#BizMapper

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2020-05-27

Today I wondered how to get to insert a data row into a table, after processing the input source that is read from a , while it constructs a document output to the file system (or an , not a db).

It does not seem possible.

The solution is to turn around the process: get the data row entered first, then use that to construct the output document, then update the data row in post.

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2020-01-02

Last week I migrated one of my applications. It went from input and output to JSON input and output, and at the same time from to .

That move cut away 2/3rds of the .

The functionality stayed roughly the same. Some validations got omitted. I may wind up adding them back in.

This is the way forward. It wouldn't have been possible without tooling that produces JSON documents.

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2019-05-15

Did I mention has an office on the other side of my town? I've become quite familiar with the , , and products they bought from . BizManager has some and issues. And its web interface is written in . I know , , and JSP from long ago (BizManager's JSP seems that old). Maybe I should offer them my help?

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2019-05-02

Last week my team learned about a limitation in processing in the application by (formerly by ):

If an XMLElement has 2 or more children with the same name, and the source format for that element has its sort order set to unordered, then BizMapper no longer knows which child element to pick.

We wanted the 2nd. BizMapper gave us the 1st.

This is understandable behavior. It's also quite annoying. We reached out to their support and hope for a solution.

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2019-03-12

The solution to this failure is 2-fold:
- recognize that the field got assigned a ;
- set the field's namespace to empty (don't remove it!).

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2019-03-12

Working with documents is a joy. Working with ones that have a is a royal pain.

The transformation tool for enterprise business communication by (formerly by ) can translate XML into : great for integration with our ERP.

If an XML document has a default ns, the Mapper happily adds it to newly-added fields. Normally that is great.

Until you don't expect it, and wanted no ns.

Then translation will fail.

Ænðr E. Feldstrawaeveltstra
2019-03-12

Anyone else here who uses by (formerly by )?

It's a document transformation tool for enterprise business communication (orders, acknowledgements, etc).

The latest version can read and produce : nice when we communicate with a partner who also speaks JSON.

It doesn't seem to want to use a JSON Schema as a template for source or target documents. That costs a lot of time.

Any ideas on whether it can do that? And if so, how?

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst