I see a lot of confusion recently between Open Source, Free Software, and generative AI, thus I feel like I need to contribute my ideas to the clarification.
For that, I'll use the analogy with a natural brain.
The system, be it a brain or an AI, sees proprietary (but still public, i.e. not secret) art. For the AI it's during training, for the brain, it's just during the life.
The exposition to the art changes the internal state of the system, coefficients for the AI, synapses for the brain.
After these changes, depending on the exact configuration of the particular system, the system may even be able to reproduce the art with some accuracy.
However, most of the time, the input serves to increase the creativity and skills of the system, even when the outputs are clearly different from the piece of art that was input.
In the case of a brain, nobody claims any restriction on the internal state, and in the event that this brain outputs (through e.g. the activity of painting) a close reproduction of some proprietary art that was seen before, then this output is subject to copyright restrictions (cannot be sold without agreeing with the rights owner, etc).
However, if this copyrighted reproduction is used as an intermediate step in a creativity process, whether it stays as a mental image locked in the brain, or if it is painted or drawn as a draft not intended for publication, then there are no restrictions. The final output, that used the copyrighted work in the creative process but that, in the end, is different enough from it, is not subject to the restrictions.
Thus my understanding is that the same scheme applies to the other kind of system, the AI: copyrighted art that is public can be used for training, the weights of the resulting model are not subject to copyrighted restrictions (thus can be Free Software) but the output of the generative model, in the case that this output is to be published (otherwise, for private use, no restriction applies), needs to be checked against existing art in order to verify that it does not infringe on copyrighted art.
So, I showed that AI is compatible with Free Software and Open Source.
I also showed that the outputs of such FOSS generative AI models are not necessarily FOSS and need to be checked against copyrighted material in order to determine it.
#FreeSoftware #AI #AiandArt #OpenSource