@gamambel@social.tchncs.de @bbhorne @eaon My personal understanding of CCC is that it used to have at its core a strong cultural element of mediation and restorative thinking, which was never codified because it was so prevalent. We are looking at this gap now, where what is currently available are only the codified "extreme measures" (Schiedsstelle, pseudo-judicial) and structures not created for conflict resolution (Awareness; event based and focused). Some are trying to close this gap, under pressure of people that demand punitive measures rather than restorative.
On https://toot.cat/@gamambel/111662238529104722 you quoted the following:
> When an offender takes responsibility for their actions and shows genuine remorse […]
Victims of his that I know have absolutely no indication that he took responsibility or showed remorse.
From stories coming through the grapevine about what I sincerely hope is "just" disturbing dark humour (Americans that don't speak German describing the idiom "Ist der Ruf erst ruiniert …" to me, which he supposedly used as a response to how he's doing), up to the way that he engaged with congress, there is absolutely no way that forgiveness is on the table in any sort of way. Just waiting it out in hiding does not count.
Linus has accused me of lying in a DM. I don't know what he refers to, I'm not engaging with him without witnesses. But, here's a thing I hadn't shared before:
At the end of the meeting, when the "but it worked for a while at least give us that!" came up again, I said yes, it's something it obviously had some effect, but it wasn't enough. And IIRC both Linus and Frank begrudgingly admitted that that is the case. Whether this was a genuine (if temporary) recognition, or just because we were already standing at the door and they didn't want to really hammer their point of view home for much longer, I honestly have no idea #37c3 #ioerror
"Forgiveness is not synonymous with turning a blind eye or justifying the harm, nor pardon, forgetfulness, denial, or reconciliation."
Forgiveness can be defined as a conscious decision to let go of feelings of anger, resentment, or revenge towards someone who has wronged you. In restorative justice, forgiveness is not just about letting go of negative emotions; it is also about finding a way forward that benefits everyone involved.
When an offender takes responsibility for their actions and shows genuine remorse, it can be easier for the victim to forgive them. This does not mean that the victim forgets what happened or condones the behavior; rather, it means that they are willing to move past it and work towards healing.
Forgiveness in restorative justice also involves acknowledging the harm done and finding ways to make amends. This may involve restitution or community service, but it can also involve more creative solutions such as mediation or dialogue between the victim and offender.
One important aspect of forgiveness in restorative justice is that it is voluntary. Victims are not pressured into forgiving offenders; rather, they are given the opportunity to do so if they choose. This allows victims to maintain their autonomy and agency throughout the process.
Another important aspect of forgiveness in restorative justice is that it is not a one-time event. Forgiveness may take time and effort on both sides, and it may need to be revisited as new challenges arise. However, when forgiveness does occur, it can have powerful effects on both individuals and communities.
For victims, forgiveness can bring closure and a sense of peace after experiencing trauma or harm. It can also help them move forward with their lives without being weighed down by negative emotions.
For offenders, forgiveness can provide an opportunity for redemption and growth.
https://restorativejustice101.com/the-power-of-forgiveness-in-restorative-justice/
Why does @thisdoesnotcomp remind me of #ioerror?