#USPTO

Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬BenjaminHCCarr@hachyderm.io
2025-12-11

#OperationBluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo
Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced it filed a formal petition with the #USPTO, asking agency to cancel X’s trademarks of words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X abandoned them.
“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark”
arstechnica.com/information-te

eicker.news ᳇ tech newstechnews@eicker.news
2025-11-28

The #USPTO updated #guidelines reaffirm that generative #AI cannot be named as an #inventor on a #patentapplication. The guidelines clarify that AI is a tool used by #humaninventors and that traditional joint #inventorship principles apply when multiple people are involved in creating an #invention with #AIassistance. engadget.com/ai/us-patent-offi #tech #media #news

Andrew Abernathyandrewabernathy
2025-11-22

The US Patent and Trademark Office is proposing rules that would make it much harder to defend against patent trolls (which is already too hard). The public comment period is approaching its close. The EFF has more info and a pointer to submitting a comment on the proposed rules.

eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/pate

2025-11-20

The #USPTO under Trump's direction is preparing to introduce new #rules that would protect #patent #trolls from challenges to their invalid patents.

The EFF's suggested comment:

I oppose the USPTO’s proposed rule changes for inter partes review (IPR), Docket No. PTO-P-2025-0025. The IPR process must remain open and fair. Patent challenges should be decided on their merits, not shut out because of legal activity elsewhere. These rules would make it nearly impossible for the public to challenge bad patents, and that will harm innovation and everyday technology users.
But feel free to write your own.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/patent-office-about-make-bad-patents-untouchable

2025-11-20

To my #American friends: Heads up, the #USPTO is about to make bad patents untouchable and is inviting your (the public) comments by Dec 2. Sounds to me like you might want to provide feedback. The #EFF has some very good examples of why this is bad and how you can take action by commenting: eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/pate

Nintendo e il riesame del brevetto 12,403,397: le implicazioni del caso Palworld negli Stati Uniti

fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.gala

<img alt="Nintendo e il riesame del brevetto 12,403,397: le implicazioni del caso Palworld negli Stati Uniti" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" height="1080" src="https://i2.wp.com/cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/MGwCjaDRdmHWYLdq6moy7b-1920-80.jpg?w=1920&amp;resize=1920,1080&amp;ssl=1" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear: both;" title="Nintendo e il riesame del brevetto 12,403,397: le implicazioni del caso Palworld negli Stati Uniti" width="1920" /><div class="starw-prima-del-contenuto_4" id="starw-1738696215"><div id="addendoContainer_Interstitial"></div></div><p>Mentre <strong>Nintendo</strong> e <strong>The Pokémon Company</strong> proseguono in Giappone la loro azione legale contro <strong>Pocketpair</strong>, lo studio creatore di <em>Palworld</em>, la vicenda assume ora una nuova dimensione internazionale. Negli Stati Uniti, infatti, l’<strong>United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)</strong> ha avviato un <strong>riesame ufficiale del brevetto 12,403,397</strong>, con potenziali conseguenze rilevanti per l’intera industria videoludica.</p><div class="starw-contenuto_6" id="starw-3197014070" style="margin-top: 2px; margin-bottom: 2px;"><!-- BOX 300x250 Articolo 1 -->
<div id="addendoContainer_9001" style="width: 300px; height: 250px;">
</div></div>
<p>Il brevetto, registrato nel settembre 2024, è stato criticato per la sua <strong>formulazione estremamente ampia</strong>: descrive un sistema di gioco in cui un giocatore può evocare “sub-person
MassivelyOPmassivelyop
2025-11-04
COPYRIGHT
2025-10-10

USPTO: USPTO launches new AI Pilot for pre-examination utility application search. “In furtherance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) steadfast commitment to dramatically improve examination quality, response time, and efficiency, the agency today announced the launch of its Artificial Intelligence Search Automated Pilot (ASAP!) Program. The ASAP! Program will test the […]

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/10/10/uspto-uspto-launches-new-ai-pilot-for-pre-examination-utility-application-search/

How to fix software patents #politics #patents #jefferson #uspto #trolls #copyright A fix for the patent system - scrap up front examination and remove the assumption that any patent is valid. Easier to get a patent, harder to use if offensively.

fed.brid.gy/r/https://ithought

2025-09-13
2025-09-02

Search Engine Journal: WordPress Trademark Applications Rejected By USPTO. “The United States Patent and Trademark Office has rejected the WordPress Foundation’s applications for trademarks on the phrases ‘Managed WordPress’ and ‘Hosted WordPress.’ But WordPress isn’t walking away just yet.”

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/09/02/search-engine-journal-wordpress-trademark-applications-rejected-by-uspto/

2025-08-28

USPTO: USPTO enhances assignment records search process. “The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is streamlining the overall assignment search experience by replacing two legacy search applications—Patent Assignment Search and Assignments on the Web—with one, more reliable, secure, and easy to use Assignment Search application.”

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/08/28/uspto-uspto-enhances-assignment-records-search-process/

Drew Crecente (they/them)crecente@games.ngo
2025-08-14

USPTO Fraud

The information used when applying for a patent or trademark is publicly available.

Bad actors access that public info (e.g. email address) to engage in scammy behavior.

They send emails which appear to be intentionally designed to mimic official correspondence from USPTO.

This has the added bonus of making legitimate correspondence from USPTO more likely to automatically go to SPAM.

We've previously filed complaints with FTC about this.

👉🏽 There should be an easier process to stop these abusive practices. At a minimum, it should be easier to track down who is paying for the phone # they are using. It is easier to get their domain shut down than it is to shut down their phone #.

❓ Is there anybody here who has called these folks and talked with "the assigned trademark examining officer"?

#USPTO #law #scam @law

Screenshot of email mimicking USPTO. Red boxes added to highlight deceptive content.
- - -

Trademark Application Verification & Owner Confirmation Required

From: teas@...guidancedocuments.org
To: contact

Dear Applicant,

Your trademark application is now live and requires verification, and endorsement in order to proceed with the final stages of registration.

The verification process includes:
Confirming the owner's details (name, address, serial number)
Duration of business operations
Description of goods and services offered 
Position of the owner within the company

To complete this step, the owner is scheduled for a verification call with the assigned trademark examining officer:

Phone: (571) *** 3902 (Press 1 to connect with the examining officer)
Appointment Time: 1:30 PM - 04:30 PM (EST)
Appointment Number: #5459
Date: 21st July 2025

Please contact your examining officer within the specified timeframe.
During the call, the attorney will verify ownership details, application specifics, and may discuss any potential conflicts or objections. This step is essential to move the application forward towards publication and final registration.

If the scheduled call is missed, there may be one opportunity for rescheduling.

Failure to complete this process may result in abandonment or rejection of the application.

Please "Confirm" receipt of this message and ensure that the scheduled verification is completed on time.

 

Regards,
Assignment Center USPTO


UnsubscribeScreenshot of email mimicking USPTO. Red boxes added to highlight deceptive content.
- - -
Trademark Application Verification
From: teas@usptoassistancecenter.org
To: contact

Dear Applicant,

Your trademark application is now live and requires verification, and endorsement in order to proceed with the final stages of registration.

[SNIPPED]

Phone: (571) *** 3902 (Press 1 to connect with the Examine Attorney) 
Appointment Time: 11:30 AM - 06:30 PM (EST)
Appointment Number: #4586
Date: 14th August 2025

[SNIP]

This step is essential to move the application forward towards publication and final registration.

Note: This call is an important step in your U.S. trademark application process. It's part of the standard review procedure with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The purpose is to confirm essential details and help move your filing forward without delays. If all required information is verified, your application could progress to the publication phase seamlessly.

If the scheduled call is missed, there may be one opportunity for rescheduling. Failure to complete this process may result in abandonment or rejection of the application.

Please "Confirm" receipt of this message and ensure that the scheduled verification is completed on time.

Regards,
United States Patent & Trademark Office

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst