First blow to national security against Trump and Vance: drug traffickers purchase private information and receive it before the President of the United States.
The Trump administration and Vance have just received their first blow to national security—and from within. A mole, or perhaps several, exposed them embarrassingly. It must be recognised that what was once a proper Secret Service now resembles little more than security guards in a shopping centre with decent salaries. And things could get even worse. This time, it wasn’t just a common occurrence; Mexican drug cartels struck where it hurts—at their national security, their inner circle, and with the same money they’ve been using to pay US congressmen every week for the past 50 years. It seems that national security ends when you touch the cartel’s money, especially the Cartel of Congressmen.
While Donald Trump sought to achieve his first epic orgasm by expelling humble illegal workers from the former land of liberty and opportunity, his Vice President, J.D. Vance, stepped forward to acknowledge what everyone knows but many Americans refuse to admit: for the past 40 years, they haven’t won a single war, conflict, or even a Kamehameha contest. Vance shamefully admitted that during his service in the armed forces, he never achieved anything for the United States, and now, with this precise blow from the Mexican drug cartels, they have been left embarrassingly exposed.
During López Obrador’s administration, all US federal agencies were expelled from Mexican territory in an act that many officials deemed a betrayal. In reality, it was a masterstroke by AMLO to combat, suspend, or eliminate the links and businesses of corrupt US federal agents with various drug cartels, primarily the Sinaloa Cartel and the CJNG (Jalisco New Generation Cartel). These corrupt federal agents had been supporting the drug cartels from the comfort of their offices at the US embassy in Mexico City, as well as in Guadalajara, Mazatlán, and even in Yucatán.
This act by then-President López Obrador aimed to curb the wave of drug trafficking, as well as the smuggling of cocaine and fentanyl into the United States. At that time, all agencies began operating from the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), where a grave mistake was made. At the EPIC in Fort Bliss, Mexican agents, who no longer pass the rigorous US vetting processes, are operating. This was where Trump and Vance made their first major error—they trusted…
Ten days ago, an operational memo was requested at the same time as the implementation of the executive order on mass deportations, mandated by the US presidency. The external advisor at the prevention level encrypted metadata into the document being sent, as there are too many corrupt federal agents from the Biden era at Fort Bliss. A copy of that document ended up in the hands of Mexican drug cartels. The EPIC has one or more moles who are alerting the cartels about operations up to 24 hours in advance.
This grave damage to national security resulted in Mexican drug cartels, using the well-known «straw purchasers» in the United States—some of whom are included on the infamous Fast and Furious list—being contacted to acquire new grenade launchers, RPG systems, rocket launchers, Barrett .50 calibre rifles, MK 19s, as well as an additional 500,000 weapons in just the last 10 days. Furthermore, the drug traffickers have purchased over 1,000 heavy weapons from corrupt Mexican military personnel to equip their «monster» vehicles and armour them in preparation for any contingencies that may arise.
And how did this happen right under the noses of all federal agencies and the Secret Service?
A 30-page document, classified as Executive Top Secret, was intended for Donald Trump and JD Vance. It arrived at Fort Bliss to be sent to their offices and at some point, was in the hands of a mole with access to the Executive Top Secret level. Isn’t it dangerous for a mole to have access to such a high level of confidentiality? Who is responsible for the security of the United States?
Upon receiving a copy of the report, the Mexican drug cartels not only began to arm themselves to counter the classified information in the document, but embarrassingly, neither Trump nor Vance were aware of such an act, which continues to severely impact national security to this day. The information was made public before the US Secret Service could react or take any action. Now, imagine how they are protecting the President and Vice President of the United States.
Now, all that remains is to wait for the lies from the White House about what they will do to remedy such a grave mistake. What is clear and has been confirmed is that the United States is full of traitors, and the new Trump administration is no exception. Seventy percent of the federal agents still in service have been corrupted during the corrupt, drug government of Joe Biden, and they remain in office, carrying badges and wielding the power of federal agents.
Donald Trump is so focused on becoming a racist xenophobe that he fails to see that 75% of his armed forces are made up of children of immigrants, some of whom are even undocumented and serve in the National Guard or armed forces in exchange for legalising their status. Trump continues to ignore the true needs of the United States. In Spain, DEA collaborators and an operational advisor from the SIU DOJ are still detained—individuals who have carried out numerous operations to protect US national security with significant achievements. They were abandoned in Argentina, and neither Trump nor Vance have done anything to recover these operatives, valuable men who have been betrayed mid-operation by corrupt federal agents.
Should the Stars and Stripes be flown upside down, or should JD Vance take charge of the government before Donald Trump drives the United States into ruin?
Some of the latest humiliating defeats of the United States on a global scale, and counting.
The Vietnam War (1955-1975): Although the Vietnam War ended over 40 years ago, its consequences still resonate in the military history of the United States. Despite massive efforts, the objective of preventing the expansion of communism in Southeast Asia failed. South Vietnam collapsed, and the country was reunified under the communist regime in 1975.
The Invasion of Panama (1989): Although the goal of overthrowing Panamanian leader Manuel Noriega and restoring democratic order was achieved, the invasion faced criticism for the high civilian casualties and collateral damage. The conflict resulted in a prolonged occupation, which many viewed as an unnecessary intervention in a sovereign country.
The Iraq War (2003-2011): The invasion of Iraq, led by the US under President George W. Bush, was based on the alleged existence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), which were never found. The overthrow of Saddam Hussein did not bring the promised stability and instead triggered a prolonged conflict, with insurgencies, sectarian violence, and the eventual rise of ISIS (the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria). The war in Iraq was seen by many as a strategic failure and a significant military and political drain on the United States.
The Afghanistan War (2001-2021): The longest conflict in US history ended with the chaotic withdrawal of American troops in 2021, when the Taliban swiftly took control of the country, just weeks after the departure of international forces. Although the initial objective was to defeat Al-Qaeda and dismantle the Taliban, the country fell back under their control after two decades of fighting, marking a clear failure in stabilising the nation.
The Syrian War (2011-present): Although the United States did not directly involve itself in the Syrian civil war from the outset, its support for rebels and limited military interventions, particularly against ISIS, have failed to bring peace or stability to the region. Furthermore, US interventions, such as the elimination of ISIS, were overshadowed by complex international alliances and the struggle with actors like Russia, Iran, and Turkey.
The Intervention in Libya (2011): The NATO intervention led by the United States to overthrow Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was initially presented as a success, but after the regime’s fall, the country plunged into a prolonged period of chaos, with rival militias and interim governments fighting for power. The lack of a post-Gaddafi plan left Libya in a state of ongoing instability.
The Intervention in Somalia (1992-1993): The US military intervention in Somalia began as a humanitarian mission to combat famine and violence in the country, but it quickly transformed into an armed conflict. In 1993, during the failed Operation in Mogadishu, two Black Hawk helicopters were shot down in a confrontation with forces loyal to Somali leader Mohamed Farrah Aidid, resulting in the deaths of 18 US soldiers and numerous injuries. The incident, widely documented in the book and film Black Hawk Down, highlighted the difficulties faced by the US in dealing with urban warfare in a context lacking a clear path to victory. The operation was viewed as a failure due to the high casualties, the lack of a clear objective, and the subsequent withdrawal of US forces from Somalia, leaving the country mired in chaos and violence.
The Intervention in Nicaragua (1980s): During Ronald Reagan’s administration, the United States supported Nicaraguan counter-revolutionaries (contras) in their fight against the leftist Sandinista government of Daniel Ortega, which had come to power following the Sandinista Revolution of 1979. The contras were backed with funds and weaponry, despite the human rights violations committed by them. The operation, known as the «Contra War,» resulted in a prolonged and costly conflict, without a decisive victory. In 1986, the Iran-Contra scandal revealed that the United States had violated domestic laws by financing the contras with money obtained from the secret sale of arms to Iran, leading to widespread controversy and a tarnished image of the intervention.
The Intervention in Guatemala (1954): In 1954, the CIA orchestrated a coup in Guatemala to overthrow the democratically elected government of Jacobo Árbenz, who had implemented agrarian reforms that affected the interests of the United Fruit Company, a major US corporation. The coup destabilised the country, leading to a prolonged civil war that lasted until 1996. The overthrow of Árbenz and the subsequent support for military dictatorships resulted in brutal repression and human rights violations that marked Guatemala’s history, highlighting the failure of the intervention in terms of promoting democracy and stability.
The Intervention in Honduras (1980s): During the 1980s, Honduras was used as a base for the operations of Nicaraguan contras, leading to a heavy militarisation of the country. In addition, the United States supported the Honduran government in its fight against leftist movements and guerrillas in the region. However, US support failed to curb the violence and drug trafficking that began to thrive in the area, and the country became ensnared in a prolonged conflict and cycle of instability, with a growing influence of drug cartels.
The Invasion of Cuba (Bay of Pigs, 1961): Also known as the Bay of Pigs Invasion, this operation was a failed attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro’s government through an invasion of Cuban exiles trained by the CIA. The operation ended in disaster, with the invading forces defeated within three days by Cuban troops. This failure was a humiliating blow to the United States and became a symbol of American incapacity in its attempt to intervene in the region’s politics and counter the spread of communism in Latin America.
The Operation in Grenada (1983): Although it is not considered a total failure, the invasion of Grenada was seen by some as unnecessary and an overuse of power, as the small island had fallen under a pro-Cuban regime following a coup. Operation «Urgent Fury» achieved a quick military success but was criticised for its justification and the international reactions. While casualties were minimal, the invasion failed to provide a clear justification in terms of US national security and generated criticism for the lack of a unified international response.
