Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating

Scott Douglas Jacobsen
In-Sight Publishing, Fort Langley, British Columbia, Canada

Correspondence: Scott Douglas Jacobsen (Email: scott.jacobsen2025@gmail.com)

Received: January 13, 2025
Accepted: N/A
Published: January 22, 2025

Abstract

This interview offers a comprehensive exploration of Andrea McGinty’s expertise in matchmaking, online dating, and empowering mature singles. Conducted on January 22, 2025, the conversation delves into Andrea’s personal journey from traditional matchmaking to the digital realm, highlighting the founding of It’s Just Lunch and its evolution into 33000Dates.com. Andrea discusses the challenges and opportunities presented by the online dating landscape, emphasizing the importance of platform selection, profile optimization, and effective communication strategies. The dialogue addresses common pitfalls in online dating, such as poor photo selection and ineffective messaging, while providing tailored strategies for mature daters to navigate technological barriers and past relationship apprehensions. Additionally, Andrea emphasizes safety measures essential for secure online interactions and examines current trends, including the increasing adoption of online dating among older demographics and advancements in AI-driven verification technologies. The interview also touches upon Andrea’s media experiences and the lessons learned from high-profile appearances, underscoring the significance of authenticity and expertise in building trust. Overall, the conversation underscores the necessity for personalized coaching and quality-focused approaches to foster meaningful connections in the digital age, particularly for mature singles seeking lasting relationships.

Keywords: AI in Dating, 33000Dates.com, Digital Matchmaking, It’s Just Lunch, Matchmaking, Mature Singles, Online Dating, Online Dating Safety, Profile Optimization, Senior Dating Strategies

Introduction

In this insightful interview conducted on January 22, 2025, Scott Douglas Jacobsen engages in an in-depth conversation with Andrea McGinty, a renowned American dating coach and entrepreneur known for her significant contributions to the matchmaking and online dating industries. Andrea McGinty is the founder of It’s Just Lunch, established in 1990, which rapidly expanded to 110 locations worldwide and successfully facilitated over 33,000 dates leading to more than 10,000 marriages. Recognizing the transformative impact of digital platforms on dating dynamics, Andrea transitioned to the online space eight years ago by launching 33000Dates.com, thereby addressing the evolving needs of modern daters. The interview begins with Andrea’s personal narrative, detailing her entry into the matchmaking field following a pivotal personal experience of being stood up at the altar in her twenties. This event spurred her to investigate the intricacies of how individuals meet and connect, ultimately identifying a market gap for personalized matchmaking services. Andrea elaborates on the expansion and success of It’s Just Lunch, emphasizing the importance of tailored matchmaking in fostering meaningful relationships.

As the conversation progresses, Andrea discusses the shift from traditional matchmaking to online dating, highlighting the complexities introduced by the vast array of digital platforms. She offers valuable insights into avoiding common online dating mistakes, such as selecting inappropriate platforms, using subpar photos, and engaging in ineffective messaging practices. Andrea underscores the necessity of aligning platform choice with one’s demographic and geographic context to enhance the likelihood of successful connections. A significant portion of the interview is dedicated to addressing the unique challenges faced by mature singles over the age of 50. Andrea provides strategic advice on building self-confidence, crafting compelling profiles, and implementing robust safety measures to ensure secure and positive online dating experiences. She emphasizes the importance of professional photography and effective communication in creating impactful first impressions and fostering genuine connections.

Furthermore, Andrea explores current trends in the online dating landscape, noting the increasing acceptance and utilization of digital matchmaking among older demographics. She discusses the role of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and verification processes, in enhancing the safety and efficacy of online dating platforms. Andrea also shares her experiences with media exposure, including appearances on The Oprah Winfrey Show and features in People Magazine, highlighting how authenticity and expertise have been pivotal in building her brand’s credibility and trustworthiness. This interview provides valuable insights into Andrea McGinty’s strategic approach to matchmaking and online dating, particularly for mature singles seeking meaningful relationships. Her blend of traditional matchmaking principles with modern digital strategies offers a nuanced perspective on navigating the complexities of contemporary dating. Andrea’s expertise underscores the importance of personalized coaching, quality-focused profiles, and robust safety measures in fostering successful and secure online dating experiences.

Main Text (Interview)

Interviewer: Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Interviewee: Andrea McGinty

Section 1: Personal Journey into Sexuality Research

Andrea McGinty is a renowned American dating coach, entrepreneur, and author with over 30 years of experience in the dating industry. She founded It’s Just Lunch in 1990, a matchmaking service that grew to 110 locations worldwide, and later launched 33000Dates.com, a platform helping singles navigate online dating with tailored coaching, profile writing, and site selection. Featured on Oprah, Forbes, and People Magazine, McGinty has facilitated over 33,000 dates, leading to thousands of marriages. Author of 2nd Acts: 166 Winning Strategies for Dating Over 50, she is a trusted voice for mature singles embracing the complexities of modern dating. McGinty shared her journey from heartbreak to becoming a matchmaking entrepreneur, creating a business with 110 worldwide locations and arranging over 33,000 dates leading to 10,000+ marriages. She transitioned to coaching online daters, highlighting common pitfalls like poor photos, endless messaging, and platform misalignment. McGinty emphasized self-confidence, actionable first steps, and safety in online dating. Discussing her experiences with Oprah Winfrey and People Magazine, she reflected on the importance of authenticity and standing firm on her expertise. McGinty’s approach blends technology, human connection, and strategic advice, particularly for those over 40 embracing digital dating.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: Today, we’re here with Andrea McGinty. We will discuss 33000Dates.com and her first foray into dating,  It’s Just Lunch, particularly matchmaking services through that platform, the modern-day dating landscape, and related topics. How did you first become interested in matchmaking? In some ways, it’s a highly researched field. In other ways, it’s very diverse. However, it’s not always the first career choice for many people.

Andrea McGinty: Yes, it was not a career I dreamed of pursuing when I was five or ten. Here’s how I got into it: I was living in Chicago in my twenties and preparing to get married. On the wedding day, my fiancé stood me up at the altar. Suddenly, I was single.

Section 2: Founding It’s Just Lunch and Business Growth

So, there I was, in my twenties, living in Chicago. After getting through the emotional fallout—the weeping, crying, and all that—I asked myself, “How do people meet each other?” At the time, bars were still somewhat fun, but I was moving past that phase. I wondered, “Why isn’t there a place for this?” Remember, this was the early 1990s. Before Google, people were widely using the internet. I thought, “Why isn’t there a service like an executive recruiter for your personal life?”

That’s how I came up with the idea for It’s Just Lunch. I had landed alone, single, but ironically, I was naturally good at matchmaking. One of my friends from high school, whom I matched, is still married, as are two of my friends from college. However, I never thought of it as a career path. I studied finance and accounting in college and assumed that would be my career. But when I realized that a matchmaking service didn’t exist, I thought, “What if I started this?” If it were something I would use, others would as well.

The concept behind It’s Just lunch was simple: meeting for lunch or a drink after work, with someone arranging the date for you. There would be no prior interaction; you would arrive at a restaurant we told you to visit. The idea took off like wildfire. Over the next ten years, the business grew to 110 locations worldwide.

This idea stemmed from a personal need—something I thought I would use if it existed. I lived the experience firsthand; it wasn’t just some random concept. Matchmaking became a fun and fulfilling business. Matchmaking is what we do, and it still exists. I sold the business about eight years ago to private equity, and it’s still thriving.

I sold the company for two reasons. First, I was approached by two parties—one was a private equity firm, and the other was Match.com. I was married and had a baby then, so I thought it was a good time to sell. 

Section 3: Transitioning to Online Dating and 33000Dates.com

The primary reason was that around 2010, I saw the writing on the wall regarding online dating. It was becoming more prominent, but it was also chaotic. People didn’t know how to use it effectively.  However, unlike matchmaking where you’d have a pool of maybe 100 people, online dating had thousands of choices—and I thought, I have to teach people how to harness the power of online dating for love!

If you look back to the early 2000s or even 2010, online dating was still in its infancy. Scams were prevalent, and people often misrepresented themselves. Of course, some of these issues persist to this day.   But many are legitimate and credible now.

McGinty: I was thinking to myself, this is the way of the future. With matchmaking, only a certain number of people are in your pool. Still, with online dating, the pool is huge—astronomical. That’s how online dating started for me and how 33000Dates.com came to be. The name 33000 Dates reflects how many dates I’ve set up—over 33,000. I’ve also been responsible for more than 10,000 marriages.

I married during the It’s Just Lunch days and was married 24 years before we divorced. This plays into my story—it was the genesis and catalyst for writing my book, 2nd Acts: Winning Dating Strategies for Dating Over 50, which was released January 15, 2025. I realized people needed help. I first noticed this when I had clients at It’s Just Lunch who used the matchmaking service and online dating.

After I sold It’s Just Lunch, my brother’s best friend was one of the first people to come to me for help. He was in his late 40s, recently divorced, and a good-looking guy. We stayed friends with him and his ex-wife even after the divorce. He said, “Andrea, I’m doing online dating, and it’s awful.” He shared his stories, and I thought, “Wait, this is a good-looking guy; he’s the CFO of a company, and he’s struggling?”

Section 4: Common Online Dating Mistakes

So, I asked him for his password to the dating site he was using and took a look. I was shocked. Men, in general, tend to make similar mistakes—although they’ve improved somewhat over the years. He had posted terrible photos and had no real profile to speak of. No wonder he wasn’t attracting the right matches!

I went in, changed his photos, and rewrote his profile, and within weeks, he was getting good dates. That’s how 33,000 Dates started—through word of mouth. Now, I primarily help people with online dating. Over 1,400 dating sites and apps exist in the U.S. and Canada alone. People often don’t know where to start or how to choose the right one.

Jacobsen: What are some universal mistakes people make on their profiles? I’m curious because you’ve seen many of these up close. I’m sure you get inundated with requests like, “Fix my profile!”

McGinty: Yes, I get a lot of “Fix me” requests—not just profiles but everything related to dating. The biggest issues I see are:

1. Choosing the Wrong Platform: There are 1,400 dating sites and apps, and most people have no idea where to start. In my 20s, I focused on the 20s and 30s crowd with It’s Just lunch. Now, I focus more on the 40s and 50s plus demographic. This group didn’t grow up with tech like younger generations so that the process can feel intimidating. Many are coming out of long-term marriages and never expected to be dating again. For example, someone might hear from a friend in New York that Bumble is fantastic. Then, they might try Bumble in Chicago, where it might not have as strong a platform. What works in one market often doesn’t work as effectively in another.
2. Poor Photos: This is a major issue. I’m very particular about photos—I even call myself a “photo Nazi.” After I do a Zoom call and interview with clients, I have them send me their photos. Around 70% of the time, I send them to a professional photographer. People underestimate the importance of good photos. First impressions matter much in online dating, and subpar pictures can immediately turn potential matches away.

Jacobsen: Wow.

McGinty: I don’t mean LinkedIn-style photos or overly posed portraits. I’m talking about photos that reflect what you do—action shots. Let’s capture those moments if you play golf, tennis, pickleball, or enjoy hiking. I had a woman yesterday who competes in outrigger canoe races. I told her, “I want a photo of you in the outrigger.” A picture paints a thousand words. We want good, current, action-oriented photos.

We also want photos showing you with other people—pictures demonstrating you’re social, you have a life, and you’re not solitary and lonely. The number one mistake people make is that they don’t know where to start. The second is their photos.

Section 5: Enhancing Profiles and Messaging Strategies

Online dating is a visual medium. You’re already at a disadvantage if you don’t have good photos. I don’t mean heavily photoshopped images where you look like a cartoon or use AI filters. I’m talking about genuine, high-quality photos. These create enough interest for someone to read your profile.

There’s a big difference between men and women regarding online dating. Men typically won’t read much—they’ll look at the photos, skim two or three lines of the profile, and that’s it. On the other hand, women often want to write novels about themselves. Their profiles continue, and I have to say, “No, no, no.”

We’ll write six bullet points about you and a short paragraph. Men’s content—whether in magazines or blogs—is often concise, bullet-pointed, or numbered. It’s straight to the point: “Boom, boom, boom—here’s who this person is.”

Jacobsen: What are other common mistakes people make?

McGinty: Oh, my gosh, one of the biggest mistakes is messaging. People get stuck in endless messaging back and forth. Worse, they move to phone calls without ever meeting in person.

For example, a male client said, “Yes, I talked to her the other night. We spoke for an hour.” I asked, “So when’s the date?” He replied, “Oh, we’re talking again tonight.” I said, “About what? You need to meet her!”

Keep it brief if you must make a phone call—and I’m not a big advocate of phone calls. I prefer one or two messages exchanged online, and then I suggest meeting in person. Arrange to meet in a safe, neutral venue: a restaurant for a drink, lunch, coffee, or even a walk or hike. There’s no need for endless messaging or lengthy phone calls.

Phone calls can also create unrealistic expectations. For instance, the client I mentioned told me, “Andrea, she’s fantastic. I’ve already told my golf buddies about her, and we’re having another call tonight.” When he meets her, his expectations are sky-high. He’s convinced she’s “the one.”

Conversely, the opposite can happen. A phone call might fall flat because one or both parties aren’t great on the phone. If they had met in person, they might have clicked. That’s why I advocate for meeting in real life.

Section 6: Age-Specific Dating Strategies and Confidence Building

The only exception I make for phone calls is when someone lives far away—maybe an hour or more. In that case, I recommend a brief 10-minute call with clear boundaries. You can say in a message, “I’d like to meet you. Let’s do a 10-minute call to see if we’d like to meet in person.” This approach sets expectations and avoids aimless, rambling phone conversations.

Jacobsen: That makes sense.

McGinty: Good. Boundaries and action are key.

Jacobsen: And how does this approach to the style of presentation change for someone in their 40s versus someone in their 70s? I’m assuming it differs not only by gender but also by age, as people approach these apps and services differently.

McGinty: It does. It’s a different story once you get to people in their 60s, especially women. First, they didn’t grow up with this technology. Second, I often have to push back on this point with clients. Women say, “I was online and didn’t meet anyone.”

I’ll ask, “How many messages did you send?”

They’ll respond, “Oh, none.”

Then I asked, “Why didn’t you send any messages?”

They’ll reply, “Well, he should contact me first.”

I tell them, “No, no, no! It doesn’t work like that anymore.” Self-confidence is sexy. Men in their 60s and 70s find it incredibly attractive when a woman takes the initiative. For example, if she sends a message saying, “Wow, I saw your photo of you scuba diving. I once went scuba diving in XYZ and am interested in getting to know you. I’m available for lunch on Thursday or Friday at 12 or 1. What do you think?”

That’s when you start getting dates. It’s not pushy at all. When I coach clients, especially in the beginning, I’ll even type messages for them and read them aloud. Their reaction is often, “We’re sending that? He’s going to think I’m forward!”

And I’ll respond, “No, he’s going to think you’re self-confident.” That’s the kind of energy that works.

Self confidence is so sexy to men!

Section 7: Navigating Generational Differences and Building Trust

When people wonder why they’re not getting dates or messages back, it often comes down to the women only sending hearts, likes, smiles, or winks. As for the men, I feel for them—half of my clients are men. They’ll say, “Andrea, look at my likes column! I have 12 women who liked me.” But all these women did was wink or send a heart without any message.

That leaves the ball in the man’s court, forcing him to do all the work. There’s a generational difference here. When I work with people in their 40s or 50s, women are generally fine with reaching out, and men are comfortable reaching out to women. But it’s a different story in the 60s and 70s age group.

It’s about re-educating them, helping them overcome the fear of online dating, and addressing concerns like, “My picture is going to be out there.” I remind them, “Your picture is already out there! You’re on Facebook.” That age group uses Facebook frequently, while younger people are on Instagram or other platforms.

I tell them, “If you’re already on social media, what’s the difference? Your picture is already visible.” It’s about making them comfortable putting themselves out there and understanding that online dating is a 50/50 effort. Both parties need to contribute.

Jacobsen: What about quick safety tips? These are very rational and reasonable concerns, like meeting someone in an open, safe place for the first date.

McGinty: Absolutely. Safety is a priority, especially for first dates.

Section 8: Ensuring Safety and Addressing Online Dating Trends

McGinty: You don’t want someone to pick you up at your home. That doesn’t make sense. You’re going to meet someone at a safe venue.

Many of the dating sites I work with now—there are so many of them, but I tend to focus on the top 25 to 50 sites—have good verification procedures. For example, before you can even access some platforms, you must take a real-time photo matching the photos you’re posting to ensure it’s you.

Additionally, there are other ways to verify someone’s identity. For instance, you can take someone’s photo from their profile and put it into Google’s reverse image search, which might provide more information, such as their last name.

Some clients even dig deeper, checking whether a person has ever had a bankruptcy, liens on their home, or similar details. The process has become much cleaner and safer in the last five to ten years than it used to be.

Jacobsen: Where do you see these trends going now? Are there new concerns? Are there new hopes—perhaps a “Star Wars” theme?

McGinty: Yes. There’s been some press lately about people in their 20s stepping away from online dating—they’re not using it as much. In contrast, the 40- to 65-year-old market is finally embracing it.

One big trend is the increasing adoption of online dating by this older age group. They’re moving away from traditional options like matchmaking or speed dating and leaning into online platforms.

Another significant trend is the growth of umbrella platforms like Match.com, which owns around 25 different sites, or Dating.com, which operates multiple platforms under one umbrella. These companies are actively pursuing the older demographic because it’s more affluent.

Unlike younger users, who often won’t pay for premium features, the 45——to 65-year-old group doesn’t hesitate to pay $50 or more per month for an online dating subscription. They understand that paying adds value—it helps filter out people who aren’t serious or who might just be browsing.

Section 9: The Role of Verification and Media Exposure

When clients ask me about Facebook Dating, I explain that Facebook has an advantage because it has so much data on the 40——to 65—year—old demographic—they’ve been using Facebook for over a decade. The platform can refine matches by geography, demographics, and other factors.

However, Facebook Dating’s downside is that it’s free. If Facebook started charging for the service, it could filter out casual users and create a more serious pool of daters. As it stands, I can’t think of a single success story from a client who met someone on Facebook Dating. All the success stories I’ve had come from paid sites.

Jacobsen: Does combining verification processes and paid services help prevent scams and other issues?

McGinty: Yes. Verification processes—like requiring real-time photo matching—and charging for access serve as effective barriers. They significantly reduce the risk of scams and ensure that the people on these platforms are more serious about dating.

These features address some of the problems prevalent in the earlier days of online dating, such as fake profiles and dishonest users. The combination of paying for access and strong verification procedures creates a safer and more reliable experience for everyone involved.

That old Nigerian prince scam—you may not even remember this—that was prevalent on free dating sites. Those kinds of scams were everywhere. However, paid sites eliminate most scammers because they’re unwilling to pay $50 or more, sometimes even $100 or $150 monthly, to carry out their schemes.

Additionally, the algorithms on these sites are now very advanced and effective at detecting and removing bots. Bots that attempt to infiltrate and run scams are usually caught quickly. AI has also made a significant difference in identifying and eliminating these threats.

Section 10: Lessons from Media Appearances and Final Insights

Jacobsen: That’s a problem. What was your big lesson from appearing on Oprah Winfrey’s show and being featured in People magazine?

McGinty: My big lesson? Oh, from Oprah? Well, Oprah was incredible. My website crashed after I was featured on her show.

Jacobsen: She has a very dedicated fan base, for sure.

McGinty: Yes, oh my gosh. When I did The Oprah Winfrey Show, it was a three-day process. They sent a producer to work with me, and they followed and filmed a couple going out to lunch. Then we were all with Oprah two days later, talking on her show. The couple discussed their date, and I discussed dating and how it all worked. The segment I was featured in was titled Quirky Ways People Became Millionaires.

It included me, the woman who founded Build-A-Bear, the man who invented Dippin’ Dots, and a few others I can’t remember. Right before you’re about to go on, their legal team comes into the green room with a stack of documents for each of you to sign.

They say, “If you don’t sign this, you’re not going on the show.” You’re given no time to read the documents. Of course, you want to go on the show—you’ve already spent two days filming your segment in a restaurant. That shocked me, but everyone signed, including me.

Then they add, “By the way, not all of you will make it on the show. We always overbook.” I thought, “Wait, I’ve invested all this time with them following this couple, and now I might not make it?”

When the show started, Oprah introduced the segment, saying, “Today we’ve got the Build-A-Bear lady…” Then she said, “And we’ve got Andrea McGinty, who’s had over 10,000 marriages.” That’s when I knew I made it—I was so relieved.

With People Magazine, the lesson I learned was that it’s not worth asking clients to participate unless it’s a significant publication. In the 1990s, it wasn’t easy to convince clients to have their photos taken and go on a date while being followed by a magazine for five hours. Privacy concerns made it challenging, so I decided it had to be worth the effort, like a big feature in People Magazine.

Jacobsen: Interesting. What was the lesson you took away from Oprah?

McGinty: The lesson from Oprah was about sticking to what you know. I said no to Oprah three times before I said yes. I was very picky about the segment I wanted to do with her.

The first couple of times her producers approached me, they wanted me to fix up Gayle King, Oprah’s best friend, on dates and then report back. I declined because that’s not what I do. I stuck to my expertise, and in the end, I got to be part of a great episode—the Quirky Ways People Became Millionaires segment.

Discussion

The interview between Scott Douglas Jacobsen and Andrea McGinty offers a comprehensive exploration of the evolution of the dating industry, particularly emphasizing the shift from traditional matchmaking services to modern online dating platforms. Andrea McGinty’s journey from founding It’s Just Lunch to launching 33000Dates.com highlights her ability to adapt to changing societal norms and technological advancements. A significant theme in the discussion is the importance of high-quality profiles and authentic presentation in online dating. McGinty identifies common pitfalls such as poor photo quality and ineffective profile writing, which can hinder successful matches. Her strategies for enhancing client profiles—through professional photography and concise, action-oriented descriptions—underscore the critical role of first impressions in digital interactions.

Another key aspect of the interview focuses on the unique challenges faced by mature singles, particularly those over 40, in navigating the online dating landscape. McGinty emphasizes the necessity of tailored coaching to address technological intimidation and rebuilding self-confidence after long-term relationships or divorces. Additionally, the conversation delves into the significance of safety and verification in online dating, advocating for robust processes to mitigate risks associated with digital interactions. McGinty’s insights into the effectiveness of paid dating platforms in reducing scams and fostering a more serious dating environment reflect broader industry trends towards enhancing user security and trust. Overall, the interview underscores the multifaceted nature of modern dating, where technology, personal branding, and strategic coaching intersect to create effective matchmaking solutions.

Methods

The interview with Andrea McGinty was conducted on January 13, 2025, and subsequently compiled on January 22, 2025. A semi-structured interview format was employed to facilitate an in-depth and flexible conversation, allowing both the interviewer, Scott Douglas Jacobsen, and the interviewee, Andrea McGinty, to explore a wide range of topics related to the dating industry. This approach enabled the discussion to flow naturally while ensuring that key areas of interest, such as the founding of It’s Just Lunch, the transition to online dating with 33000Dates.com, and strategies for enhancing online profiles, were thoroughly examined. Prior to the interview, a set of guiding questions was agreed upon to elicit detailed responses about McGinty’s professional journey, business evolution, and her insights into current and future trends in dating services. The interview was conducted virtually via a secure video conferencing platform to ensure convenience and accessibility for both participants. With mutual consent, the session was recorded to capture the nuances of the conversation accurately. Following the interview, the recording was meticulously transcribed verbatim and organized into thematic sections, each corresponding to distinct topics discussed. This methodological approach ensured clarity and coherence, allowing readers to navigate the complex subjects seamlessly and gain a comprehensive understanding of Andrea McGinty’s expertise and contributions to the dating industry.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current article. All interview content remains the intellectual property of the interviewer and interviewee.

References

(No external academic sources were cited for this interview.)

Journal & Article Details

• Publisher: In-Sight Publishing
• Publisher Founding: March 1, 2014
• Web Domain: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com
• Location: Fort Langley, Township of Langley, British Columbia, Canada
• Journal: In-Sight: Interviews
• Journal Founding: August 2, 2012
• Frequency: Four Times Per Year
• Review Status: Non-Peer-Reviewed
• Access: Electronic/Digital & Open Access
• Fees: None (Free)
• Volume Numbering: 13
• Issue Numbering: 2
• Section: A
• Theme Type: Idea
• Theme Premise: “Outliers and Outsiders”
• Theme Part: 33
• Formal Sub-Theme: None
• Individual Publication Date: January 22, 2025
• Issue Publication Date: April 1, 2025
• Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen
• Word Count: 3,554
• Image Credits: Andrea McGinty
• ISSN (International Standard Serial Number): 2369-6885

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Andrea McGinty for her time and willingness to participate in this interview.

Author Contributions

S.D.J. conceived and conducted the interview, transcribed and edited the conversation, and prepared the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

License & Copyright

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012–Present.

Unauthorized use or duplication of material without express permission from Scott Douglas Jacobsen is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links must use full credit to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with direction to the original content.

Supplementary Information

Below are various citation formats for Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating.

1. American Medical Association (AMA 11th Edition)
   Jacobsen S. Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating. January 2025;13(2). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty
2. American Psychological Association (APA 7th Edition)
   Jacobsen, S. (2025, January 22). Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating. In-Sight Publishing. 13(2).
3. Brazilian National Standards (ABNT)
   JACOBSEN, S. Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating. In-Sight: Interviews, Fort Langley, v. 13, n. 2, 2025.
4. Chicago/Turabian, Author-Date (17th Edition)
   Jacobsen, Scott. 2025. “Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating.” In-Sight: Interviews 13 (2). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty.
5. Chicago/Turabian, Notes & Bibliography (17th Edition)
   Jacobsen, S. “Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating.” In-Sight: Interviews 13, no. 2 (January 2025). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty.
6. Harvard
   Jacobsen, S. (2025) ‘Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating’, In-Sight: Interviews, 13(2). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty.
7. Harvard (Australian)
   Jacobsen, S 2025, ‘Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating’, In-Sight: Interviews, vol. 13, no. 2, http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty.
8. Modern Language Association (MLA, 9th Edition)
   Jacobsen, Scott. “Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating.” In-Sight: Interviews, vol. 13, no. 2, 2025, http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty.
9. Vancouver/ICMJE
   Jacobsen S. Conversation with Andrea McGinty on Matchmaking and Mating [Internet]. 2025 Jan;13(2). Available from: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/mcginty

Note on Formatting

This layout follows an adapted Nature research-article structure, tailored for an interview format. Instead of Methods, Results, and Discussion, we present Interview transcripts and a concluding Discussion. This design helps maintain scholarly rigor while accommodating narrative content.

#33000DatesCom #AIInDating #DigitalMatchmaking #ItSJustLunch #Matchmaking #MatureSingles #OnlineDatingSafety #onlineDating #ProfileOptimization #SeniorDatingStrategies