Hai quân Mỹ thừa nhận kế hoạch xây dựng chiến hạm lớp “Trump” chỉ triển khai được sớm nhất năm 2030, hiện đang ở giai đoạn rất sơ khai. #HaiQuânMỹ #ChiếnHạm #LớpTrump #Naval #Vietnam #USStrategy #MilitaryNews

https://vietnamnet.vn/hai-quan-my-thua-nhan-gap-kho-ve-ke-hoach-dong-chien-ham-lop-trump-2475694.html

USA Drops Game-Changing 2025 National Security Strategy

2025 National Security Strategy: Key Priorities and Shifts in US Policy

A Return to Realistic American Power

USA Unveils Document Outlining New National Security Strategy Policies

In the waning days of November 2025, the White House unveiled the 2025 National Security Strategy, a document that encapsulates the Trump administration’s vision for safeguarding the United States in an increasingly complex global landscape. This 33-page strategy, dated November 2025 and released amid ongoing geopolitical tensions, represents a significant departure from the expansive, interventionist approaches of previous eras.

Instead, it champions an “America First” ethos, emphasizing the protection of core national interests through strength, pragmatism, and a focus on domestic resilience. As the world grapples with challenges like great-power competition and border insecurity, the 2025 National Security Strategy seeks to realign U.S. foreign policy with the realities of limited resources and sovereign priorities, ensuring that American power serves American people above all.

The introduction of the 2025 National Security Strategy sets a candid tone, critiquing post-Cold War policies for pursuing unattainable goals of global domination. It argues that such ambitions led to overextension, burdensome alliances, and the erosion of domestic foundations, including the middle class and industrial capabilities.

President Trump’s first term is credited with initiating corrections, and this document builds on that foundation by explicitly linking “ends” – what the U.S. fundamentally wants – with “means” – the tools available to achieve them. “The purpose of foreign policy is the protection of core national interests; that is the sole focus of this strategy,” the document states, underscoring a shift toward realism over idealism.

At its core, the 2025 National Security Strategy outlines what the United States should aspire to: survival as a sovereign republic, security from existential threats, economic prosperity, and a stable international environment that supports these goals without unnecessary entanglements. Domestically, it prioritizes ending mass migration, which is viewed as a direct threat to borders, infrastructure, and social cohesion.

The strategy calls for robust border control to combat terrorism, espionage, and human trafficking, framing these as intertwined with national survival. It also stresses protecting citizens’ natural rights, such as free speech and religion, while opposing abuses of power that could undermine liberty.

On the global stage, the 2025 National Security Strategy identifies key objectives across regions. In the Western Hemisphere, it asserts a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine, aiming to keep external powers at bay and foster stability through cooperation on trade and security. For Asia, particularly the Indo-Pacific, the focus is on deterring aggression, especially from China, while maintaining open sea lanes and secure supply chains.

Europe is encouraged to build self-confidence and handle its own defense, with the U.S. pushing for greater burden-sharing. The Middle East receives reduced emphasis, with calls to prevent adversarial dominance – notably Iran – through peace deals rather than endless military commitments. Africa shifts from aid dependency to trade and investment partnerships.

Strategic Priorities in the 2025 National Security Strategy

One of the most prominent elements of the 2025 National Security Strategy is its approach to major threats. China emerges as the primary competitor, with the document advocating measures to reverse unbalanced trade, counter intellectual property theft, and secure critical supply chains. It emphasizes reciprocity in economic dealings and deterrence to prevent conflict, particularly over Taiwan, where the strategy commits to preserving the status quo without provoking unilateral changes. Russia is addressed through calls for negotiating an end to the Ukraine conflict, prioritizing European stability to avoid broader escalation. Iran, described as degraded by recent actions including Israeli strikes and U.S.-led operations like Midnight Hammer, is targeted for containment via diplomacy and alliances, such as expanding the Abraham Accords.

Non-state actors, including terrorist groups and cartels, are tackled with a focus on ideological neutralization and targeted military action, eschewing nation-building efforts that have proven costly in the past. The strategy’s non-interventionist stance sets a high bar for U.S. involvement abroad, reserving it for scenarios where core interests are directly at stake. This marks a clear pivot from the more expansive doctrines of prior administrations, which often entangled the U.S. in prolonged conflicts.

Alliances play a crucial role in the 2025 National Security Strategy, but with strings attached. The document demands burden-sharing, proposing that allies commit at least 5% of GDP to defense under a new “Hague Commitment.” NATO and other partnerships are reframed as regional anchors where the U.S. acts as a convener rather than the primary enforcer. Rewards for responsible allies include preferential trade and technology access, while the strategy calls for reforming international institutions to prioritize sovereign nations over globalist agendas. In the Indo-Pacific, this means bolstering ties with the Quad, Japan, and South Korea, urging them to increase defense spending.

Economic security is woven throughout the 2025 National Security Strategy as a pillar of national power. It advocates rebalancing trade deficits, securing critical materials, and reindustrializing the U.S. economy through tax cuts, deregulation, and reshoring production. The revival of the defense industrial base is highlighted, with goals to produce low-cost, high-end weapons efficiently. Energy dominance is a key theme, promoting oil, gas, and nuclear production while rejecting “Net Zero” policies deemed unrealistic. Financial sector preservation through free markets and innovation rounds out this focus, ensuring the U.S. maintains its edge in global commerce.

Domestically, the 2025 National Security Strategy integrates security with broader societal health. It calls for rooting out divisive practices like DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) in institutions, investing in science and technology, and promoting merit-based systems. The strategy envisions a revitalized America with strong families, prosperous workers, and resilient infrastructure, arguing that internal strength is essential for external projection. This holistic view ties foreign policy to everyday American concerns, such as job creation and cultural preservation.

Expert Analyses and Broader Implications of the 2025 National Security Strategy

Reactions to the 2025 National Security Strategy have been mixed, reflecting its bold departures. Analysts at the Council on Foreign Relations note that the document introduces a “Trump twist” by prioritizing profit and migration control over spreading democracy, potentially reshaping U.S. engagements worldwide. The Atlantic Council highlights ambitions for U.S. dominance in energy, industry, and technology, but warns that long-term success requires sustained investment and alliances. The New York Times describes it as a strategy focused on business and border security, avoiding ideological crusades, which could reduce U.S. involvement in peripheral conflicts but risk alienating partners.

War on the Rocks outlines ten “jolting takeaways,” including the Trump Corollary and a pragmatic approach to diplomacy, praising its realism while questioning enforcement mechanisms. PBS interviews with national security strategists emphasize the strategy’s push to end the Ukraine war for European stability, viewing it as a core interest. Modern Diplomacy frames it as a “return of realism,” portraying a confident yet cautious America that acknowledges limits to power. Even on platforms like Reddit, discussions audit the strategy’s regional priorities, such as deterring China and securing the Western Hemisphere, appreciating its audit-like assessment of past failures.

Critics from think tanks like CSIS point to potential alarm bells, such as ideological shifts that might undermine alliances or overlook emerging threats. Overall, the 2025 National Security Strategy is seen as a manifesto for restrained power, potentially leading to a more sustainable U.S. role globally. However, its success hinges on implementation, diplomatic finesse, and adapting to unforeseen challenges.

The implications of the 2025 National Security Strategy extend beyond policy circles. By emphasizing economic tools over military ones, it could foster innovation and growth at home while deterring adversaries abroad. Yet, the focus on burden-sharing might strain relationships with allies accustomed to U.S. leadership. In an era of rapid technological change, the strategy’s call for leadership in AI, biotech, and quantum computing positions the U.S. to compete effectively, provided investments follow through.

As the world watches, the 2025 National Security Strategy offers a roadmap that prioritizes American sovereignty and prosperity. It challenges the status quo, urging a reevaluation of what truly constitutes security in the 21st century. Whether it achieves its aims will depend on the interplay of domestic politics, international dynamics, and unwavering commitment to its principles.

Share your thoughts in the comments, and explore more insights on our Journal and Magazine. Please consider becoming a subscriber, thank you: https://dunapress.org/subscriptions – Follow J&M Duna Press on social media. Join the Oslo Meet by connecting experiences and uniting solutions: https://oslomeet.org

References

• Official Document: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf
• USNI News: https://news.usni.org/2025/12/05/2025-u-s-national-security-strategy
• CSIS Analysis: https://www.csis.org/analysis/national-security-strategy-good-not-so-great-and-alarm-bells
• CFR Expert Brief: https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/unpacking-trump-twist-national-security-strategy
• Atlantic Council: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/experts-react/experts-react-what-trumps-national-security-strategy-means-for-us-foreign-policy/
• New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/us/politics/trump-national-security-strategy.html
• War on the Rocks: https://warontherocks.com/2025/12/ten-jolting-takeaways-from-trumps-new-national-security-strategy/
• PBS: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/national-security-strategist-analyzes-trump-administrations-new-global-policy
• Modern Diplomacy: https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/12/07/u-s-national-security-strategy-2025-the-return-of-realism/
• Reddit Discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/geopolitics/comments/1pgmr3t/2025_us_national_security_strategy_a_strategic/

#foreignPolicy #NationalSecurity #USStrategy

Saturday, December 6, 2025

https://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025/12/saturday-december-6-2025/

Interview: Col. Douglas Macgregor on Trump’s Failed Ukraine Peace Plan and the Decline of US Strategic Thinking

Col. Douglas Macgregor on Trump’s failed Ukraine peace plan: The US lacks strategy, driven by emotion and lobbies. He calls for hemispheric defense and a multipolar approach to avoid further decline. #UkraineWar #USStrategy #Geopolitics

https://dunapress.com/ukraine-peace-failure-and-us-strategic-decline/