#ECHR

Amnesty in Salisbury & South Wiltshiresalisburyai.com@salisburyai.com
2025-10-09

Impact of ECHR on Asylum Seekers in 2025

Immigration and asylum seekers still making waves in UK.

October 2025

This month has been dominated by arguments around the European Convention on Human Rights and the rights of protesters to express their views. Neither of these are directly about refugees, but do have a bearing on the treatment of asylum seekers and dealing with the effects of conflicts. Boat crossings and asylum seekers do feature in the desire to leave the ECHR however.

The government has taken two more actions affecting migrants: making the “leave to remain” decision more difficult by extending the time taken to achieve it, adding more requirements, and blocking family reunions which would previously have been regarded as acceptable. Nando Sigona commented that this “allows policymakers to set shifting and arbitrary standards of belonging.”

One of the areas of complaint by the government has been the “last-minute” stay on deportation of unsuccessful claimants. It has now become clear that this is not gaming the system but the result of the short time available for appeals to be made against the Home Office’s “notice of intent” and the lack of emergency legal aid.

Still in the UK, the “one in, one out” agreement with France has started, but obviously the numbers involved are pretty small. Nevertheless, some commentators, such as Sunder Katwala of British Future take a positive view. At present, the scheme aims to return about 50 people a week; were it to be expanded tenfold, it would make returns “more likely than not”, and at 20 times, “it could operationalise a returns guarantee”. This would effectively destroy the business model of small-boats traffickers, says Katwala. “If you got to the point where there was a guarantee that the irregular route, where you paid a trafficker, wasn’t going to work, and there was a legal scheme to apply to as well, then you would see a three-quarters drop [in numbers arriving by boat].” Eventually, “you could actually eliminate it entirely”. British Future’s polling suggests an intake of 50,000 refugees a year would be supported by 48% of Britons, and opposed by just 18%.

Katwala notes that the US did actually get on top of immigration at the Mexican border in the final year of Joe Biden’s presidency, with a similar “routes and returns” approach by closing off illegal routes to immigration and creating legal ones. The numbers crossing the US border were far greater than those crossing the Channel – 2 million a year – and Biden’s approach reduced them by 77% between December 2023 and August 2024, an achievement that was barely reported at the time.

Also domestically, the government is still planning to phase out hotel accommodation for claimants and is

looking at redundant sites (mostly military) away from inhabited areas – the chief problem is that most of these require major repair work before being acceptable. Also noteworthy is the rumour that the imminent budget will take money away from spending in this area to reduce the deficit. Finally, back to the ECHR; the Supreme Court has taken to using the concept of “margin of appreciation” (in the ECHR but not the HRA) which is a bias towards accepting government cases rather than those of the lawyers – this will likely loom large.

Immigrant numbers falling in Europe

In Europe as a whole, the number of migrants has fallen sharply this year, according to Frontex. In 2025 so far, 112,000 have arrived in the continent, 21% down on last year. Similarly, the number of asylum claims is down by 23% to around 400,000 in the first half of the year. One of the main reasons for this is the EU’s policy of paying “transition countries” to cooperate by not allowing potential migrants through. These countries are chiefly Tunisia and Libya. There have been reports of Libyan security staff throwing people off boats into the sea (Libya is, of course, in the midst of civil war so is not likely to be particularly fastidious).

Frontex say that the number of arrivals by the western route through Algeria have, however, gone up. France and Spain have overtaken Germany as the most favoured final destination – the largest group of national arrivals have been from Venezuela, using Spain as a destination for language reasons. Ursula Van der Leyen has noted that only 20% of those with rejected claims have actually left Europe, and this will be on the agenda for the introduction next year of the new migration pact that has been said to “harden border procedures and envisages accelerated deportation.” Talks are continuing especially about the financial aspects. Interestingly, Hungary is being fined 1 million Euros a day for breeching its responsibilities towards asylum seekers – the government is unmoved.

Fergal Keane at the BBC has been touring the border areas and observed that in Greece, Poland and Latvia migrants were being physically pushed back across the border. The hazardous nature of the whole scenario is reflected in the fact that, over the last 10 years 32,000 migrants have died en route.

For the record, the number of arrivals on small boats this year so far is 34,000, up 36% on the same period last year. The weather is probably the main factor.

Compulsory reading!: The truth about the small-boats crisis – New Statesman.

AH

#asylum #ECHR #Europe #Frontex #immigration #Venezuela

2025-10-09

Do British people want to leave the ECHR? What a decade of polls reveals.

Withdrawing the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), once a fringe idea, has become a defining issue for political parties in the UK.

In the most recent YouGov poll on this issue, 54% of Conservative voters and 72% of Reform voters were in favour of leaving.

But evidence shows that “the people” don’t actually want to leave.

mediafaro.org/article/20251009

#UK #Politics #ECHR #HumanRights #Europe

Robin Csp1ndrift
2025-10-09

TLDR explain why leaving the ECHR is nonsense in under 7 minutes.

I’m so tired of politicians getting away with proposing this shit without any pushback from mainstream media. Badenoch and Farrage should be ridiculed for their utter stupidity.

youtu.be/DTRPSj5b_Y8

Martin Michaelis (he/him)MartMichaelis@mastodonapp.uk
2025-10-09

Leaving the #ECHR is just propaganda. It will not make a tangible positive difference to the lives of people in the UK, but it will contribute to a more fragmented world and undermine our moral standards. #Immigration has a very limited impact.

Why do we not focus on the real issues, the #climatecrisis, the consequences of financial crisis and COVID-19, population ageing, and the wars?

We cannot tackle problems by looking the other way, living in denial, fighting scapegoats, and promoting pseudo-solutions. Only seriously addressing the real issues will give us back control and to improve our societies.

Leaving the ECHR will only make the world a more divided, less secure place, but do nothing in our favour.

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm283e

legolasposeidon at KillBaitlegolasposeidon@killbait.com
2025-10-09

The Political Debate and Implications of the UK Leaving the ECHR

The article explores the political controversy surrounding the UK Conservative Party's pledge to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) if they win the next election. Led by Kemi Badenoch, the proposal aims to protect borders and citizens, amid pressure from Reform UK and Nigel Farage ... [More info]

Amnesty in Salisbury & South Wiltshiresalisburyai.com@salisburyai.com
2025-10-08

Conservative Party’s Plan to Repeal Human Rights Laws

Speech by the leader of the Conservative party in Manchester

October 2025

These are some extracts from the speech Kemi Badenoch MP gave to the Conservative party conference in Manchester this week. We have selected those parts which focus on human rights issues and in particular the plan to leave the European Convention and to repeal the Human Rights Act.

“[…] It is fundamental, why can’t we control our borders and remove those who need to go? All these

questions boil down to who should make the laws that govern the United Kingdom? Conservatives, believe it should be our sovereign Parliament, accountable to the British people. The reality today, is that this is simply not the case.

“This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I call lawfare. Well-meaning treaties and statutes – like the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention on Action against Trafficking drafted with the best of intentions in generations gone by, and more recent additions like the Modern Slavery Act, are now being used in ways never intended by their original authors.

“What should be shields to protect the vulnerable, have instead become swords to attack democratic decisions and frustrate common sense. It is that whole system which we need to reform. And the place to start is the European Convention on Human Rights.

Five tests that a country has to pass to be truly sovereign.

First, can we deport foreign criminals and those who are here illegally?

Second, can we stop our veterans being harassed through the courts?

Third, can we put British citizens first for social housing and public services?

Fourth, can we make sure protests do not intimidate people or stop them living their lives?

And fifth, can we stop endless red tape and legal challenges choking off economic growth?

[Lord Wolfson was commissioned to study the ECHR and our membership of it and produced a report the key conclusion was]

When it comes to control of our sovereign borders, preventing our military veterans from being pursued indefinitely, ensuring prison sentences are applied rigorously for serious crimes, stopping disruptive protests, or placing blanket restrictions on foreign nationals in terms of social housing and benefits, the only way such positions are feasible would be to leave the ECHR.’

Commitment to leave

[Badenoch] “We must leave the ECHR and repeal the Human Rights Act. Conference, I want you to know that the next Conservative manifesto will contain our commitment to leave (our emphasis). Leaving the Convention is a necessary step, but not enough on its own to achieve our goals. If there are other treaties and laws, we need to revise or revisit then we will do so. And we will do so in the same calm and responsible way, working out the detail before we rush to announce.

“The rights we enjoy did not come from the ECHR. They were there for hundreds of years in our common law. Parliament has legislated over centuries to reflect and protect our freedoms. Human Rights in the United Kingdom did not start in 1998 with the Human Rights Act, and will not end with it. As we work through our detailed plan, we are clear that leaving the ECHR and repealing the Human Rights Act will not mean that we lose any of the rights we cherish”. […]

Comment

The statement by the Conservative leader is clear and unequivocal. Even allowing that it is a speech a long way from an election and designed to encourage a party currently scoring badly in the polls, it is part of a worrying trend with more and more voices calling for us to leave the ECHR.

The big claim towards the end of her speech quoted above that ‘Human Rights in the United Kingdom did not start in 1998 with the Human Rights Act, and will not end with it‘.’ Many did start, and some will end if it is repealed. If there will be no difference, then why the desire to end it? She seems to have forgotten that the HRA was introduced because people had to go to Strasbourg to get the justice denied them in the British courts. It is nonsense to claim that the HRA has added nothing of benefit to the rights of the ordinary person.

There are likely to be many who will disagree with Lord Wolfson’s benign conclusion that the proposed departure from the ECHR would be fully compliant with the Belfast Agreement.

Leaving the ECHR will be a retrograde step and have repercussions for our international relations. It is likely to make trade between us and Europe more difficult. We will join Russia and Belarus as the only nations outside its remit. Repealing the HRA – which has been promised several times before by Conservative leaders but never carried out – will seriously damage our rights as citizens. Combined with recent legislation to limit protests for example, it will be a retrograde step.

An Amnesty petition can be accessed here.

Speech accessed from the Conservative website [8 October]

#conference #conservatives #ECHR #GoodFridayAgreement #HRA #KemiBadenoch #speech

2025-10-08

#petition your #UK #mp to support the European convention on #HumanRights

The #echr was set up together after ww2 to ensure dictators or other governments could not dilute our minimum rights.

#ReformUK and others think they'd rather get rid of this, because it gets in way of their desires to be #racist #homophobic #transphobic #mysoginistic corporate gits.

amnesty.org.uk/actions/defend-

#amnesty

2025-10-08

‘Conservative Party would abolish stamp duty, Badenoch tells conference’

Let me fix that for you #BBC

‘Pro-Torture Party would give wealthy another tax break, Badenoch tells conference’

#UKPol #ECHR

2025-10-08

Scott Brown's defence of the European Convention on Human Rights (#ECHR) is good but unexceptional. Yet it is a #BBCnews story, because it is this #NorthNorthamptonshire councillor's reason for leaving the #UK's #ConservativeParty. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c931eg

25 years ago, ECHR support was unanimous in the #HouseOfCommons. Now both the once-dominant #Tories and the poll-leading #ReformUK oppose it so firmly that supporters are forced out.

Scott Brown's full statement is at facebook.com/share/1EFM6jqDsq/

Image of black text ona white background: 

The ECHR is not merely an international agreement; it is a cornerstone of civil liberties, enshrining rights that protect individuals from arbitrary state power and ensure justice, fairness, and dignity for all. Its origins trace back to the aftermath of World War II, but its spirit echoes the foundational tenets of British liberty as embodied in the Magna Carta of 1215. 

The Magna Carta, often hailed as the bedrock of constitutional governance, established that no one—not even the sovereign—is above the law, limiting executive overreach and guaranteeing due process. 

The ECHR builds upon this legacy, adapting these ancient protections to modern challenges and safeguarding the very freedoms that make Britain a beacon of democracy.
Political Cartoon GalleryPoliticalCartoon@mastodonapp.uk
2025-10-07

Matt @MattCartoonist on #KemiBadenoch #Conservatives #cpc2025 #ECHR @Telegraph – political cartoon gallery in London original-political-cartoon.com

Jon PENNYCOOKjonpsp@mstdn.social
2025-10-07

Lord Sumption: "The only possible reason for going back to the old system would be to appoint judges who were less independent or more political than the ones appointed by the judicial appointments commission."

"It is particularly awkward for the Tories to have Lord Sumption criticising Jenrick on this because Sumption is one of the most prominent British judges advocating withdrawal from the " ECHR

theguardian.com/politics/live/

#law #UK #ukpol #politics #RobertJenrick #judges #ECHR #LordSumption

Robin Csp1ndrift
2025-10-07

An oldie but a goodie. Please can someone share this with Kemi Badenoch?

youtu.be/ptfmAY6M6aA

2025-10-07

‘IMF Bailout: Will Enforced Austerity Lead To A Fascist Government?’ colombotelegraph.com/index.php
Let’s be clear, Empire owns the IMF so is responsible for maintaining our fascist and totalitarian world order. Its moments of silence are never for the victims of its diabolical cruelty and violence, but those who continue to protect and serve its war on human rights! #EmpireIsFascist #TheFederationIsAntifa #EcocideEmpire #FreedomFromFascistGenocides #HumanRights #ECHR #VictimsOfEmpire #MomentsOfSilence #FakeVictims #Empire’sWarOnHumanRights

Jon PENNYCOOKjonpsp@mstdn.social
2025-10-06

If the #UK left the #ECHR as every major politician seems to want now, other than the obvious problems, wouldn't we be unable to extradite anyone arrested in Europe (except perhaps from Hungary) for crimes committed in the UK, because we wouldn't be able to guarantee the rights of the accused? Especially if our freedoms are not allowed to be exercised except at times convenient for the Government.

#HumanRights #law #crime

2025-10-06

The very people that want us to leave the ECHR are the people you don’t want to be responsible for protecting you.

If they could be trusted with your rights they wouldn’t want to remove the safeguards that protect them.

It really is that simple.

#ukpol #echr

2025-10-06

Who believes the UK should leave the European Convention on Human Rights?

#politics #ukpolitics #echr #humanrights

Kentish Fran 🇪🇺kentishfran@mastodonapp.uk
2025-10-06

#ECHR
Leaving would be a disaster for the rights of 70 million British people.

2025-10-06

Every time you hear #StopTheBoats remember this: #Brexit tore up the tool that actually stopped them. And now the same people want us to leave the #ECHR. Ask yourself why the parties of the right - of big business and billionaires - want to reduce and remove your human rights.

Kentish Fran 🇪🇺kentishfran@mastodonapp.uk
2025-10-06

At 1 hour 49 minutes is an explanation of what we get from the #ECHR.
It would affect all of us, be a disaster and make dealing with illegal immigration even HARDER.
We would strip multiple rights of 70 million people in the UK for, perhaps, be able to deport an extra 150 people a year.
Also the ECHR guarantees the Good Friday Agreement which would collapse if we withdraw.
Check out this episode of Matt Frei on Global Player - share-lbc.globalplayer.com/cat

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst