#filmreviewblogs

alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2025-02-05

Film Review Blog No. 106 – ORWO Wolfen P400

Like last year's review of ORWO Wolfen NP100, ORWO Wolfen P400 is a version of ORWO N74+ but modified to better suit still-photography by removing the anti-halation layer. I had this film stock on my wish list and was able to find it last year through Freestyle. The one thing I also noticed is that there is a slight difference between the two film stocks to indicate that something else has been done to the film stock in the process of stripping that layer. Thankfully there is already a lot of existing times that are listed directly for P400. The first thing I noticed with the film is that it is all packaged in newer metal cassettes not the plastic ones that I encountered with my review of NP100, the second is how thin the film feels compared to past ORWO motion picture films.

Film Specs
Manufacturer: ORWO
Name: Wolfen P400
Type: Panchromatic Black & White
Film Base: Polyester
Film Speed: ASA-400, Latitude: +/- 2-Stops
Formats Available: 135 (35mm)

Roll 01 - Flic Film B/W Cine Film Developer
While P400 is modified to suit better photography, it is still, at its core, a motion picture film, so I'm starting off the review using the normal motion picture film developer, Kodak D-96, or in this case, the Flic Film produced version. Going with the stock dilution and dropping the time from my listed 6.5 minutes to 6.25 minutes to compensate slightly for exposing the film at ASA-320, the negatives looked thin but had good detail. And they scanned well, and with some adjustments in Photoshop, I'm pleased with these images. There's a good contrast, thanks mainly to the mixed light. I noticed the most that these images seemed a little soft, and the grain was a bit mushy but still present. That is more thanks to the developer rather than the film itself. I like this combination. It works well in these conditions and gives you a better feel for what the film can do than straight D-76.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm 1:1.4 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Flic Film B/W Cinefilm Developer (Stock) 6:15 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm 1:1.4 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Flic Film B/W Cinefilm Developer (Stock) 6:15 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm 1:1.4 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Flic Film B/W Cinefilm Developer (Stock) 6:15 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm 1:1.4 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Flic Film B/W Cinefilm Developer (Stock) 6:15 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm 1:1.4 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Flic Film B/W Cinefilm Developer (Stock) 6:15 @ 20C

Roll 02 - Ilford Ilfotec HC
The only available time for Ilfotec HC was a 1+31 dilution. I always preferred to develop motion picture films in 1+63, so I went ahead and shot the roll at the full box speed of ASA-400 and doubled the available time while knocking it back to compensate for the constant rotation in development. I also shot this roll under bright, challenging conditions and more mixed light under trees. I should have let these develop a bit longer, the negatives were rather thin, but I'd take thin negatives over dense ones. Sadly, these were too thin, but with a bit of work in the post, I was able to pull out some images. I'm not a fan, but they work, and I'm not too happy with them. First, there is a lot of grain and medium contrast, but the images are sharp. Now I understand that P400/N74+ is not a fine-grain film, but all the same, these are mushy and grainy. Two things happened here: under-exposed and under-developed. I should have exposed these at either ASA-320 or ASA-250 and developed normally. As for the under-development, I'm leaning towards my bottle of Ilfotec HC reaching the end of its life. Either way, Ilfotec HC can work as a developer, but you will want to over-expose your film between 1/3 and 2/3 of a stop.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Zoom AF 24-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 D - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-400 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Zoom AF 24-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 D - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-400 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Zoom AF 24-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 D - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-400 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Zoom AF 24-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 D - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-400 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Zoom AF 24-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 D - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-400 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)

Roll 03 - Rodinal
For my third roll and using Rodinal I decided to over-expose the film by one stop, shooting at ASA-200 then pulling in my development and using a 1+50 dilution with further reduction to compensate for constant rotation. And I thought the previous roll had a lot of grain, this one has even more! But I was prepared for it but on the plus side the images are sharp, the downside is that the contrast feels flat in some scenes but that could be more the lighting than the film. I don't enjoy high-contrast images and do like a low-contrast image but on cine-films I look for something middle ground, with character. And these images don't have that. Of course, I could always have played around with the contrast in post-processing and given the frames a bit more character.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-200 - Blazinal (1+50) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-200 - Blazinal (1+50) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-200 - Blazinal (1+50) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-200 - Blazinal (1+50) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-200 - Blazinal (1+50) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)

Roll 04 - Adox XT-3
For the fourth and final roll I went with Adox XT-3, the Adox clone of Kodak Xtol using a 1+1 dilution. While I wanted to use 510-Pyro here, I went with an officially listed time. After seeing the trouble with the Ilfotec HC roll and the lovely results I got from B/W Cine developer, I went and exposed the roll at ASA-320 and developed normally. Upon pulling the negatives out of the tank, I was pleasantly surprised. The negatives did not look under or over developed and had good visible density on initial inspection. While these were certainly better than the second and third roll they still have problems, there's the compressed tonal range and despite being a fine-grain developer XT-3 did little to reduce the visible grain to something far more pleasing. Despite having high hopes for this roll I was still a little disappointed.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 20mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Adox XT-3 (1+1) 9:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 20mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Adox XT-3 (1+1) 9:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 20mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Adox XT-3 (1+1) 9:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 20mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Adox XT-3 (1+1) 9:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 20mm 1:2.8 - ORWO Wolfen P400 @ ASA-320 - Adox XT-3 (1+1) 9:30 @ 20C

Final Thoughts
Thankfully, the thinner base did not present any problems loading the film onto the reels, but I noticed that the film appears to be bulk-loaded rather than commercially loaded. I also noticed that the film tends to fog easily, so keeping it out of direct light is best. It could be because of the room's temperature, but I noticed a slight cupping when the film dried. All four rolls of the negatives came out thin, which made scanning difficult but not impossible. You could increase the development times by fifteen to thirty seconds to get added density and expose the film to your taste at either ASA-320 or ASA-250. It also doesn't surprise me that the best results from the film came from the roll developed in Flic Film B/W Cine Developer (Kodak D-96), and be ready to play around with the contrast in post-processing to get it where you want it. I'll be cautious in recommending this film; it isn't that P400 is a bad film; it takes a bit more effort to get good results, and you have to be willing to play a bit more in post-processing. This review warrants revisiting the film stock for a review (ORWO N74+) to see about getting it to a point where I'm happier with my results. What I think will help this film out the most is lots of good hard light.

Further Reading
Don't just take my word on P400, you can check out the reviews by other awesome camera reviewers!
Shoot Film Like A Boss - ORWO P400 Review

#filmreviewblogs #adoxxt3 #blazinal #cambridge #canada #filmreview #flicfilmbwcinefilmdeveloper #galt #guelph #ilfordilfotechc #minoltamaxxum9 #oakville #ontario #orwowolfenp400 #review #toronto

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2023-11-01

Film Retrospective | 100 Reviews Special

This is only the second time I've reached a significant milestone in my ongoing reviews, the magic number of one hundred. And to be clear, I've done one hundred film reviews, not reviewed one hundred separate film stocks. And that's because I've reviewed some rebadged films; sometimes, I knew it was a rebadge and then made a point not to go after that film stock again, notability ORWO films. I reviewed the four motion picture-specific films from ORWO as their Lomography rebadge. But in the case of Fomapan 100, I reviewed that first as KosmoFoto Mono 100 and then again as Fomapan 100. Agfa AviFoto 80 has been reviewed many times under Rollei Retro 80s, Rollei RPX 25, Adox HR-50 and Adox Scala 50. So today, I will look back at the last 100 reviews and make a top list of some of my favourites, similar to what I did at the 100 camera review mark but slightly different.

Top Five Favourite Films
It's always hard to choose just one! But in these cases these are films that are still produced and readily available. They are also ones that I will always grab when I need to get the shot! Both for my personal and professional work. And yes, these days it is mostly Ilford on the list, which is interesting because when I started reviewing film stocks, it would have been dominated by Kodak.

Ilford FP4+
When it comes to a go-to mid-speed film, Ilford FP4+ is that film. It offers up everything I look for in this speed range, with excellent tonality, great latitude, classic grain and excellent edge sharpness. I was first introduced to FP4+ when Kodak discontinued Plus-X and I wanted something similar, and FP4+ was that film, even has the classic ASA-125 box speed. It's my goto for outdoor events, portrait work, and general photography. Plus I can use it in all my cameras from 35mm up to 4×5 and larger. And it handles any situation I throw at it when it comes to lighting, natural, artificial, high-contrast, low contrast. And you can over and under expose it and push/pull in development when the situation requires such a process. And it responds to ever developer I throw its way.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Konica-Minolta Zoom AF 24-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 D - Ilford FP4+ @ ASA-125 - Tetenal Neofin Blau (1+9) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Ilford FP4+ @ ASA-125 - 510-Pyro (1+100) 10:30 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Ilford FP4+ @ ASA-125 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 6:00 @ 20CPacemaker Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Ilford FP4+ @ ASA-64 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 8:00 @ 20C

Ilford Delta 100
While of a speed similar to FP4+, Delta 100 is the one film I take when I need something that looks sharp and modern. Thanks to the contemporary emulsion, I can achieve excellent results across all the formats. I started to enjoy Delta 100 with my original review set in 2015 when I began exploring the Ilford line of films and developers. And I'm glad I did; this spot would have been filled with Tmax 100, but I needed to find something similar with the cost increases. Also, Delta 100 works well with all the developers I use. It has become the go to film stock for my lens tests along with Delta 400. Now to see if I can over-expose it to ASA-32.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (Yellow-12) - Ilford Delta 100 @ ASA-100 - Fotospeed FD10 (1+9) 7:00 @ 20CModified Anniversary Speed Graphic - Schneider-Kreuznack Angulon 1:6,8 90mm - Ilford Delta 100 @ ASA-50 - Agfa Rodinal (1+25) 7:00 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Ilford Delta 100 @ ASA-100 - Kodak HC-110 Dil. E 7:30 @ 20CBronica GS-1 - Zenzanon-PG 1:3.5 f=100mm - Ilford Delta 100 @ ASA-80 - SPUR HRX (1+20) 9:00 @ 20C

Ilford HP5+
You guessed it, another Kodak replacement. While I struggled for a while to come to love Ilford HP5+ in 35mm, I always enjoyed working with it in medium and large format. Probably my favourite combination across the board is shooting it at ASA-200 and developing it in Pyrocat-HD. But it works well in almost any developer, except Rodinal. Perfect when you need a fast shutter speed, offers up excellent latitude. Good tonality, edge sharpness, and a bit more visible grain but nothing too serious.

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Ilford HP5+ @ ASA-400 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 13:00 @ 20CHolga 120N - Optical Lens f=60mm 1:8 - Ilford HP5+ @ ASA-400 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Ilford HP5+ @ ASA-1600 - Bellini EcoFilm (Stock) 11:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Graflex Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Ilford HP5+ @ ASA-200 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 9:00 @ 20C

Eastman-Kodak Double-X 5222
Wait, there's a 200-speed film that I actually enjoy working with? Well yes, because there is something incredibly special about Double-X. First there is the connection to motion pictures, Casino Royale and more recently Oppenheimer. But Double-X always delivers the goods, while not fine-grained, it has a wonderful grain structure, and a tonality that goes on for days. I use this film for street photography, general-purpose and travel. It can be developed in a lot of different developers, but it does look amazing in Kodak's dedicated motion picture developer D-96. No matter the situation, this film will give you excellent image quality. Plus if you go through CineStill you can get Double-X in both 35mm and 120 formats.

Hasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Cinestill BwXX @ ASA-200 - FPP D96 (Stock) 6:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 85mm 1:1.8D - CineStill BwXX @ ASA-250 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 10:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - CineStill BwXX @ ASA-250 - Fotospeed FD10 (1+9) 10:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - Tamron AF 100-300mm 1:5-6.3 - Cinestill BwXX @ ASA-200 - Cinestill D96 (Stock) 6:30 @ 20C

Ilford Pan F+
It's always good to have a slow film in your toolkit. And while there are plenty of options, my go-to when things matter is Ilford Pan F+. You get a slow film with lots of contrast and latitude. Excellent edge sharpness and fine grain. Plus, you can throw it in almost any developer and get excellent results. Perfect for landscapes, portraits, and bright days. It replaces Panatomic-X a little more than TMax 100 does in my books, despite having much more contrast. And it looks good in high-contrast developers like D-19, much better than I thought it would.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Ilford Pan F+ @ ASA-50 - Tetenal Neofin Blau (1+9) 12:15 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 24mm 1:2.8 - Ilford Pan F+ @ ASA-50 - Kodak D-19 (1+1) 5:30 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Canon EOS 3000 - Canon Lens EF 28mm 1:2.8 - Ilford Pan F+ @ ASA-50 - 510-Pyro (1+100) 6:15 @ 21CHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Ilford Pan F+ @ ASA-50 - Ilford Microphen (1+1) 6:00 @ 20C

Top Five Discontinued Film Stocks
While we are lucky to have as many films out there as we do today, there are many that have been discontinued. Some recently, others before I was born. Yet I still am drawn towards a bunch of these and will purchase them when I come across them at a camera fair, store, or online.

Kodak Panatomic-X - Discontinued: 1987
By this point, you're probably sick of me extolling the virtues of Panatomic-X. But I cannot stop; it's such a great film and, oddly enough, one I found because I thought the name was cool. I mean, Panatomic-X, it's so cold war! Now this film is only for some, it doesn't have a lot of contrast natively, but that can be fixed in either post-processing or by using a strong mix of a high-contrast developer. While personally, I love the film in D-76, HC-110 (Dil. H), and Xtol. It might do well in D-19 (to boost that contrast) or drop the contrast even more with D-23. And while Panatomic-X is long gone, a few options exist to get a near experience. You can always shoot TMax 100 at ASA-32 and pull the film in development, or get your hands on CatLABS X Film 80 or Mk. II.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Kodak Panatomic-X @ ASA-32 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 5:00 @ 20CNikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Kodak Panatomic-X @ ASA-32 - Blazinal (1+50) 10:00 @ 20CNikon F4 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Kodak Panatomic-X @ ASA-32 - Kodak Xtol (1+1) 7:30 @ 20CMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Kodak Panatomic-X @ ASA-32 - Kodak HC-110 Dil. H 9:00 @ 20C

Kodak Kodachrome - Discontinued: 2002-2009
It would only be a list of discontinued films with Kodachrome. I first heard about Kodachrome through the Film Photography Project right when Kodak announced the discontinuation of the legendary film stock. I got my hands on a couple of rolls, but sadly those were poorly stored, and they showed. But I got more from Sean Galbraith, and these were in top condition, and I started to see why people love this film so much! It has rich, authentic colour reproduction. But I also had the chance to shoot Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome 40 (Tungsten) balanced and get them out to Dwayne's Photo before they stopped processing the film.

Nikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Kodak Kodachrome 64 - Processing By: Dwyanes PhotoNikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Kodak Kodachrome 64 - Processing By: Dwyanes PhotoNikon F4s - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Kodak Kodachrome 25 - Processing By: Dwyanes PhotoNikon F4s - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Kodak Kodachrome 40 Type A - Processing By: Dwyanes Photo

Fujifilm Astia 100F - Discontinued: 2011
Fuji often gets a bad rap for it's constant discontinuation of films, and most of these films are slide films. Although they are noted for some colour negative and B&W stocks that people still yearn after. But of all the films that Fuji has discontinued, my favourite, oddly is a slide film. Fujifilm Astia 100F is the second slide film that I ever shot, the first is the Sensia line. But it was Astia that made me love slide film. It had the perfect balance of contrast, sharpness, and colour replication. In fact, I feel it had the most realistic colour replication of all the Fuji slide films.

Nikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Fuji Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sRollieflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sArsenal Kiev 88 - Biometar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sIntrepid 4×5 Mk. I - Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar-S 1:5.6/210 - Fuji Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: The Darkroom

Agfa APX 25 - Discontinued: 1989-2000
I'll admit, I had a roll of APX 25 in 120 long before I knew what the film was and used it to practice loading film onto Patterson reels in daylight. I admit that mistake, but since then, I have used this film several times, including a 120-roll. I enjoy working with slow films, and APX 25 offers excellent edge sharpness, fine grain, and fantastic tonality. While you get terrific results from Rodinal, I enjoyed using Adox FX-39 II. But I also have gotten superb results from Fotospeed FD10. I am looking forward to trying the film with Diafine and Compard R09 Spezial (Studional). I do regret not being able to develop a roll in Tetenal Neofin Blau, but you cannot make the old stock solution with the new bottles.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - Agfa APX 25 @ ASA-25 - Ilford ID-11 (Stock) 8:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - Agfa APX 25 @ ASA-25 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:30 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Agfa APX 25 @ ASA-25 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 9:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - Agfa APX 25 @ ASA-25 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 5:15 @ 20C

Efke Films - Discontinued: 2012
Okay, so I'm going a little weird for this last one because I'm including all Efke films in this section. While I have only done an official review (twice) for KB100 (the fastest film of the group), I have had the chance to shoot all three versions. Efke's line of films includes ASA-25, ASA-50, and ASA-100 versions and are based on the original Adox B&W films released in the mid-20th Century. Efke got their hands on the formulas and equipment after Dupont sold it in 1972. Eventually, Fotoimpex would begin rebadging the film under the Adox name until discontinuation in 2012, when Efke could no longer maintain the equipment. After learning about Freestyle Photographic through the Film Photography Project, I first got my hands on films. I started to explore the weird world of B&W films. The films are silver rich and provide a classic look that most modern films don't offer. However, you did need to use a water stop bath and hardening fixer to preserve these film stocks.

Zeiss Ikon Contax IIIa - Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1:3,5 f=5cm T - Efke KB100 @ ASA-100 - Kodak D-23 (Stock) 7:45 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Adox CHS 100 - Blazinal (1+25) 6:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (Yellow-15) - Efke KB50 @ ASA-50 - Kodak Xtol (Stock) 8:00 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Adox CHS 50 - Processing By: Silvano'sPacemaker Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon W 1:5.6/125 - Efke PL25 @ ASA-25 - PMK Pyro (1+2+100) 7:30 @ 21CModified Anniversary Speed Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Efke PL25 @ ASA-25 - PMK Pyro (1+2+100) 7:30 @ 21C

Top Five Favourite B &W Films
While these aren't always the one I'll reach for when results matter, they are among my favourites that I've shot and used. And I continue to use them when I'm feeling in a creative rut or want to get out and have some film fun and work in the black & white sphere!

Kentmere 100
Kentmere 100 is a wonderful budget film from Harman Technologies/Ilford Photo. But don't let the budget label scare you, because Kentmere 100 is a film that hits high above its price point. Yes, it doesn't have the finest grain out there but it has a lovely traditional grain structure. But that grain helps enhance the edge sharpness which combined with the wonderful tonal range of the film creates a delightful film that will deliver excellent results. Plus with the recent release of the film in 120 format makes it a great film that can fill out your film cataloge.

Nikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - Kentmere 100 @ ASA-100 - Kodak HC-110 Dil. B 5:45 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Kentmere 100 @ ASA-80 - SPUR HRX (1+20) 9:30 @ 20COlympus OM-10 - Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-W 1:3,5 f=28mm (Yellow-12) - Ketmere 100 @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 12:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Kentmere 100 - Compard R09 Spezial (1+30) 9:00 @ 20C

Rollei RPX 25
Based on Agfa Avifoto 80, and probably is my favourite of all the films based on this surveillance film stock. While it also works well as Adox HR-50 and makes unique transparencies as Adox Scala 50. When you get to Retro 80s, it gets far too punchy. RPX 25 is a film rated at ASA-25, has excellent near-IR sensitivity and responds well to many different light. But what makes RPX 25 a cut above the other versions? You can get this in 35mm, 120, and 4×5 sheets! While not a film you take out all the time with a slow ASA-25 speed, it is a film for sunny days.

Pacemaker Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Rollei RPX 25 @ ASA-25 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 12:00 @ 20CContax G2 - Carl Zeiss Biogon 28/2,8 T* - Rollei RPX 25 @ ASA-25 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 8:00 @ 20CPentax 67II - SMC Pentax 67 1:2.4 105mm - Rollei RPX 25 @ ASA-25 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 11:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - Rollei RPX 25 @ ASA-25 - Adox Scala Developer (1+1) 10:45 @ 20C

Adox CHS 100 II
The return of the classic! CHS 100 II is a reformulated and reintroduced version of Efke KB100, which is based on an original Adox film stock. CHS 100 II is similar to the original one but has a more robust emulsion and has a bit more latitude. It offers up an old school look with a bit more grain than modern 100-speed films. The one thing I did notice with this film is that it doesn't do well in high-contrast conditions, you'll loose a lot of shadow detail. So you can probably shoot it at ASA-80 or ASA-64 to help open up those shadows when you develop, don't pull in development. You can get this in 35mm and 4×5, although I would love to see Adox bring it back in the 120 format. While you can use this with any developer, for the best results I recommend Adox FX-39 II.

Canon AE-1 - Canon Lens FD 28mm 1:2.8 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-80 - Adox Atomal 49 (1+1) 9:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Graflex Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox Atomal 49 (Stock) 5:45 @ 20CKonica-Minolta Maxxum 70 - Minolta Maxxum AF 35-70mm 1:4 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:00 @ 20CCrown Graphic - Schneider-Kreuznack Xenar 1:4,7/135 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Kodak Xtol (1+1) 7:15 @ 20C

ORWO UN54+ (Lomography Potsdam)
ORWO is a strange company these days. While tracing itself to the original Agfa company and then reformed on the eastern side of the iron curtain. The company's current iteration has been in hot water of late, especially the owner. All that aside, UN54+ is a beautiful film with tonnes of tonality, fine grain and excellent sharpness. Plus, if you get it from Lomography, you can order it in 35mm and 120. It loves D96 and handles other developers well. But honestly, for best results, a Pyro developer or D96, and you'll be happy.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Lomography Potsdam 100 @ ASA-100 - Kodak HC-110 Dil. E 6:00 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Lomography Potsdam 100 @ ASA-100 - Blazinal (1+50) 9:30 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Lomography Potsdam 100 @ ASA-100 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 10:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Lomography Potsdam 100 @ ASA-100 - Cinestill D96 (Stock) 6:00 @ 20C

Fomapan 100
Along the same lines as Kentmere 100, Fomapan 100 is an excellent budget film. But it has a look that's different from Kentmere 100, its a classic film with a classic look. It has an excellent edge sharpness, but is a little more fine-grain than Kentmere 100 but it also depends on how you develop the film. It has a good tonality, but can get pretty crunchy under high-contrast situations. Plus you can get this film under multiple boutique and budget brands. So even if you cannot get the Foma branded stuff, there are plenty of other ways to get your hands on the stock. Fomapan 100 is also avaliable in 35mm, 120, and sheet films.

Leitz Leica M4-P - 7Artisans DJ-Optical 35/2 - Fomapan 100 @ ASA-100 - Foma Retro Special (Stock) 4:00 @ 20CMamiya C220f - Mamiya-Sekor 1:2.8 f=80mm - Fomapan 100 @ ASA-100 - 510-Pyro (1+100) 8:30 @ 20CNikon FM - AI-S Nikkor 105mm 1:2.5 - Fomapan 100 @ ASA-100 - Ilford Microphen (1+1) 9:00 @ 20CHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fomapan 100 @ ASA-100 - Kodak D-23 (Stock) 10:00 @ 20C

Top Five Favourite Colour Films (C-41 & E-6)
I don't shoot a lot of colour film, I find it difficult to scan and getting it processed is a bit of a drag. I can and have processed colour at home, but because the kits last for several rolls I usually will wait until I have a huge backlog then spend the next couple of evenings running everything through. If I take it to the lab I'm looking at at least a week turn around if I can take the time to drop the rolls off. And colour slide is still a mail out process. Plus, colour film is not the cheapest way to shoot film these days. But these are some of my favourite colour films I've reviewed.

Kodak Ektachrome E100
Regarding slide film, I have always been more of a Fujifilm shooter. But with Fujifilm cutting or reducing the production of many of their E-6 films, the reintroduction of Ektachrome E100 made me sit up and look. I have shot plenty of Ektachrome, including E100G and E100VS. So when Kodak said that the new E100 would take the best of both those film stocks, I was excited. I don't see myself using this again due to increased prices and the struggle to shoot enough to make it worthwhile for an E-6 kit or to send it out to a lab and have a good month's turnaround. I will recommend this to someone wanting to start shooting slide films. It's forgiving for a slide with decent latitude and has a beautiful rich colour replication and excellent edge-sharpness. Plus it looks fun when cross-processed using the ECN-2 process.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Kodak Ektachrome E100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Boréalis PhotolabMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Ektachrome E100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Boréalis PhotolabMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Kodak Ektachrome E100 @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Ektachrome E100 @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 Kit

Kodak Portra 400
Okay, I don't shoot a lot of Portra anymore; the biggest reason it is hard to find is that everyone wants to shoot Portra 400. The second is that it costs so much money when you find it; I tend to leave it for those who live and breathe nothing but Portra 400. Yet, this is probably the most accessible professional film for the average photographer, especially for those who are moving to film from digital. Portra 400 is a film you can abuse and shoot almost like your digital camera, adjusting the sensitivity between shots and then processing it normally. While it doesn't have as wide a range as digital, you can shoot Portra 400 between 100 and 1600 without pushing and pulling during processing. The colours will change depending on the EI and processing, but generally, they are pleasing. More pastel and soft with over-exposure and punching with under-exposure, and relatively accurate when shot at the box speed. It's a good film, one I would use for jobs where the client insisted on colour film but not for everyday shooting; for that, I would go with Ultramax 400.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Portra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm 1:1.7 - Kodak Portra 400 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington CameraHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Portra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Portra 400 @ 1600 - Processing By: Silvano's

Eastman-Kodak Vision3 250D
Regarding colour film, other than Areocolor IV, the most affordable way to shoot colour is to go to the Kodak Vision3 series of films; of the four stocks available, my hands-down favourite is 250D. This lovely mid-speed film has a lot of latitude and does a beautiful job replicating colours. It isn't weird like 200T or 500T that requires extensive colour grading and filtering to work in daylight, you get excellent results right from the scanner, and you can shoot it over or under a stop without any loss when processing normally. The downside is that it comes with a remjet layer, so only specific labs can handle that and the ECN-2 process. But you can get it with this layer removed or never put it in place during manufacturing.

Nikon FE2 - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Kodak Vision3 5207 250D @ ASA-250 - FPP Super Color Negative ECN-2 KitNikon FE2 - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Kodak Vision3 5207 250D @ ASA-250 - FPP Super Color Negative ECN-2 KitNikon FE2 - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Kodak Vision3 5207 250D @ ASA-250 - FPP Super Color Negative ECN-2 KitNikon FE2 - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Kodak Vision3 5207 250D @ ASA-250 - FPP Super Color Negative ECN-2 Kit

Kodak Ultramax 400
It was hard to figure out which film to fill this spot, it was a close match between Gold 200 and Ultramax 400, but in the end, it was how Ultramax 400 looked at ASA-200 and normally developed that sold it for me. But don't just shoot it one stopover; it performed beautifully at box speed and one stop under. It's the perfect well-rounded consumer film I recommend to new shooters over Portra 400. The problem is that supply is hard to come by, and the cost is rising. But if you do find it, you are in for a treat. I consider this film superior to Portra 400; the colours look better.

Nikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Ultramax 400 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Kodak Ultramax 400 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraPentax Espio 115m - Pentax Zoom Lens 38-115mm 1:3.9-10.5 - Kodak Ultramax 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - Kodak Ultramax 400 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

SantaColor 100 (Kodak Areocolor IV)
The "New" kid on the block, while it isn't really new but rather newly available. Kodak Areocolor IV is designed as an aerial surveillance film that can be processed in either C-41 (Colour Negative) or E-6 (Colour Slide) because it lacks the orange mask that is a type of negative film. Plus, it is a fresh film and continues to be produced. The problem in the past has been that it can only be purchased in large bulk rolls, making it difficult for even home bulk loaders to split it down. Enter several companies who started rerolling this under various house brands. You have SantaColor 100, FlicFilm Electra 100, FilmWashi X, and Luminar 100. Plus, who knows how many others! This is a fun colour film that I can get behind as it produces a beautiful warm colour with plenty of latitude. It works best between ASA-125 and ASA-200, rather than the 'box' speed of ASA-100, which blows out the images.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - KameraStore SantaColor 100 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - KameraStore SantaColor 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - KameraStore SantaColor 100 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - KameraStore SantaColor 100 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Five Most Difficult Films
Sometimes there are films that are difficult to nail down. And while these aren't bad films, I've just had trouble getting them to a point that I'm happy with the results. And while I have managed to figure some films out (see the next section), others continue to elude my efforts. Now I haven't given up on these films and in some cases I do keep on trying to get results that I like out of them, but others I have given up on.

FilmWashi Type D
Washi D surprised me in a couple of ways, the first being that despite having a box speed of ASA-500, the images are fine-grained and sharp. Probably because this is a surveillance film stock that is designed to give exacting details for intelligence agents. The second is how crazy the images got when you added a yellow filter. With a deep yellow filter you get dramatically dark skies and even a pale yellow there is significant darkening. That said, this film drove me crazy with the paper thin emulsion that I ruined one roll and nearly ruined a second. It also does not handle overcast conditions, strange for a 500-Speed film and dislikes HC-110/Ilfotec HC. Although in the case of Ilfotec HC, I think I could have extended the development at least a minute and a half to help bring out the shadow details. That said, Type D is no longer available as it is sourced from Russia and since the illegal invasion and ongoing war in Ukraine is not sold by Washi.

[](https://www.flickr.com/photos/axle81401/50162308641/in/dateposted-public/ "FRB No. 64 - Film Washi "D" - Roll No. 1 (Kodak D-76)")Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (Yellow-15) - FilmWashi Type D @ ASA-500 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 8:30 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 (Yellow-12) - Film Washi D @ ASA-500 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 8:00 @ 20C[](https://www.flickr.com/photos/axle81401/50165890966/in/dateposted-public/ "FRB No. 64 - Film Washi "D" - Roll No. 2 (Rodinal)")Olympus OM-2n - Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-W 1:3.5 f=28mm (Yellow-12) - FilmWashi D @ ASA-500 - Blazinal (1+50) 11:00 @ 20C

Agfa Copex Rapid
Of all the films I have faced difficulties with, Copex Rapid is the one that I certainly will want to try again. The problem is that the film itself can be difficult to source, but the real trouble is the dedicated developer cannot be found in North America and costs a lot of money and will take a long time to ship from Europe. And the type of photography Copex Rapid is aimed at I don't practice. But it does perform well with regular developers under bright conditions. This is a fair weather film, it loves bright sunlight, and needs exacting exposure.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Agfa Copex Rapid @ ASA-25 - Ilford ID-11 (Stock) 5:00 @ 20CNikon FE2 - AI Nikkor 24mm 1:2.8 - Agfa Copex Rapid @ ASA-50 - Adox Rodinal (1+100) 18:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Agfa Copex Rapid @ ASA-64 - 510-Pyro (1+300) 20:00 @ 21CNikon FE2 - AI Nikkor 24mm 1:2.8 - Agfa Copex Rapid @ ASA-50 - Adox FX-39 II (1+19) 9:00 @ 20C

Adox CMS 20 II
I caught a lot of flack for this film stock, CMS 20 II is a closed imaging system, which is to say it works with only one developer, Adotech IV. Now I'm not one for a closed system, especally with a B&W film, so I wanted to try and use other developers. Also it was near impossible to get bottles of Adotech IV when I completed this review. Now I did get workable results from most of the developers I used, D-76, Rodinal, and Pyrocat-HD. The best results I got are from TMax Developer. I did go back and revisit this film twice, once with Adotech IV and again with the Adox Scala Reversal Kit. In both cases, I don't know what happened but I could not get results good enough for publishing. Unlike some of the other films on this list, I won't be trying CMS 20 II again.

Pentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Adox CMS 20 II @ ASA-20 - Kodak TMax Developer (1+4) 5:30 @ 20CNikon F90 - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - Adox CMS 20 II @ ASA-20 - Kodak D-76 (1+3) 10:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Adox CMS 20 II @ ASA-20 - Blazinal (1+100) 18:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4D (CPOL) - Adox CMS 20 II @ ASA-12 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 9:00 @ 20C

Svema Foto 200
There are a lot of people who feel this film is special, and they aren't wrong. It's a wonderful film that provides amazing tonality and excellent sharpness. But it comes at a cost, there is way more grain with this film than I would expect from a 200-Speed film! Surprisingly it works best in Rodinal, and has less-visible grain than the other developers I tried it in, it also responds well to Kodak Xtol. But the real problem I have with Svema 200, is getting it loaded onto the reels. The paper thin negatives buckle at the slightest resistance and when working in a change bag, it heats up quickly and you get the film sweats. I don't have a need for Svema 200 in my current photography so I won't be returning to this film.

Nikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 (CPOL) - Svema Photo 200 @ ASA-200 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 8:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF DC-Nikkor 105mm 1:2D - Svema Foto 200 @ ASA-200 - Blazinal (1+50) 14:00 @ 20CNikon F4 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Svema Foto 200 @ ASA-200 - Kodak Xtol (1+1) 12:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Svema Foto 200 @ ASA-200 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 15:30 @ 20C

Foma Retropan 320
I really wanted to like Retropan, I think this film has a lot of potential to fill in a gap that is just enough different from Fomapan 400, but I can't get around the fact that the contrast is far to low in most developers! To get the best results, you do want to add some filtration and use the dedicated Retro Special developer. But once you start straying, you start to see a lot of muddy grain, displeasing low contrast, and an overall softness. It even didn't play well with Pyrocat-HD, and looks ugly in D-76 stock. I think it would do well in a high-contrast developer like LQR or D-19, but again, I don't see it a worthwhile effort when I have better results from Fomapan 400.

Mamyia m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N (Yellow-12) - Foma Retropan 320 Soft @ ASA-320 - Foma Retro Special Developer (Stock) 5:00 @ 20CMamyia m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N (Yellow-12) - Foma Retropan 320 Soft @ ASA-200 - Foma Fomadon LQN (1+10) 8:30 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Foma Retropan 320 @ ASA-320 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 9:30 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Foma Retropan 320 @ ASA-320 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 11:30 @ 20C

Redeemed Films
I honestly have a drive to find the right way to shoot and develop a film. It might take a bit of time to discover the right combination to get results that I like, but it can be worth it and you discover a film that will work in odd situations or to give a look of yesteryear that isn't possible with modern film stocks.

Fomapan 400
Foma 400 is an interesting film. When I first heard about it, the film was not given the best reputation. Gritty, Grainy, Mushy. But when I reviewed the stock I saw that it had some potential. It took a lot of work to figure out how to get the best results from Fomapan 400. Some will say that it is not a true 400-Speed Film, but I do disagree with that statement now. Fomapan 400 is a beautiful film when shot at either 400, 800, or 200 and every point in-between. It's all about shooting the stock at the right speed and developing it right in the situation at hand. Fomapan 400 is a true classic film, it looks like the Tri-X of the 60s and 70s. Works well with high-contrast developers, compensating developers, and yellow filters. You can pick this stuff up in 120, 35mm, and sheet films. Along with various boutique and budget rebadges.

Mamiya C220f - Mamiya-Sekor D 1:3.5 f=105mm - Fomapan 400 @ ASA-200 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+31) 6:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 14mm 1:2.8D - Fomapan 400 - Foma Retro Special Developer (Stock) 6:00 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fomapan 400 @ ASA-200 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 9:00 @ 20CNikon FM - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Fomapan 400 @ ASA-200 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 12:00 @W film. P30 was a film that baffled me for a long time, a tough nut to crack. But I had to figure out the best conditions and development for the film. Then there was also the slight difference between the original Alpha release and the full production film stock. A delightful film that certainly gives a unique perspective. It loves light and medium contrast conditions, works best in run of the mill developers like D-96 and Xtol clones. While I haven't used the film in 120, I do plan on using it in that medium. Although if I had to choose between P30 and the newly released ORTO, I would pick ORTO.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 100mm 1:2.8 MACRO - FilmFerrania P30 @ ASA-80 - Cinestill D96 (Stock) 8:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - FilmFerrania P30 @ ASA-80 - Adox XT-3 (Stock) 9:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (Yellow-15) - Film Ferrania P30 @ ASA-50 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 8:00 @ 20CNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Ferrania P30 @ ASA-80 - Kodak HC-110 Dil. H 12:00 @ 20C

Kentmere 400
When I first reviewed Kentmere 400 I disliked it more than Fomapan 400. This was an ugly film, gritty, grainy, and mushy. But after Ilford released the film in 120 I started to get into the film a lot more. A budget friendly fast film that isn't Fomapan 400, and Kentmere 400 has a different look and feel. Like Foma 400, Kentmere 400 is a film that you need to develop and shoot right to get the best results. Compensating developers are a must, Tmax Developer, Atomal 49, and Studional (R09 Spezial/Hydrofin). And also, don't try over-exposing the film, it just goes grey and not in a good way. But you can push it a couple of stops and see some excellent results.

Nikon FE2 - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Kentmere 400 @ ASA-400 - Compard R09 Spezial (1+30) 8:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Kentmere 400 @ ASA-400 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 10:00 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Leitz Leica M4-P - DJ-Optical 7Artisans 35/2 - Kentmere 400 @ ASA-400 - Adox Atomal 49 (1+1) 13:30 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Kentmere 400 @ ASA-400 - Adox Atomal 49 (1+1) 13:30 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)

Fomapan 200
While I warmed up to Fomapan 400 it took me a lot longer to get used to Fomapan 200. I still don't think I'm 100% there with Foma 200. But I've always disliked most 200-speed films. But I'm certainly on the right path with Fomapan 200. The trouble is that it likes exotic developers, Pyro-Based, HR-DEV, Atomal 49, and others. My opinion of Fomapan 200 has certainly improved and it is a capable film I just haven't figured out the right spot for where I like the stock. I guess I still have a way to go with this film, but maybe using it on a Frugal Film Project cycle will help out?

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fomapan 200 @ ASA-200 - Compard R09 Spezial (1+30) 10:45 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Nikon FM - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 (Yellow-12) - Fomapan 200 @ ASA-100 - Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 7:30 @ 20CRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fomapan 200 @ ASA-125 - Adox HR-DEV (1+35) 12:00 @ 20CNikon FM - AI-S Nikkor 200mm 1:4 - Fomapan 200 @ ASA-200 - Kodak D-23 (Stock) 7:00 @ 20C

Rollei Superpan 200
Here's another 200-speed film, Superpan 200 is an interesting film stock that has a lot to offer. It has a unique look and feel that extends into the near-IR range. While I haven't tried it with a dedicated IR filter, but it looks amazing under a red filter and a high-contrast developer. Like Fomapan 200, it took me a while to get to know Superpan 200. It all started with a stand development in Rodinal. Now I'm not big on stand-development, but it gave me a starting point for what I want Superpan to look like. Then it was a matter of building from there, will it be a regular choice, no, but I at least know how to get it to the right spot.

Mamiya m645 - Mamyia-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N (Red-25) - Rollei Superpan 200 @ ASA-200 - Kodak D-19 (1+1) 8:30 @ 20CMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Rollei Superpan 200 @ ASA-200 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 14:00 @ 20CNew Mamiya 6 - Mamiya G 1:3.5 f=75mm L - Rollei Superpan 200 @ ASA-200 - Adox FX-39 II (1+14) 15:15 @ 20C (Constant Rotation)Nikon Nikkormat EL - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Rollei Superpan 200 @ ASA-200 - Adox Atomal 49 (Stock) 10:30 @ 20C

Well that wraps up the first 100 reviews! Here's to another 100 reviews, but it may never reach that number. Sadly unlike cameras and lenses there is a finite number of film stocks out there, but hopefully I can at least get up to 150? And I do want to get my hands on more discontinued and expired film stocks to fill out some more reviews. Plus I have some ideas to add secondary reviews for film stocks already tested. Until then you can find a complete list of my reviews over on the dedicated page.

#filmreviewblogs #510pyro #adoxatomal49 #adoxchs100art #adoxchs100ii #adoxcms20ii #adoxfx39ii #adoxhrdev #adoxrodinal #adoxscaladeveloper #adoxxt3 #agfaapx25 #agfacopexrapid #agfarodinal #arsenalkiev88 #belliniecofilm #blazinal #canonae1 #canoneos3000 #cinestilld96 #compardr09spezial #eastmandoublex #eastmanvision3250d #efkekb100 #film #filmreview #filmferraniap30 #filmwashid #flicfilmblackwhitegreen #fomafomadonlqn #fomaretrospecialdeveloper #fomaretropan320 #fomapan100 #fomapan200 #fomapan400 #fotospeedfd10 #fppsupercolornegativeecn2kit #fujifilmastia100f #graflexcrowngraphic #graflexspeedgraphic #hasselblad500c #holga120n #ilforddelta100 #ilfordfp4 #ilfordhp5 #ilfordid11 #ilfordilfotechc #ilfordmicrophen #ilfordpanf #intrepid4x5mk1 #kamerastoresantacolor100 #kentmere100 #kentmere400 #kodakd19 #kodakd23 #kodakd76 #kodakektachromee100 #kodakhc110 #kodakkodachrome25 #kodakkodachrome40typea #kodakkodachrome64 #kodakpanatomicx #kodakportra400 #kodaktmaxdeveloper #kodakultramax400 #kodakxtol #konicaminoltamaxxum70 #kyoceracontaxg2 #leitzleicam4p #mamyiac220f #mamyiam645 #minoltamaxxum9 #minoltaxe7 #newmamyia6 #nikonf3 #nikonf4 #nikonf5 #nikonf90 #nikonfa #nikonfe #nikonfe2 #nikonfm #nikonnikkormatel #olympusom10 #olympusom2n #orwoun54 #pentax645 #pentax67ii #pentaxespio115m #pmkpyro #pyrocathd #review #rolleirpx25 #rolleisuperpan200 #rolleiflex28f #special #spurhrx #svemafoto200 #tetenalneofinblau #unicolorrapide6kit #zeissikoncontaxiiia #zenzabronicags1

imageMilton in the SpringParis Baptist ChurchThe Cascade
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-05-09

Film Review Blog No. 83 – Film Washi Type “I”

This month, we're sticking to an X-Ray theme with a new film stock from Film Washi. While I use the term 'new' only to indicate that it is a newly available stock through Film Washi. I found this film through the Film Photography Project Store through their email newsletter and was drawn to the fact it was available in 120 formats, so I jumped at the chance. The film stock was initially used for industrial non-destructive tests like welding quality checks. Being coated on each side of its thick blue polyester base and without an anti-halation layer will give the pictures a unique look. And after seeing the exciting results I got from last month's review of Washi F, I was looking forward to seeing something different.

Film Specs
Type: Orthochromatic X-Ray Film, B&W
Film Base: Blue Polyester, 175 μm
Film Speed: ASA-80
Formats Available: 120

Roll 01 - Ilford ID-11
The original Washi datasheets called for a development time of 4.5 minutes at a 1+1 dilution. This time and dilution struck me as odd for two reasons. The first reason is that the rule of thumb for development is that you need times above five minutes for consistent results, and the second is that short of a development time for a dilute mix doesn't add up. So I went with the HP5+ time of thirteen minutes. And I'm glad I did, although I wish I had bumped it a little more to say 14.5 minutes. I will assume that the datasheet is a misprint missing the 1. Thankfully in scanning, I recovered some of the images with a bit of heavy editing. I'm reasonably happy with the results, the grain is a little more noticeable than I expected, but the photos are clean, sharp, and have high contrast. I can see that ID-11/D-76 is an excellent choice for Washi I. Only make sure to meter for your shadows and give it that 14.5 minute time in the 1+1 dilution.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 13:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 13:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 13:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 13:00 @ 20C

Roll 02 - Ilford Ilfotec HC
I stuck with my goto Ilfortec HC times for HP5+ for this time around, running with thirteen minutes at a 1+63 dilution. There was undoubtedly an improvement in my negatives, especially those where there wasn't much difference between the shadows and highlights. Going with the longer development time and a more dilute developer certainly helped along the way, and I think some extra time in the tank might have helped. The grain and sharpness are improved with Ilfotec HC; I believe the lower dilution helped also tame the contrast slightly. At this point, I think that Washi I has a limited latitude and given its original use, I'm not surprised, X-Ray film is designed to do one thing under tightly controlled conditions.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 13:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 13:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 13:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 13:00 @ 20C

Roll 03 - Adox Rodinal
Having seen poor results in the previous two negatives, I decided to change a couple of things this time around. Thankfully despite being incredibly cold the day I was out, the sun was bright direct and starting to pop up over the horizon. First of all, I pulled my trusty Pentax Spotmeter V out to handle the metering. I tried as best to run average metering, taking a reading from the highlights and then again from the shadows; most of the time, I had a nice, even five-stop difference. Still, I favoured my shadows being perfectly okay with sacrificing my highlights when I didn't. Secondly, I upped my development time, going with the HP5+ times for Rodinal at a 1+50 dilution. And the negatives looked much better, still not where I want them but certainly better. Sadly when scanning, the troubles came back, the images still seemed a little undercooked, and I'm still dealing with extreme contrast. Although the quality I do see is a sharp, fine-grained image with high contrast. And thankfully, all without any real increase in visible grain.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:00 @ 20C

Roll 04 - Ilford Ilfotec LC29
It was time to put everything together, it only took three rolls, but I think I have this film nailed. I again took out my Pentax Spotmeter V to handle the metering running averages between the shadows and highlights. Next, I went with the listed LC29 development times and upped the time by a minute and a half. And it worked. Finally, the negatives came out cleaner. However, we're not escaping that contrast. It's still there, and while certainly better and a much clearer picture of the film's actual contrast, it's high. However, you get a better idea of the film's orthochromatic nature; it seems to not see blue, again right in light with most other x-ray films. When you get past the moulting on the film, thanks to the backing paper and packaging. In LC29, you have no grain and sharp results.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec LC29 (1+19) 8:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec LC29 (1+19) 8:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec LC29 (1+19) 8:00 @ 20CMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 35mm 1:3.5 N - Film Washi Type I @ ASA-80 - Ilford Ilfotec LC29 (1+19) 8:00 @ 20C

Final Thoughts
The Washi datasheets say that this film has a thick base; that is an understatement. The first roll I loaded onto the reel in the dark felt like cardstock, a departure for other Washi films. This film is easy to work within the dark bag and loads onto Paterson reels without any fighting. My Mamiya m645 handled the film well, although it struggled near the end of the roll, and the rolls seemed to be a bit fat after being wound up but didn't spill past the reel. Either way, I scotch-taped down the end tongue and put the film back in the container. And thankfully ended up without any light leaks or fogging. My one suggestion is that you need to watch which camera you load this into, the Mamiya, Pentax, and Hasselblads would handle the film well, but a box camera or even a TLR might struggle a bit with such a thick film base. If there's one thing that I finally figured out by the fourth roll, add 1.5 minutes to HP5+ times, have good accurate metering, and you'll get results each time. I've reviewed some trying films, and I can now add Washi I among those films. You'd have better luck working with Washi F and getting consistent results than Washi I, and I am glad to be done with the film.

Further Reading
Don't just take my word on Film Washi Type "I"; you can check out the reviews by other excellent reviewers!
No Other Reviews Found.

#filmreviewblogs #adoxrodinal #canada #film #filmreview #filmwashi #filmwashitypei #ilfordid11 #ilfordilfotechc #ilfordilfoteclc29 #mamiyam645 #media #medium #milton #oakville #ontario #review #sheridancollege #toronto #typei #washi

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-04-19

Film Review Blog No. 82 – Film Washi Type “F”

When it comes to Film Washi, they certainly have gotten their hands on some interesting film stocks. And after enjoying some of their products last year, one of their products I've wanted to try. But with any repurposed film stock, you have to wait for the raw materials to become available. Thankfully after watching out on the Film Photography Project's store I saw them come back in stock thanks to their email newsletter. Type "F" is a special X-Ray film used for mass lung disease diagnoses; according to the Film Washi website, it is truly a unique film that offers, coated without an anti-halation layer, a high diffusion effect beautiful grain.

Film Specs
Type: Orthochromatic X-Ray Film, B&W
Film Base: Polyester, 100 μm
Film Speed: ASA-100
Formats Available: 135 (35mm)

Roll 01 - Ilford ID-11
I didn't know what to expect from these negatives; they looked decent, a bit dense, but nothing too terrible out of the tank. Silverfast, however, made the initial pre-scan look overcooked. Thankfully once I got the frames set up, things started to look better. There is undoubtedly an ethereal quality to these images, a soft fuzziness around the edges. Almost as if you're looking through the world with dirty glasses. You do lose your highlights but get excellent shadow details. Probably the one thing that caught my attention is how grainy the film is, not that I'm complaining; we are talking cut down x-ray film here, so a bit of grain is to be expected. But the images have an excellent sharpness about them, which only adds to the film's overall feel. And for a first roll, I think I'm going to enjoy the film moving forward.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20C

Roll 02 - Ilford Ilfotec HC
After seeing the results, I got with the first roll. I decided to play off my strength and see if I could push the film towards that same ethereal look. Rather than go with the dilution and time on the Washi datasheets, which called for 4.5 minutes in a dilution of 1+15 (Dilution A). I felt that the time was too short and the dilution too strong. Thankfully, Washi tells you an alternative source for times, so I went with a sixteen minute time in 1+63 (Dilution H). Although the film probably would have done better in either the 1+15 or 1+31 dilutions, it would have bumped up the contrast. I am, however, happy with the results I got; you got that same ethereal glow about the images and a certain drop in the visibility of the grain; I did have to dial things back in editing, so maybe drop the development time to fifteen minutes or go with a more substantial dilution.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20C

Roll 03 - Adox Rodinal
I'll admit I was torn when picking a development using Rodinal. On the one hand, I knew that I would get some increased amount of grain no matter which dilution I went, but I wanted to see a bit more contrast from Washi F. In the end, I went with a tried and listed time, going with a 1+25 dilution for nine minutes. After pulling them from the tank, the negatives looked like the rest, which is a good sign. They are a bit overcooked; thankfully, a bit of work in post-processing did drag a bit of detail back out of those highlights. Some of the times are a little off on the datasheet, and I would go with at least one minute less on all listed times.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20C

Roll 04 - Flic Film Black/White & Green
The joy of running these films sequentially is that I can make adjustments as I go along with developing the rolls. In the case of this last roll, I took my advice and went with one minute left on development. Here I went for the FP4+ times again and used the Flic Film Black/White & Green, which is liquid Xtol, hoping it might tame the film. Sadly it did not, and despite shooting under wildly different lighting conditions, the film came out of the tank looking like every other roll. In fact, despite being developed by four different developers, everything looked the same. There's the same ethereal look to the images, loss of highlights, tonnes of grain and sharpness.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20C

Final Thoughts
Washi F is not for the faint of heart; it's a film that has specific tolerances and has very little in the way of forgiveness when outside those tolerances. And that isn't surprising for me, it is a film with a single purpose, and here I am taking it well outside that purpose. An X-Ray camera does one thing well and does it the same every time. On that side, if you're into this look, then Washi F will give you a fun film to experiment with ethereal portraits and landscapes and certainly makes you embrace the grain. And no matter what you develop the film in, it will look the same. The one thing I did note with his film is how difficult the handle is. The first thing is that the base is thin, not super light like other Washi films, but thin enough to give my F5 some headaches when loading. The second is handling when loading onto plastic reels, the first roll through bound a little during the process. Thankfully, I kept the film rolling with a bit of luck and a touch of violence. The thin base did allow the film to dry flat, but it did tend to roll upon itself. It also tends to suffer from light piping, so keep the roll inside the canister until you're ready to use it and load in dim light. The canister recommends shooting six frames, but four seems to do the trick. If you're looking for Washi F, it can be challenging to obtain as Washi is a small company out of France, thankfully they have a long reach, you can find a complete list of retail partners over on the Film Washi site.

Further Reading
Don't just take my word on Film Washi Type "F", you can check out the reviews by other awesome reviewers!
Emulsive - 5 Frames with Film Washi Type F
Analogue Wonderland - Washi F Film Review
Filtr Film Cameras - Film Review - Washi F

#filmreviewblogs #adoxrodinal #canada #film #filmreview #filmwashi #filmwashitypef #flicfilmblackwhitegreen #hamilton #ilfordid11 #ilfordilfotechc #media #medium #milton #nikonf5 #ontario #review #rockton #toronto #typef #washi #westfieldheritagevillage

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-04-11

Film Review Blog No. 82 – Film Washi Type “F”

When it comes to Film Washi, they certainly have gotten their hands on some interesting film stocks. And after enjoying some of their products last year, one of their products I've wanted to try. But with any repurposed film stock, you have to wait for the raw materials to become available. Thankfully after watching out on the Film Photography Project's store I saw them come back in stock thanks to their email newsletter. Type "F" is a special X-Ray film used for mass lung disease diagnoses; according to the Film Washi website, it is truly a unique film that offers, coated without an anti-halation layer, a high diffusion effect beautiful grain.

Film Specs
Type: Orthochromatic X-Ray Film, B&W
Film Base: Polyester, 100 μm
Film Speed: ASA-100
Formats Available: 135 (35mm)

Roll 01 - Ilford ID-11
I didn't know what to expect from these negatives; they looked decent, a bit dense, but nothing too terrible out of the tank. Silverfast, however, made the initial pre-scan look overcooked. Thankfully once I got the frames set up, things started to look better. There is undoubtedly an ethereal quality to these images, a soft fuzziness around the edges. Almost as if you're looking through the world with dirty glasses. You do lose your highlights but get excellent shadow details. Probably the one thing that caught my attention is how grainy the film is, not that I'm complaining; we are talking cut down x-ray film here, so a bit of grain is to be expected. But the images have an excellent sharpness about them, which only adds to the film's overall feel. And for a first roll, I think I'm going to enjoy the film moving forward.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford ID-11 (1+1) 11:00 @ 20C

Roll 02 - Ilford Ilfotec HC
After seeing the results, I got with the first roll. I decided to play off my strength and see if I could push the film towards that same ethereal look. Rather than go with the dilution and time on the Washi datasheets, which called for 4.5 minutes in a dilution of 1+15 (Dilution A). I felt that the time was too short and the dilution too strong. Thankfully, Washi tells you an alternative source for times, so I went with a sixteen minute time in 1+63 (Dilution H). Although the film probably would have done better in either the 1+15 or 1+31 dilutions, it would have bumped up the contrast. I am, however, happy with the results I got; you got that same ethereal glow about the images and a certain drop in the visibility of the grain; I did have to dial things back in editing, so maybe drop the development time to fifteen minutes or go with a more substantial dilution.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 16:00 @ 20C

Roll 03 - Adox Rodinal
I'll admit I was torn when picking a development using Rodinal. On the one hand, I knew that I would get some increased amount of grain no matter which dilution I went, but I wanted to see a bit more contrast from Washi F. In the end, I went with a tried and listed time, going with a 1+25 dilution for nine minutes. After pulling them from the tank, the negatives looked like the rest, which is a good sign. They are a bit overcooked; thankfully, a bit of work in post-processing did drag a bit of detail back out of those highlights. Some of the times are a little off on the datasheet, and I would go with at least one minute less on all listed times.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 15:00 @ 20C

Roll 04 - Flic Film Black/White & Green
The joy of running these films sequentially is that I can make adjustments as I go along with developing the rolls. In the case of this last roll, I took my advice and went with one minute left on development. Here I went for the FP4+ times again and used the Flic Film Black/White & Green, which is liquid Xtol, hoping it might tame the film. Sadly it did not, and despite shooting under wildly different lighting conditions, the film came out of the tank looking like every other roll. In fact, despite being developed by four different developers, everything looked the same. There's the same ethereal look to the images, loss of highlights, tonnes of grain and sharpness.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Film Washi Type F @ ASA-100 - Flic Film Black/White & Green (1+49) 11:45 @ 20C

Final Thoughts
Washi F is not for the faint of heart; it's a film that has specific tolerances and has very little in the way of forgiveness when outside those tolerances. And that isn't surprising for me, it is a film with a single purpose, and here I am taking it well outside that purpose. An X-Ray camera does one thing well and does it the same every time. On that side, if you're into this look, then Washi F will give you a fun film to experiment with ethereal portraits and landscapes and certainly makes you embrace the grain. And no matter what you develop the film in, it will look the same. The one thing I did note with his film is how difficult the handle is. The first thing is that the base is thin, not super light like other Washi films, but thin enough to give my F5 some headaches when loading. The second is handling when loading onto plastic reels, the first roll through bound a little during the process. Thankfully, I kept the film rolling with a bit of luck and a touch of violence. The thin base did allow the film to dry flat, but it did tend to roll upon itself. It also tends to suffer from light piping, so keep the roll inside the canister until you're ready to use it and load in dim light. The canister recommends shooting six frames, but four seems to do the trick. If you're looking for Washi F, it can be challenging to obtain as Washi is a small company out of France, thankfully they have a long reach, you can find a complete list of retail partners over on the Film Washi site.

Further Reading
Don't just take my word on Film Washi Type "F", you can check out the reviews by other awesome reviewers!
Emulsive - 5 Frames with Film Washi Type F
Analogue Wonderland - Washi F Film Review
Filtr Film Cameras - Film Review - Washi F

#filmreviewblogs #adoxrodinal #canada #film #filmreview #filmwashi #filmwashitypef #flicfilmblackwhitegreen #hamilton #ilfordid11 #ilfordilfotechc #media #medium #milton #nikonf5 #ontario #review #rockton #toronto #typef #washi #westfieldheritagevillage

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-03-14

Film Review Blog No. 81 – Fujifilm Fujicolor C200

Some films carry with them a particular cult following. While I'm not one to follow these cult followings when I've never shot the film stock before and usually don't play into these followings. At least until I see a trusted and respected photographer rave about the film stock. And Fujicolor C200 is that film stock, and I can see why people love working with the stock. C200 is a film that fills a gap that provides a rich, almost perfect colour reproduction and blends well with the current digital age and is one of the most straightforward colour films to scan and run through post-processing. Thankfully I managed to find a couple of rolls last year and kept them on ice for a future review as the current climate of lengthening supply lines and shortages in colour negative stock.

Note: This is a review of the original Fujicolor C200, currently this film is being marketed under the name Fujicolor 200 which is a rebrand of Kodak Gold 200 in North America.

Film Specs
Type: Color Negative (C-41)
Film Base: Cellulose Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-200, Latitude: +/- 1-Stop
Formats Available: 135 (35mm)

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Colour Rendition
The first thing that I found with C200 is faithful colour reproduction is to the real world. The only other camera system that I've found that handles colour this well is digital. And yes, I have no problems saying that. And I indeed say that seeing it perform both in sunny and overcast conditions. While there is a certain dulling of the colour reproduction under the overcast conditions, there is only a slight difference between the two. I feel the strongest quality about the colours is that it certainly doesn't have high contrast; I found the film to have low contrast. Which only helps the colour palette, making it different from Kodak colour films. Probably the closest film stock on the Kodak line is Portra 160.

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Image Quality
There is no fault in the image quality from C200. While the colour replication is probably the film's strongest quality, it only helps increase the overall image quality outputted by the film. Despite the medium-to-low contrast from the film stock, the tonal separation is superb, and the whites are clean and blacks are dark. And there's no difference between bright and dull light. Images are clean and sharp with almost no grain. Between edge sharpness and tonal separation, the film stock is incredibly sharp, and you lose none of this when scanning, as there is little in the way of loss from the digitisation process.

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Scanning
If there's one thing that I hate to do is colour balance and adjust film scans, I should get my hands on a plugin like Negative Lab Pro to help me along, but as I shoot colour negative film so rarely, I cannot be bothered. But C200, however, is an exception when it comes to ease of scanning and digitisation. And I scanned one roll using my V700 and Epson Scan software and the other through my Nikon Coolscan V ED and Nikon Scan software. In the case of the Epson, once I ran and balanced things out through Photoshop, everything looked right the first time; I only made a few tweaks with the levels to get things perfect. The Nikon Scan software nailed it right away, with again only minor adjustments needed. The scans right out of the Epson software did carry the typical Fuji magenta bias that was quickly corrected for through the auto colour function. Only slight colour aberrations were introduced and easily removed without any loss of sharpness or quality.

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Overall Impression
I can see myself using this film again, especially if I need a good general-purpose colour film to handle any situation I throw at the stock. I can see it working well for travel, portraiture, landscape, and architecture. It can also make for a medium speed film when you don't want to over-expose your 400-speed film and risk losing contrast. I can also see the value of shooting C200 at ASA-100 to get an even smoother colour palette more in line with what you could get with an original Agfa colour stock or getting plenty of punch with a one-stop under-exposure. Hopefully, C200 doesn't fall the way of other Fuji colour films, and soon stocks will start to increase worldwide because it would be a shame to see the end of this beautiful film stock.

Further Reading
Don't only take my word on Fujicolor C200, check out these other reviews by other amazing photographers
35mmc - Fuji C200 Mini Review
Casual Photophile - Fujicolor C200 - Fuji's Cheap Option
The Darkroom - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 Review
My Favourite Lens - Fujicolor C200 35mm Film Review
Parallax Photographic Coop - Fuji C200 Review
Carlos Garcia - Fujicolor C200 Review
Filter Grade - Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 Film Stock Review
Rambling Polymath - FujiFilm C200 - 35mm Film Review

#filmreviewblogs #c200 #canada #film #filmreview #fujifujicolorc200 #fujicolor #fujifilm #london #minoltaxe7 #ontario #petrolia #review

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-02-14

Film Review Blog No. 80 – Fujifilm Superia X-Tra 400

If there is one film stock that defines my earliest experiments in photography, it is Fujifilm Superia 400. However, I shot it as a rebranded film from President's Choice because it was cheap as chips and often came with film processing at the PhotoLab in the Loblaw's store (Real Canadian Superstore), where I bought it from. The film ran through all my earliest cameras, including the Hi-Matic and SR-T and captured many of those early PYPS weekends where I cut my teeth on photography. Today I shoot little in the way of Colour Negative film. Still, if there's one thing that is starting many other photographers, it is Superia X-Tra 400, a baseline consumer colour negative film with excellent image quality and colour reproduction. Not to mention easy to scan either at home or the lab. Sadly though the end of 2021, with the stress on supply lines, it became increasingly difficult to find new sources of colour negative film. I turned to the secondary market and ended up with a pair of rolls of differing quality. These were expired in poorly stored, resulting in less-than-ideal results—still, enough to give an idea of the quality the film can output.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Negative (C-41)
Film Base: Cellilous Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-400, Latitude +/- 1-2 Stops
Formats Available: 135

Nikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Colour Rendition
There is a definable warmth to the colours that come out of Superia 400, while it's a little more noticeable on the roll that isn't as expired as the first. The reds, oranges, and yellows pop the most make it perfect for fall days at peak colours when you have full sunlight. And while the film does handle blues well, I find at least in my examples they aren't exactly what I like in my blues. Even the expired film allows some of these same colours to pop, but these were also shot under more overcast conditions. While I wouldn't call the colours a natural reproduction, they add a bit of rich vibrance even in dull light, but it performs much better under brighter conditions. And this surprises me, as I would expect a film like Superia 400 to perform well in every situation, especially under lower light.

Nikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Image Quality
Despite having two rolls of expired film with Superia 400, the image quality remained excellent. The first roll being worse off than the second, both retained their colour representation and fine-grain. The one thing that certainly surprised me is the fine-grain nature of the film, but it retains excellent edge sharpness. While the film does have issues performing under low light conditions under clear or partly sunny conditions, the image quality remains excellent. You do see a bit more visible grain under common light conditions but it is not too terrible. Although where the film truly does shine in terms of quality is print, I'm, of course, talking about the standard 4×6 prints you get from a film lab. I have never seen a bad print from this film stock unless something went wrong during the actual shooting of the film.

[caption width=1024 align=aligncenter]Nikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Scanning
Despite the expiration and poor storage of the rolls, I found Superia 400 easy to scan. The Epson V700 and Epson Scan software handled the colour reproduction well, although it did give a bit of a magenta (no surprise) cast to the scans. There were more colour aberrations than I expected in the scan, but I feel these were more because of the nature of the roll than of the actual film stock. The aberrations were less noticeable on the roll that wasn't as expired as the other. Thankfully in both cases, the colour cast and aberrations were easily fixed up in Photoshop. Although in some cases, the magenta case proved a bit more challenging to clean up without moving too far into the greens. Also, that rich vibrance carries through easily without needing to do anything in Photoshop to help with that pop.

Nikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraNikon FE - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Overall Impression
As a consumer film, Superia 400 is designed to work well with your standard point-and-shoot cameras, which remain a popular choice among many photographers. But don't only shoot this film through those cameras; it is a strong performer, especially when you get fresh or lightly expired rolls of film. They make for an excellent choice when testing a new camera to make sure everything works. While it is not a film I'll reach for personally for my photography as I prefer Kodak's consumer stocks, Ultramax and Gold, Superia X-Tra is undoubtedly one that makes for a good backup in your work. Plus, you can get the stock under several different brands that can be had for even lower costs than the Fuji branded rolls. If you're new to film photography and love your point-and-shoots, I highly recommend stocking up on Superia X-Tra 400.

Further Reading
Don't take only my word on Fujifilm Superia X-Tra 400 check out these other blogs from some other awesome photographers.
Emulsive - My first roll…Of 35mm Film - Fuji Superia X-Tra 400 in a Pentax K1000
35mmc - Fuji Superia 400 - A Single Roll Review
Casual Photophile - Why Fujifilm Superia 400 Should be Every Shooters First Film
Analog Wonderland - Fujifilm Superia X-Tra 400 Expired Film Review
The Darkroom - Fuji Superia X-Tra 400 Review
Filter Grade - Fujifilm Superia X-Tra 400 Film Stock Review
Carlos Garcia - Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400 Review

#filmreviewblogs #canada #colourfilm #filmreview #fuji #fujisuperiaxtra400 #fujicolor #fujifilm #milton #oakville #ontario

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-01-21

Classic Film Review Blog – Fujifilm Fujichrome Velvia

When I was starting to shoot film seriously, I stuck mainly to negative colour stock but started experimenting with black & white, but slide film was something that I avoided. Slide film was for professional photographers or travel photographers who wanted to share their trips on a slide projector. My first experience with slide film was Fuji Sensia and I was hooked. So I decided to jump right into the iconic Fuji slide film, Velvia. The original Kodachrome killer, and yet I only started shooting the stock after it got discontinued, the first roll running through my camera in 2007.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) - Processing By: Silvano's

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal Film (E-6)
Film Base: Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-50
Formats Available: 135, 120, 220, 4×5, 8×10, 13x18cm, Super8, 16mm
Discontinued: 2005

Nikon F90 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (CPOL) - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: The DarkroomNikon F90 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (CPOL) - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: The DarkroomNikon F90 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (CPOL) - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: The DarkroomNikon F90 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D (CPOL) - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: The Darkroom

Colour Rendition
There is a reason that the nickname for Velvia is Fujifilm Velveeta. The reason is that Velveeta is a cheese 'product' with an artificial orange colour and rich, creamy consistency. That is exactly what you get with the shades of Velvia, rich, creamy, and often unctuous as it tends to exaggerate colours. The high-contrast nature of the film will make the colours pop or reach out from the slide and punch you in the face. You'll notice this in all colours, but mainly in the reds and blues, followed by greens. While this works well for landscapes, you do have to watch for skin tones, although I did find that it wasn't too bad in the few times I've photographed people with Velvia. While many aren't too happy with the punchy colours, they can add drama to the images in the right situations.

Pentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Unicolor Rapid E6 KitPentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Unicolor Rapid E6 KitPentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Unicolor Rapid E6 KitPentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Unicolor Rapid E6 Kit

Image Quality
the one thing that you don't have to worry about is image quality. Velvia produces a delightfully sharp and fine-grained image that offers up a nearly grain-free image no matter if you're scanning or projecting. The one thing you will notice about the film is the contrast; this is probably the pinnacle of high-contrast for colour films, but don't let that stop you. Like any slide film, you need to be accurate with your exposure as there is a bit of latitude but nothing like what you get with colour negative or B&W films. If you are metering, especially portrait work, you'll want to meter the light falling on your subject, incident metering, and try and average as best you can between the shadows and highlights. In the shot of the ladies at Fort Michilimackinac, you'll note that I missed this and lost the one woman's face in the shadows of her hats. But when you do get that exposure nailed, you'll be treated to clean highlights, dark shadows, and excellent colour tones across the image.

Modified Anniversary Speed Graphic - Schneider-Kreuznack Angulon 1:6,8/90 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Toronto Image WorksModified Anniversary Speed Graphic - Schneider-Kreuznack Angulon 1:6,8/90 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Toronto Image WorksModified Anniversary Speed Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoModified Anniversary Speed Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Scanning
While most slide films can be challenging to scan, and Velvia can be a bit of a challenge, but if you have correctly exposed film, the scanning is much easier. The one thing that I did notice with Velvia is that it tends to scan in with a basis towards magenta. I only found that when scanning with Epson software and the V700 scanner. It did a better job nailing the colour balance using the Nikon Coolscan V ED and Nikon Scanning software. Thankfully any colour shifts can be easily adjusted for in post-processing; even Adobe Photoshop's automatic adjustments are enough to fix any colour shifts. While you won't get as nice of a result with expired film, you can get the slides almost back to normal with a bit of time. There is some introduction of colour aberrations, but nothing that a bit of work in Photoshop won't fix.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia (RVP) @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano's

Overall Impression
If Sensia introduced me to slide film, Velvia showed me exactly what slide film could do! However, a specific photograph and subject matter makes Velvia, so you get that Velvia punch. You want to shoot the stock in bright conditions with lots of hard light and plenty of copunch. You also have to remember Velvia filled in a gap in the slide film market; when it was released, the biggest player for professional photography and the slow film was Kodachrome 64, but Kodachrome required a specific and complex processing method. Velvia provided a similar experience but could be taken to any lab and have at the time a 1-2 hour turnaround time. And while the original has been discontinued for a decade and a half now, the new film stock is still hanging on (barely). But the big question is which version do I prefer, the Velvia or Velvia 50? I have to say, I prefer the original Velvia; I found it a bit more forgiving especially when I shot the film at ASA-64, and it has a far more punchy result. These days, the original Velvia can still be found, but it is starting to get on in age, so if you have any rolls left, now is the time to shoot them; you'll probably want to shoot these closer to ASA-25 have them developed normally. Because Velvia does not age well when poorly stored, and you'll get some serious colour shifts. But if you do get your hands on a cold stored roll or, if you're lucky, a box of 4×5, you're in for a real treat.

#filmreviewblogs #asheville #canada #centrewellington #elora #film #filmreview #fortmichlimackinac #fujichrome #fujifilm #fujifilmvelvia #mackinaccity #media #medium #michigan #montreal #nationalmuseumoftheunitedstatesairforce #nikonf90 #northcarolina #ohio #ontario #pentax645 #pisgahnationalforest #quebec #review #rolleiflex28f #rvp #speedgraphic #toronto #unitedstates #wolfford

imageDowntownRiverside AppartmentsThe Old Ruins
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2022-01-10

Film Review Blog No. 79 – Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800

When it comes to colour negative films, there are a few fast options out there, and one of the most iconic of these is Fuji Superia Xtra 800. Fuji also released a professional version, Venus and an even faster ASA-1600. Now I've never been one to shoot fast films. Usually, I go as high as ASA-800. Even with my Delta and TMax, I'll rate them lower than box speed. I have shot this film in the past but only ended up with a handful of good shots. Although, like most Fuji colour negative films and any colour negative film through 2021, it became difficult to source a roll or two for review. Thankfully I landed on a single roll of the stuff along with a pair of Superia X-Tra 400 rolls (which are being reviewed next month). Sadly like some films on the secondary market, the viability and storage of the film proved less than ideal. Although I got a good feel for the film, the image quality is less than you would expect from a fresh roll.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Negative (C-41) Film
Film Base: Cellulose Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-800, Latitude: +/- 2-Stops
Formats Available: 35mm

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Colour Rendition
The colour reproduction is near perfect; even in an expired state, you can see excellent reds and greens being the strongest and most natural. And they aren't overly contrasty either, with a good mid-contrast not too dull but not excessively bright. Even in dull weather, each colour is faithfully replicated in that typical Fuji colour pallette. And it even performs well in any lighting condition, from direct daylight where you have the best performance, overcast and even inside. When shooting under artificial light, you have an orange/brown colour cast but nothing too serious.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Image Quality
The first thing that impressed me the most was that despite being heavy, the image quality of Xtra 800 is decent! Most of the deficiencies I found with the film come from poor storage and the expired nature of the film. The film is sharp mainly when it comes to edge sharpness or acutance, thanks to an excellent grain structure. And the grain is pleasing and present but is not distracting from the image (in the best conditions, mind you), but even in an expired state, the grain isn't too bad. And significant issues can be easily overcome with a bit of noise and grain reduction in post-processing. The film's tonal separation is decent, allowing for good contrast and that shows given the bad weather conditions I was shooting in during the day. With the rain and heavy overcast and overall low-contrast lighting, Xtra 800 performed well, providing an extra punch when needed.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Scanning
Despite being heavily expired, the film is surprisingly easy to scan even in a poor state. But given how expired the film is, it also provided insight into how new or well-stored films will behave. Sadly the film was too far gone for scanning it in the Nikon Coolscan V ED, but the Epson V700 handled the film like a champ. During the scanning process, the film has a strong magenta cast, exaggerated by poor storage. While Photoshop was able to compensate, it often went too far into a green bias, but I managed to get the images to a happy medium with a bit of tweaking. Another thing I noticed is that there was a lot of colour noise introduced into the film through the scanning process. While I'm sure this is also due to age and storage, I can't imagine a new film being better or worse. Again nothing that Photoshop couldn't handle with the stock reduce noise filter.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington CameraMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 @ ASA-800 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Overall Impression
I first have to say that Fuji no longer produces an 800-Speed colour negative film, although they are making a single-use waterproof camera again. The big unknown is which film it is loaded with, and some questions are surrounding that stock. It is either from another company, or they are still working through any surviving bulk rolls. Despite having a lousy roll, I can honestly see what people saw in Superia 800, as a film for working indoors or in low light, it would do its job and produce quality images. Honestly, I think this film would work better over-exposed by a stop to ASA-400 or even only slightly to ASA-640. Would I reshoot Superia 800? Probably, if I got a better roll that was not as expired, but I won't go and search specifically for Superia 800.

Further Reading
Don't take my word on Fuji Superia X-Tra 800; check out these other excellent blogs on the film stock!
Carlos Garcia Photography - Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800 Review
China Camera Style - Film Review: Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 800
Craig Fouche - Review - Fujifilm Superia X-Tra 800
James Madison Photography - Review: Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 800

#filmreviewblogs #burlingtoncamera #c41 #canada #colourfilm #colournegative #expiredfilm #film #filmreview #fujisuperiaxtra800 #fujicolor #fujifilm #kington #minoltamaxxum9 #ontario

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-12-13

Film Review Blog No. 78 – Rollei Paul & Reinhold

I remember not being overly excited about Rollei Paul & Reinhold when it was first announced in September of 2020. I mean, yes, it is great to see a special edition film released to celebrate the 100th Anniversary of a premier and historic camera maker (Franke & Heidecke later Rollei). There was little data on the film at the time, and there are still many gaps. This is a special edition film, limited production, and limited developer formulas; there's no time for Ilfotec HC!

Film Specs
Type: Panchromatic B&W
Film Base: Polyester
Film Speed: ASA-640, Latitude: 320-1600
Formats Available: 135 (35mm)

Roll 01 - Rollei Supergrain
My gut was telling me that I would end up with some grainy mush, not that I see that as a bad thing, but I wasn't expecting much from the film. Of course, as soon as I pulled the negatives out from the tank, my mind changed instantly. The density of the negatives were perfect, the film base proved clear with the Rollei and Paul & Reinhold/640 clearly marked on the rebate. But then scanning came treat number two. There's a reason that Rollei recommended their Supergrain developer because I ended up with a rich contrast that delivered excellent tonal separation. While there is grain, but it helps add edge sharpness, and the film is nice and sharp. As an introduction to the film, I am certainly impressed.

Nikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Rollei Supergrain (1+12) 9:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Rollei Supergrain (1+12) 9:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Rollei Supergrain (1+12) 9:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Rollei Supergrain (1+12) 9:30 @ 20C

Roll 02 - Kodak D-76
I have mixed reaction to these images. My initial plan had been to develop these using a 1+1 time which might have helped reduce the prevalence of grain but probably would have dropped the contrast, whereas I did notice a certain drop in contrast even with stock but an uptick in visible grain. Yeah, mixed reaction. I'm not saying that these are bad nor is the combination bad, it certainly is what I initially expected from Paul & Reinhold, lower contrast and a bit more grain. The grain is a bit mushy, but you do have decent edge sharpness but you do lose that tonal separation, even with a yellow filter added in, maybe adding a deeper yellow filter will help out. While not a recommended developer in my case, but it will work in a pinch.

Nikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 9:00 @ 20CNikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 9:00 @ 20CNikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 9:00 @ 20CNikon FA - AI-S Nikkor 35mm 1:2.8 (Yellow-12) - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Kodak D-76 (Stock) 9:00 @ 20C

Roll 03 - Adox Rodinal
Alright, so there is an official Rodinal time for Paul & Reinhold, and I nearly did use the listed time, but I wanted to see how well the film performed when developed using the stand method. When developed normally in Rodinal the film is excellent and I was drawn in by some examples shared by fellow photographer Ori. But I made the choice after seeing the results I got out of D-76 being a little too grainy from what I saw earlier. The results were awesome, I went with a 1+100 dilution and had two slow inversions at the 30-minute mark. While there is still grain it's far more reduced than what I saw with D-76. But the grain helps build up that edge sharpness which combined with the tonal separation adds to the film's overall sharpness. There's a good contrast, nothing too harsh or soft a nice middle ground. While worth the effort and time taken for the results.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Adox Rodinal (1+100) 60:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Adox Rodinal (1+100) 60:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Adox Rodinal (1+100) 60:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4.5 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Adox Rodinal (1+100) 60:00 @ 20C

Roll 04 - Adox FX-39 II
In full disclosure, there are no official published times for Paul & Reinhold and Adox FX-39 II, but have decided to do one roll as stand developed I didn't want to include two going with HC-110 Dil. J. This means I needed to backwards engineer a time as I didn't have any other official listed chemistry. I went back through my records and found a film with a close box speed and the same D-76 stock dilution times. I landed on Bergger Pancro 400, which is decently close to the ASA-640 of Paul & Reinhold. From there I looked up FX-39 times, which I had felt would be a good fit for the film, landing on a longer more dilute time, I calculated back to a 1+9 dilution time. I ended up shooting two rolls the first at the box speed of ASA-640 and the second at ASA-320. The results are both excellent, at ASA-640, the negatives were thin but after scanning and some work in Photoshop they turned out better. The images were sharp, with a bit of grain, but I've come to expect that with this film, deep tones and excellent contrast. The second roll I pulled in development to account for the overexposure and the results were even better, with good density on the negatives that scanned well and needed little in the way of adjustment. There is some reduction in grain but no loss of sharpness, the contrast has also been reduced but nothing that takes away from the images themselves.

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD W.Rokkor-X 28mm 1:2.8 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-640 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta XD11 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm 1:1.7 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-320 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 8:00 @ 20CMinolta XD11 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm 1:1.7 - Rollei Paul & Reinhold @ ASA-320 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 8:00 @ 20C

Final Thoughts
Despite all my searching online, I haven't found any real clue onto the original source of this film, some point to a re-release of Agfa Isopan or Tasma T42, or a found roll of older film that's been over-exposed. How much was made or if it will continue to be made is unknown, so if you want to try it, now is the time as some stores still have it in stock but that stock may be limited. Overall I'm rather happy with the results and the film, the one thing that I wish they had were HC-110 times, but I managed to pick up another pair of rolls to see what I can figure out, thankfully working with FX-39 II on Bergger Pancro 400 times gives me an educated guess! And it actually worked and the images developed in Ilfotec HC turned out amazing, and probably are my favourite from the film.

Further Reading
Don't take my word on Paul & Reinhold, check out these other reviews of the films stock!
Beau Photo - Camera Confidential: Rollei Paul & Reinhold Limited Edition B&W Film
Kosmo Foto - New ‘Paul & Reinhold’ black-and-white films mark 100th anniversary of Rollei

#filmreviewblogs #adoxfx39ii #adoxrodinal #asa640 #canada #film #filmreview #guelph #hamilton #hiltonfalls #kodakd76 #macodirect #milton #minoltamaxxum9 #minoltaxe7 #nikonf5 #nikonfa #ontario #paulreinhold #review #rollei #rolleipaulreinhold #rolleisupergrain

imageThe Mansion
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-11-08

Film Review Blog No. 77 – Fujifilm Provia 100F (RDPIII)

When it comes to slide film, it is not something that I like to shoot often, mostly because when it comes to processing, it's time-consuming and costly; even purchasing the stock is costly. Plus, scanning some slide films stocks are difficult to nail down both exposure and colour balance. And then there's Provia 100F; Provia is a solid performer and one that gives an excellent starting point in the world of shooting slide film. It reminds me of Sensia and Astia, both excellent slide films with a bit more forgiveness than the Velvia line and natural colour reproduction. It also scans easily without too much trouble.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal Film (E-6 Process)
Film Base: Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-100, Latitude +/- 2-Stops
Formats Avaliable: 135, 120, Sheets (4×5, 8×10)

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Colour Rendition
The easiest way to describe the colour rendition of Provia 100F is natural; there's nothing over-the-top or extreme. The contrast is modest, and all the colours look as they do in real life, especially if you have good optics on your camera. This makes the film a jack of all trades; if you want to show off a traditional slide show of your vacation Provia 100F will deliver no matter the subject matter. It handles landscape, people, and architecture. Being a daylight balanced film, it works best outdoors. Colour biases tend to lean towards magenta and other warm colours, but I find that pleasing in the summer months. This warmth is even more seen when working with the film inside under artificial light; despite being daylight-balanced, I like how the film behaves under tungsten lights, amping up that warmth and presenting some interesting internal shots. I found this reaction during my first trip to Montreal and photographing inside some of the city's historic churches such as St. Joseph Oratory and at sunset when you have direct low evening light hitting the subject.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Fujifilm Provia 100F @ ASA-100 Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Image Quality
The image quality of Provia 100F is excellent, and I have no real complaints. The images are sharp and fine-grained; while you pick up a bit more than Velvia, it isn't much more, and unless you zoom right in, the average viewer won't pick up on the grain. Plus, the grain adds to the edge sharpness, and I would rate Provia 100F as slightly sharper than Velvia 100F and on par with the sharpness of Ektachrome E100. Contrast wise, Provia 100F sits in a middle ground with a good separation of tones and colours but not enough to smack you in the face and over-the-top contrast. The film also projects well, and you have good sharp images up on the screen, and everything looks right. Unlike what I found with Velvia, Provia 100F handles harsh light far better. It can capture both highlight and shadow details wildly different without sacrificing too much on either end. In other words, Provia 100F is far more forgiving and behaves more like a consumer slide film where exposures aren't always perfect. You cannot push that feature too far or mess up the film, but you have closer to a stop on either end than, say, a third.

Hasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 Kit

Scanning
Of the three Fuji slide films I've reviewed this year, Provia has proven to be the easiest to scan. I did not have to do any major corrections in post-production for balancing out the levels and colours in many cases. It also helped that I was running with my Nikon Coolscan V ED, a powerful film scanner and, despite its age, handled the film and colours well. In some cases, I did have to bump up the brightness, but I'm chalking that one up to the age/condition of the scan and the need to crack the case and clean off the mirror. Another help to the digitization process is the colour rendition I spoke to in a previous paragraph, being more on the cool side with no obvious colour biases. For someone like me, who doesn't do well with colour balance, the film is easy to correct, usually through automated options in Photoshop but required a light touch when adjusting manually.

Pacemaker Crown Graphic - Schneider-Kreuznach Angulon 1:6,8/90 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitPacemaker Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitPacemaker Crown Graphic - Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar-S 1:5.6/210 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 KitPacemaker Crown Graphic - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Fuji Provia 100F @ ASA-100 - Unicolor Rapid E-6 Kit

Overall Impression
With the recent news of the end of the current version of Velvia 100, Provia 100F has ended up on top as Fuji's (relatively) faster slide film. While I'm not a fan of slide film, it is far too finicky for my tastes and getting it processed in a lab requires a trip to a post office and waiting for the lab. I find the cost/enjoyment ratio far too in favour of cost rather than enjoyment. That said, Provia 100F is an excellent slide film and one of my favourites, the other being Kodak Ektachrome E100. Provia 100F offers a far easier gateway into the film stock with a bit more latitude than Velvia and far more natural colour representations, and far easier scanning if you start shooting slide film. And I don't see Fujifilm cutting the stock anytime soon, but Fuji is a big black box, and you don't know what they have planned next until it's announced.

Further Reading
Don't take my work on Fuji Provia 100F, check out these other reviews on the film stock!
Emulsive - Film Stock Review: Fuji Provia 100F (RDPIII)
Casual Photophile - Fujifilm Provia 100F Slide Film Profile
The Darkroom - Fujilfilm Provia 100F - Film Review
Richard Haw - Review: Fujifilm Provia 100F

#filmreviewblogs #canada #crowngraphic #districtofcolumbia #film #filmreview #fujifilm #fujifilmprovia100f #halifax #hasselblad500c #minoltaxe7 #nikonf5 #novascotia #oakville #ontario #provia #rdpiii #review #unitedstates #uxbridge #washington

imageClocktowerK181Tug II
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-10-22

Film Review Blog No. 76 – Fujifilm Velvia 100

When it comes to the name Velvia, most photographers will often latch onto the cult classic Fuji Velvia or its modern form, Velvia 50. But Fuji also released a one-stop faster version, Velvia 100 or 100F, which offers everything you like about Velvia 50 but in a slightly faster form. While I've shot plenty of slide films, Velvia 100 is one that I have far less experience with; again, I'm more likely to shoot Provia, Ektachrome, or Astia (RIP) when shooting a 100-Speed slide film. But Velvia 100 is an interesting animal and one that I'm not likely to shoot again. So I wasn't too put out when on the 8th of March 2021 that Fujifilm announced the discontinuation of Velvia 100. The reason for the discontinuation of both the sale and commercial processing of Velvia 100 in the United States due to the presence of the chemical phenol, isopropylated phosphate, sources at Fujifilm state that 0.0003% trace amount of PIP is contained in the layers of the film, but even that trace amount has resulted in the discontinuation of the film stock in order to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency. While this announcement does seem to only affect the sale in the United States, but I will continue to monitor and update as needed.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal (E-6), Daylight Balanced
Film Base: Cellulose Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-100 Latitude: +/- 1/3 Stop)
Formats Avaliable: 135, 120, Sheets
Discontinued: 2021 (USA only)

Hasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Colour Rendition
If you liked how Velvia 50 rendered colours but were turned off by the slow speed, Velvia 100 might fit your photography style. The colours are rendered in the same rich saturation and high contrast manner. Your blacks are deep, and whites are bright. The film does tend to lean into the warmer tones, so the reds, greens, and yellows, so that is something you'll need to watch for when digitizing your slides. While not as rich as Velvia 50, Velvia 100 works as hard to bring you a good 95% of the slower film stock. You could probably do well with landscape and architecture work with these colours, but portraits are well within the realm of possibility with various skin tones, but again, it wouldn't be my first choice.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Image Quality
Suppose there's one thing that Velvia 100 doesn't lack in image quality. Honestly, I could not tell the difference between Velvia 50 and Velvia 100 at a glance. Velvia 100 offers up clean positives, with excellent edge sharpness and separation of colour and tones. And it does have a good fine-grain; you have to zoom in close to catch your first glimpse of grain. This helps make for clean scans and excellent projection. And that is what makes Velvia 100 edge out Velvia 50 slightly; it projects far cleaner and provides a much better visual image on a screen with even a dimmer projector bulb. Like any slide film, you have to watch your exposure; there's little in the way of latitude, so to get the best results, you want a good meter, either external or internal, because any over/underexposure or hard contrasty light will make your life miserable.

Pentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabPentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabPentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabPentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo Lab

Scanning
Like most slide films, modern scanners do struggle a bit with Velvia 50 and Velvia 100. And I was nearly pulling my hair out when scanning the two rolls of Velvia 100 using my Epson V700. Unfortunately, I could not get a roll of the stock in 35mm to see how my Nikon Coolscan V handled the film stock. Because of the deep contrast and hyper-real colour rendering, both the Epson scanning software and Adobe Photoshop had trouble locking onto the levels and colour balance using any automatic tool. Most of the time, I ended up having to take care of these manually, which is always a struggle in my post-processing world. Like any slide film, you do have to expose them properly, and in a couple of cases, I think my exposure was off slightly, which with the latitude of a stiff board, can cause problems. I found that the software tended to overcorrect towards greens and cyan, and with a bit of fine touch, I could correct them. Thankfully the film did not scan with too much aberration and required little additional sharpening and colour noise reduction.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo Lab

Overall Impression
There's nothing wrong with Velvia 100; it's a good film that will deliver excellent images in the right conditions; in fact, I would have to say that I would prefer to shoot Velvia 100 over Velvia 50. That little extra stop of film speed does help while still delivering the same image quality and colour from the Velvia series. But like those films, Velvia 100 requires an exacting exposure, so either make sure your handheld meter is calibrated properly, or your internal meter is dead-on accurate. And it also helps to have a good hand at colour correction in post-processing or a superb scanner and software that handles colours like a boss.

Further Reading
Don't take my word on Velvia 100, check out these other reviews of the film stock!
Emulsive - Film Stock Review: Fujifilm Velvia 100
The Darkroom - Velvia 100 Film Review
Blue Moon Camera - Film Friday Review: Fuji Velvia 100
Ken Rockwell - Fuji Velvia 100 Review
Filter Grade - Fuji Velvia 100 Film Stock Review

#filmreviewblogs #canada #film #filmreview #fuji #fujivelvia100 #fujichrome #fujifilm #hamilton #harborsprings #hasselblad500c #mamiyam645 #media #medium #michigan #oakville #ontario #pentax645 #review #rolleiflex28f #rvp100 #unitedstates #waterdown

imagePhotostock 2012Photostock 2012Photostock 2012
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-10-22

Classic Film Review Blog – Fujifilm Fujicolor Pro 400H

When it comes to colour films, I'm picky about which ones I shoot. I'm the first to admit I wouldn't say I like working with colour film as I have a digital camera that gives me consistent colour images with little work on my part. The biggest problem is getting the colours right from my scans as I don't use specialised software like Negative Lab Pro. When it comes to medium format, I am reliant on my Epson V700; the Nikon Coolscan V ED makes life easier. So it comes as no surprise that when I learned of the discontinuation of Fujicolor Pro 400H that upon looking back in my collection, I found two rolls of the earlier version of Pro 400H known as Fuji NPH. I've included those at the end of this review. Other than that, most of my colour work with 'professional' film stocks has been with Kodak. I quickly resigned myself to the fact that I would never get to shoot the film as in the wake of its discontinuation announcement, the prices went up everywhere, and suddenly frozen stock starting popping out of the woodwork at insane prices. Thankfully a chance visit to Burlington Camera saw a few pro packs of Pro 400H in 120 sitting in their film fridge. And yes, it cost 17$ per roll, but that's what you pay for Portra 400 in 120, so it seemed fair, and I grabbed a pair of rolls.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Negative Film (C-41)
Film Base: Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-400, Latitude: 100-1600
Formats Available: 35mm & Medium Format (120/220).
Discontinued: 2021

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Colour Rendition
Okay, I can see why people like this film! The colour reproduction is stunning; while I would not say a perfect representation of natural colour, there is a softness, almost pastel nature. It's almost as if the world is being seen through the lens of an art film. I can also see why people enjoy this film for portrait work; it certainly will work with almost any skin tone out there without making things look unnatural. Across the board, the colours pop without slapping you in the face; greens, reds, and blue are all vibrant but with a touch of softness. You also have excellent separation of tones and colours, with your blacks dark and whites bright.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Image Quality
The image quality you get from the film is superb. With the colour and tonal separation, you already have a decent level of sharpness; this is only added to the edge sharpness present in the film. While I can only speak to the medium format version of the film, the grain is about on par with what I would expect from a 400-speed film. Enough to help with that edge sharpness but not enough to be distracting from the image itself. You have good contrast, not too firm, weak, an excellent middle ground to help with that softer colour palette in Pro 400H. And this is present in both indoor and outdoor lighting. Having seen what the older version of the film can do, there are only slight differences between them.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Scanning
The one thing that stood out to me with Pro 400H is how easily it scans. Oddly enough, I've only ever shot and scanned the stock in medium format using the Epson Scan Software and a flatbed scanner (V500 and V700). However, I'm sure that a dedicated film scanner like a Coolscan V or a digital camera setup Pro 400H will scan. Like any negative film, you will have to make some adjustments in post-processing. Given the soft colour palette, I had some doubts about the ease at which Epson Scan would balance them out, so I left that part to Adobe Photoshop. The automatic adjustment did, in many cases, overcompensate, giving some images a green colour cast; I managed to fix those up manually by giving a bit more back to the magenta side for the highlights and shadows. There was very little in the way of colour noise and aberration added to the digitisation process. Again, nothing couldn't be handled by a quick noise reduction. And very little post-sharpening was needed to give the best results. Pro 400H is undoubtedly one of the more straightforward colour films I've had to scan; it behaves more like a consumer film in the scanner than a professional film.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Overall Impression
It's hard to give an impression on a film stock that you've shot so little of and probably will shoot little in the future since it's no longer being produced. But I would not count it out yet, as Fujifilm has brought back films in the past. Although any future version of Pro 400H may appear slightly different, the reason for the cancellation is the lack of a chemical needed to create that fourth colour layer that made Pro 400H stand out. And there are plenty of fans of the film stock out there who enjoy shooting the film more than I do, so it would be better to let the fans enjoy their last rolls than trying to chase down another roll in 35mm. Did I like the results I got? Yes, I did; if I happened across a reasonably priced roll in 35mm, I probably would buy it to test? While it's always a sad day when another film gets cancelled, we have to realise that film, and the film photography community doesn't have the same buying power as it once did, and in the end, everything dies.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano'sYashica-12 - Yashinon 80mm 1:3.5 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano'sYashica-12 - Yashinon 80mm 1:3.5 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano's

Further Reading
Don't only take my word on Fujicolor Pro 400H, check out these other reviews on this film stock!
Casual Photophile - Fujifilm Fujicolor Pro 400H Film Profile
The Darkroom - Fuji Pro 400H Film Review
Emulsive - Fujifilm Pro 400H: The Best Film I’ll Never Shoot Again
Shoot It With Film - How to Shoot Fuji Pro 400H
Filter Grade - Fujifilm PRO 400H Film Stock Review
Blue Moon Camera - Film Fridays: Fuji Pro 400H
Rambling Polymath - Film Review: Fuji Pro 400H
James Madison Photography - Review: Fujifilm Pro 400H

#filmreviewblogs #burlington #c41 #canada #colourfilm #film #filmreview #fujinph400 #fujipro400h #fujicolor #fujifilm #oakville #ontario #pro400h #review #rolleiflex28f #sheridancollege #toronto #yashica12

imageRemember ThemSt John
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-10-22

Classic Film Review Blog – Fujifilm Fujicolor Pro 400H

When it comes to colour films, I'm picky about which ones I shoot. I'm the first to admit I wouldn't say I like working with colour film as I have a digital camera that gives me consistent colour images with little work on my part. The biggest problem is getting the colours right from my scans as I don't use specialised software like Negative Lab Pro. When it comes to medium format, I am reliant on my Epson V700; the Nikon Coolscan V ED makes life easier. So it comes as no surprise that when I learned of the discontinuation of Fujicolor Pro 400H that upon looking back in my collection, I found two rolls of the earlier version of Pro 400H known as Fuji NPH. I've included those at the end of this review. Other than that, most of my colour work with 'professional' film stocks has been with Kodak. I quickly resigned myself to the fact that I would never get to shoot the film as in the wake of its discontinuation announcement, the prices went up everywhere, and suddenly frozen stock starting popping out of the woodwork at insane prices. Thankfully a chance visit to Burlington Camera saw a few pro packs of Pro 400H in 120 sitting in their film fridge. And yes, it cost 17$ per roll, but that's what you pay for Portra 400 in 120, so it seemed fair, and I grabbed a pair of rolls.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Negative Film (C-41)
Film Base: Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-400, Latitude: 100-1600
Formats Available: 35mm & Medium Format (120/220).
Discontinued: 2021

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Colour Rendition
Okay, I can see why people like this film! The colour reproduction is stunning; while I would not say a perfect representation of natural colour, there is a softness, almost pastel nature. It's almost as if the world is being seen through the lens of an art film. I can also see why people enjoy this film for portrait work; it certainly will work with almost any skin tone out there without making things look unnatural. Across the board, the colours pop without slapping you in the face; greens, reds, and blue are all vibrant but with a touch of softness. You also have excellent separation of tones and colours, with your blacks dark and whites bright.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolour Pro 400H @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Image Quality
The image quality you get from the film is superb. With the colour and tonal separation, you already have a decent level of sharpness; this is only added to the edge sharpness present in the film. While I can only speak to the medium format version of the film, the grain is about on par with what I would expect from a 400-speed film. Enough to help with that edge sharpness but not enough to be distracting from the image itself. You have good contrast, not too firm, weak, an excellent middle ground to help with that softer colour palette in Pro 400H. And this is present in both indoor and outdoor lighting. Having seen what the older version of the film can do, there are only slight differences between them.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Scanning
The one thing that stood out to me with Pro 400H is how easily it scans. Oddly enough, I've only ever shot and scanned the stock in medium format using the Epson Scan Software and a flatbed scanner (V500 and V700). However, I'm sure that a dedicated film scanner like a Coolscan V or a digital camera setup Pro 400H will scan. Like any negative film, you will have to make some adjustments in post-processing. Given the soft colour palette, I had some doubts about the ease at which Epson Scan would balance them out, so I left that part to Adobe Photoshop. The automatic adjustment did, in many cases, overcompensate, giving some images a green colour cast; I managed to fix those up manually by giving a bit more back to the magenta side for the highlights and shadows. There was very little in the way of colour noise and aberration added to the digitisation process. Again, nothing couldn't be handled by a quick noise reduction. And very little post-sharpening was needed to give the best results. Pro 400H is undoubtedly one of the more straightforward colour films I've had to scan; it behaves more like a consumer film in the scanner than a professional film.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington CameraRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Processing By: Burlington Camera

Overall Impression
It's hard to give an impression on a film stock that you've shot so little of and probably will shoot little in the future since it's no longer being produced. But I would not count it out yet, as Fujifilm has brought back films in the past. Although any future version of Pro 400H may appear slightly different, the reason for the cancellation is the lack of a chemical needed to create that fourth colour layer that made Pro 400H stand out. And there are plenty of fans of the film stock out there who enjoy shooting the film more than I do, so it would be better to let the fans enjoy their last rolls than trying to chase down another roll in 35mm. Did I like the results I got? Yes, I did; if I happened across a reasonably priced roll in 35mm, I probably would buy it to test? While it's always a sad day when another film gets cancelled, we have to realise that film, and the film photography community doesn't have the same buying power as it once did, and in the end, everything dies.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano'sYashica-12 - Yashinon 80mm 1:3.5 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano'sYashica-12 - Yashinon 80mm 1:3.5 - Fujifilm Fujicolor NPH 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By Silvano's

Further Reading
Don't only take my word on Fujicolor Pro 400H, check out these other reviews on this film stock!
Casual Photophile - Fujifilm Fujicolor Pro 400H Film Profile
The Darkroom - Fuji Pro 400H Film Review
Emulsive - Fujifilm Pro 400H: The Best Film I’ll Never Shoot Again
Shoot It With Film - How to Shoot Fuji Pro 400H
Filter Grade - Fujifilm PRO 400H Film Stock Review
Blue Moon Camera - Film Fridays: Fuji Pro 400H
Rambling Polymath - Film Review: Fuji Pro 400H
James Madison Photography - Review: Fujifilm Pro 400H

#filmreviewblogs #burlington #c41 #canada #colourfilm #film #filmreview #fujinph400 #fujipro400h #fujicolor #fujifilm #oakville #ontario #pro400h #review #rolleiflex28f #sheridancollege #toronto #yashica12

imageRemember ThemSt John
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-10-11

Film Review Blog No. 76 – Fujifilm Velvia 100

When it comes to the name Velvia, most photographers will often latch onto the cult classic Fuji Velvia or its modern form, Velvia 50. But Fuji also released a one-stop faster version, Velvia 100 or 100F, which offers everything you like about Velvia 50 but in a slightly faster form. While I've shot plenty of slide films, Velvia 100 is one that I have far less experience with; again, I'm more likely to shoot Provia, Ektachrome, or Astia (RIP) when shooting a 100-Speed slide film. But Velvia 100 is an interesting animal and one that I'm not likely to shoot again. So I wasn't too put out when on the 8th of March 2021 that Fujifilm announced the discontinuation of Velvia 100. The reason for the discontinuation of both the sale and commercial processing of Velvia 100 in the United States due to the presence of the chemical phenol, isopropylated phosphate, sources at Fujifilm state that 0.0003% trace amount of PIP is contained in the layers of the film, but even that trace amount has resulted in the discontinuation of the film stock in order to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency. While this announcement does seem to only affect the sale in the United States, but I will continue to monitor and update as needed.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal (E-6), Daylight Balanced
Film Base: Cellulose Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-100 Latitude: +/- 1/3 Stop)
Formats Avaliable: 135, 120, Sheets
Discontinued: 2021 (USA only)

Hasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoHasselblad 500c - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Colour Rendition
If you liked how Velvia 50 rendered colours but were turned off by the slow speed, Velvia 100 might fit your photography style. The colours are rendered in the same rich saturation and high contrast manner. Your blacks are deep, and whites are bright. The film does tend to lean into the warmer tones, so the reds, greens, and yellows, so that is something you'll need to watch for when digitizing your slides. While not as rich as Velvia 50, Velvia 100 works as hard to bring you a good 95% of the slower film stock. You could probably do well with landscape and architecture work with these colours, but portraits are well within the realm of possibility with various skin tones, but again, it wouldn't be my first choice.

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N - Fujifilm Velvia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Image Quality
Suppose there's one thing that Velvia 100 doesn't lack in image quality. Honestly, I could not tell the difference between Velvia 50 and Velvia 100 at a glance. Velvia 100 offers up clean positives, with excellent edge sharpness and separation of colour and tones. And it does have a good fine-grain; you have to zoom in close to catch your first glimpse of grain. This helps make for clean scans and excellent projection. And that is what makes Velvia 100 edge out Velvia 50 slightly; it projects far cleaner and provides a much better visual image on a screen with even a dimmer projector bulb. Like any slide film, you have to watch your exposure; there's little in the way of latitude, so to get the best results, you want a good meter, either external or internal, because any over/underexposure or hard contrasty light will make your life miserable.

Pentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabPentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabPentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabPentax 645 - SMC Pentax 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo Lab

Scanning
Like most slide films, modern scanners do struggle a bit with Velvia 50 and Velvia 100. And I was nearly pulling my hair out when scanning the two rolls of Velvia 100 using my Epson V700. Unfortunately, I could not get a roll of the stock in 35mm to see how my Nikon Coolscan V handled the film stock. Because of the deep contrast and hyper-real colour rendering, both the Epson scanning software and Adobe Photoshop had trouble locking onto the levels and colour balance using any automatic tool. Most of the time, I ended up having to take care of these manually, which is always a struggle in my post-processing world. Like any slide film, you do have to expose them properly, and in a couple of cases, I think my exposure was off slightly, which with the latitude of a stiff board, can cause problems. I found that the software tended to overcorrect towards greens and cyan, and with a bit of fine touch, I could correct them. Thankfully the film did not scan with too much aberration and required little additional sharpening and colour noise reduction.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo LabRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fuji Velvia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Old School Photo Lab

Overall Impression
There's nothing wrong with Velvia 100; it's a good film that will deliver excellent images in the right conditions; in fact, I would have to say that I would prefer to shoot Velvia 100 over Velvia 50. That little extra stop of film speed does help while still delivering the same image quality and colour from the Velvia series. But like those films, Velvia 100 requires an exacting exposure, so either make sure your handheld meter is calibrated properly, or your internal meter is dead-on accurate. And it also helps to have a good hand at colour correction in post-processing or a superb scanner and software that handles colours like a boss.

Further Reading
Don't take my word on Velvia 100, check out these other reviews of the film stock!
Emulsive - Film Stock Review: Fujifilm Velvia 100
The Darkroom - Velvia 100 Film Review
Blue Moon Camera - Film Friday Review: Fuji Velvia 100
Ken Rockwell - Fuji Velvia 100 Review
Filter Grade - Fuji Velvia 100 Film Stock Review

#filmreviewblogs #canada #film #filmreview #fuji #fujivelvia100 #fujichrome #fujifilm #hamilton #harborsprings #hasselblad500c #mamiyam645 #media #medium #michigan #oakville #ontario #pentax645 #review #rolleiflex28f #rvp100 #unitedstates #waterdown

imagePhotostock 2012Photostock 2012Photostock 2012
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-09-17

Classic Film Review Blog – Fujichrome Astia 100F

When it comes to slide film, Fuji Sensia introduced me to the medium, but it was Astia that made me love slide film. Sitting neatly in the worlds of Velvia 100 and Provia 100, Astia is often an overlooked member of the Fujichrome family, with more people going towards Velvia for rich saturated colours or Provia for a more natural tonality. But Astia was a happy medium between the two; you get a stronger contrast than Provia and more natural colours than Velvia. Astia quickly became my go-to slide film for trips and events where I wanted the magic of slide film with a bit more latitude in exposure.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal (E-6), Slide Film
Film Base: Acetate
Film Speed: ASA-100
Formats Available: 135, Medium Format, Sheet Format

Intrepid - Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar-S 1:5.6/210 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: The DarkroomIntrepid - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: The DarkroomIntrepid - Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar-S 1:5.6/210 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: The DarkroomIntrepid - Fuji Fujinon-W 1:5.6/125 -Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: The Darkroom

Colour Rendition
As I mentioned in my introduction, Astia is the happy medium between Provia and Velvia. It provides a natural colour palette that seems more in line with their colour negative films than slide film but do not think of the colour palette as soft. Astia produces some of the nicest colours I've seen in a slide film, and that's even comparing it to Kodak Ektachrome E100 (the new stuff). I think the power of Astia comes with the power it has to take on the nature of the colour of the scene it's shooting. Indoors in muted light, the colours become soft, almost pastel, while you get a higher saturation rate in the bright overhead light. And in the fall, you get amazing oranges and reds out the leaves. It even handles low light well, as seen by some of the interior shots from Montreal. Overall, it certainly is a winning film based on how the colour looks!

Nikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sNikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sNikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sNikon F3 - AI-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano's

Image Quality
And the hits keep on coming when it comes to the overall image quality you get out of Asista. There is no question that Fuji had a real winner here. Probably the best part about Astia is that you get a bit more forgiveness in exposure latitude than Velvia (100 and 50). I personally find that the quality is amazing, and that's having shot all three formats that could get of Astia. It certainly lives up to having an F at the end of the name, meaning Fine-Grain, while completely non-existent with 4×5 and 120 even in 35mm, there is little to no visible grain. And that's going with digital scanning or projection of a 35mm slide. Asitia again hits a middle group; it has a bit more contrast and saturation in colour than Provia but far less than Velvia. In other words, your slides won't reach out and slap you around with saturated colour and deep contrast. And despite the fine grain, the images remain sharp, both in edge sharpness and tonal separation.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano's

Scanning
One of the hardest parts of working with slide film these days is scanning; at least, that has been my experience. But here, Fuji again has a winner; I had zero trouble scanning Astia film. And even back in the days when I was working with a V500 and using everything on automatic, the Epson scan software had zero issues locking in the right colour balance. Once I started working a bit more manual with my scanning workflow, I was surprised that Astia leaned a bit into the cyan but was easily fixed in post-processing. The film did tend to cup, but back rolling or using a dedicated film scanner helped flatten the negatives. The scans have a bit of aberration, but the noise reduction filter cannot fix in post-processing.

Киев 88 - Биометар 2.8/80 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sКиев 88 - Биометар 2.8/80 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sКиев 88 - Биометар 2.8/80 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sКиев 88 - Биометар 2.8/80 - Fujichrome Astia 100F @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano's

Overall Impression
As someone who does not shoot a lot of colour film, I find Astia a superb film stock to work with, and one that I wish still was around as I would probably shoot more slide film. Like Sensia, this was a great next step up in the slide film work for those who wanted to move beyond the 'consumer' films. While it never got the same cult following as Velvia, it certainly makes for a well-rounded slide film that worked well for projection and digitization. These days, with Fuji now down to only a pair of slide films, maybe it's time to bring back Astia to fill the void left with the (American) cancellation of Velvia 100.

#filmreviewblogs #canada #chicago #dundas #film #filmreview #fujichrome #fujifilm #fujifilmastia100f #ilinois #intrepid4x5 #kiev88cm #mackinaccity #michigan #montreal #nikonf3 #ontario #peliston #quebec #rap100f #review #rolleiflex28f #toronto #usa

imageSkylineThe Old Train StationThe Dull Day
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-09-13

Film Review Blog No. 75 – Fujifilm Velvia 50

While Fuji Velvia was not my first experience with slide film, it is certainly is the one that made me like slide film. First released in 1990, the film became an immediate threat to Kodachrome, especially Kodachrome 25. And unlike Kodachrome, Velvia used the standard E-6 process that could be done in any lab that covered the process. No need to send it to speciality labs, and you could have your slides back the same day from the right lab. The name itself comes from combining Velvet and Media to describe the smooth images produced by the stock. While the original version was discontinued in 2005, Fuji tends to bring back popular brands from the dead. It would only take two years for a replacement to be introduced, using the original code (RVP) but added the film speed 50, creating the new Velvia 50 and RVP50. The two main differences between the original RVP and the re-release RVP50 are the film base and re-engineered materials to make the emulsion.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal (E-6), Daylight Balanced
Film Base: Cellulose Triacetate
Film Speed: ASA-50 Latitude: +/- 1/3 Stop)
Formats Avaliable: 135, 120, Sheets

Mamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoMamiya m645 - Mamiya-Sekor C 1:2.8 f=80mm - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-64 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Colour Rendition
The one thing that the original Velvia was known for was to knock your socks off-colour saturation and high contrast. Earning the film the obnoxious nickname Velvita from the so-called 'cheese' of the same name. While still retaining a rich colour, the new version of the film has knocked back the contrast and saturation to give a far more natural look and feel to the film. It almost seems light; there's a hyper-real nature to each image, with each colour saturated with your deep blacks and bright whites added in, as long as you have good lighting conditions outside. I honestly can see the draw of Velvia for landscape photography, especially in the fall or for certain portrait shooting, but you want to make sure the makeup is spot on in that case, as without it, your skin tones are going to look strange. Most of the time, the colours will lean towards your greens with fresh film, and the expired will go more towards magenta.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire PhotoRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8 - Fujifilm Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Boréalis Laboratoire Photo

Image Quality
When it comes to Velvia 50, it certainly has its strong point in the image quality it produces, but it is a fickle film to handle both in the field and in the scanning. As you can see, with the initial set of four images, they are pretty terrible, as in I wasn't even sure I wanted to share them. But given that this is a review, sometimes it is helpful to show what the film cannot do, which is handle low light conditions. The day I shot these, I probably should not have, dull overcast with very little in the way of sunlight. I ended up showing the lack of latitude and forgiveness of Velvia. But in bright and even light, Velvia performs perfectly; you get incredible sharpness and fine grain. But you do have to expose it perfectly to get the best results and have the best conditions.

Rolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8
Fuji Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8
Fuji Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8
Fuji Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano'sRolleiflex 2.8F - Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm 1:2.8
Fuji Velvia 50 @ ASA-50 - Processing By: Silvano's

Scanning
I had forgotten how much I wouldn't say I like scanning Velvia. Because of the highly saturated colour tones and fickle nature of slide film, it is the worst film I've ever tried to scan. While I did not have a chance to scan using my Nikon Coolscan V ED, my Epson V700 certainly had trouble with the shots taken in Oakville under terrible lighting conditions. And even those shot in sunny conditions with a lot of difference between the highlights and shadows. But by far, the worst process is with colour balancing and levels; Epson scanning software and Adobe Photoshop had a hard time getting the levels and colours balanced automatically. I did my best to do it by hand, but it is not a strong point for me, and trying to find a good online source for colour balance was difficult. Thankfully, the fine-grain helped reduce any JPG artefacts and aberrations in the scanning process.

Pentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 50 @ ISO-64 - Processing By: Silvano'sPentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 50 @ ISO-64 - Processing By: Silvano'sPentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 50 @ ISO-64 - Processing By: Silvano'sPentax 645 - SMC Pentax A 645 35mm 1:3.5 - Fuji Velvia 50 @ ISO-64 - Processing By: Silvano's

Overall Impression
The funny thing is that I have a clear memory of both liking and hating Velvia simultaneously; under the right conditions, it is an excellent film but hard to handle. Between the trouble scanning it, narrow latitude and hyper-real colour replication and difficulty in post-processing, I don't see it as a film that I'll be using anytime soon. But I wouldn't say no to a box of 4×5 Velvia 50, especially if offered up for free. But given the cost of the film and the time needed to get it developed (I can develop E-6 myself, but shoot so little slide film I send it off for processing), it isn't worth my time and effort these days.

Further Reading
Please, don't take my word on Velvia 50; check out these other reviews of the film stock!
Emulsive - Film Stock Review - Fujichrome Velvia 50
TheDarkroom.com - Fujifilm Velvia 50 Review
Ken Rockwell - Fuji Velvia 50 Review
Beau Photo - Film Friday No. 32 - Fujifilm Velvia 50

#filmreviewblogs #beamsville #canada #film #filmreview #fuji #fujivelvia50 #fujichrome #fujifilm #mamiyam645 #milton #newyork #newyorkcity #oakville #ontario #pentax645 #review #rolleiflex28f #rvp50 #unitedstates #velvia50

imageLower Manhattan from New JerseyThe TowerFreedom Eagle
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-08-09

Film Review Blog No. 74 – Adox HR-50

I have known about Adox HR-50 for some time but have purposefully avoided including it past years. Originally released in 2018, HR-50 was one of the new film emulsions to come out of Adox shortly after releasing CHS 100 II (reviewed last month). The reason being that HR-50 is a semi-closed imaging system and I never had good luck with those, as seen by my Adox CMS20 II review. I caught a lot of flack for that one. There is also the trouble with getting the stuff here in Canada. But when I saw that both the film and the dedicated developer, Adox HR-DEV were available through my favourite online film source, Argentix.ca I jumped on the stock. According to the official documents, HR-50 is based on a technical film, designed for high-resolution, sharpness, and fine grain. But it also includes a speed-boost technology to help get it up to that ASA-50 rating. Thankfully also since 2018, I have discovered a few more developers to round out a successful review of HR-50 in 2021. You'll notice that HR-50 is my second review this year that has two developers clearly missing, Kodak D-76 and Rodinal. In fact, on the official documents, it doesn't even recommend using these two standard developers. Instead, the main developer to achieve that baseline is HR-DEV, with DD-X standing in as the speciality developer and Adox FX-39 II standing in for Rodinal. The only standard developer is Kodak HC-110 and even then we're working with an unofficial dilution.

Film Specs
Type: Panchromatic B&W
Film Base: PET
Film Speed: ASA-50, Latitude: 40-80
Formats Available: 135, Medium (120), Sheet (4×5)

Roll 01 - Adox HR-DEV
While initially warry after pulling the negatives out of the tank, that feeling soon vanished after looking at them closely on a light table and a loupe. They looked a little bit thin, but even still they scanned in amazing! Yes, I had to do a bit of work in post-processing but I know of only a few films that look good straight out of the scanner. But if you're looking for a good baseline on HR-50, use HR-DEV. I already knew that the film would have excellent acutance and fine-grain, and HR-DEV will give you exactly that, in fact, you'd have a hard time finding any grain on these negatives while maintaining excellent edge sharpness. Contrast wise, I would rate this about a middle-ground, probably thanks to the addition of a yellow filter. Of course, when working with HR-DEV you will be using a different agitation pattern with an initial thirty seconds on constant agitation, with 2 inversions every minute. Honestly, if I can get this out of the film, I cannot wait to see what other developers can do, because I don't feel that this film is a one-trick pony.

Olympus OM-2n - Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-W 1:2.8 f=35mm (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox HR-DEV (1+49) 11:00 @ 22COlympus OM-2n - Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-W 1:2.8 f=35mm (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox HR-DEV (1+49) 11:00 @ 22COlympus OM-2n - Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-W 1:2.8 f=35mm (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox HR-DEV (1+49) 11:00 @ 22COlympus OM-2n - Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-W 1:2.8 f=35mm (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox HR-DEV (1+49) 11:00 @ 22C

Roll 02 - Ilford Ilfotec HC
Initially, I was not too keen to develop HR-50 in a standard developer, given that it is a speciality film. But after seeing the excellent results from fellow blogger Jim Grey I was a little more comfortable. I ended up going with my standard dilution (1+63). After processing, the negatives did appear fairly thin, but then I looked back at my other negatives and saw that they all appeared a little thin. Thankfully they scanned easily and I was able to pull a lot of detail out in post-processing. I like these results, there is excellent tonal separation and acutance which combined creates excellent overall sharpness. The grain, while a bit more noticeable (probably due to the post-processing) is pleasing and doesn't detract from the images. Overall, while not my favourite, Ilfotec HC and by extension HC-110 and all the similar clones is a solid choice for HR-50.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 28mm 1:2.8 - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+63) 9:00 @ 20C

Roll 03 - Ilford Ilfotec DD-X
I'm going to admit, I did not shoot these in the best light and should have gone with my 14-24mm lens instead of the 35mm, but you know you can show off the power of a film by shooting it in less than ideal conditions. And HR-50 did not fail me, despite being low light and not getting any aperture over f/5.6 and shutter speeds over 1/30th of a second you'll see that these are a little soft on the edge, that's mainly from the shallow depth of field and a touch of camera shake. Ilford DD-X is a developer I have only used once before but decided to get another bottle specifically to review the developer and to give myself another developer for HR-50. In DD-X you get the same middle contrast, but a soft tonality, you get the same blacks and whites, but the greys in between are magic. You get the same fine grain and a decent amount of sharpness, I'm sure it would be better under brighter conditions but honestly, I like the middle sharpness given the conditions. And given that DD-X is a lot easier to get here in North America, it's an excellent choice next to HC-110.

Nikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec DD-X (1+4) 7:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec DD-X (1+4) 7:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec DD-X (1+4) 7:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Ilford Ilfotec DD-X (1+4) 7:30 @ 20C

Roll 04 - Adox FX-39 II
Despite not being the matched-pair developer, I like these results better than the ones I got with HR-DEV. In fact, I'd almost rate FX-39 as the better developer for HR-50. First off, the tones are dead perfect, with excellent separation. The contrast is far lower than I would expect, but without losing any of the whites or blacks. This separation added with edge sharpness makes for amazingly sharp images and all without any increase in the apparent grain. I would love to make prints from these, but they would be a pain to focus in the darkroom! Yes, this is my favourite combination for HR-50.

Nikon FA - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:15 @ 20CNikon FA - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:15 @ 20CNikon FA - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:15 @ 20CNikon FA - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 (Yellow-12) - Adox HR-50 @ ASA-50 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:15 @ 20C

Final Thoughts

Further Reading
Don't just take my word on Adox HR-50, check out these other reviews by fellow bloggers!
Down the Road - Shooting Adox HR-50
Emulsive - Five Frames…With Adox HR-50

#filmreviewblogs #adox #adoxhr50 #burlington #canada #film #filmreview #fotoimpex #hr50 #milton #minoltamaxxum9 #nikonf5 #nikonfa #oakville #olympusom2n #ontario #review #welland

image
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-07-12

Film Review Blog No. 73 – Adox CHS 100 II

The year was 2012; I had been shooting film in a far more serious way for three years at that point. I learned of a speciality film store called Freestyle Photographic from an episode of the Film Photography Project. They had all sorts of weird films from Europe that I had never heard of nor seen at my local camera store (which at that time was either Henry's or Burlington Camera). With companies like Efke and Adox, strange, exotic for my North American sensibilities. I purchased a pile of Efke and Adox CHS Art films, both in 35mm and 120, 50 and 100-speed offerings. While Efke became a favourite, the CHS films also presenting a whole new look. Sadly, around that same time Fotokemika, the company that was making both Efke and Adox CHS films at the time, folded. No longer able to maintain or repair the machines that had been chugging along since the 1940s and 1950s. Despite that I managed to hold onto my last roll of CHS 100, finally shooting it in 2015 in the Netherlands. Adox took the reigns and took back the CHS line and released in 2013 a new version, CHS 100 II. Using the original film as a base, they painstakingly reproduced the classic dual emulsion in a single layer coating, even doing their best to duplicate the original sensitization. While CHS 100 II is not the original, it is pretty darn close. And I'm happy to be able to finally review this classic film that helped push me deeper down the rabbit hole of Black & White film and Adox products.

Film Specs
Type: Ortho-Panchromatic
Film Base: Polyester (PET) 100μm
Film Speed: ASA-100, Latitude: 100-400
Formats Available: 135, 120 (currently unavailable), Sheet Film (4×5 to 20×24)

Roll 01 - Kodak D-76
And CHS 100 II comes out swinging for the fences. I knew these were winners when I first pulled the negatives from the development tank. They carried a good density and, more importantly, dried perfectly flat. They also scanned easily in my V700. Quality-wise, they perform exactly how I would expect any film to perform with D-76, good tone and contrast, nothing especially fancy or unique. There's enough tonal separation to help with sharpness. And there's also good edge sharpness. The one thing I did notice is that there is more grain in these images than your standard ASA-100 film, and while a bit of a surprise, knowing the linage of CHS 100 II makes it understandable. This is based on a film that first came out in the mid-20th Century, not a modern emulsion with years of tweaking. While D-76 wouldn't be my first choice here, it will do the job.

Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 35-70mm 1:4 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 35-70mm 1:4 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 35-70mm 1:4 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 9:00 @ 20CMinolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 35-70mm 1:4 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Kodak D-76 (1+1) 9:00 @ 20C

Roll 02 - Ilford Ilfotec HC
I went a little off-script for Ilfotec HC; rather than go with a usual dilution of 1+31 or 1+63, I went with 1+39. For those in the Kodak world, that's Dilution D, a little-used dilution in most cases. It also required a different agitation pattern, constant for the first thirty seconds, then five seconds (two inversions) every following thirty seconds. It certainly kept me on my toes. The first thing I noticed was how thin the negatives appeared. Thankfully there was enough there to scan them well. Overall, I think Ilfotech HC/HC-110 is an excellent choice. The images were a little more contrasty than I would like, but going with a 1+63 dilution will probably work better. That said, the images remain sharp, with excellent tonal separation and edge sharpness. A little bit more in the way of grain, but an excellent grain structure.

Nikon FE - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+39) 7:00 @ 20CNikon FE - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+39) 7:00 @ 20CNikon FE - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+39) 7:00 @ 20CNikon FE - AI Nikkor 28mm 1:3.5 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+39) 7:00 @ 20C

Roll 03 - Adox Rodinal
A little rough, a little grainy, but what are you to expect from Rodinal and a film that isn't fine-grain. However, the results are far better than I was expected. You get more grain than what you might get from another 100-Speed film, but this does help edge sharpness. There is also an increase in contrast which does help with tonal separation, and the tones are excellent across the board with good blacks, whites, and mid-tones. I also noted that the film responds well to a yellow filter with plenty of cutting of the blues, with my skies rendering nearly black in several cases. While not my favourite combination, I certainly feel that going with a 1+50 dilution resulted in far better images than if I had gone with 1+25. I also think that CHS 100 II will respond better to stand-development in Rodinal.

Minolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 (Yellow-12) - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:30 @ 20CMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 (Yellow-12) - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:30 @ 20CMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 (Yellow-12) - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:30 @ 20CMinolta XE-7 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 (Yellow-12) - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox Rodinal (1+50) 12:30 @ 20C

Roll 04 - Adox FX-39 II
I knew these were winning images almost as soon as I pulled the negatives from the tank. The base turned clear; I can see why Adox has CHS 100 II as a good option for reversal processing. When I scanned the negatives, I could see that these were beautiful, almost as if FX-39 was the perfect choice for the film. While there still is grain, it's far less noticeable than those developed in Kodak D-76. But the grain does add to the edge sharpness, but the real sharpness comes from the tonal separation. While I'm not a practitioner of the zone system, I can say that almost all zones are represented in these images. And it does that without increasing the contrast, which sits at a happy medium.

Nikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:30 @ 20CNikon F5 - AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm 1:2.8D - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Adox FX-39 II (1+9) 7:30 @ 20C

Final Thoughts
The one thing that I certainly get from CHS 100 II is that old-school flavour that I remember from my earlier experience with Efke 100/Adox CHS 100, which are based on the original Adox formula. The film is rich and contrasty, and you certainly want to make sure that you develop it right. Personally, my favourite results are in Adox FX-39 II, but I'm banking the film will look great in Kodak D-23 or Adox Atomal 49. While the film is a little harder to get in North America, ordering it right from the source is your best bet, and that's Fotoimpex in Germany. Sure it might take a good month to arrive, but it is well worth the wait. The one thing I'm waiting for is the return of 120 format in the film, but it also looks amazing in 4×5, which was my first experience with the film. You can see an example below developed in Xtol. The one thing that I can see this film being good for is reenactments; if I ever get that WW2 combat photographer impression together, my film choices will certainly be CHS 100 II and Fomapan 400 and plenty of Atomal 49.

Pacemaker Crown Graphic - Schneider-Krueznack Symmar-S 1:5.6/210 - Adox CHS 100 II @ ASA-100 - Kodak Xtol (1+1) 7:15 @ 20C

Further Reading
Don't take my word on Adox CHS 100 II, check out these other reviews by fellow bloggers!
Adam Roe Photography - New Film: Adox CHS 100 ii
Retro Glass Photos - A German Wonder Film: Adox CHS 100 II

#filmreviewblogs #adox #adoxchs100ii #adoxfx39ii #adoxphoto #adoxrodinal #canada #chs100ii #crowngraphic #filmreview #fotoimpex #ilfordilfotechc #kodakd76 #kodakxtol #midway #milton #minoltamaxxum9 #minoltaxe7 #nikonf5 #nikonfe #oakville #ohio #ontario #review #stjacobs #unitedstates #uxbridge

imageMidway Village School
alex luyckx unofficialalexluyckx@ծմակուտ.հայ
2021-07-05

Classic Film Review Blog – Fuji Fujichrome Sensia (100, 200, 400)

I remember it clearly, having walked into Henry's store to get film for an upcoming PYPS weekend, Winter Weekend 2006 in Oshawa, Ontario. I don't remember exactly why I pulled the roll of Sensia 400 off the rack; my jam in those days was colour negative films. But that was also the weekend that I had a digital camera for the first time, so maybe I started to branch out in my shooting. Sensia was the right speed I usually shot (400), and the name was close to Superia (at a glance), and my journey into slide film had begun. Eventually, I branched out and shot the 100 and 200 offerings as well. Then in 2010, due to decreasing demand, the Sensia line was canned by Fujifilm; I first learned about it on my trip to Montreal from the folks at the Photo Service shop and immediately purchased a handful of rolls, it was still at the time my slide film of choice. I, of course, moved on, exploring Astia, Velvia, and Provia in my slide film journey, and still today, I have one single roll left of Sensia, which I need to shoot finally.

Film Specs
Type: Colour Reversal Film (E-6)
Film Base: Tri-Acetate
Film Speed: ASA-100, ASA-200, ASA-400
Formats Available: 135
Discontinued: 2010

Colour Rendition
One of the best parts about working with a consumer film is that the colour replication is fairly natural. No matter what flavour that I shot of Senisa, I ended up with natural colour reproduction. Which for a slide film can be difficult. Officially a daylight balanced film, bringing it indoors under artificial light tends to lean towards the warmer end of the spectrum. It is rather pleasing and honest is what sold me on the Sensia line. But also does matter the lens you shoot it behind. It performed admirably behind Rokkor and Nikkor lenses, but when I put it behind the iconic Minitar 1 lens on the LC-A+, the optics there did give the film a much stronger punch, but then again, that was also an expired roll. What is also awesome about Sensia is that it expires rather nicely; it doesn't lean towards magenta as most Fuji slide films do. If anything, it goes more towards yellow but only slightly if properly stored. I have not tried any heavily expired Sensia. I also don't know how well it would handle Cross-Processing, but it would look excellent if it's like Kodak's consumer slide film, Elite Chrome.

Minolta X700 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fuji Sensia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sMinolta X700 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fuji Sensia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sMinolta X700 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fuji Sensia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano'sMinolta X700 - Minolta MD Rokkor-X 45mm 1:2 - Fuji Sensia 100 @ ASA-100 - Processing By: Silvano's

Image Quality
Being a slide film, you can already expect an excellent image quality from the film. Still, as with the colour replication, the image quality is consistent across all three versions of the film, with only minor changes in film speed changes. Overall the image quality I get from Sensia is excellent. There is an excellent contrast to help with both colour separation and tonal separation (it desaturates very well, I didn't include any, but I did adjust some scans to see) and superb edge sharpness. Both are important for projection, and it does project well; I remember troubleshooting some old scans with my Opa and using his slide projector to see the images on a screen. There is a bit more grain as a result, but nothing too serious; it shows more on the 400-speed option. But even the 200-Speed version isn't bad!

Nikon F4s - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - Fuji Sensia 200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Silvano'sNikon F4s - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - Fuji Sensia 200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Silvano'sNikon F4s - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - Fuji Sensia 200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Silvano'sNikon F4s - AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G - Fuji Sensia 200 @ ASA-200 - Processing By: Silvano's

Scanning
When it comes to scanning, I had scanned any form of Sensia as most of what I shot I was not scanning at home. Mostly done by the lab that I processed it with. But having one small roll of expired film of Sensia 100 to reacquaint me with the film stock. And while I did shoot it through the Minitar-1 lens, which did pump up the contrast, Sensia is an easy film to scan. A consumer slide film made before the wide availability of home film scanners is an excellent but unsurprising trait. I did mention that the film projects well, which is exactly what a film scanner does. I did have an edge with my Nikon Coolscan V ED, which did an excellent job getting that colour replication nailed. But even in the past, using an Epson V500 and lab scans did an excellent job in some cases. When it came to post-processing, there was little I had to adjust in the way of levels and colour balance, and in many cases, the automatic functions did a good job.

Minolta X-7a - Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 1:1.7 f=50mm - Fuji Sensia 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Silvano'sMinolta X-7a - Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 1:1.7 f=50mm - Fuji Sensia 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Silvano'sMinolta X-7a - Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 1:1.7 f=50mm - Fuji Sensia 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Silvano'sMinolta X-7a - Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 1:1.7 f=50mm - Fuji Sensia 400 @ ASA-400 - Processing By: Silvano's

Overall Impression
If there is one slide film other than Kodachrome that I miss the most, it would be Sensia! It's an easy film to handle and is available at speeds for any condition! I mean, Sensia was only one of three slide films that offered up a 400-Speed option! And they're all gone now also. It made colour positives available to the masses, sure Kodachrome was used for years, but Sensia was an E-6 film and was faster. Even in the waning days of mass film photography, I could get Sensia at a local photo lab without having to go to a store like Henry's. The first film also felt a sense of loss when it was dropped, probably due to low demand after digital gained greater availability. And also remember hunting down the stuff on trips to Montreal and New York City in small out of the way photography stores still had the film in stock. If you are planning on getting your hands on Sensia, like any expired film, ensure that it has been well stored and not too old, most are starting to push a decade past the expiry date by this point, but even still, it is well worth the effort.

#filmreviewblogs #baysville #canada #cochranton #film #filmreview #fuji #fujichrome #fujichromesensia #fujifilm #minoltax700 #minoltax7a #newyork #nikkor #nikonf4s #ontario #pennsylvania #review #rochester #rokkor #sensia #unitedstates

imageimg056img057img066

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst