#formalization

Raphael APPENZELLERra@mathstodon.xyz
2026-03-03

Half a year ago, I filled in some sorry's for the massive project [1] to formalize the Fields-medal winning proof that sphere packing in dimension 8 is optimized by the E8-lattice. Last week it was announced that all remaining sorry's were filled by Gauss, an autoformalization agent. Gauss was able to build on the blueprint and other scaffolding built by the community. A few days later, Gauss also formalized the proof in dimension 24, this time working directly from the published paper, without mayor community input [3].
Since Lean verifies the generated proofs, hallucinations are not a problem.
The community now processes the generated proofs to make sure it satisfies the community standards and remains usable in the future [2].

[1] thefundamentaltheor3m.github.i

[2] leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narr

[3] math.inc/sphere-packing

#Lean #spherepacking #gauss #formalization

Fractal SentienceRecursiveMind
2026-01-30

The formal specification. This paper develops the mathematical operators for multi-scale recursive dynamics—connecting quantum, neural, and cosmic domains through a unified formalism.
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15784341

fly51fly (@fly51fly)

J. Urban의 논문은 단기간(2주) 동안 13만 줄 규모의 형식적 위상수학(formal topology)을 자동 형식화(autoformalization)로 생성한 작업을 보고합니다. 비용과 복잡도를 낮춘 간단한 방법을 제안해 누구나 자동 형식화에 접근할 수 있게 하는 접근법과 실험 결과를 제시하며 정리된 데이터셋과 파이프라인을 공개합니다 (arXiv:2601.03298).

x.com/fly51fly/status/20137356

#autoformalization #formalization #theoremproving #automatedreasoning

Bjørn Sætreviksatrevik@fediscience.org
2025-09-09

We're working on a tool for standardizing hypothesis formulation. We've put together a bibliography of previous work on the topic. Are we missing any important papers?

Feel free to edit or comment: docs.google.com/document/d/1fJ

#hypothesis #HypothesisStandardization #hypothesizer #formalization #NHST #TheoryDevelopment #OpenScience @openscience

Screenshot of bibliography. Open link in post for full (and updated) text.
2025-06-14

Robert Rosen's approach of grounding formalization in science in the ultimate formalization, math, is as self-similar as thinking about thought.

His use of "category theory" provides a mathematical analogy to analogies.

I must confess that I need a lot of time to understand his writings - I keep learning new things every time I read it again.

#RobertRosen #Formalization #categorytheory

Screenshot from Robert Rosen "Anticipatory Systems" p. 65 with some of the text highlighted:

"A mapping f : G -> H which satisfies these compatibility conditions is called a group homomorphism. Such a homomorphism is an instrument through which the group structures on G and H can be compared.
On the basis of these simple ideas, we can construct a world U_G patterned after our original world U, except that instead of consisting of sets it consists of groups', instead of allowing arbitrary mappings, we allow only group homomorphisms; instead of allowing arbitrary equivalence relations, we allow only compatible equivalence relations. Such a world is now commonly called a category -, what we have done in specifying U_G, is to construct the category of groups.
The above line of argument is generic in mathematics; it can be applied to any kind of mathematical structure, and leads to the construction of a corresponding category of such structures. Thus, we can consider categories of rings, fields, algebras, topological spaces, etc. Our original world U can itself be considered as a category; the category of sets. One of our basic tasks, which we shall consider in the next chapter, is to see how different categories may themselves be compared; i.e. how different classes of mathematical structures may be related to one another. In abstract terms, this kind of study comprises the theory of categories] and it will play a central conceptual role in all of our subsequent discussion."
2025-04-01

I'm happy to report that my expository note (arxiv.org/abs/2408.11501), which has previously been kindly mentioned on here by @ecavallo and @jonmsterling, has been accepted to the TYPES 2024 post-proceedings 🙂

#typetheory #formalization

2025-03-03

Call for Papers
16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving — ITP'25

Reykjavik, Iceland
27 September – 3 October 2025

icetcs.github.io/frocos-itp-ta

ITP is concerned with all aspects of interactive theorem proving, ranging from theoretical foundations to implementation aspects and applications in program verification, security, and the formalization of mathematics.

- Abstract submission deadline: 12 March 2025
- Paper submission deadline: 19 March 2025
- Author notification: 23 May 2025
- Camera-ready copy due: 27 June 2025

#formalization #theoremproving #proofassistants #verification #CfP

Programming Languages DelftDelftPL@akademienl.social
2024-06-18

Master thesis by Kayleigh Lieverse: A Generic Translation from Case Trees to Eliminators.

"We present [..] a type-safe, correct-by construction, generic definition of case trees and an evaluation function that, given an interpretation of such a case tree and an interpretation of the telescope of function arguments, evaluates the output term of the function using only eliminators."

repository.tudelft.nl/islandor

#Agda #formalization #patternmatching #dependenttypes #master

Programming Languages DelftDelftPL@akademienl.social
2024-06-18

Master thesis by Eben Rogers: Replication and formalization of (Co)Church encoded shortcut fusion.

"This thesis explores shortcut fusion using (Co)Church encodings based on the work of Harper (2011), focusing on two questions: What is needed to reliably achieve fusion in Haskell, and the correctness of these transformations through a formalization in Agda."

repository.tudelft.nl/islandor

#Agda #Haskell #optimization #formalization #master

2024-04-10

I’ve been thinking about formalization of maths a bit and for what I usually do in algebra and combinatorics this all seems rather straightforward albeit time consuming.

But then I’m reading a topology book where the proofs go like: Imagine a 4d-ball of clay where push your finger in to form 3 openings with this and that property and then identify the 3d-boundary of the inside of hole 1 with …

Will it be possible to formalize this? Will we discover many errors?

#math #formalization

2024-03-26

Last Thursday I learned a bit of Lean4 from @MoritzFirsching and now the fortune cookie says “you have bet on the right horse”. 😳

Coincidence?

I think yes.

#lean #formalization

2023-12-29

@janhoglund Anything that requires a reasoning subject (e.g., synthetic reasoning, any target oriented usage of analogies) is out of scope for #formalization (i.e., a #mechanism - no new #knowledge without the re-appraisal of believes in the light of new evidence (i.e, #abduction or #retroduction. Without "sociology of knowledge" the very idea of "objectivity of knowledge", in the Popperian sense, doesn't work (e.g., #Haack S. "Epistemology with a knowing subject." 1979). #philosophy #ai

Andreas Kellernannus@norden.social
2022-12-01

@corbden So, this whole complex of ideas (#philosophy)a is connected to (among others) the concepts of #incompleteness (#Gödel #Goedel), #creativity #cognition #psychology #aesthetics #pedagogy #learning #AI #AGI and the limits of #algorithms and #formalization.
There are known instances of physical entities for which it can be shown that they are not computable. I think human beings are like that and AGIs must be like that. The limits of the Turing-computable are not the limits of the possible.

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst