@FranckLeroy Nation states, or just states, as in a political entity, vs. a wealth-derived one?
Keep in mind that a nation is a cultural construct, a state is a political one.
Nation-states are contrasted against empires (multiple nationalities under one polity), city-states (a single municipality or municipal region, several of which still exist), confederations, etc. The term arose in the 18th and 19th centuries as contrasted to highly provincial states in which allegiances were to a local lord, and perhaps a central monarch, but affinity and allegiance to neighbouring polities, even under the same overarching umbrella was at best low. This even extended to entities we now consider as nation states: in the early United States popular sentiment flowed much more to individual states rather than the country as a whole, though about the Civil War as I understand. "Nation-state" was a cosmopolitan viewpoint.
This turned in the 20th century, particularly under the 1st & 2nd World Wars, in which nation-states were constraining concept rather than an expanding one, in which rather than uniting individual polities of a single nation (notably Germany and Italy), the notion of the nation state pitted nations (that is, cultural heritages) against one another.
It seems you're wanting to contrast something else, probably against a plutocracy or corporate state (such as, say, the British East India Company, which once literally governed India as a corporation, or more modern examples of petro-states (KSA, House of Saud, and Saudi Aramco are difficult to disentangle, similar comparisons might be made of mid-20th century banana republics (Dole), kieretsu (Japan) and Chaebol (S. Korea). Liberal democracy, representative democracy, or even a limited constitutional monarchy (UK, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Thailand, etc.) also come to mind.
Non-nation-states include the United States (its formative construct is its constitution, not, at least nominally, race, heritage, or religion), the Ottoman Empire, Austria-Hungary, Switzerland (famously comprised of French, Italian, German, and Romance nationalities), the Netherlands (Flemish and Walloons), the UK (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland), India (Hindu and Muslim religions, both famously an fractiously), Lebanon (Christian and Muslim), just off the top of my head.
That said: If you're arguing that polity is what contrasts to rule-by-wealth, yes, I'm in strong agreement.
https://www.britannica.com/question/What-is-the-difference-between-a-nation-and-a-state
#Nation #State #NationState #Polity #LiberalDemocracy #RepresentativeGovernment #Plutocracy #Governance