#MooseCult

2025-06-15

Grey Mountain – Grey Mountain Review

By ClarkKent

While Grey Mountain is technically a debut, it’s the fourth project and 17th album overall fronted by Jon Higgs from the label Eat Lead and Die Music. His other bands — Monsterworks, Thūn, and Moose Cult — have all received the AMG review treatment from various writers, often noting that these many projects sound similar to each other.1 And Higgs bringing along a Monsterworks bandmate, drummer James Garnett, to Grey Mountain, does little to squash the fear of over-familiarity. However, this new act’s third member, Kishor Haulenbeek, is a n00b to the Eat Lead and Die Music roster. While Higgs brings in a well-polished prog/doom style to his sound, Haulenbeek is more raw and dissonant. Are these fresh contributions influential enough to allow Grey Mountain to stand apart from Higgs’ other projects?

Grey Mountain does sound remarkably similar to its kin, more along the lines of the progressive ideas from Monsterworks and less so the doomy ones from Thūn. But Haulenbeek does bring a unique style to the band. The guitars have a more dissonant tone, and the overall sound is much rawer. It reminds me of Opeth’s early work, like Morningrise. But where Opeth is deliberate in their songwriting, Grey Mountain feels much more free in style, as if the band members are playing in a jam session together rather than performing pre-written parts, which gives looseness that avoids easy definition. While opener “Grey Mountain” fits the doom mold, the rest of the songs are faster tempo and more playful. Grey Mountain is post/prog above all, but you will also hear some funky bass grooves and even moments of spacey psychedelia.

Grey Mountain’s unpredictable nature means that it’s not always cohesive, but it’s also never boring. The free form style is both a curse and a blessing. The individual band members play their instruments very well, but they don’t always sound like they’re playing together, as if competing in ideologies. Haulenbeek’s dissonant lines don’t always gel with the prog, and the result is jarring compared to the smoother sound of Higgs’ other works. Yet the freestyling also means songs don’t dwell for very long on any one passage, and the extensive use of elaborate guitar solos keeps things moving along. The result is both rewarding and frustrating. On two instances (“Hermitage,” “Living Mythology”), a song will begin to build momentum with incredibly catchy riffs, only for the payoff to fizzle due to a lack of direction.

The biggest issue holding back Grey Mountain, however, is the singing. Just as my head starts bobbing to the opening of “Grey Mountain,” the primary vocalist erupts in a sudden screech that sounds like someone recorded their nails scratching a chalkboard. Grey Mountain uses a dual vocalist approach (both Higgs and Haulenbeek receive credit), but it’s difficult to tell who’s who since neither sounds much like they do on other albums. One singer uses muscular death metal growls that suit the songs well. The issue isn’t just that the main vocal attack is bad, but both of the singers are inconsistent. The main guy occasionally loses his screech and actually sounds tolerable (“Hermitage”), while the harsh vocal presence loses steam on the latter half of the album. I’m normally not bothered by extreme vocals, but here they sound so off-pitch it made me cringe.

Listening to Grey Mountain, it’s clear the band had fun making this album; they’re even in talks about writing another Grey Mountain record. Perhaps what they need is additional time writing music together in order to create a more cohesive sound (and please ditch the screeches). The presence of Haulenbeek may not have moved Higgs entirely out of the umbrella of his core Monsterworks/Thūn/Moose Cult sound, and perhaps that’s okay because the prog sound allows for immense variety. While Grey Mountain may sound, at its core, like those other bands, it has enough of its own nuances to give it an identity all its own. Sadly, Grey Mountain doesn’t escape the label’s mixed reception here at AMG, but they show enough promise to break the mold next time.

Rating: 2.5/5.0
DR: 10 | Format Reviewed: 320 kbps mp3
Label: Eat Lead and Die Music
Websites: greymountain.bandcamp.com/album/grey-mountain | ampwall.com/a/greymountain2
Releases Worldwide: March 7th, 2025

#25 #2025 #DoomMetal #EatLeadAndDieMusic #GreyMountain #InternationalMetal #Mar25 #Monsterworks #MooseCult #Opeth #PostMetal #ProgressiveMetal #PsychRock #Review #Reviews #Thūn

2024-09-05

Moose Cult – Book of the Machines Review

By Kenstrosity

UK progressive heavy/doom metal troupe Moose Cult should sound familiar to fans of the blog. Featuring members of Bull Elephant, Conglaciation, Monsterworks, The Anchoret, and Thūn, Moose Cult constitute a new installment in the Eat Lead and Die canon of artists that we’ve covered over the last decade. This project focuses on generalized environmental issues and human folly, justifying somewhat the band’s self-assigned moniker of “Envirometal.” While that does a poor job of illustrating what it is that Moose Cult plays beyond the scope of lyrical theme and content, sophomore record Book of the Machines won’t puzzle listeners nearly as much as the bespoke genre tag might.

Moose Cult’s closest living relative in the metalverse is very clearly Bull Elephant. Wild combinations of gritty heavy metal, aggressive doom, progressive metal and a touch of the extreme characterize Book of the Machines’ thirty-eight minutes. Gruff vocals reminiscent of Boss Keloid fused with Bütcher passionately deliver lyrics that tackle a wide array of uniquely human quandaries. Meanwhile, lurching guitars and pounding skins—along with an impressive variety of different blast beat variations—provide the muscle to move that kind of potentially weighty messaging. Moose Cult aren’t the first band to concern themselves with environmental matters, but their more vague, generalized approach to that theme differs greatly from the more story-driven, niche nature of Bull Elephant’s material. Whether that is a boon or a detractor is up for debate. However, I maintain that using a near-carbon copy of Bull Elephant’s blueprint to unleash a shotgun blast against human greed and mankind’s disregard for the environment, rather than crafting a more distinct sound to enact a focused attack on a specific environmental issue, works against Moose Cult’s favor.

Book of the Machines’ greatest fumble extends beyond plagiarism of sister projects’ style and application. A more damning lack of memorable songwriting leaves me with little of consequence to hold on to after the record concludes. Enjoyable and entertaining in the moment, stronger cuts like “Erewhon,” “Curse of Creation,” “Earth(l)ing,” and “Book of the Machines” do offer small nuggets worth preserving. “Curse of Creation” in particular features a beautiful, psychedelic ambience in its midsection that immerses me in vivid, kaleidoscopic light, only to bring me crashing back down to a ruined Earth a minute later. Highly effective puts it mildly. However, these moments aren’t strong enough to carry any song on its own, let alone an entire album filled with solid lyrical ideas that never got the development they deserved. Across Book of the Machines’ runtime, passages shift and shimmy with an arbitrary sort of movement that jostles arrangements enough to destabilize them. Put another way, this record is not a smooth one, and consequently feels disjointed and unsteady.

Despite its awkward songwriting and flimsy messaging, Book of the Machines holds potential. Throat singing embellishments and fantastic soloing help elevate tracks like “Gateway to Evolving Thought” and “Headless Cult” almost enough to establish a trademark sound for the band. Closer “Book of the Machines” accomplishes a similar feat, albeit with a completely different approach that evokes a more extreme variant of Killing Joke. If Moose Cult buckles down and unifies these more differentiated elements into a unique, but cohesive, palette that better stands on its own, all the better for future efforts. On the other hand, Moose Cult nailed the production with Book of the Machines. Rich, warm, textured, and dynamic, this record blooms with vibrant color and its varying instrumentation strikes an ideal clarity that deftly avoids an over-polished sheen.

Overall, I am disappointed with Moose Cult so far. I am a longtime fan of Bull Elephant and have heard good things about several of these artists’ other projects, but this record isn’t what it could’ve been. Between the sparse substance behind its theme and the plagiaristic nature of its musical content, Book of the Machines offers a substandard proof of concept that makes it difficult to buy in. Without focusing its message and finding a unique—or at least more creative—voice with which to express it, this record fails to make an impact. Therefore, I recommend passing on it, hanging tight, and waiting to hear where Moose Cult go from here.

Rating: Disappointing.
DR: 11 | Format Reviewed: 320 kb/s mp3
Label: Eat Lead and Die Music
Website: moosecult.bandcamp.com
Releases Worldwide: September 6th, 2024

#20 #2024 #BookOfTheMachines #BossKeloid #BullElephant #Bütcher #Conglaciation #DoomMetal #EatLeadAndDieMusic #HeavyMetal #KillingJoke #Monsterworks #MooseCult #ProgressiveMetal #PsychedelicMetal #Review #Reviews #Sep24 #TheAnchoret #Thūn #UKMetal

2024-07-28

Album Review: Moose Cult – Book Of The Machines

There are times when the very name of a band is enough to spark interest, and that's all it takes, really. Moose Cult? Okay, I”m in. Mastered by Dan Swanö as well? Say no more. Book of The Machines is the second outing by the English/American four piece, having burst onto the scene last year with their self

moshville.co.uk/reviews/album-

#AlbumReviews #MooseCult

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst