Pragmatic Truth • 4.2
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07/13/pragmatic-truth-4/
Truth Theories —
There are practical considerations we need to keep in mind when contemplating such radically simple schemes of classification. Real‑world practice seldom presents us with pure cases and ideal types. There are many settings where it is useful to speak of a truth theory as “almost” k‑adic or to say it “would be” k‑adic if certain details are abstracted away and neglected in a particular context of discussion. That said, given the generic division of truth predicates according to their dimensionality, further species may be differentiated within each genus according to a number of more refined features.
The truth predicate in a correspondence theory of truth tells of a relation between representations and objective states of affairs and is therefore expressed by a dyadic predicate. In general terms, one says a representation is true of an objective situation, more briefly, a sign is true of an object. The nature of the correspondence may vary from theory to theory in this family. The correspondence can be fairly arbitrary or it can take on the character of an “analogy”, an “icon”, or a “morphism”, where a representation is rendered true of its object by the existence of corresponding elements and a similar structure.
Resources —
Logic Syllabus
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-syllabus/
Pragmatic Maxim
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/07/pragmatic-maxim-a/
Truth Theory
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory
Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • Document History
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory_Of_Truth
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory_Of_Truth#Document_history
Correspondence Theory Of Truth
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_Theory_Of_Truth
#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory
#RelationTheory #TriadicRelations #SignRelations #Semiotics