar telescope, which looks a little like a dog bone, with the mirrors on one end, a long  mast, and the instruments on the other end. Arrow points to mirrors: "High-resolution, small field-of-view (0.05deg²), snapshots of the sky"Towards fully probing the sterile neutrino dark matter window?
Many points on a map of the sky.
"Full-sky" analyses: 332 (!) Ms of NuSTAR data + 547 (!!) Ms of XMM-Newton data
Foster et al. 2102.02207 (2021)
Roach et al. 2207.04572 (2023)
New! Krivonos et al. 2405.17861 (2024)
Graph showing possible mixing of neutrinos vs neutrino mass. Most of the area is shaded in, ruling out those areas.
Limits reach the edge of theoretical predictions of simplest models, leaving only a small room left to explore.
2024-06-13

Day 4 of #AAS244
Here is a video with a sped-up walkthrough of the Monona Terrace Conference Center and the exhibit hall.
youtu.be/hW-zCnvkpI4

2024-06-13

Jessie Thwaites: Preparations are underway to observe the expected nova in T CrB with IceCube. It's closer, in a better area of the sky for detector sensitivity, and has a short eruption, so they are optimistic they will see something.
#AAS244

Prospects for T CrB neutrino search.
Graph showing the sensitivity of the IceCube detectors vs change in time. A map of sky coordinates and the sensitivity of the detector. IceCube is more sensitive to T CrB than the nova RS Oph.Summary and looking forward
* Novae are an exciting potential transient neutrino source class
* Neutrinos from nearby Galactic novae are able to be probed by IceCube, to investigate hadronic particle acceleration in nova shocks.
* T Coronae Borealis is nearby, bright, and predicted to erupt any time now.
Photo of the IceCube building at the south pole during the Antarctic night, with the Milky Way and an aurora.
2024-06-13

First session: The Powerful Shocks in Novae V: Revisiting Novae with a Multi-messenger Approach

Kirill Sokolovsky: NuSTAR X-ray observations of classical novae show depleted iron (or maybe enhanced CNO elements). X-ray light curves don't have periodic changes in brightness like in visible light, suggesting X-rays are made further out.

Justin Vandenbroucke: Do novae produce neutrinos? Probably, but searches of IceCube Neutrino observatory data don't find anything, only upper limits. #AAS244

NuSTAR lightcurves and shock location
• Some variability on ~10 hour timescale
• No periodic modulation (orbital/WD rotation)
• No obvious correlation with optical
Shocked region is large compared to the binary?
Not directly related to optical - below the photosphere?Summary
• NuSTAR spectra of all detected novae look alike
• Consistent with single-temperature CNO-enriched plasma
• Heavily absorbed - shocks are deep within ejecta
• But no fast variability, so not too close to the WD
Lx/Ly <<1, defying explanationThe IceCube Neutrino Observatory
* Sensitive to neutrinos at MeV, GeV, TeV, PeV, EeV scales
* >99% up time
* Full sky (both hemispheres) capability
*  Better sensitivity in North than South (at TeV scale)
*  Bi-directional real-time observatory
Diagram of a spherical IceCube detector
Diagram of the full observatory showing a cut-away view of the ice top, through the Antarctic ice, down to the bedrock. The bedrock is 2820 m below the ice. There are 80 stings, arranged in a hexagon pattern that contain sensors. They go from the ice top to the bedrock.Neutrinos from novae?
• It is likely that all novae are gamma-ray sources
• The gamma-ray emission is likely hadronic
• Therefore, novae are likely neutrino sources
• And likely also cosmic-ray sources
• "I have enough faith in the hadronic model that [neutrinos are] a pretty sure bet." - Brian Metzger, March 6, 2020 email
• Protons colliding with photons or other protons produce pions
• Neutral pions decay to gamma rays
• Charged pions decay to neutrinos
• High-energy neutrinos are a smoking gun of high-energy hadrons
2024-06-13

And finally ending the day with this abomination — mac and cheese pizza. #AAS244

A pizza, but the only topping is macaroni and cheese.
2024-06-13

Next the RAS Gold Plenary Lecture: Challenges to the Cosmological Model, John Peacock, University of Edinburgh.

Do headlines about results that break the consensus Lambda CDM model of the Universe hold up?

"Maybe there is something wrong with cosmology. Ok, fine, but I’m not giving the medal back."

The Hubble tension — "Once upon a time this level of agreement would be considered miraculous."

Observational evidence prefers a Lambda CMD model with a slightly smaller matter density #AAS244

67 years to model the universe
1917: Slipher shows galaxies are redshifted on average
1922/4: Friedmann models
1932: Shapley & Ames find Superclustering
1965: Detection of CMB
1970s: Primordial deuterium low baryon density (Ω << 1)
1980: Inflation and a preference for flat models (Ω = 1)
1980: Reines 10-eV neutrino mass: Hot Dark Matter
1982: Peebles proposes CDM
1984: Calculations of CMB anisotropies in Lambda CDMThe Charge Sheet (problems with Lambda CDM)
(1) Large-scale streaming velocities
(2) Anomalous quasar dipoles
(3) Rings and other super-structures
(4) The H_{0} tension (direct expansion vs CMB extrapolation)
(5) The S_{8} tension (direct measurement of local matter inhomogeneity vs CMB extrapolation)A consistent lensing picture (2010.00466)
Total CMB lensing fits Planck:
Omega_{m} ^ 0.25 * sigma_{8} = 0.589 plus/minus  0.020
Local CMB lensing is also low:
Omega_{m} ^ 0.78 * sigma_{8} = 0.297 plus/minus 0.009
Lensing is consistent, and needs lower density than Planck:
Omega_{m} = 0.274 plus/minus 0.024
Omega_{m} = 0.296 sigma_{8} = 0.798
Formal combination with Planck just consistent with both constraints at 95%
Graph showing overlapping probability regions between lensing measurement at Planck measurement. The Plank measurements almost but do not quite overlap with the lensing measurements.Conclusions & outlook
• Cosmology has had ACDM as a standard model for ~ 40 years
- Has survived huge improvements in data precision ( Bayesian confidence)
- Current tensions do not point consistently to one new ingredient
- Quite unlike introduction of Lambda in 1990s
• ACDM model with 2m = 0.29, Ho = 69 seems best bet
• Still much to settle:
- Nature of DM
- Are there primordial gravitational waves?
- Were the initial fluctuations slightly non-Gaussian?
• But progress needs careful control of systematics in data and theory
2024-06-13

Next a panel with Historic Observatories: Current Activities and Potential for Education, Public Outreach, and Research, with representatives from the Washburn Observatory, Detroit Observatory, Lick Observatory, Lowell Observatory, Yerkes Observatory, and Alliance of Historic Observatories.

Where do historical observatories fit into a modern scientific context? Developing smaller instruments for larger telescopes. Testing new technology, making connections to industry and universities. #AAS244

ASTRAL College Consortium Astronomy/STEM Alliance with Lick Observatory
Map of the San Francisco Bay Area with colleges marked:
Santa Rosa JC
Sonoma State
San Francisco State
Las Positas College
City College of San Francisco
Foothill College
San Jose State
Evergreen Valley College
Hartnell CollegeRe-furbished research facilities:
Clark 24" refractor (2015)
Pluto Camera (A. Lawrence Lowell Telescope, 2017)
Outreach specific facilities:
Steele Visitor Center (built 1994)
• Giovale Open Deck Observatory (opened 2019)
Astronomy Discovery Center (opening November 2024)
Growth in interest and attendance has helped drive the updates in facilities. E.g. General admission at Lowell in 2023 was roughly 85,000 people.Research at Yerkes
For scientists
• In person and remote observing on 24" and 40" reflectors
• Test bed for instrumentation
• Science Residency
• Workshop and conference space
• Digitization of 180,000 historic glass plates is in progress
For students
• Hands-on training
• Summer research experiencesEducation & Outreach at Yerkes
• School visits
• Inquiry based, NGSS-inspired STEAM activities
• Exploring the history of astronomy through Yerkes' lens
Teacher professional development programming
• Curriculum development
• Astronomy education community of practice
Public open houses, observing events, tours, and upcoming accessible Play/Space
2024-06-13

Next: The STScI Town Hall

Hubble is transitioning to 1-gyro mode after issues with gyro 3. The probability that at least one gyro will be functional to 2030 is above 90%. Budget cuts from NASA will reduce the operations budget by about 10%, and the only way to cut costs is by reducing support for science instruments.

JWST is continuing to function well and is doing great science.
Roman data is so big that you will have to run analysis on the cloud science platform, not your laptop. #AAS244

Gyro operations
Installed 2009: 3 standard + 3 enhanced gyros
Enhanced gyros all operational - Gyro 3 has had transient stability issues
Probability > 90% at least 1 gyro through 2030.
Broad instantaneous field-of-regard in3- gyro mode (full-sky excluding solar exclusion zone)
Reduced gyro mode covers fraction of sky similar to JWST, but with no loss in science performance.
Scientific performance with either 1 or 2 gyros is the same as that with 3, and since 2021, we have only used 1 gyro for science exposures.
Diagram shows the area of the sky Hubble can observe. At top is the 3-gyro mode with only a zone around the Sun excluded. At bottom about half the graph is shaded, and has a slightly larger exclusion zone around the Sun. 
Graph shows probably of at lest gyro above 70% out to at least 2035.Hubble budget
Fiscal Year President's Budget Request (M$)
2024*: 98.3, 2025: 88.9, 2026: 87.5, 2027: 87.7, 2028: 83.0, 2029: 64.7.
*FY24 = Congressional budget appropriation

* 10% cut from current to FY25 request
- plus ongoing grant commitments set with past higher budgets
* Hubble staffing has decreased by >70% since SM2
* Majority of current staff (~70%) cover basic observatory operations incompressible
* Savings (while continuing to operate) can only be achieved by reducing support for science instruments
Graph shows total FTEs decreasing from around 800 in SM2 to around 300 today.JWST Science Instruments
All Near-IR instruments are operating nominally and producing excellent scientific results.
The MIRI instrument has experienced a loss of throughput at the longest wavelengths:
• The overall MIRI trend shows that the imager, as well as most MRS channels/bands, exhibit a settling behavior.
• The root cause remains under investigation
• The JWST pipeline accounts for this evolution in sensitivity
• The Cycle 4 ETC (available~ Aug 1) will estimate S/N at the end of Cycle 4. 
• Still producing excellent science
Spectrum showing neon gas in a proplanetary disk.
Graph showing the relative count rate for MIRI MRS is decreasing over time, especially in the reddest wavelghts, but starting to plateau.The structure of a cloud science platform, at a glance
Cloud-hosted environments that enable you to start remote Jupyterlab sessions in a browser.
Includes pre-installed software and tools for calibration, analysis, visualization, and training.
Diagram of the science platform.
Users on browsers connect to JupyterHub and JupyterLab Sessions. Feeding into the JupyterLab sessions are public science data, reference files, pre-installed software, persistent $HOME. It connects to MAST, PyPi, and GitHub.
2024-06-13

Next Plenary Lecture: When Data is Not Enough: Illustrating Astrophysics for the Public by Robert Hurt, Caltech/IPAC.

He discussed his career working on producing visualizations and illustrations to communicate science.

Art connects known facts, possibilities, and even known falsehoods (like relative scales), to give you visual context to understand scientific results. It can even form visual hypotheses with the available information (since you have to commit to something). #AAS244

My "AstroVizicist" Career
Visualization Scientist/Public Communications
2001-Present
Spitzer GALEX [NEO]WISE Herschel NuSTAR Kepler ZTF LIGO EHТ (+...)
Images from Spitzer, GALEX telescopes, plus illustrations of a disk around a star, the exoplanets and a black hole.Understanding Your Audience
Audences exist on a spectrum from: Education in Classrooms, which are Pre-Arranged and Facilitated, to Informal Ed in Planetariums/Museums, to Communications News/Social Media where you Compete for Attention.Symbols representing known facts, known falsehoods, and possibilities are connected by a brown blob which represents art.Illustration of an exoplanet system, where the planets and star look like marbles sitting in a shiny black surface. Near the star there is steam, in the middle is water which implies a habitable zone, and on the outside is ice. The star has an accurate color temperature, there is correct scaling of planets, and visual clues suggest tidal locking. There is also a square root scaling of the radii.
2024-06-13

Next was Creating the Story of Community in Astronomy: Multimedia Storytelling that Reflects, Honors, Includes, and Inspires, a panel discussion on storytelling.

The One Sky project brought together partners from across the world to tell a traditional astronomy story in an animated, full-dome video for planetariums.

My colleague Yesenia Pérez got to debut a rough cut of the video The Physics of Pō, that we have been working on with our Hawaiin partners from 'Imiloa. #AAS244

Maunakea Observatories, AAS,
AAS244 Madison | Meeting-in-a-Meeting
Community Models of Astronomy
Session 5: Creating the Story of Community in Astronomy: Multimedia Storytelling that Reflects, Honors, Includes and Inspires
June 12, 2024 | 10:00-11:30AMSpeakers: Ka'iu Kimura Director, 'Imiloa; Yesenia Pérez STScI; Kalā Baybayan Tanaka Navigator & Educator, Hui O Wa'a Kaulua, Polynesian Voyaging Society & 'Ohana Wa'a; and Nā'ālehu Anthony Palikū Documentary Films'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i, STSCI Space Telescope Science Institue, Kumulipo: Physics Of Pō.
2024-06-13

Day 3 of #AAS244
First Plenary of the day was: The Lives and Deaths of Star Clusters, and the Black Holes they Make along the Way by Carl Rodriguez, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

It's actually quite hard to create the 30-solar-ish black holes found by LIGO and Gaia with normal stars, but it might be possible in the dense environment of stellar clusters.

They simulate star clusters moving through their host galaxies to see if mergers can create black holes with the right mass.

Black Hole-Star Binaries
The radial velocity BHs are all in one globular cluster, NGC 3201, Giesers at al. (2018) MNRASL 475,15, Giesers at al. (2019) A&A 362, 3
The astrometric BHs are nearby (1 kpc) in the galactic field. El-Badry at al. (2023) MNRAS 518, 1057, El-Badry at al. (2023) MNRAS 521, 4323, Panuzzo at al. (2024)A&A in press
Giesers at al. (2018) Giesers at al. (2019) MNRASL 475,15 A&A 362, 3 2404.10486.Masses in the Stellar Graveyard
Diagram showing the pre-merger and post-merger events for black holes detected by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, plus the masses of black holes detected in X-ray binaries (EM black holes), Radial Velocity, Astrometric Gaia. The masses range from 2 to 100 solar masses.
Gaia BH3 is in a stream.Can we connect these scales?
Cosmological and galaxy simulations are getting to the point where they can resolve individual molecular clouds (or smaller!)
Can we connect the formation of star clusters across cosmic time to these surprising black holes?
Illustration with three different scales: a galaxy arrow pointing to a globular star cluster, arrow pointing to a star orbiting a black hole.Diagram showing the merger history for stars that could create Gaia BH1 and Gaia BH2.
In Gaia BH1 several stars in binary pairs interact, eventually leading to a 0.6 solar mass and 54 solar mass binary, which forms a common envelope and a 0.6 solar mass main sequence star and a 6.6 solar mass black hole.
In Gaia BH2 several stars in binary pairs interact, before ending up as a 1.2 solar mass star and a 8.1 solar mass black hole.
Work by Ugo Di Carlo.
2024-06-12

First talk of the day done -- now to write my Astro on Tap talk for tonight! #AAS244

2024-06-12

Hi everyone at #AAS244 -- swing by the Exhibitor Theater (in the Exhibit Hall, toward the back) at 10 AM today to hear @ThomasConnor talk about 25 Years of Science with NASA's Flagship X-ray Observatory.

The Chandra spacecraft illustrated in front of a cloudy space background with faint point sources glistening behind. In the bottom corner is the 25 Years of Chandra logo, a stylized numeral 2 and 5 inset in 4 concentric semicircles.
2024-06-12

Wienermobile sighting at #AAS244 in front of the capitol!

The Oscar Mayer Wiener-mobile outside of the Wisconsin State Capitol. The Wiener-mobile is an orange and yellow car shaped like a wiener on a yellow base, and the Capitol is a prominent white dome with lofty columns and a triumphant golden statue atop.
2024-06-12

Final Plenary Lecture: With a Wild Surmise: A New Era of Exoplanet Exploration, Tom Beatty, University of Wisconsin at Madison.

JWST is revolutionizing the field, allowing us to go beyond broad colors (Spitzer) or visible/near-IR spectra focused on water (Hubble). JWST can observe many more molecules, especially those with carbon and oxygen, and see features from clouds.

JWST can also see differences in the dawn and dust terminators of exoplanets like WASP-107 b. #AAS244

These observations give us different ways to look at atmospheres
Diagram shows a planet passing in front of its star — transmission. A graph, shows a bump, labeled "absorption feature.
Diagram shows a planet going behind its star — emission. A graph shows a dip, labeled "absorption feature".JWST's increased sensitivity and wavelength coverage is allowing us to measure the major C and O molecules in exoplanet atmospheres for the first time.
Plot showing transit depth (%) vs wavelength (in microns). The transit depth vaires from 2.10 to 2.30%. The wavelght ranges from 1 to 5 microns.
The data has several bumps. Below are shaded areas representing the contributions from Na, K, H2O, CO, SO2, and clouds. The larges bumps are from CO and CO2.WASP-107 shows limb-asymmetry that demonstrates both temperature and chemical changes from one side of the planet to the other.
Graph showing Transit Depth (ppm) vs wavelength in microns, which ranges from 2.5 to 11 microns. There are two lines made from data points with error bars. The orange points are from the evening side of the planet. They are higher on the left side of the graph and lower on the right side of the graph. The blue points are from the morning side of the planet. They are lower in the left side of the graph and higher on the right side of the graph.The next several years of JWST observations should be very exciting, and will give us answers to:
* Are there trends in the compositions of exoplanets, and how do these compare to their host stars?
* What determines the cloudiness of exoplanets? What are these clouds made from?
* How well can we measure spatial and temporal inhomogeneity on exoplanets? How much do things like limb-asymmetry affect "disk integrated" observations?
* What are the interiors of sub-Neptunes? Are they even a single class of objects?
* Can we detect biosignatures on non-Earth-like planets?
Logo of the Wisconsin Center for Origins Research
2024-06-12

Next Plenary Lecture: Leveraging AI to Transform the Astronomy Data Revolution into a Discovery Revolution, Cecilia Garraffo, CfA.

Their group builds AI models for large astronomical data sets. Their autoencoder uses physical parameters, not a "black box", to reduce the dimensionality of the data.

You need probabilistic models for exoplanets to tell what compositions fit the data within errors.

To apply models trained on synthetic data to real data, you can use transfer learning. #AAS244

Astro AI: Enabling Next Generation Astrophysics.
Diagram showing an AI Autoencoder. Data goes in. It passes through an encoder, through code, and then a decoder, which reconstructs the data.Astro AI: Enabling Next Generation Astrophysics.
A similar diagram to the autoencoder, data goes in, is parameterized, and then goes out. However, this time in the middle are physical parameters. Work by Ethan Tregidga.Astro AI: Enabling Next Generation Astrophysics. 
Similar diagram, data goes in, it is parameterized, the middle are parameters Radius of the star, effective temperature, H20, C02, CO, CH4 NH3, and the reconstruction comes out.
Work by Mayeul Aubin.Diagram showing transfer learning. MIST synthetic data goes into a model that does a task. This is transferred to a new model, this one has the input of D&H observed data, and also outputs a task.
2024-06-12

I managed to catch the last talk of the Laboratory Astrophysics Division III session - JWST Data Cubes of the Protostellar Jet HH 46, Patrick Hartigan.

The MIRI IFU data gives you a spectrum of every pixel, in this case, the center of the jets blown out by the binary protostars in HH46/47. Since you can also get the velocities of the gas from the spectra, you can map the gas in the blue-shifted lobe pointing toward us and the red-shifted lobe pointing away from us. #AAS244

Department of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
Patrick Hartigan
AAS 224 Madison June 11, 2024
JWST Datacubes of the Protostellar Jet HH 46
PROJECT
Overview paper: 2024, ApJ 967 168 Nisini et al.
Image of a dark cloud of gas and dust on a background of stars. A red jet erupts out of the cloud and end in a blue, semi-circle shock.Redshifted jet now visable to within 90 au of source. Image of a two-lobed jet that extends diagonally from the top left to the bottom right. A yellow rectangle outlines most of the jet. It is labeled MIRI Channel 4 FOV. A white rectangle is inside the yellow rectangle and outlines a smaller portion of the jet. It is labeled MIRI Channel 1 FOV.Kinematics of H2 Emission
At top are four images from blueshifted spectral lines. The left one is a dot in the center. The next three have an hourglass shape, with the top of the hourglass brighter. In the middle is a zero doppler shift image has an equally bright hourglass shape. On the bottom are four images from reshifted spectral lines. The left shows an equally bright hourglass shape, the next shows a similar shape that is brighter on the bottom, the next mostly shows the bottom of the hourglass, the last is mostly a dot in the center.A two-lobed jet hat extends diagonally from the top left to the bottom right. The top half is blue. The bottom half is orange.

[Fe II] 5.34 µm
Blue-300 km/s, -270 km/s, -240 km/s, -210 km/s
Cyan: -180 km/s, -150 km/s, -120 km/s, -90 km/s
Green: -60 km/s, -30 km/s, 0 km/s, 30 km/s, 60 km/s
Yellow: 90 km/s, 120 km/s, 150 km/s., 180 km/s
Red: 210 km/s, 240 km/s, 270 km/s, 300 km/s
2024-06-12

Macarena Garcia Marin gave an update on scientific highlights and data pipeline processing updates.

This included the farthest known galaxy from JADES, a secondary atmosphere on the exoplanet 55 Cancri e, the dusty "cat's tail" in the debris disk in Beta Pic, hydrocarbons in the protoplanetary disk ISO-ChaI 147, and observations of our solar system.

Pipeline corrections include a correction for "snowballs" in near-IR detectors, 1/f noise in NIRSpec, and fringes in MIRI MRS. #AAS244

Macarena Garcia Marin stands at a lectern and speaks in front of a seated crowd. To the right is a slide showing the furthest known galaxy from JADES, a photo of the JADES field with, an image of the red, blobby galaxy, and a spectrum showing a clear balmer break. The lectern says "Monona Terrace" in an art deco font. The backdrop features the American Astronomical Society logo.Macarena Garcia Marin stands at a lectern and speaks in front of a seated crowd. To the right is a slide showing a red and white starfield before and after the correction of "snowballs". The lectern says "Monona Terrace" in an art deco font. The backdrop features the American Astronomical Society logo.

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst