@abucci unsurprisingly I'm with you. Imo that was the core sin of "#HashtagActivism." They were so entranced with the network analyses that Twitter data allowed them to do that they didn't consider how people work: how does change happen; where does power lie; etc. What the book ultimately did was accidentally analyze Twitter as a medium then ascribe the results to people or society. No outside Twitter theorizing or grounding in actual human topics. It's a frustrating trend to say the least.