The review was surprisingly quick with 6 weeks. Surprisingly, the two reviewers remarked practically nothing and had no further questions, but emphasized the suitability of the topic and our rigorous methods for the journal. First I was rather sceptical of this review, as it had vibes of #predatoryJournals. But then again I really poured a lot of work and fine-tuning into this particular article to make it consistent. And PLOS journals appear pretty non-predatory.¹




