#SharpWaveRipples

2024-12-17

@elduvelle_neuro

2/2

Importantly, not preplay, which occurs before any experience, but shortcuts, which occur after experience and allow the animal to learn the connectivity of the map.

One of the useful things lost in the publication is that Gupta et al 2010 (cell.com/neuron/abstract/S0896) and Gupta et al 2012 (nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/) are the same data. 2010 is #SharpWaveRipples and 2012 is #ThetaSequences. What's cool is that the theta segments the task, while SWRs link those segments together.

2024-10-11

#JournalClub on Closed-loop modulation of remote hippocampal representations with neurofeedback, from #FrankLab: little summary + comments.

  • The goal is to see if rats can deliberately reactivate internal representations, without external cues.
  • The authors design a closed-loop system that does clusterless real-time decoding of position and rewards the rats when they reactivate a specific maze arm end.
  • The rats go through a gradual training process: first getting reward on the actual maze (a T-maze), then getting reward in the home box when they orient towards the target arm of the maze [head-direction task], then getting reward in the home box when they reactivate the representation of the target maze end [neurofeedback task].
  • The rat's performance is not too bad given the difficulty of the task, kudos to Rat2 who seemed to really know what he was doing.
  • interestingly, the reactivations do not happen during #SharpWaveRipples, and not really during theta either, just during an uncharacterised LFP state.
  • Little caveat 1: as far as I can see, the head-direction of the rats is not shown in any plot and it is not possible to say if the rats might still be doing the head-direction task during the neurofeedback task. That being said, the rats clearly reactivate the target arm more in the neurofeedback than head-direction task, which is quite convincing.
  • Little caveat 2: the performance is always shown in terms of total rewards collected, and not reward rate. So in different sessions rats might reach the maximum reward but take twice the time. Showing reward rate would be more informative.

  • conclusion: this is pretty cool, but we would really need to know about the head-direction.

  • question for the audience: what do you think the rats "think about" during those reactivation moments??

#Neuroscience #HippocampalReplay (not really) #ThetaSequences (not really) #PlaceCells #NeuroRat #Hippocampus

Screenshot of task protocol, I will paste the legend below:
"The task environment consisted of a central “box” area with a central reward port and two arms, each with a reward port at the end. The end of one of the two arms was used as the target location for neurofeedback in each session. Note that the walls surrounding the central box are opaque. Each task session contained two task phases, exploration and feedback. During the feedback phase, either specific head directions or remote target representation were detected and triggered a tone. A nosepoke at the center well within 3 seconds of the tone then triggered delivery of reward"screenshot of figure showing an example representation, see legend:
"Clusterless decoding of hippocampal activity accurately tracked the rat’s actual position during movement. During feedback, the decoder detected remote representations that triggered tone and reward"Screenshot of Figure showing the increased representation of the target location in the neurofeedback sessions vs the head-direction sessions. See legend:
"Grouped (LME) analysis across all 6 rats."Screenshot of figure showing the type of brain state (ripple, non-ripple, theta) during which the rewarded epoch happened.
Legend: "Summary of brain state during remote representations."

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst