#LAtimes

2025-06-15

There a reason the protests are being covered differently from the Tea Party

The Tea Party was a front for the wealth class that owns the media and were used to demonize necessary reform

These protests were democratic and populist, which the wealth class and its media opposes

Hope that helps

#classwar #maga #teaparty #uspol #corruption #fascism #complicity #nyt #wapo #latimes #nokings #regicide #trump #nazi #nazis #elonMusk #markZuckerberg #gestapo #ICE #classAnalysis

Michaela W.MichaelaWifi
2025-06-10

" klingt nach Spielzeugmunition. Die LAPD-Beamten griffen laut "nach 'weniger tödlichen' Kampfgewehren, die abfeuern, die bei jedem, den sie treffen, rote Striemen und hässliche Blutergüsse hinterlassen." Ist so bei Schaumstoff, oder?

Robert Linkphaedral
2025-06-09

@MEActNOW The fascist shit rag got something right?

🇺🇸Sleepy Liberal🇺🇦Agent661
2025-06-04

: "This is the 's fault"

🤓☝️

Article screenshot: LA Times

U.S. and Israeli-backed group pauses food delivery in Gaza after deadly shootings

Story by Wafaa Shurafa
2025-05-11

A lot of things have changed, mostly for the worst, between the first and second Trump presidency. For example, during our first dance with assclown fascism under Downmarket Mussolini, American corporate media made a massive show of "opposing" Trump; despite the fact that I (and many other observers) pointed out that their coverage of the administration typically benefitted the regime more often than it hurt them, and the class solidarity inherent to corporate media outlets often resulted in them covering up for the wealthy donors and supporters that propped up Trump's administration until the precise moment it became clear he wasn't going to win a second term in 2020. The story has been quite different here in the second Trump era however; as this Guardian article notes, despite Trump's threats and smears towards the media, corporate outlets like WaPo, LA Times, and now CBS have willingly collaborated with Trump's fascist regime and agenda. What changed? As it turns out, the whims and financial motivations of billionaire reactionaries who own corporate media companies.

theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

Trump complains the US media aren’t bending to his will. Aren’t they?

"Despite that acquiescence, Trump has continued to threaten journalists, branding pollsters “negative criminals” who “should be investigated for election fraud”. In April, he attacked “radical lunatic Democrats and their comrades in the fake news media”, adding: “Those lying to the American People on behalf of violent criminals have to be held responsible by the Agencies and the Courts.”

The attacks overlook the ways in which some outlets have submitted to Trump’s will – either by executives settling frivolous lawsuits or wealthy owners interfering to avoid upsetting Trump.

Jeff Bezos, the Washington Post owner, ordered an overhaul to the paper’s editorial pages in February that effectively muzzled the newspaper’s criticism of Trump. The Los Angeles Times dropped its endorsement of Kamala Harris under pressure from Patrick Soon-Shiong, its billionaire owner.

In December, ABC News settled a Trump lawsuit, in a move first amendment experts said could foster more attacks on the media. And in another blow, the owner of CBS News is said to be considering settling a $10bn lawsuit brought against the network over the editing of a Kamala Harris interview."

Folks, this is a story about greed and cowardice and that's not just my opinion. Trump isn't right, and the activities he's undertaking to cow the American media, be they government investigations or frivolous lawsuits, have no basis in the law. If folks like Jeff Bezos, Patrick Soon-Shiong, and Shari Redstone wanted to fight this, they'd win. Since surrendering and collaborating is more profitable to these billionaire leeches however, they're directing their media companies to roll over. Furthermore, the cost of this collaboration with fascism goes far beyond the mitigation of Trump criticism in our media environment; with billionaire media barons kissing his ring, and corporate outlets scrambling to settle his obscenely conspiratorial lawsuits based on open lies, the Kelpto Kaiser will now argue that he's been right about the media all along and that justifies further cracking down on the so-called "free press" in America. Collaborating with fascism, will merely breed more fascism; not that any of these rich reactionaries who own media companies seem to give a shit at all.

As someone who engages in a lot of media criticism and analysis, I can't say any of this is surprising to me; if anything, corporate media's outward posture of hostility towards Trump at points during his first administration is the historical aberration here. For profit media in America has always consistently sided with power and the state; after all the same class of people who own corporate media companies, also own most of the country. Just because we can easily predict class solidarity and billionaire ownership rolling over for fascism however, doesn't change the horrifying reality of what's going on here; nobody is handing out Pulitzer's here, but both WaPo and the LA Times did some excellent critical reporting during the first Trump regime and have been nowhere as effective here in Der Leader's second term. This is a big win for the Kelpto Kaiser; which makes it a devastating loss for all of us who don't want the fascists to win.

#Fascism #Trump #Media #Collaboration #Capitalism #CorporateMedia #WashingtonPost #LATimes #CBS #60Minutes #ShariRedstone #JeffBezos #PatrickSoonShiong #USPol #censorship

2025-05-09

"Whether it’s his plan or not, Trump’s policies so far closely align with Project 2025"
#LATimes #Project2025 #Trump #murica
latimes.com/politics/story/202

2025-05-04

#latimes going hard with its coulda woulda shoulda…the reservoir could have helped the fires if it was full…could have…#propaganda #mediaoutrage

2025-05-03

Just kinda, you know…

putting this out there…

#HaroldBloom on #JKRowling

Link (#LATimes, Sept. 19, 2003): latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-20

Screenshot of portion of Los Angeles Times article by literary critic Harold Bloom (September, 19th, 2003).
2025-05-01

How much have Trump’s oligarch supporters lost since his inauguration… 😏

The Los Angeles Times faces financial challenges, losing $50 million in 2024 and $30 million in 2023 due to a decline in paying subscribers and advertisers. Owner Soon-Shiong’s decisions, such as revoking the paper’s presidential endorsement and implementing a bias meter, led to 23,000 digital subscriber departures. The Times has resorted to buyouts, budget cuts, and layoffs, while Netflix has halted advertising due to concerns about changes under Soon-Shiong.

adweek.com/media/los-angeles-t or archive.is/yfMNw

#trumpism #USfascism #latimes #press #pressfreedom

2025-04-05

@stefan

Didn't, won't, read the article. Won't visit, will denounce and cancel the manipulative lying diseased infectious #NYTimes. The Coup Paper.

Cancel the #LATimes
Cancel rhe #WashingtonPost
#coupPapers

I'm seeing protest headlines from the #LATimes, #NBC, #USAToday, #WSJ, #AP etc. It looks like the mainstream media is noticing. Can't vouch for how good the coverage is, of course. #HandsOff

2025-04-04

@bascule

" . . . not paying attention . . . "

Most tv and papers are billionaire news systems. They are not neutral, and the Washington Post, New York Times and L A Times are actively uninvolved in rhe subversion. Just as they were during the election.

Actively involved in subversion.

#coup #musk #nytimes #latimes

2025-04-01

@tekkie

I mute or block accounts using the Coup Paper as a source.

Cancel the NYTimes, WaPo, LATimes.

#Cancel #Cancel #Cancel #NYTimes #LATimes #WashingtoPost

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst