#PIRADS

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2024-12-02

This retrospective study assessed the diagnostic performance of prostate MRI by estimating the proportion of clinically significant (csPCa) in patients without prostate pathology. It found varying csPCa proportions based on PI-RADS scores, with sensitivity of 76.6–77.3%, specificity of 67.5–78.6%, and NPV of 84.4–87.2%. (Hirotsugu Nakai et al.)

🔗 buff.ly/4fHwrOm

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2024-09-12

This study investigated if a software could improve scoring consistency on bi-parametric prostate MRI. (Aydan Arslan et al.)

🔗 buff.ly/4c4hNP6

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2024-06-17

Byung Kwan Park et al. explore a new transperineal ultrasound (TPUS)-guided biopsy technique that may contribute to the detection of large 5 in men following a Miles' operation.

🔗 buff.ly/4ebTNeC

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2024-05-28

Zhoujie Sun et al. explore the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy in patients with different and histologic zones for prostate lesions, which shows promise as an alternative approach.

🔗 buff.ly/3WSuAQk

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2023-06-05

Quantitative shear wave elastography (USWE) and mpMRI using classification shows a good degree of prediction for Gleason score of clinically significant (csPCa). (Wael Ageeli et al.)

🔗 insightsimaging.springeropen.c

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2023-05-29

Educational Review: Understanding PI-QUAL for quality: a practical primer for . (Francesco Giganti et al.)

🔗 insightsimaging.springeropen.c

Insights Into ImagingInsightsImaging
2023-05-18

MULTI study: PI-RADSv2.1 descriptors are more specific than PI-RADSv2 descriptors when assessing the same set of lesions, but did not improve inter-reader variability. (Florian Di Franco et al.)

🔗 insightsimaging.springeropen.c

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst