software enthusiast
Looks like the #fosstodon nazi bar is open for business again, with their new mods professing their fandom for alt-right content creators.
https://fosstodon.org/@tsvenson/114800276999401731
https://fosstodon.org/@el_on_libera/114803529158473251
That didn't last very long ...
Can you really?
https://fosstodon.org/@thomy2000/114598682498931402
https://fosstodon.org/@tsvenson/114800276999401731
Odd way of showing it then I guess
@agnes Yeah, #fosstodon is a cesspit
@andrewrk A plan to rename pigs is already underway and I hear good things about it
@TomSellers If its a #Cisco product, it has hard coded credential. Just as the sky is blue and the grass is green.
@vera @lix_project
It would help if the post would include a link to a static nix binary.
It's not necessarily trivial to find.
@AAMfP @Mehrad @Lluis_Revilla @EUCommission
It's of course intended as an anti-SaaS clause, and the big SaaS providers are of course aware, so in that sense it is quite deliberately done this way.
Of course it affects eg. Hobbyists who just want to run a service on VPS in exactly the same way.
IMO the #EUPL is a very double edged sword in that sense.
@kytta @scy That's technically incorrect. I know the fsf believes you can just "relicense" EUPL code under a different license, but that's a misinterpretation of "compatibility".
What you can do is link your GPL code against EUPL code or include EUPL code in your GPL program and continue to distribute the work as GPL.
That works because there is no virility in European law.
The included code will however remain EUPL licensed.
@AAMfP @Mehrad @Lluis_Revilla @EUCommission
The main caveat here is that this paragraph turns this license into an EULA, which does not only apply to the developer but also the user of the software.
It does not only apply to developers if software but also its users. As such, I would argue that "silently" forcing the obligations guaranteed onto the user is not a friendly move and is probably not compatible with the law on many European countries.
The same applies to AGPL as well, though they choose to not state it explicitly, which might be just fine in American jurisdiction, for which GPL licenses are primarily designed.
@david_chisnall
That is just misrepresenting the facts in bad faith. Gnome has not "given up" on BSD. They wanted to move forward with features which relied on systemd on Linux and reached out to communities like FreeBSD, trying to work out solutions through with BSD could provide similar capabilities. There was close to zero interest especially by the BSD community.
So the choice was to drop working on these features or drop support for platforms to willing to meet the project half way.
Seems like an obvious choice to me.
@flashfox @jakehamilton Hey, creator of nixidy here :) I'm using the generated options from kubenix still. If they don't update from 1.30 soon I might pull that code into nixidy.
My project is very much alive though :)
@arnar @jakehamilton Yeah, I'm already cannibalizing your cluster config repository 😄
It looks really useful, thanks so much for your effort of making this available.
Well, mindlessly scrolling through @jakehamilton|s feed and I found #nixidy, which looks rather promising
@parcifal Stop thinking in terms of and using the term microservice, it does not help you.
@rriemann @davidgerard @matrix Sure, but this is not about the business model of #element , its about #matrix.org / the foundation
@rriemann @davidgerard @matrix
> Instead of complaining that others donate not enough time and money
I'm pretty sure no one in this thread has voiced such complaints or argued in any way against the values of standardization for that matter.
> In reality, the Foundation did not know this was coming, and a huge support net was pulled away under their feet.
> I really don't think many people at the foundation want this
Gee, I always wonder how such tings always happen without anyone wanting it or knowing about it. It such a mystery ...
