Lmst

Food safety is unimportant compared to attacking vulnerable minorities and women.

#USADeathSpiral
#DefendYourself
#BoycottDairy
#RemoveTrump
#DeportElon

Ecosystems Sell Dirt Cheap for Palm Oil Filled Snickers and KitKat

A recent report highlighted by Mongabay uncovers that deforestation-linked palm oil may still be in popular snacks like Snickers and Kit Kat, despite pledges from brands like Mars, Nestlé, and Mondelēz to use only deforestation-free palm oil. The issue lies in the palm oil-based animal feed used for dairy production, which these companies are not being transparent about. Thirteen out of the fourteen largest U.S. dairy processors, including Mars, Nestlé, and Mondelēz, fail to disclose how much palm oil-based animal feed is in their supply chains, raising concerns over hidden deforestation. If you are wanting to be kind to farmed and wild animals and ecosystems, make sure that you be #vegan #BoycottPalmOil #BoycottDairy #Boycott4Wildlife

#Kitkat and #Snickers makers #Mondelez, #Nestle, Mars lace snacks with #palmoil #deforestation by way of animal feed for #dairy cows. #Consumers may be buying #ecocide unaware! Fight back, be #vegan 🥕🥦#Boycottpalmoil 🌴🚫 #Boycott4Wildlife @palmoildetect https://palmoildetectives.com/2024/09/26/ecosystems-sell-dirt-cheap-for-palm-oil-filled-snickers-and-kitkat/

Share to BlueSky Share to Twitter

Mondelez, #Nestle and Mars show flagrant disregard for #rainforests. A new #report finds they purchase #palmoil to use in dairy animal feed. Take a strong stance! Don’t buy #Kitkat and #Snickers and #Boycottpalmoil #Boycott4Wildlife 🌴🚫🔥 @palmoildetect https://palmoildetectives.com/2024/09/26/ecosystems-sell-dirt-cheap-for-palm-oil-filled-snickers-and-kitkat/

Share to BlueSky Share to Twitter

Written by Hans Nicholas Jong, for Mongabay. Published 24th of September, 2024. Republished under the Creative Commons attribution licence. Read original article.

https://youtu.be/GNYH-yWC7ug

Makers of iconic snacks like Snickers and Kit Kat have pledged to only use deforestation-free palm oil, but a new report says deforestation-linked palm oil may still be finding its way into their products.
That’s because much of the dairy that goes into these foods comes from cattle raised on palm oil-based animal feed, whose import into the U.S. doesn’t account for whether it derives from deforested land.
The report found 13 of the 14 biggest dairy processors in the U.S. — including Mars, Nestlé and Mondelēz — don’t provide information about how much palm oil-based animal feed they use in their supply chains.
It calls on the Consumer Goods Forum (CGF), of which many of these companies are members, to include this so-called embedded palm oil in their deforestation-free policies, similar to how the CGF has a policy for accounting for embedded soy.

Consumers in the U.S. might be unknowingly exposed to palm oil products that come from deforestation, despite major consumer goods producers there adopting zero-deforestation pledges. That’s because these companies, which include the makers of iconic foods like Snickers, Kit Kat and Nutella, don’t account for the significant role that palm oil-based animal feed plays in their supply chains, according to a new report.

Its relatively low price and extremely versatility mean palm oil has become the most widely used vegetable oil in the world. In the U.S. itself, palm oil can be found in roughly half of all packaged goods in the average grocery store, from shampoo to cookies and crackers.

Palm oil is also increasingly being used as an additive in livestock feed, particularly for dairy cows. As such, it has become “embedded” in consumer goods products deriving from dairy, such as milk, cheese, ice cream and chocolate.

This indirect use of palm oil is often overlooked in the zero-deforestation accounting process, despite its growing use, according to a report by U.S.-based advocacy group Rainforest Action Network (RAN). The report found that palm oil-based animal feed is now the single largest palm oil product category imported by the U.S., accounting for 36% of all palm oil imports into the country by weight.

This dairy — “embedded” with palm oil, some of which may be associated with deforestation — then enters the supply chains of major food producers. And these producers, despite their public pledges to avoid deforestation-linked products, are largely ignoring this source of palm oil in their accounting, according to the report.

The report analyzed 14 of the largest dairy-processing and consumer goods companies operating in the U.S.: Arla, Dairy Farmers of America, Danone, Ferrero, Frontera, FrieslandCampina, Lactalis, Mars, Mengniu, Mondelēz, Nestlé, Saputo, Unilever and Yili.

The report found that 13 of them don’t provide information about how much palm oil-based animal feed is used in their supply chains.

The only company that provides such information is Unilever, which says that embedded palm oil in its dairy supply chain in 2022 accounted for just 3%, or 30,0000 metric tons, of its overall palm oil consumption.

Thirteen of the 14 assessed companies also don’t mention embedded palm oil in their “No Deforestation, No Peatland, No Exploitation” (NDPE) policies, and as such have no commitments to sourcing only deforestation-free embedded palm oil. Only Danish-Swedish dairy giant Arla’s NDPE policy explicitly states that it applies to palm oil-based feed used in its milk supply chain.

“When companies have adopted palm oil policies, they completely refuse or haven’t considered palm oil use in their dairy supply chain,” RAN forest policy director Gemma Tillack told Mongabay. “Lack of attention to this issue means that it hasn’t [been] accounted for in companies’ NDPE policies, or if it’s included, it’s not adequately enforced.”

Import-export oversight

This oversight extends to both importers and exporters of palm oil-based livestock feed into the U.S. The report assessed 24 exporters based in Indonesia and Malaysia, the world’s top two producers of palm oil, and 17 U.S. companies that import palm oil-based animal feed.

It found that 15 of the 24 exporters companies and 15 of the 17 importers companies don’t have public NDPE policies. These 15 exporting companies account for two-thirds of exports to the U.S. by weight.

The report also found that 28% of U.S. imports of feed-grade palm oil products came from Indonesia, the country with the highest deforestation rates associated with palm oil. That makes it likely that such problematic palm oil has found its way into dairy products like milk and confectionaries regularly consumed by Americans, according to the report.

Cattle in Colombia. Image by Rhett A. Butler / Mongabay.

Deforestation-free claims

Without adequately accounting for embedded palm oil in their NDPE policies and supply chains, consumer goods brands can’t guarantee that their products are deforestation free, even if they claim that’s the case, RAN said.

Nestlé, for instance, says 96.0% of its “primary supply chain” of palm oil in 2023 was deforestation-free, but makes no reference to embedded palm oil in that claim.

If embedded palm oil were accounted for, then Nestlé’s deforestation-free claim would fall to about 72%, according to RAN’s analysis. It based this on the assumption that 10% of the milk the company sources was linked to palm oil-based animal feed.

This large variance means deforestation-free claims by the likes of Nestlé and others might be inaccurate or misleading, the report said.

Responding to the findings, Nestlé said the figures used by RAN and the corresponding assumptions are incorrect, but didn’t provide details about its concerns.

The failure to account for embedded palm oil in supply chains could have broader implications for these brands, as most of them also do business in the European Union. The EU market will, from the end of this year, be subject to a deforestation-free regulation known as the EUDR, which will ban the import of commodities like palm oil and its derived products if they’re associated with deforestation.

To prove that the products they bring into the EU aren’t linked to deforestation, companies have to be able to trace the products all the way back to the production units and ensure no deforestation has taken place there after a cutoff date of Dec. 31, 2020.

The RAN report’s revelations suggest it’s unlikely that companies like Danone and Ferrero — which are headquartered in the EU and source much of their milk from there — as well as Nestlé and Unilever — which have significant operations within the EU that process dairy products — can guarantee the deforestation-free status of their animal feed imports.

As a result, the EUDR should be of particular concern to these companies, the report said.

Bulldozers are being used by palm oil plantation PT Sawit Panen Terus to destroy significant areas of lowland rainforest in the Leuser Ecosystem, in February 2024. Image courtesy of RAN.

Call for action

The failure to account for embedded palm oil in their supply chains and NDPE policies is an “industry-wide problem that needs an industrywide solution,” the report said. It called on the Consumer Goods Forum (CGF), a network of the world’s largest consumer goods brands, to encourage its members, including Danone, Ferrero, FrieslandCampina, Nestlé, Mars, Mengniu, Mondelēz and Unilever, to include embedded palm oil in their NDPE policies.

So far, the CGF has failed to do so, RAN noted.

It has also failed to include embedded palm oil in its road map that sets the expectations for how members of its so-called forest-positive coalition should implement NDPE policy commitments in the palm oil sector. The coalition aims to accelerate efforts to eliminate deforestation from the supply chains of each member.

This is in contrast to the CGF’s initiative for the soy industry, which has its own road map that details the types of “embedded soy” products that need to be accounted for — such as soy used in feed mix for animal products and soy embedded in meat, dairy and eggs used in processed food.

“We need to see these commitments in place to ensure palm oil-based animal feed is not a new leakage market,” RAN’s Tillack said.

Written by Hans Nicholas Jong, for Mongabay. Published 24th of September, 2024. Republished under the Creative Commons attribution licence. Read original article.

ENDS

Read more about deforestation and ecocide in the palm oil industry

The Great Malaysian Timber and Palm Oil Swindle

A joint investigation by Malaysiakini and Pulitzer Center’s Rainforest Investigations Network (RIN) reveals alarming deforestation in Pahang, #Malaysia, caused by one of the country’s largest #palmoil plantations. The plantation threatens endangered species like…

Deadly Harvest: How Demand for Palm Oil Fuels Corruption in Honduras

Latin America is the fastest-growing producer of palm oil, but at what price for the environment and its defenders? Park rangers in Honduras tell harrowing tales of daily threats to their lives and…

Major Food Companies Sued Over Addictive Ultra-Processed Foods Targeting Children

A landmark lawsuit filed in Philadelphia names major food companies: Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Post Holdings, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills, Nestlé, Kellogg’s, Mars, and ConAgra and accuses them of designing and marketing ultra-processed foods…

Palm Oil Protesters Silenced and Arrested in Congo

On Tuesday, April 30, 2024, a shocking and disgraceful incident occurred in Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). During a meeting of shareholders from Plantations et Huileries du Congo…

How banks and investors are bankrolling extinction and ecocide

This article highlights the significant role that banks and investors play in fuelling a global biodiversity crisis – particularly in relation to palm oil, meat, soy and timber deforestation.

By financially supporting…

Load more posts

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.

Take Action in Five Ways

1. Join the #Boycott4Wildlife on social media and subscribe to stay in the loop: Share posts from this website to your own network on Twitter, Mastadon, Instagram, Facebook and Youtube using the hashtags #Boycottpalmoil #Boycott4Wildlife.

2. Contribute stories: Academics, conservationists, scientists, indigenous rights advocates and animal rights advocates working to expose the corruption of the palm oil industry or to save animals can contribute stories to the website.

Wildlife Artist Juanchi Pérez

Mel Lumby: Dedicated Devotee to Borneo’s Living Beings

Anthropologist and Author Dr Sophie Chao

Health Physician Dr Evan Allen

The World’s Most Loved Cup: A Social, Ethical & Environmental History of Coffee by Aviary Doert

How do we stop the world’s ecosystems from going into a death spiral? A #SteadyState Economy

3. Supermarket sleuthing: Next time you’re in the supermarket, take photos of products containing palm oil. Share these to social media along with the hashtags to call out the greenwashing and ecocide of the brands who use palm oil. You can also take photos of palm oil free products and congratulate brands when they go palm oil free.

https://twitter.com/CuriousApe4/status/1526136783557529600?s=20

https://twitter.com/PhillDixon1/status/1749010345555788144?s=20

https://twitter.com/mugabe139/status/1678027567977078784?s=20

4. Take to the streets: Get in touch with Palm Oil Detectives to find out more.

5. Donate: Make a one-off or monthly donation to Palm Oil Detectives as a way of saying thank you and to help pay for ongoing running costs of the website and social media campaigns. Donate here

Pledge your support

#BoycottPalmOil #Boycott4wildlife #BoycottDairy #BoycottPalmOil #consumers #corruption #dairy #deforestation #ecocide #Kitkat #Mondelez #Nestle #PalmOil #palmOilBiofuel #palmOilDeforestation #palmoil #rainforests #report #Snickers #vegan

Ecosystems Sell Dirt Cheap for Palm Oil Filled Snickers and KitKat

Ultra-processed Foods: Trashing Health and The Planet

Our world is facing a huge challenge: we need to create enough high-quality, diverse and nutritious food to feed a growing population – and do so within the boundaries of our planet. This means significantly reducing the environmental impact of the global food system. Below is information about how you can identify ultra processed foods containing palm oil and other harmful ingredients in order to avoid them – for your own health and the health of the planet. Help the planet, animals and indigenous peoples – #BoycottPalmOil #Boycott4Wildlife

#Palmoil 🌴🪔 and #meat 🥩🍖💀 are ultra-processed unhealthy foods 🍔🍟 that are harmful to health and harmful to the planet 🌏🔥 Here’s how to avoid them. Be #vegan for the animals, and the planet! #Boycottpalmoil #Boycott4Wildlife @palmoildetect https://palmoildetectives.com/2023/05/10/ultra-processed-foods-are-trashing-our-health-and-the-planet/

Share to BlueSky Share to Twitter

Ultra processed #foods #UPF: #palmoil #meat and #dairy are harmful to health and linked to chronic disease and mortality 🫁🫀💀 Here’s how to avoid them for environmental and #health reasons #Boycottpalmoil 🌴🚫 #Boycott4Wildlife @palmoildetect https://palmoildetectives.com/2023/05/10/ultra-processed-foods-are-trashing-our-health-and-the-planet/

Share to BlueSky Share to Twitter

There are more than 7,000 edible plant species which could be consumed for food. But today, 90% of global energy intake comes from 15 crop species, with more than half of the world’s population relying on just three cereal crops: rice, wheat and maize.

The rise of ultra-processed foods is likely playing a major role in this ongoing change, as our latest research notes. Thus, reducing our consumption and production of these foods offers a unique opportunity to improve both our health and the environmental sustainability of the food system.

Food agriculture is a major driver of environmental damage and ecocide

Agriculture is a major driver of environmental change. It is responsible for one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions and about 70% of freshwater use. It also uses 38% of global land and is the largest driver of biodiversity loss.

While research has highlighted how western diets containing excessive calories and livestock products tend to have large environmental impacts, there are also environmental concerns linked to ultra-processed foods.

Sumatran Rhino Dicerorhinus sumatrensis. 10,000s of animal species, like the Sumatran Rhino are pushed out of their homes by the encroachment of agriculture to make cheap, processed foods

The impacts of these foods on human health are well described, but the effects on the environment have been given less consideration. This is surprising, considering ultra-processed foods are a dominant component of the food supply in high-income countries (and sales are rapidly rising through low and middle-income countries too).

Our latest research, led by colleagues in Brazil, proposes that increasingly globalised diets high in ultra-processed foods come at the expense of the cultivation, manufacture and consumption of “traditional” foods.

How to spot ultra-processed foods

Ultra-processed foods are a group of foods defined as “formulations of ingredients, mostly of exclusive industrial use, that result from a series of industrial processes”.

They typically contain cosmetic additives and little or no whole foods. You can think of them as foods you would struggle to create in your own kitchen. Examples include confectionery, soft drinks, chips, pre-prepared meals and restaurant fast-food products.

In contrast with this are “traditional” foods – such as fruits, vegetables, wholegrains, preserved legumes, dairy and meat products – which are minimally processed, or made using traditional processing methods.

While traditional processing, methods such as fermentation, canning and bottling are key to ensuring food safety and global food security. Ultra-processed foods, however, are processed beyond what is necessary for food safety.

Australians have particularly high rates of ultra-processed food consumption. These foods account for 39% of total energy intake among Australian adults. This is more than Belgium, Brazil, Columbia, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico and Spain – but less than the United States, where they account for 57.9% of adults’ dietary energy.

According to an analysis of the 2011-12 Australian Health Survey (the most recent national data available on this), the ultra-processed foods that contributed the most dietary energy for Australians aged two and above included ready-made meals, fast food, pastries, buns and cakes, breakfast cereals, fruit drinks, iced tea and confectionery.

What are the environmental impacts?

Ultra-processed foods also rely on a small number of crop species, which places burden on the environments in which these ingredients are grown.

Maize, wheat, soy and oil seed crops (such as palm oil) are good examples. These crops are chosen by food manufacturers because they are cheap to produce and high yielding, meaning they can be produced in large volumes.

Also, animal-derived ingredients in ultra-processed foods are sourced from animals which rely on these same crops as feed.

The rise of convenient and cheap ultra-processed foods has replaced a wide variety of minimally-processed wholefoods including fruits, vegetables, grains, legumes, meat and dairy. This has reduced both the quality of our diet and food supply diversity.

Ferrero and Nutella responsible for palm oil deforestation despite supposedly using “sustainable” palm oil. Image: Charlie Hebdo

In Australia, the most frequently used ingredients in the 2019 packaged food and drink supply were sugar (40.7%), wheat flour (15.6%), vegetable oil (12.8%) and milk (11.0%).

Some ingredients used in ultra-processed foods such as cocoa, sugar and some vegetable oils are also strongly associated with biodiversity loss.

Hersheys is responsible for palm oil deforestation despite supposedly using “sustainable” palm oil.

What can be done?

The environmental impact of ultra-processed foods is avoidable. Not only are these foods harmful, they are also unnecessary for human nutrition. Diets high in ultra-processed foods are linked with poor health outcomes, including heart disease, type-2 diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome, cancer and depression, among others.

To counter this, food production resources across the world could be re-routed into producing healthier, less processed foods. For example, globally, significant quantities of cereals such as wheat, maize and rice are milled into refined flours to produce refined breads, cakes, donuts and other bakery products.

These could be rerouted into producing more nutritious foods such as wholemeal bread or pasta. This would contribute to improving global food security and also provide more buffer against natural disasters and conflicts in major breadbasket areas.

Other environmental resources could be saved by avoiding the use of certain ingredients altogether.

Demand for palm oil (a common ingredient in ultra-processed foods, and associated with deforestation in Southeast Asia) could be significantly reduced through consumers shifting their preferences towards healthier foods.

Reducing your consumption of ultra-processed foods is one way by which you can reduce your environmental footprint, while also improving your health.

Kim Anastasiou, Research Dietitian (CSIRO), PhD Candidate (Deakin University), Deakin University; Mark Lawrence, Professor of Public Health Nutrition, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University; Michalis Hadjikakou, Lecturer in Environmental Sustainability, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering & Built Environment, Deakin University, and Phillip Baker, Research Fellow, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Deakin University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

ENDS

Take Action in Five Ways

✓ Subscribed

Wildlife Artist Juanchi Pérez

Mel Lumby: Dedicated Devotee to Borneo’s Living Beings

Anthropologist and Author Dr Sophie Chao

Health Physician Dr Evan Allen

The World’s Most Loved Cup: A Social, Ethical & Environmental History of Coffee by Aviary Doert

How do we stop the world’s ecosystems from going into a death spiral? A #SteadyState Economy

https://twitter.com/CuriousApe4/status/1526136783557529600?s=20

https://twitter.com/PhillDixon1/status/1749010345555788144?s=20

https://twitter.com/mugabe139/status/1678027567977078784?s=20

4. Take to the streets: Get in touch with Palm Oil Detectives to find out more.

5. Donate: Make a one-off or monthly donation to Palm Oil Detectives as a way of saying thank you and to help pay for ongoing running costs of the website and social media campaigns. Donate here

Pledge your support

#BoycottMeat #BoycottPalmOil #Boycott4wildlife #BoycottDairy #BoycottPalmOil #brandBoycotts #consumerBoycott #consumerRights #dairy #dairyFoods #deforestation #diet #foods #health #meat #meatAgriculture #News #PalmOil #palmOilDeforestation #palmOilFree #palmoil #plantBasedDiet #ultraprocessed #UPF #vegan #veganism

#BoycottDairy

Client Info