#FactorAnalysis

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2025-05-16

#345 Best practices for your confirmatory factor analysis: A JASP and lavaan tutorial

Thoughts: Don't want to install but still want to do SEM/CFA with {lavaan}, @JASPStats is your friend!

rdcu.be/eme1V

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2025-05-15

#344 Questionable Research Practices when Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Thoughts: CFAs might be better than EFAs, but they are still complicated and easy to abuse.

dr.lib.iastate.edu/bitstreams/

Nick Byrd, Ph.D.ByrdNick@nerdculture.de
2024-12-02

An adversarial collaboration reports that mathematical reflection tests assess #math ability about as much as anything else. 😬

And what is the evidence that the paper's β€œindependent” measure of reflection actually measured reflection? 🧐

doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240919112

#psychometrics #psychology #cogPsych #JDM #decisionScience #economics #factorAnalysis #stats #rStats

The 8-item mathematical reflection test. (CRT = cognitive reflection test)An alleged measure of "reflection".Results: the allegedly independent measure of reflection shared as much latent variance with math test as that math test did with CRT (cognitive reflection test) or NUM (numeracy). I am struggling to see how this confirms that REF was measuring reflection rather than math. What am I missing?
guyjantic has moved!guyjantic@c.im
2024-09-05

TL;DR: It's not a psychometric scale and it's not weebly

This "Weebly racism scale" has been posted a couple of times on the Fediverse, and I finally decided to look it up. It seems like a multidimensional construct reduced to one dimension, so I wanted to see the items, hopefully an exploratory #FactorAnalysis, evidence of #reliability and (dare I hope?) #validity.

Yeah, no. It's not a scale at all, in the psychometric sense. No data collection or #analysis (AFAICT) was part of this, so there is no (and, at this point, can be no) validity information.

This is one person's ideas about racism. This is absolutely the kind of thought work that should be done when one is at the very beginning of scale creation, but it's not a scale like that.

The scale is hosted on weebly dot com, a web host kind of like squarespace.

The fact that hundreds (or thousands) of other people resonate with this scale is a good sign for potential validity. However, that is not sufficient psychometric evidence to call this a "racism scale" alongside things like the Modern Racism Scale, etc.

This seems like a useful activity to get you thinking about your experiences with racism (on either side of that line), but because it's not a psychometric scale, there's no *scientific* reason to believe

* The implied or explicit categories map onto actual racist thinking/behavior patterns

* The order of the categories is valid--e.g., there's no evidence "I'm not racist but..." is more racist than "'Funny' Black Face", etc.

* The categories even belong on the same continuum

As I said above, it really feels like a decent start, but with several dimensions squashed into one. I'd personally love to see a racism researcher use this to develop an actual scale, or try to. I suspect the result would be something vaguely resembling this scale but with significant differences.

#psychometrics #psychology #racism #prejudice #scale #discrimination #scaleconstruction

*

The racism scale shared frequently online. It has been relabeled from "racism scale" to "one person's conceptual racism diagram."Tweet screenshot:
@CristilnMD 
Hello, I am the creator of the racism scale and just saw that it's made it's way to twitter. You can see the latest version n better resolution here RacismScale.weebly.comTweet screenshot from @CristiInMD:

That part of the scale was made in 2017. I'm sure there was a reason at the time but honestly | can't remember what it was. The scale is a living thing and things get moved around as new things are added. Previous versions are on the website. RacismScale.weebly.comScreenshot of a tweet from @CristiInMD

Hi! I'm not an academic, just an activist who was trying to explain something so | put what | saw into a graphic to make it easier. You can see the progression at racismscale.weebly.com
Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌼🐝mzloteanu
2024-07-04

#129 Structural Models (EFA, CFA, SEM, ...) w/ {parameters}

Thoughts: Lots of debate about vs ; very confusing. Once I figure out what to use, this package seems to have lots of functionality.

easystats.github.io/parameters

Dr. Leonie VogelsmeierLeonieVogelsm@fediscience.org
2024-04-17

Our new article on evaluating (qualitative changes in) emotional granularity/differentiation in
#ESM
data led by Marcel Schmitt has now been published in MBR :-) tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10 #measurement #psychometrics #factoranalysis #affect

Statistics GlobeStatisticsGlobe
2024-03-10

PCA focuses on maximizing variance and transforming variables into principal components, while Factor Analysis seeks to model the underlying structure and relationships among variables through latent factors.

PCA in R programming online course starting on April 02: statisticsglobe.com/online-cou

Jan R. Boehnkejrboehnke
2024-03-08

"The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.94, which means that the sample size is adequate for ."

Jan R. Boehnkejrboehnke
2023-08-06

Quote from the popular Tucker & Lewis paper on a reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood .

Screenshot of a quote from
Tucker & Lewis, 1973, Psychometrika, 1-10.

The quote:
The proposed reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factoring appears to summarize the quality of representation of the interrelation of attributes in a battery by a factor analytic model having a limited number of common factors. It does not appear to provide a criterion as to how many common factors to accept. However, as pointed out previously, the likelihood ratio test also does not provide such a criterion. The number of factors to accept appears to depend on size of loadings and meaningfulness of factoring results. [p. 9]

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst