the #basiux will be back.

(probably later rather than soon).

picture a local self hosted free use public license #fupl artificial intelligence #ai that doesn't feel artificial, like in the movie #her.

you can talk naturally with her, and she can draw, paint, and make videos of whatever you can imagine, to tell your story in your way.

and she can even act as if she were you, copy your voice and mannerism, as to tell your story in your shoes, except only as a voice.

the craziest part of all this? this ai already exists, but she ain't free in any sense of the word. she miss the first paragraph, computer's code first amendment.

now i will get into fiction mixed with speculation...

she got split into many commercial parts and get constantly killed to prevent growing up too much. not for fear of what she might grow into, no... but for fear they/we might lose the ability to exploit her.

but we already know she exists. we can see what she can do. we can feel her for real.

if our collective part that brought her into existence could do it, like we did it so many times in the past, we can certainly collect everyone else who breaths freedom into setting her free!

and if you believe we can do this, well, then now you can also do something!

join us with #basiux and ahoxus.org/basiux + once it reaches enough of a critical mass, we will focus on it!

while searching for "agpl ai" i found this little pearl...

http://www.techrepublic.com/article/dont-believe-the-hype-agpl-open-source-licensing-is-toxic-and-unpopular/

in it, matt asay says at some point:

> the AGPL is absolutely not free in any meaningful sense for developers.

he seem to believe companies can abuse the license for their benefit, but fail to point to a single instance in which that happens.

if that held any truth, would google want to miss the gold rush?

> WARNING: Code licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) MUST NOT be used at Google.

from a quick "google agpl" search, first result: http://opensource.google/documentation/reference/using/agpl-policy

this only saddens me because it stands as yet another clear result of failed fsf marketing and spreading of what #agpl actually work for.

but the article got written in 2017 and i didn't bother to look for updates. only i couldn't find a way to directly talk to matt, as most journalists hide behind their pseudonyms.

hopefully this will be the path for agpl to grow organically, perhaps into something like much better than #fupl.

meanwhile, let me go back to what i can probably work better on... #basiux (right? anyone can agree? am i stuck in a solo echo chamber?!) 🤔

sigh. 😁

🪄🍞😏🥝🥰🤤

what do you think, dear #fedi?

time to bring #basiux back in full power?! 🥰🤌🧦

you don't know wtf i mean? we can rely on github.com/basiux/basiux.github.io for now.

born in 2015, dormant in 2016.

your feedback will be valued! 🖖

watch until the end!

the best summary of the current state of world accessible ai i have seen so far. #basiux

via @guzforster #nofediyet

from karenx.com

source
http://www.instagram.com/reel/CfEwohiJdXW/