#academicMisconduct
Scientific Journal Publishes AI-Generated Rat with Gigantic Penis In Worrying Incident
#AcademicMisconduct
Surprised by this? NOT!
Traditional Plagiarism = Out
AI Powered Misconduct = Growing
Survey of academic integrity violations i the UK found almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating using AI tools in 2023-24, or 5.1 for every 1,000 students, and increase from 1.6 cases per 1,000 in 2022-23. Indications are it will increase to ~ 7.5 proven cases per 1,000 students. Discovered cases represent only the tip of the iceberg.
In 2019-20, before the widespread availability of generative AI, plagiarism accounted for nearly two-thirds of all academic misconduct.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/jun/15/thousands-of-uk-university-students-caught-cheating-using-ai-artificial-intelligence-survey
#Plagiarism #AI #AICheating #Universities #CollegeStudents #academicmisconduct #Guardian
#AcademicMisconduct tend to be very common in some contexts. Actually the norm. Imagine now that you are unfairly accused of #AI #plagiarism.
How the emerging world collapse with old (bad) practices, multiplying the issue and requiring #P2P fair systems rightly mediate by #AI.
Those of you that haven’t read Dying Inside might be struck by some of the outdated ideas (there’s some sexism and racism) but the blunt portrayal of what it might be like to be a telepath in a University setting is prescient and powerful and so relevant to our thoughts on Gen AI and the academy… #HigherEducation #HigherEd #ScienceFiction #ContractCheating #GenAI #AcademicMisconduct #cheating #telepathy
What do you know? The contempt STEM as a field has had for artists bites them in the ass.
Stop using AI to generate illustrations for your slides, blogs, presentations. Artists work as hard at what they do as you do. AI corps stole from artists. It is plagiarism.
Maybe it's time for STEM to admit (1) Art matters - you want it, after all, and (2) The ability to create art is a skilled one, which is why you're trying to cheat to fake the skill. https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy3jbz/scientific-journal-frontiers-publishes-ai-generated-rat-with-gigantic-penis-in-worrying-incident
"The decision by the stomach cancer study’s publisher, Elsevier, not to post an explanation for the paper’s removal made it less likely that the episode would draw public attention or affect the duo’s work. That very study continued to be cited in papers by other scientists."
It seems as though "continued to be cited" means citations are ungrounded in "actually read the paper," if the paper is not available?
University of Regina investigating 50 cases of possible academic misconduct
The University of Regina stated 50 cases were investigated into possible academic misconduct and confirmed some occurrences did happen.
#globalnews #Education #academicmisconduct #Investigation #nursingstudents
https://globalnews.ca/news/10242938/university-of-regina-investigating-possible-academic-misconduct/
University of Regina investigating 50 cases of possible academic misconduct
The University of Regina stated 50 cases were investigated into possible academic misconduct and confirmed some occurrences did happen.
#globalnews #Education #academicmisconduct #Investigation #nursingstudents
https://globalnews.ca/news/10242938/university-of-regina-investigating-possible-academic-misconduct/
5/5: All of this is to say that these institutions only care about plagiarism if someone they care about is making them care.
So when such accusations just happen to come up and are taken seriously in the case of a Black woman who isn't immediately knuckling under to what white supremacist forces in this country desire, it's for a reason. Fascists are adept at weaponizing standards they care nothing about themselves. #AcademicMisconduct #UCAccessNow
4/5: Absolutely nothing of consequence happened. The first author stonewalled even citing. No real investigation was conducted and I know this because no one contacted me to view the evidence I had, nor did anyone interview the co-author who said they'd argued for citation pre-publication. #AcademicMisconduct #UCAccessNow @academicchatter
2/5: After I posted about the academic misconduct on Twitter, that PhD candidate was given a mtg with the Executive Director of Strategic Communications so they could get tips on how to "manage" this...despite the fact we are both grad students at UC Davis. So prior to any investigation into the allegations of academic misconduct, UC Davis put its weight behind the more politically connected student. It had no interest in actually investigating. @academicchatter #AcademicMisconduct #UCAccessNow
Thread 1/5: Since plagiarism's being discussed again, I wanted to give an example of just how much prestige higher ed institutions do not care about academic misconduct unless someone they actually care about is forcing them to pay attention to it.
A UC Davis PhD candidate was lead author on a paper that should have cited the UC Access Now Demandifesto at the very minimum. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N1HCiHed7A6G2_e3-jPVKzYSPAiURVYM-unOfyI8UdQ/edit?usp=sharing '
https://web.archive.org/web/20220610215739/https://twitter.com/may_gun/status/1496201940056915981
Harvard president Claudine Gay faces allegations and controversies https://noah-news.com/us/en/education/2023/12/17/harvard-president-claudine-gay-faces-allegations-and-controversies #HarvardUniversity #ClaudineGay #academicmisconduct
That moment when you realise it wasn't 2 students cheating. It was 5 students cheating. And they honestly thought I would not notice. #academicmisconduct
Doing some lit review and found a relevant Nature paper in which authors explicitly claimed no conflicts of interest. Yet I found they had applied for and been granted a patent on the same technology two years prior. Is this a big deal and if so does it merit a comment on #PubPeer or something similar?
Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia-based paper mill
#AcademicMisconduct #AnnaAbalkina #ghostwriting #PredatoryJournals #PredatoryPublishing #ResearchMisconduct #Russia #ScholarlyPublishing #ScientificCommunication
Never thought I would find a Texas legal decision good, but I do:
Texas Supreme Court rules that universities can revoke degrees for academic misconduct
I am undertaking research into attitudes towards and perceptions of contract cheating, within UK-based higher education.
Below is a link to an anonymous survey, which takes around 5-10 minutes to complete. The survey can be taken by #Students or #Teachers / #Lecturers / #Professors / #Tutors / #Instructors or anybody who has taught in some capacity at a UK-based higher educational facility. It does not matter if you reside in the UK, just that you taught / studied at a UK-based institution, no matter how long ago.
This research is for my #MBA #Dissertation and therefore all responses will be extremely helpful.
Thank you in advance for you consideration and participation.
https://mmu.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_dcBGSIrUma85UV0
#Learning #LearningTechnology #ContractCheating #AcademicMisconduct #AcademicDishonesty #Cheating #EssayMills #PayingForWork #Plagiarism #Research #UK-based #HigherEducation
I just gave a #GenerativeAI workshop for some 300 high-school students in a program of Toronto's Lifelong Leadership Institute. The LLI serves the Candian Jamaican, Carribean and Black community with #education opportunities. We opened with the most meaningful #LandAcknowledgement I have ever heard (by a participant), and I got to have a spirited conversation with a group of wonderful, well informed, smart, and curious students.
Some take-aways:
We polled uptake:
- About 1/3 of students have not used #ChatGPT so far;
- About 1/3 have used it only a few times overall;
- About 1/3 use it regularly. Interesting: of those who use it regularly, the majority are frequent users, i.e. either you have not used it for some reason, or you use it a lot. Not much middle ground.
During the workshop, we focussed on the Sentient Syllabus - Three Principles for AI use in academia...
https://sentientsyllabus.substack.com/p/just-the-basics
... and one question stood out: how can we implement the new thinking around generative AI in classroom practice? Indeed, how. We need to grow practice. I always look for a win-win angle - coercion is the wrong way, but on this topic it is particularly easy: figuring out solutions is absolutely a topic that learners and lecturers must approach shoulder to shoulder. In this case it means: "Better learning support for students, deeper questions for educators".
Of course, the question of #academicMisconduct always comes up: my mantra is "Have the AI think with you, not for you". From that perspective we can avoid making this the next battleground. Liberalize - and teach how the AI's level of performance can no longer be a passing grade. Because that quality is what your future employer gets for free.
#Plagiarism? Open it up. #Alignment? Stop thinking about controls and democratize it instead. #Bing? Yes, that psychotic episode created a foundational piece of writing. Jobs? That's on us: to educate society the value of the human touch. #Sentience? No. But #emergence! It does more than what it was trained for. The future? IDK. I really don't. But stay in control. Learn what it can do, and then determine what it should do for us (always good advice).
:-)
What are the equity implications Academic Misconduct from use of ChatGPT/AI?
Keep asking myself: Who is likely to be accused of using AI tools for academic misconduct? How will biases/expectations about English or academic language skills play into this?
I"m not seeing this in the discourse much on academic implications of generative AI.
Interesting to see that UBC's Academic Integrity now has a FAQ on ChatGPT/AI.
Client Info
Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst