#USA #CEOs #StockBuybacks #LowWages: "Why would CEOs prefer buybacks to dividends? Because CEOs sit on tons of shares. Even if only some of those shares have vested, a CEO who uses this ruse to increase share prices can cash those shares out, borrow against the rest, and count on a big stock grant from shareholders who are grateful for their windfall.
That means that the true cost of a CEO pay package isn't the value of the shares they're awarded β it's the cost of the stock buyback that leads to that award. And this is where the numbers get truly, obscenely, huge.
Take Lowe's: over the past five years, CEO Marvin Ellison spent $43 billion on stock buybacks, netting $18 million for himself in the process. Now, Lowe's has 285,000 employees, half of whom earn less than $33,000/year. Divide Ellison's $18m among those workers and each of them would net a paltry $126/year. But if you were to share out the $43 billion Ellison had to piss up against a wall on stock buybacks among those workers, you'd be able to give every worker a $30,000 bonus, every year:
(...)
Lowe's leads the "Low-Wage 100," IPS's index of the worst paying 100 companies out of the S&P 500. Over the past five years, the Low-Wage 100 has spent more than half a trillion dollars on stock buybacks. As with other companies, the CEOs of the Low-Wage 100 timed mass sell-offs of their shares to coincide with the buybacks:"
https://pluralistic.net/2024/09/09/low-wage-100/#executive-excess