Don't ever give elevated permissions to an Avian Intelligence...
Professional software engineer, amateur photographer, tech & video game enthusiast, elder millennial, destroyer of waffles.
Don't ever give elevated permissions to an Avian Intelligence...
Leading medical technology company Stryker has been hit by a wiper malware attack claimed by Handala, an Iranian-linked and pro-Palestinian hacktivist group.
Breaking, new, by me: Iran-backed Hackers Claim Wiper Attack on Medtech Firm Stryker
A hacktivist group with links to Iran's intelligence agencies is claiming responsibility for a data-wiping attack against Stryker, a global medical technology company based in Michigan. News reports out of Ireland, Stryker's largest hub outside of the United States, said the company sent home more than 5,000 workers there today. Meanwhile, a voicemail message at Stryker's main U.S. headquarters says the company is currently experiencing a building emergency.
From the story:
"Wiper attacks usually involve malicious software designed to overwrite any existing data on infected devices. But a trusted source with knowledge of the attack who spoke on condition of anonymity told KrebsOnSecurity the perpetrators in this case appear to have used a Microsoft service called Microsoft Intune to issue a ‘remote wipe’ command against all connected devices."
"Intune is a cloud-based solution built for IT teams to enforce security and data compliance policies, and it provides a single, web-based administrative console to monitor and control devices regardless of location. The Intune connection is supported by this Reddit discussion on the Stryker outage, where several users who claimed to be Stryker employees said they were told to uninstall Intune urgently."
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/03/iran-backed-hackers-claim-wiper-attack-on-medtech-firm-stryker/
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@mariuscerwenetz
I think it can be additive, depending on the tool chains and skillset. We use linters and static analyzers, but sometimes, even after all that, the code is not optimal or doesn't adhere to logical standards. On the skill set side, I sometimes feel there are so many things to know, but not everyone is even aware of the tooling or knows how to properly set it up, especially when you're in a rush to get things out the door (as many of us are nowadays).
@mariuscerwenetz
Thanks for this - didn't see that. I want to use it for my own work, but don't really have a chance to learn with everything going on right now. But given my own experience and seeing what has happened since, I definitely agree that guardrails and nuanced policy are needed. Outright bans rarely (if ever) work and would only serve to create forks by those who desire permissiveness to use the tools. Not necessarily a bad thing, but stifles cross-pollination of tools across forks.
@mariuscerwenetz
Agreed. I'm a lead for my group at work and the volume of things that come my way is overwhelming. I told my team that they can use Cursor if it can help them find, fix and develop things (with the caveat that it doesn't lift code from somewhere else and that they've thoroughly reviewed it personally before submission) but it has really just overwhelmed me more.
I know Daniel Stenberg of curl has been vocal about it, and I totally understand and respect his stance about it all.
By the way, I got to explain to a couple kids today that, when making or fixing something - using tools - that slow is smooth, and smooth is fast. It’s amazing how long it took me to learn that myself.
Veritasium made an excellent and accessible explanation of the xz incident, and I think it's great. If you've got an hour to understand why the open source community should be supported better, this is definitely a video I recommend watching:
Every day I’m more convinced that the Fediverse’s slow mainstream adoption isn’t really about usability.
People say it’s because it’s hard to join, the terms are confusing, or the apps aren’t polished enough. Maybe a little. But honestly… look at the platforms people already use.
Finding anything on LinkedIn is painful.
Trying to locate the original video on TikTok is a scavenger hunt.
Facebook is still full of weird bugs and odd UI choices.
Instagram hides posts behind algorithms.
Twitter/X constantly changes the rules of engagement.
None of these platforms are exactly “easy.”
People stay because their friends are there. Because the big creators are there. Because that’s where the conversation already lives.
And, if we’re honest, because these platforms are engineered around a very effective reward loop: notifications, likes, infinite scroll. A dopamine machine. You learn the confusing terms and awkward interfaces because there’s a constant reward for doing so.
So yes, making the Fediverse easier to join absolutely helps.
But what would help even more is something simpler:
more mainstream, recognizable, official accounts showing up here.
That’s how networks grow.
People follow people not platforms.
It's the first Monday after the Springtime time change.
I always try to take responsibility for what I’ve done, because if I don’t, who will?
You Bought Zuck’s Ray-Bans. Now Someone in Nairobi Is Watching You Poop 💩🕶️
FOR THE PIDDLING PRICE OF SEVERAL THOUSAND DOLLARS, YOU CAN OWN *THE* HIGH WATER MARK OF DIRTLING CULTURE:
In Race Condition/Eventual Consistency Bug hell.
(comic) Do you like your job? https://workchronicles.substack.com/p/comic-do-you-like-your-job
@redhoodoutlaw
I suspect my issues are that my colleagues are using unauthorized AI apps to generate mountains for me, making them look like high performing folks, but the bottleneck becomes me who needs to sift through it all, understand and digest it, then make decisions. Jokes on them when they can't move forward because I'm completely tied up with the backlog of messages.
@seantpayne
Oh yes, and while I can't blame it all on AI, it has recently given me more headaches than I can count.