Connecticut Law Review

Journal of legal scholarship published and edited by students at the University of Connecticut School of Law.

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-12-12

This year, the four journals partnered with the Center for Children's Advocacy to organize a holiday drive for foster children and families. The law school community not only fulfilled the gift requests, but also donated funds for food and other necessities.

Thank you to everyone who donated! Your generosity was what made this effort so successful.

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-12-06

Our first issue is off to the printer! 🎉 Here's a preview of what we're publishing in Issue 1 of Volume 56.

CLR is so grateful to these authors for trusting us with their work. We look forward to highlighting their scholarship on here in the coming weeks.

A listing of all the Articles we will be publishing in Volume 56, Issue 1 of the Connecticut Law Review
Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-09

Today is . We honor the resiliency of Native peoples & respect the enduring relationships they have with this land.

If you missed Friday's symposium —addressing tribal sovereignty & —it's available here: bit.ly/3ZONwyP

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

That's a wrap on our 2023 Symposium, !

Thanks to all for tuning in and we hope you enjoyed the program for those who were able to watch.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

are flowing in! The Panelists of Panel 2 are showing optimism regarding Equal Protection challenges to not reaching again.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Seth Davis highlights four structural issues regarding that show how is an, "ideological charge against the federal government" by State governments.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Prof. Ablavsky states, "The Court has become a much more dangerous source of doctrine for Native people in the present." He forecasts that Thomas's view will be utilized to expand into Native Country.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Prof. Ablavsky of @stanfordlaw expands on Prof. Torres' point, stating that defining means that the has the power to legislate for Native people directly.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Prof. Torres states is a case about and quotes Justice Amy Coney Barrett's opinion, "It is plenary within its sphere, but even a sizeable sphere has borders."



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Prof. Briggs kicks off Panel 2 by teaching that whenever we review a stating that was passed because children were being taken, "just know that decades of history is being glossed over."



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Panel 2 is about to kick off with @ljbriggs, Prof. Gerald Torres, @stanfordlaw 's Prof. Gregory Ablavsky, and Seth Davis.

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

During the after Panel 1, Prof. Kathryn Fort advocated for increased education of and classifications of Native tribes, which will help future when the time comes.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Chairwoman Andrews-Maltais encourages to reach out to their to increase and strengthen the laws of to fortify the against ever-present threats.



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Chairwoman Andrews-Maltais describes the day that the came down: "We cheered, we cried, we laughed . . . but the threats are ever-present."



Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Chairwoman Cheryl Andrews-Maltais of Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head Aquinnah rounds out Panel 1 of by stating that, "the theft of our children is the most egregious and harmful genocide that can possibly be imagined."

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Attorney Ian Gershengorn discusses his main points he brought to to preserve in to show that this action was, "political, political, political".

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Did you know, according to Professor Kathryn Fort, was made difficult because it is one of the first cases shifting from state court to federal courts, and don't usually deal with child welfare issues?

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

@Bethanyrberger, Professor Kathryn Fort, Attorney Ian Gershengorn, and Chairwoman Cheryl Andrews-Maltais are about to kick off Panel 1's discussion of to chat about the history of and 's procedural history and posture.

Prof. Berger shows how the case had a tumultuous history with originally being deemed in the district courts.

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-06

Our 2023 Symposium is starting ! Tune in to listen to Dean Nelson's opening remarks before Panel 1 takes the stage to discuss and .

Connecticut Law Reviewconnlrev
2023-10-05

Our 2023 Symposium: Interrogating Haaland v. : Family Regulation, Constitutional Power & Tribal Resilience is less than twenty-four hours away!

Join us virtually TOMORROW Friday, October 6th from 12:00-2:30 PM EDT.

bit.ly/interrogatingbrackeen

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst