#TruthTheory

2024-07-20

Pragmatic Truth • 4.2
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07

Truth Theories —

There are practical considerations we need to keep in mind when contemplating such radically simple schemes of classification. Real‑world practice seldom presents us with pure cases and ideal types. There are many settings where it is useful to speak of a truth theory as “almost” k‑adic or to say it “would be” k‑adic if certain details are abstracted away and neglected in a particular context of discussion. That said, given the generic division of truth predicates according to their dimensionality, further species may be differentiated within each genus according to a number of more refined features.

The truth predicate in a correspondence theory of truth tells of a relation between representations and objective states of affairs and is therefore expressed by a dyadic predicate. In general terms, one says a representation is true of an objective situation, more briefly, a sign is true of an object. The nature of the correspondence may vary from theory to theory in this family. The correspondence can be fairly arbitrary or it can take on the character of an “analogy”, an “icon”, or a “morphism”, where a representation is rendered true of its object by the existence of corresponding elements and a similar structure.

Resources —

Logic Syllabus
inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s

Pragmatic Maxim
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

Truth Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • Document History
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

Correspondence Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_T

#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory
#RelationTheory #TriadicRelations #SignRelations #Semiotics

2024-07-15

Pragmatic Truth • 4.1
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07

Truth Theories —

Theories of truth may be described according to several dimensions of description affecting the character of the predicate “true”. The truth predicates used in different theories may be classified according to the number of things which have to be taken into account in order to evaluate the truth of a sign, counting the sign itself as the first thing. The number of dimensions is sometimes called the “arity” or “adicity” of the truth predicate.

• A truth predicate is “monadic” if it applies to its main subject, typically a concrete representation or its abstract content, independently of reference to anything else. In that case one may think of a truth bearer as being true in and of itself.

• A truth predicate is “dyadic” if it applies to its main subject only in reference to something else, a second subject. Most commonly, the ancillary subject is either an “object”, an “interpreter”, or a “language” to which the representation bears a specified relation.

• A truth predicate is “triadic” if it applies to its main subject only in reference to a second and a third subject. For example, in a pragmatic theory of truth one has to specify both the “object” of the sign and either its interpreter or another sign called its “interpretant”. In that case, one says the sign is true “of” its object “to” its interpreting agent or sign.

Resources —

Truth Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

Correspondence Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_T

#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory
#RelationTheory #TriadicRelations #SignRelations #Semiotics

2024-07-15

Pragmatic Truth • 3.2
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07

Truth Predicates —

One of the first questions to be asked in this setting concerns the relationship between the significant performance and its reflective critique. If one expresses oneself in a particular fashion, and someone says “that’s true”, is there anything useful at all to be said in general terms about the relationship between those two acts? For instance, does the critique add value to the expression criticized, does it say something significant in its own right, or is it but an insubstantial echo of the original sign?

Resources —

Logic Syllabus
inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s

Pragmatic Maxim
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

Truth Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • Document History
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

Correspondence Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_T

#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory #Semiotics #Meaning
#JohnDewey #WilliamJames #PragmaticMaxim #Pragmatism #InquiryDrivenSystems

2024-07-15

Pragmatic Truth • 3.1
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07

Truth Predicates —

An inquiry into the character of truth generally begins with the idea of an informative, meaningful, or significant element, the goodness of whose information, meaning, or significance may be put in question and needs to be evaluated. Depending on context, the element may be called an artefact, expression, image, impression, lyric, mark, performance, picture, sentence, sign, string, symbol, text, thought, token, utterance, word, work, and so on. However that may be, one has the task of judging whether the bearers of information, meaning, or significance are indeed truth‑bearers or not. That judgment is typically expressed in the form of a specific “truth predicate”, whose positive application to a sign, or so on, asserts the truth of the sign.

Considered within the broadest horizon, there is little reason to imagine the process of judging a work, which leads to a predication of false or true, is necessarily amenable to formalization, and that task may always remain what is commonly called a judgment call. But there are many well-circumscribed domains where it is useful to consider disciplined forms of evaluation and the observation of those limits allows for the institution of what is called a “method” of judging truth and falsity.

Resources —

Logic Syllabus
inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s

Pragmatic Maxim
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

Truth Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

Correspondence Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_T

#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory
#InquiryDrivenSystems #PragmaticMaxim #Pragmatism #Semiotics

2024-07-14

Pragmatic Truth • 2
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07

Truth as the Good of Logic —

Pragmatic theories of truth enter on a stage set by the philosophies of former ages, with special reference to the Ancient Greeks, the Scholastics, and Immanuel Kant. Recalling a few elements of that background can provide valuable insight into the play of ideas as they have developed up through our time. Because pragmatic ideas about truth are often confused with a number of quite distinct notions it is useful say a few words about those other theories and to highlight the points of significant contrast.

In one classical formulation, truth is defined as the good of logic, where logic is classed as a normative science, in other words, an inquiry into a good or value which seeks to arrive at knowledge of it and the means to achieve it. In that view, truth cannot be discussed to much effect outside the context of inquiry, knowledge, and logic, all very broadly conceived.

Resources —

Logic Syllabus
inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s

Pragmatic Maxim
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

Truth Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • Document History
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

Correspondence Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_T

#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory #Semiotics #Meaning
#JohnDewey #WilliamJames #PragmaticMaxim #Pragmatism #InquiryDrivenSystems

2024-07-14

Pragmatic Truth • 1
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07

Questions about the “pragmatic conception of truth” have broken out in several quarters, asking in effect, “What conceptions of truth arise most naturally from and are best suited to pragmatic ways of thinking?” My best thoughts on that score were written out quite a few years ago, in an article I originally wrote for Wikipedia. I haven't dared look at what's become of it on that site — linked below is my current fork on another wiki.

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

It begins as follows …

❝“Pragmatic theory of truth” refers to those accounts, definitions, and theories of the concept “truth” distinguishing the philosophies of pragmatism and pragmaticism. The conception of truth in question varies along lines reflecting the influence of several thinkers, initially and notably, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, but a number of common features can be identified.

❝The most characteristic features are (1) a reliance on the “pragmatic maxim” as a means of clarifying the meanings of difficult concepts, truth in particular, and (2) an emphasis on the fact that the product variously branded as belief, certainty, knowledge, or truth is the result of a process, namely, “inquiry”.❞

Et sic deinceps …

Resources —

Logic Syllabus
inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s

Pragmatic Maxim
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

Truth Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Truth_theory

Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • Document History
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory
oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory

Correspondence Theory Of Truth
oeis.org/wiki/Correspondence_T

#Peirce #Logic #Inquiry #Truth #PragmaticTruth #TruthTheory
#JohnDewey #WilliamJames #PragmaticMaxim #Semiotics #Meaning

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst