Fewer results out there for #CheatGPT than I'd imagined there would be by now
Fewer results out there for #CheatGPT than I'd imagined there would be by now
I guess some researchers will now call for "biologically diverse training datasets". Talk about missing the point.
Dear Fans and #Friends of others #bubbles,
As we may have #gathered, everyone's #experience, #priorities and view of #reality is VERY elephant ... eh wait ... #different. Despite this, we have a #commonality of #interchange, widely #accepted and #comprehensible.
Despite:
- #Different ages
- Many #languages
- Biases
- #Affiliations
- #Regional #Socialisation
AI (Awful Imbecility) is just a data sorting. Useful and also impractical for critical widened models of #context. Who knew that? Not #CheatGPT for Far Shore.
People have been trying to find meaning in the cracks of boiled turtle shells, the entrails of animals, the flight path of random birds, the lines of the hand, the cold trajectories of the stars crossing the night skies, and so on and so forth ad nauseam for like forever.
But trying to find meaning in the output of autocomplete is a new one.
I call this, "autocompletomancy".
And Lilian leads a team on AI Safety, shake my damn head.
Via @timnitGebru
In fairness, ChatGPT could replace Tom Friedman, Pamela Paul, David Brooks, Maureen Dowd, Maggie Haberman, and Peter Baker, and the bullshit level of the New York Times would not increase.
We should call it #CheatGPT.
It steals our works but gives no credit or compensation.
Today I received an irresistible offer.
A publisher claims to have staff writers to write a book for me, and because I am an unknown author, they will also market the book I did not write for me. All I have to do is loan them my name and suggest a topic.
I smell #ChatGPT.
“Either we’ll be able to solve those requirements or not,” said Altman. “[T]here are technical limits to what’s possible.”
The limit is:
1) they can no longer say what data they used because they grabbed data indiscriminately and the documentation debt is impossible to pay; or
2) they don't want to say what data they used because saying would reveal that they grabbed data indiscriminately including data they had no permission to use.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/25/23737116/openai-ai-regulation-eu-ai-act-cease-operating
Gekko lanceert CheatGPT!
Creatief boekhouden, powered by AI.
Verlaag je belasting met onze nieuwste tool, zodat je altijd zo min mogelijk belasting betaald.
https://www.getgekko.com/blog/cheatgpt-belastingen-verlagen-door-middel-van-ai/
US insurance colossus Cigna built a system to allow its doctors to reject claims without opening patient files. Using this system, Cigna doctors denied over 300,000 claims in two months, spending an average of 1.2 seconds on each case.
Here's a great business case for #ChatGPT: write bullshit justifications for denied claims, in the style of Bram Stoker.
#HealthCare #Profit #AI #CheatGPT
https://www.propublica.org/article/cigna-pxdx-medical-health-insurance-rejection-claims
@aadmaa @imalcolm @avitt @neilhimself @DrCuriosity
LOL.
It will be easy for chatbots to produce the poo. After all, that is their appeal: automation and speed. The nutritive stuff is produced by (some) humans who cannot possibly compete with the chatbots in terms of output. Experts will soon be unable to contain the flood of poop, at which point the chatbots will be consuming their own poop.
I like it. A more technical term would be: redigested degraded information.
#CheatGPT #ChatGPT #LLM #SF #microfiction
Idea for a SF story: an apocalyptic world war ensues when a chatbot is used for automatic interpretation in a peace conference. The chatbot had been trained using poorly curated text that included 4chan, 8chan, and Elon Musk rants.