#modernSynthesis

2023-05-18

Non-Darwinian #evolution is any mechanism which tends to downplay the role of natural selection in evolution. It also may reject gradualism, sexual selection or any other aspect of Darwinian evolution.

It should be remembered that "alternative medicine" which actually works is called "medicine". The same care needs to be taken with "Non-Darwinian evolution" — if it were generally accepted it would be part of the Modern Synthesis.

Historian of science Peter J. Bowler has written on non-Darwinian evolution in detail. According to Bowler, non-Darwinian theories of evolution were widely accepted in the late 19th century and focused attention on conceptual issues that have now been reopened by evolutionary developmental biology. Non-Darwinian evolution was proposed because many scientists did not believe natural selection was powerful enough to explain evolution.

#RationalWiki #CharlesDarwin #modernsynthesis
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Non-Darw

2022-12-31

I believe none of the stated reasons for revisiting “#Darwin’sDangerousIdea” in this most-read Guardian article of 2022 will have any effect on how “#ModernSynthesis” explains #Evolution.

For example:

1️⃣ “The study of the way organisms alter their environment in order to reduce the normal pressure of natural selection – think of beavers building dams” only shows that #NaturalSelection favors beavers genetically programmed to build better dams.

2️⃣ “The Senegal bichir adapting to land in a single generation” and dung beetles growing larger wings in cold weather only show the co-producing relationship between nature and nurture and the known fact that the same set of genes (genotype) will produce slightly different phenotypes in different environments. It surely does not explain speciation.

and lastly

3️⃣ I really don’t see the difference between passing to the next generation randomly as opposed to artificially induced mutations. Natural selection will “weed out” one and the other the same way.

theguardian.com/science/2022/j

@arlin @BehavEcol Which makes me wonder, what is the "true" story? In other words, if one were to ignore Mayr, Hull, Cain, etc. (if they had never existed) and wrote an accurate account of the development of biological classification/systematics, what would that history be? Has it been written? 2/2

#ErnstMayr
#ModernSynthesis

2022-11-22

New #preprint led by @arlin, with contributions by me and others. ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view It's a criticism of writings by @EvolOdonata , which in our view misrepresent the latest #science (both #theory and empirical work) on how #MutationBias influences #adaptation. #evolution #ModernSynthesis

Radical AnthropologyRadicalAnthro@c.im
2022-11-13
2022-11-12

A great review of the importance of Clausen, Keck & Hiesey's work on our understanding of #evolution, and their connection to (and neglect in) the #modernSynthesis.

Dissects their perfection of common garden #experiments, and contributions to our understanding of #adaptation ("one of the first field verifications of #localAdaptation by #naturalSelection"), #plasticity, #speciation, #polyploidy, #genetic architecture of trait variation.

And an excellent read.

journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/

Figure 1 from J. Núñez-Farfán and C. D. Schlichting (article referenced int this post). Caption from the article: "Depiction of the relationships within the genus Layia based on barriers to crossing. Shaded circles indicate species, with haploid chromosome numbers indicated. Species within the same shading are considered to be more closely related, and dotted lines represent major morphological discontinuities among groups. The width of continuous lines indicates the degree of successful intercrossing between a given pair of species; in most cases the highest fertility was only 50%. Unsuccessful crosses are not shown. (From Clausen et al. 1941.)"Figure 4 from J. Núñez-Farfán and C. D. Schlichting (the subject of this post). Figure depicts the elevational gradient of 6 Potentilla species and 3 Horkelia species, ranging from sea level to a bit over 13,000 feet, as well as the position of three planting locations (Stanford near sea level; Mather near 4500 feet; Timberline near 10,000 feet). Caption from the figure: "Altitudinal distribution of the different species of Potentilla and Horkelia (Rosaceae) along the transect from the coast to the Sierra Nevada in Central California. The three transplant locations (Stanford, Mather, and Timberline) are also shown (Modified from Figure 154 of Clausen et al. 1940.)"
2022-11-07

My latest #ecoevo publication is an intro to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, commissioned by the John Templeton Foundation. It is a 60 pg document that lays out the assumptions of the #ModernSynthesis according to the #EES, the diverse origins of the EES in multiple disciplines, and the current status & objections to the #extendedsynthesis. A friendly & illustrated review for anyone interested in knowing what it's all about.

templeton.org/discoveries/exte

#evolution #evobio #evolutionarybiology

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst